Do we need non-linear corrections? On the boundary Forchheimer equation in acoustic scattering
This paper presents a rapid numerical method for predicting the aerodynamic noise generated by foam-like porous aerofoils. In such situations, particularly for high-frequency noise sources, Darcy’s law may be unsuitable for describing the pressure jump across the aerofoil. Therefore, an inertial For...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of sound and vibration 2021-03, Vol.495, p.115905, Article 115905 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 115905 |
container_title | Journal of sound and vibration |
container_volume | 495 |
creator | Colbrook, Matthew J. Ayton, Lorna J. |
description | This paper presents a rapid numerical method for predicting the aerodynamic noise generated by foam-like porous aerofoils. In such situations, particularly for high-frequency noise sources, Darcy’s law may be unsuitable for describing the pressure jump across the aerofoil. Therefore, an inertial Forchheimer correction is introduced. This results in a non-linear boundary condition relating the pressure jump across the material to the fluid displacement. We aim to provide a quick, semi-analytical model that incorporates such non-linear effects without requiring a full turbulent simulation. The numerical scheme implemented is based on local Mathieu function expansions, leading to a semi-analytical boundary spectral method that is well-suited to both linear and non-linear boundary conditions (including boundary conditions more general than the Forchheimer correction). In the latter case, Newton’s method is employed to solve the resulting non-linear system of equations for the unknown coefficients. Whilst the physical model is simplified to consider just the scattering by a thin porous aerofoil with no background flow, when the non-linear inertial correction is included good agreement is seen between the model predictions and both experimental results and large eddy simulations. It is found that for sufficiently low-permeability materials, the effects of inertia can outweigh the noise attenuation effects of viscosity. This helps explain the discrepancy between experimental results and previous (linear) low-fidelity numerical simulations or analytical predictions, which typically overestimate the noise reduction capabilities of porous aerofoils. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115905 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2492706021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022460X20307446</els_id><sourcerecordid>2492706021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-521b00d280c4dc44d25ec3eb93f4ac3dcef7d7972e3b69edc8851f2637e855793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvA89ZJNtkPPIhUq0KhFwVPht1k1mZpkzbZrfjv3bKePQ0DzzsfDyHXDGYMWHbbztp4mHHgQ89kCfKETBiUMilkVpySCQDnicjg45xcxNgCQClSMSGfj55-I3WIhjrvko11WAWqfQioO-tdvKcrR7s10tr3zlThhy580Os12i0Givu-OmLUOlpp38fOahp11XUYrPu6JGdNtYl49Ven5H3x9DZ_SZar59f5wzLRaVZ0ieSsBjC8AC2MFsJwiTrFukwbUenUaGxyk5c5x7TOSjS6KCRreJbmWEiZl-mU3Ixzd8Hve4ydan0f3LBScVHyHDLgbKDYSOngYwzYqF2w2-ElxUAdNapWDRrVUaMaNQ6ZuzGDw_kHi0FFbdFpNPZoSBlv_0n_AkMKe2E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492706021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do we need non-linear corrections? On the boundary Forchheimer equation in acoustic scattering</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Colbrook, Matthew J. ; Ayton, Lorna J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Colbrook, Matthew J. ; Ayton, Lorna J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a rapid numerical method for predicting the aerodynamic noise generated by foam-like porous aerofoils. In such situations, particularly for high-frequency noise sources, Darcy’s law may be unsuitable for describing the pressure jump across the aerofoil. Therefore, an inertial Forchheimer correction is introduced. This results in a non-linear boundary condition relating the pressure jump across the material to the fluid displacement. We aim to provide a quick, semi-analytical model that incorporates such non-linear effects without requiring a full turbulent simulation. The numerical scheme implemented is based on local Mathieu function expansions, leading to a semi-analytical boundary spectral method that is well-suited to both linear and non-linear boundary conditions (including boundary conditions more general than the Forchheimer correction). In the latter case, Newton’s method is employed to solve the resulting non-linear system of equations for the unknown coefficients. Whilst the physical model is simplified to consider just the scattering by a thin porous aerofoil with no background flow, when the non-linear inertial correction is included good agreement is seen between the model predictions and both experimental results and large eddy simulations. It is found that for sufficiently low-permeability materials, the effects of inertia can outweigh the noise attenuation effects of viscosity. This helps explain the discrepancy between experimental results and previous (linear) low-fidelity numerical simulations or analytical predictions, which typically overestimate the noise reduction capabilities of porous aerofoils.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-460X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acoustic scattering ; Acoustics ; Aerodynamic noise ; Aerodynamics ; Airfoils ; Attenuation ; Boundary conditions ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Darcys law ; Fluid flow ; Large eddy simulation ; Mathematical models ; Mathieu function ; Newton methods ; Noise prediction ; Noise reduction ; Non-linear boundary conditions ; Numerical methods ; Numerical prediction ; Porous airfoils ; Pressure jump ; Scattering ; Spectral methods ; Trailing-edge noise</subject><ispartof>Journal of sound and vibration, 2021-03, Vol.495, p.115905, Article 115905</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 17, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-521b00d280c4dc44d25ec3eb93f4ac3dcef7d7972e3b69edc8851f2637e855793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-521b00d280c4dc44d25ec3eb93f4ac3dcef7d7972e3b69edc8851f2637e855793</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6280-9460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022460X20307446$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colbrook, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayton, Lorna J.</creatorcontrib><title>Do we need non-linear corrections? On the boundary Forchheimer equation in acoustic scattering</title><title>Journal of sound and vibration</title><description>This paper presents a rapid numerical method for predicting the aerodynamic noise generated by foam-like porous aerofoils. In such situations, particularly for high-frequency noise sources, Darcy’s law may be unsuitable for describing the pressure jump across the aerofoil. Therefore, an inertial Forchheimer correction is introduced. This results in a non-linear boundary condition relating the pressure jump across the material to the fluid displacement. We aim to provide a quick, semi-analytical model that incorporates such non-linear effects without requiring a full turbulent simulation. The numerical scheme implemented is based on local Mathieu function expansions, leading to a semi-analytical boundary spectral method that is well-suited to both linear and non-linear boundary conditions (including boundary conditions more general than the Forchheimer correction). In the latter case, Newton’s method is employed to solve the resulting non-linear system of equations for the unknown coefficients. Whilst the physical model is simplified to consider just the scattering by a thin porous aerofoil with no background flow, when the non-linear inertial correction is included good agreement is seen between the model predictions and both experimental results and large eddy simulations. It is found that for sufficiently low-permeability materials, the effects of inertia can outweigh the noise attenuation effects of viscosity. This helps explain the discrepancy between experimental results and previous (linear) low-fidelity numerical simulations or analytical predictions, which typically overestimate the noise reduction capabilities of porous aerofoils.</description><subject>Acoustic scattering</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Aerodynamic noise</subject><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Airfoils</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Darcys law</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Large eddy simulation</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathieu function</subject><subject>Newton methods</subject><subject>Noise prediction</subject><subject>Noise reduction</subject><subject>Non-linear boundary conditions</subject><subject>Numerical methods</subject><subject>Numerical prediction</subject><subject>Porous airfoils</subject><subject>Pressure jump</subject><subject>Scattering</subject><subject>Spectral methods</subject><subject>Trailing-edge noise</subject><issn>0022-460X</issn><issn>1095-8568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvA89ZJNtkPPIhUq0KhFwVPht1k1mZpkzbZrfjv3bKePQ0DzzsfDyHXDGYMWHbbztp4mHHgQ89kCfKETBiUMilkVpySCQDnicjg45xcxNgCQClSMSGfj55-I3WIhjrvko11WAWqfQioO-tdvKcrR7s10tr3zlThhy580Os12i0Givu-OmLUOlpp38fOahp11XUYrPu6JGdNtYl49Ven5H3x9DZ_SZar59f5wzLRaVZ0ieSsBjC8AC2MFsJwiTrFukwbUenUaGxyk5c5x7TOSjS6KCRreJbmWEiZl-mU3Ixzd8Hve4ydan0f3LBScVHyHDLgbKDYSOngYwzYqF2w2-ElxUAdNapWDRrVUaMaNQ6ZuzGDw_kHi0FFbdFpNPZoSBlv_0n_AkMKe2E</recordid><startdate>20210317</startdate><enddate>20210317</enddate><creator>Colbrook, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Ayton, Lorna J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6280-9460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210317</creationdate><title>Do we need non-linear corrections? On the boundary Forchheimer equation in acoustic scattering</title><author>Colbrook, Matthew J. ; Ayton, Lorna J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-521b00d280c4dc44d25ec3eb93f4ac3dcef7d7972e3b69edc8851f2637e855793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acoustic scattering</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Aerodynamic noise</topic><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Airfoils</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Darcys law</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Large eddy simulation</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathieu function</topic><topic>Newton methods</topic><topic>Noise prediction</topic><topic>Noise reduction</topic><topic>Non-linear boundary conditions</topic><topic>Numerical methods</topic><topic>Numerical prediction</topic><topic>Porous airfoils</topic><topic>Pressure jump</topic><topic>Scattering</topic><topic>Spectral methods</topic><topic>Trailing-edge noise</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colbrook, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayton, Lorna J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of sound and vibration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colbrook, Matthew J.</au><au>Ayton, Lorna J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do we need non-linear corrections? On the boundary Forchheimer equation in acoustic scattering</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sound and vibration</jtitle><date>2021-03-17</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>495</volume><spage>115905</spage><pages>115905-</pages><artnum>115905</artnum><issn>0022-460X</issn><eissn>1095-8568</eissn><abstract>This paper presents a rapid numerical method for predicting the aerodynamic noise generated by foam-like porous aerofoils. In such situations, particularly for high-frequency noise sources, Darcy’s law may be unsuitable for describing the pressure jump across the aerofoil. Therefore, an inertial Forchheimer correction is introduced. This results in a non-linear boundary condition relating the pressure jump across the material to the fluid displacement. We aim to provide a quick, semi-analytical model that incorporates such non-linear effects without requiring a full turbulent simulation. The numerical scheme implemented is based on local Mathieu function expansions, leading to a semi-analytical boundary spectral method that is well-suited to both linear and non-linear boundary conditions (including boundary conditions more general than the Forchheimer correction). In the latter case, Newton’s method is employed to solve the resulting non-linear system of equations for the unknown coefficients. Whilst the physical model is simplified to consider just the scattering by a thin porous aerofoil with no background flow, when the non-linear inertial correction is included good agreement is seen between the model predictions and both experimental results and large eddy simulations. It is found that for sufficiently low-permeability materials, the effects of inertia can outweigh the noise attenuation effects of viscosity. This helps explain the discrepancy between experimental results and previous (linear) low-fidelity numerical simulations or analytical predictions, which typically overestimate the noise reduction capabilities of porous aerofoils.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115905</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6280-9460</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-460X |
ispartof | Journal of sound and vibration, 2021-03, Vol.495, p.115905, Article 115905 |
issn | 0022-460X 1095-8568 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2492706021 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acoustic scattering Acoustics Aerodynamic noise Aerodynamics Airfoils Attenuation Boundary conditions Computational fluid dynamics Darcys law Fluid flow Large eddy simulation Mathematical models Mathieu function Newton methods Noise prediction Noise reduction Non-linear boundary conditions Numerical methods Numerical prediction Porous airfoils Pressure jump Scattering Spectral methods Trailing-edge noise |
title | Do we need non-linear corrections? On the boundary Forchheimer equation in acoustic scattering |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T07%3A38%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20we%20need%20non-linear%20corrections?%20On%20the%20boundary%20Forchheimer%20equation%20in%20acoustic%20scattering&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sound%20and%20vibration&rft.au=Colbrook,%20Matthew%20J.&rft.date=2021-03-17&rft.volume=495&rft.spage=115905&rft.pages=115905-&rft.artnum=115905&rft.issn=0022-460X&rft.eissn=1095-8568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115905&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2492706021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492706021&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022460X20307446&rfr_iscdi=true |