Towards a Theory of Network Facilitation: A Microfoundations Perspective on the Antecedents, Practices and Outcomes of Network Facilitation

Firms cooperate in inter-firm networks to foster their competitiveness and improve their innovation outcomes. In many cases, network facilitators who are either embedded in a lead firm or a third-party organization manage the cooperation among the network firms. This qualitative study adopts a micro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of management 2021, Vol.32 (1), p.80-96
1. Verfasser: Mueller, Elisabeth F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue 1
container_start_page 80
container_title British journal of management
container_volume 32
creator Mueller, Elisabeth F
description Firms cooperate in inter-firm networks to foster their competitiveness and improve their innovation outcomes. In many cases, network facilitators who are either embedded in a lead firm or a third-party organization manage the cooperation among the network firms. This qualitative study adopts a microfoundations perspective to investigate the behavioural antecedents of the network facilitators, their facilitation practices and the related network-level outcomes. Results show that lead-firm facilitators more strongly invest in trust-building measures since they are considered deficient in benevolence and integrity. Without these investments, they run the risk that conflicts of interest hinder the stimulation of positive network-level outcomes. Third-party facilitators, by contrast, enjoy certain credits of trust and focus on balancing firm interests from the network's activation, but need to invest in enhancing their competencies and skills with regard to the industry the firms operate in. The findings contribute to developing a theory of network facilitation by providing a nuanced understanding of how network-level outcomes can be reduced to individual-level factors.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-8551.12470
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2492970577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A653610007</galeid><sourcerecordid>A653610007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4100-ac9fff558b3072a468185ec05792ee836cf3c1b592c08acaf7ee249e789e5d683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUT1PwzAQjRBIQGFmQrKExERbO4njhC1UlA8BZSizZZwzGEpcbIfS38CfxmkAsSC8nO_5vXfnuyjaI3hAwhmSNGP9nFIyIHHK8Fq09YOs_7pvRtvOPWEcgIxtRR9TsxC2ckig6SMYu0RGoRvwC2Of0VhIPdNeeG3qY1Siay2tUaapqxXk0C1YNwfp9RsgUyP_CKisPUiooPbuCN1aER4lBPu6QpPGS_MSkj9K7EQbSswc7H7FXnQ3Pp2OzvtXk7OLUXnVlynBuC9koZSiNL9PMItFmuUkpyAxZUUMkCeZVIkk97SIJc6FFIoBxGkBLC-AVlme9KKDznduzWsDzvMn09g6lOSBFxcsWLHAOuxYD2IGXNfShJ-9-wfROMd5mdEkC93gljjsiGE4zllQfG71i7BLTjBvV8Pb4fN2-Hy1mqDIOsVCz2D5H52fXE6uv4X7nRBCN9rxNjhvLI-ThKVp8gmlCJt4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492970577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards a Theory of Network Facilitation: A Microfoundations Perspective on the Antecedents, Practices and Outcomes of Network Facilitation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Mueller, Elisabeth F</creator><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Elisabeth F</creatorcontrib><description>Firms cooperate in inter-firm networks to foster their competitiveness and improve their innovation outcomes. In many cases, network facilitators who are either embedded in a lead firm or a third-party organization manage the cooperation among the network firms. This qualitative study adopts a microfoundations perspective to investigate the behavioural antecedents of the network facilitators, their facilitation practices and the related network-level outcomes. Results show that lead-firm facilitators more strongly invest in trust-building measures since they are considered deficient in benevolence and integrity. Without these investments, they run the risk that conflicts of interest hinder the stimulation of positive network-level outcomes. Third-party facilitators, by contrast, enjoy certain credits of trust and focus on balancing firm interests from the network's activation, but need to invest in enhancing their competencies and skills with regard to the industry the firms operate in. The findings contribute to developing a theory of network facilitation by providing a nuanced understanding of how network-level outcomes can be reduced to individual-level factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-8551</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley</publisher><subject>Analysis ; College teachers ; Companies ; Competitiveness ; Conflicts of interest ; Cooperation ; Family corporations ; Family-owned business enterprises ; Innovations ; Lead industry ; Morality ; Qualitative research ; Stimulation</subject><ispartof>British journal of management, 2021, Vol.32 (1), p.80-96</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Academy of Management</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4100-ac9fff558b3072a468185ec05792ee836cf3c1b592c08acaf7ee249e789e5d683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4100-ac9fff558b3072a468185ec05792ee836cf3c1b592c08acaf7ee249e789e5d683</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1509-9088</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-8551.12470$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-8551.12470$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,4010,27904,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Elisabeth F</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a Theory of Network Facilitation: A Microfoundations Perspective on the Antecedents, Practices and Outcomes of Network Facilitation</title><title>British journal of management</title><description>Firms cooperate in inter-firm networks to foster their competitiveness and improve their innovation outcomes. In many cases, network facilitators who are either embedded in a lead firm or a third-party organization manage the cooperation among the network firms. This qualitative study adopts a microfoundations perspective to investigate the behavioural antecedents of the network facilitators, their facilitation practices and the related network-level outcomes. Results show that lead-firm facilitators more strongly invest in trust-building measures since they are considered deficient in benevolence and integrity. Without these investments, they run the risk that conflicts of interest hinder the stimulation of positive network-level outcomes. Third-party facilitators, by contrast, enjoy certain credits of trust and focus on balancing firm interests from the network's activation, but need to invest in enhancing their competencies and skills with regard to the industry the firms operate in. The findings contribute to developing a theory of network facilitation by providing a nuanced understanding of how network-level outcomes can be reduced to individual-level factors.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>College teachers</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Family corporations</subject><subject>Family-owned business enterprises</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Lead industry</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><issn>1467-8551</issn><issn>1045-3172</issn><issn>1467-8551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUT1PwzAQjRBIQGFmQrKExERbO4njhC1UlA8BZSizZZwzGEpcbIfS38CfxmkAsSC8nO_5vXfnuyjaI3hAwhmSNGP9nFIyIHHK8Fq09YOs_7pvRtvOPWEcgIxtRR9TsxC2ckig6SMYu0RGoRvwC2Of0VhIPdNeeG3qY1Siay2tUaapqxXk0C1YNwfp9RsgUyP_CKisPUiooPbuCN1aER4lBPu6QpPGS_MSkj9K7EQbSswc7H7FXnQ3Pp2OzvtXk7OLUXnVlynBuC9koZSiNL9PMItFmuUkpyAxZUUMkCeZVIkk97SIJc6FFIoBxGkBLC-AVlme9KKDznduzWsDzvMn09g6lOSBFxcsWLHAOuxYD2IGXNfShJ-9-wfROMd5mdEkC93gljjsiGE4zllQfG71i7BLTjBvV8Pb4fN2-Hy1mqDIOsVCz2D5H52fXE6uv4X7nRBCN9rxNjhvLI-ThKVp8gmlCJt4</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Mueller, Elisabeth F</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1509-9088</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Towards a Theory of Network Facilitation: A Microfoundations Perspective on the Antecedents, Practices and Outcomes of Network Facilitation</title><author>Mueller, Elisabeth F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4100-ac9fff558b3072a468185ec05792ee836cf3c1b592c08acaf7ee249e789e5d683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>College teachers</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Family corporations</topic><topic>Family-owned business enterprises</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Lead industry</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Elisabeth F</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>British journal of management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mueller, Elisabeth F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards a Theory of Network Facilitation: A Microfoundations Perspective on the Antecedents, Practices and Outcomes of Network Facilitation</atitle><jtitle>British journal of management</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>80-96</pages><issn>1467-8551</issn><issn>1045-3172</issn><eissn>1467-8551</eissn><abstract>Firms cooperate in inter-firm networks to foster their competitiveness and improve their innovation outcomes. In many cases, network facilitators who are either embedded in a lead firm or a third-party organization manage the cooperation among the network firms. This qualitative study adopts a microfoundations perspective to investigate the behavioural antecedents of the network facilitators, their facilitation practices and the related network-level outcomes. Results show that lead-firm facilitators more strongly invest in trust-building measures since they are considered deficient in benevolence and integrity. Without these investments, they run the risk that conflicts of interest hinder the stimulation of positive network-level outcomes. Third-party facilitators, by contrast, enjoy certain credits of trust and focus on balancing firm interests from the network's activation, but need to invest in enhancing their competencies and skills with regard to the industry the firms operate in. The findings contribute to developing a theory of network facilitation by providing a nuanced understanding of how network-level outcomes can be reduced to individual-level factors.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8551.12470</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1509-9088</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1467-8551
ispartof British journal of management, 2021, Vol.32 (1), p.80-96
issn 1467-8551
1045-3172
1467-8551
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2492970577
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete
subjects Analysis
College teachers
Companies
Competitiveness
Conflicts of interest
Cooperation
Family corporations
Family-owned business enterprises
Innovations
Lead industry
Morality
Qualitative research
Stimulation
title Towards a Theory of Network Facilitation: A Microfoundations Perspective on the Antecedents, Practices and Outcomes of Network Facilitation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T04%3A03%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20Theory%20of%20Network%20Facilitation:%20A%20Microfoundations%20Perspective%20on%20the%20Antecedents,%20Practices%20and%20Outcomes%20of%20Network%20Facilitation&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20management&rft.au=Mueller,%20Elisabeth%20F&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=80-96&rft.issn=1467-8551&rft.eissn=1467-8551&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8551.12470&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA653610007%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492970577&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A653610007&rfr_iscdi=true