Predictive Validity of Thin Slices of Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviors: Comparison of Slice Lengths and Rating Methodologies
Thin slices, or excerpts of behavior, are commonly used by researchers to represent behaviors in their full stimulus. The present study asked how slices of different lengths and locations, as well as different measurement methodologies, influence correlations between the measured behavior and differ...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of nonverbal behavior 2021-03, Vol.45 (1), p.53-66 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 66 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 53 |
| container_title | Journal of nonverbal behavior |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Wang, Michael Z. Chen, Katrina Hall, Judith A. |
| description | Thin slices, or excerpts of behavior, are commonly used by researchers to represent behaviors in their full stimulus. The present study asked how slices of different lengths and locations, as well as different measurement methodologies, influence correlations between the measured behavior and different variables (predictive validity). We collected self-rated, perceiver-rated, and objectively measured data on 60 participants who participated in a 5-min interaction with a confederate on video. These videos were split into five 1-min slices and rated for verbal and nonverbal behaviors via global impressions, using the same rater for all five slices and also using a different rater for each slice. For single slices, results indicated no clear pattern for optimal slice locations. In general, single slices had weaker predictive validity than the total. Slices of 2 or 3 min were, in general, equal to 5-min total in predictive validity. The magnitude of correlations was similar when same versus different coders were used, and the predictive validity correlations of the two methods covaried strongly across behavior-outcome variable combinations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10919-020-00343-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2492122091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2492122091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fe2cc0cd0948729fd5022ad81a8ee148c5290c047ef7d3323e9d07e1d76c33a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuA19WTpF0b73T4BfMDnbsNMTntMmozk24wf73dKnjn1eGF93kPPIScMjhnAPlFZCCZTIBDAiBSkbA9MmBZLhIxysQ-GQCTLMmKYnRIjmJcAEAq03xAvl8CWmdat0Y607Wzrt1QX9Lp3DX0rXYG4zbOMHzomurG0iffrPt0jXO9dj7ESzr2n0sdXPTNtr3j6ASbqp3HHfSqW9dU9BHbube-9pXDeEwOSl1HPPm9Q_J-ezMd3yeT57uH8dUkMYLJNimRGwPGgkyLnMvSZsC5tgXTBSJLC5NxCQbSHMvcCsEFSgs5MpuPjBBaiiE563eXwX-tMLZq4Veh6V4qnkrOOO_cdS3et0zwMQYs1TK4Tx02ioHaOla9Y9U5VjvHaguJHopduakw_E3_Q_0AhGN_og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492122091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictive Validity of Thin Slices of Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviors: Comparison of Slice Lengths and Rating Methodologies</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wang, Michael Z. ; Chen, Katrina ; Hall, Judith A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Michael Z. ; Chen, Katrina ; Hall, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><description>Thin slices, or excerpts of behavior, are commonly used by researchers to represent behaviors in their full stimulus. The present study asked how slices of different lengths and locations, as well as different measurement methodologies, influence correlations between the measured behavior and different variables (predictive validity). We collected self-rated, perceiver-rated, and objectively measured data on 60 participants who participated in a 5-min interaction with a confederate on video. These videos were split into five 1-min slices and rated for verbal and nonverbal behaviors via global impressions, using the same rater for all five slices and also using a different rater for each slice. For single slices, results indicated no clear pattern for optimal slice locations. In general, single slices had weaker predictive validity than the total. Slices of 2 or 3 min were, in general, equal to 5-min total in predictive validity. The magnitude of correlations was similar when same versus different coders were used, and the predictive validity correlations of the two methods covaried strongly across behavior-outcome variable combinations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-5886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10919-020-00343-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Original Paper ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Psychology ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of nonverbal behavior, 2021-03, Vol.45 (1), p.53-66</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fe2cc0cd0948729fd5022ad81a8ee148c5290c047ef7d3323e9d07e1d76c33a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fe2cc0cd0948729fd5022ad81a8ee148c5290c047ef7d3323e9d07e1d76c33a93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5840-2895</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10919-020-00343-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10919-020-00343-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Michael Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><title>Predictive Validity of Thin Slices of Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviors: Comparison of Slice Lengths and Rating Methodologies</title><title>Journal of nonverbal behavior</title><addtitle>J Nonverbal Behav</addtitle><description>Thin slices, or excerpts of behavior, are commonly used by researchers to represent behaviors in their full stimulus. The present study asked how slices of different lengths and locations, as well as different measurement methodologies, influence correlations between the measured behavior and different variables (predictive validity). We collected self-rated, perceiver-rated, and objectively measured data on 60 participants who participated in a 5-min interaction with a confederate on video. These videos were split into five 1-min slices and rated for verbal and nonverbal behaviors via global impressions, using the same rater for all five slices and also using a different rater for each slice. For single slices, results indicated no clear pattern for optimal slice locations. In general, single slices had weaker predictive validity than the total. Slices of 2 or 3 min were, in general, equal to 5-min total in predictive validity. The magnitude of correlations was similar when same versus different coders were used, and the predictive validity correlations of the two methods covaried strongly across behavior-outcome variable combinations.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0191-5886</issn><issn>1573-3653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuA19WTpF0b73T4BfMDnbsNMTntMmozk24wf73dKnjn1eGF93kPPIScMjhnAPlFZCCZTIBDAiBSkbA9MmBZLhIxysQ-GQCTLMmKYnRIjmJcAEAq03xAvl8CWmdat0Y607Wzrt1QX9Lp3DX0rXYG4zbOMHzomurG0iffrPt0jXO9dj7ESzr2n0sdXPTNtr3j6ASbqp3HHfSqW9dU9BHbube-9pXDeEwOSl1HPPm9Q_J-ezMd3yeT57uH8dUkMYLJNimRGwPGgkyLnMvSZsC5tgXTBSJLC5NxCQbSHMvcCsEFSgs5MpuPjBBaiiE563eXwX-tMLZq4Veh6V4qnkrOOO_cdS3et0zwMQYs1TK4Tx02ioHaOla9Y9U5VjvHaguJHopduakw_E3_Q_0AhGN_og</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Wang, Michael Z.</creator><creator>Chen, Katrina</creator><creator>Hall, Judith A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5840-2895</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Predictive Validity of Thin Slices of Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviors: Comparison of Slice Lengths and Rating Methodologies</title><author>Wang, Michael Z. ; Chen, Katrina ; Hall, Judith A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-fe2cc0cd0948729fd5022ad81a8ee148c5290c047ef7d3323e9d07e1d76c33a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Michael Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Judith A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of nonverbal behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Michael Z.</au><au>Chen, Katrina</au><au>Hall, Judith A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictive Validity of Thin Slices of Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviors: Comparison of Slice Lengths and Rating Methodologies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nonverbal behavior</jtitle><stitle>J Nonverbal Behav</stitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>53-66</pages><issn>0191-5886</issn><eissn>1573-3653</eissn><abstract>Thin slices, or excerpts of behavior, are commonly used by researchers to represent behaviors in their full stimulus. The present study asked how slices of different lengths and locations, as well as different measurement methodologies, influence correlations between the measured behavior and different variables (predictive validity). We collected self-rated, perceiver-rated, and objectively measured data on 60 participants who participated in a 5-min interaction with a confederate on video. These videos were split into five 1-min slices and rated for verbal and nonverbal behaviors via global impressions, using the same rater for all five slices and also using a different rater for each slice. For single slices, results indicated no clear pattern for optimal slice locations. In general, single slices had weaker predictive validity than the total. Slices of 2 or 3 min were, in general, equal to 5-min total in predictive validity. The magnitude of correlations was similar when same versus different coders were used, and the predictive validity correlations of the two methods covaried strongly across behavior-outcome variable combinations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10919-020-00343-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5840-2895</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0191-5886 |
| ispartof | Journal of nonverbal behavior, 2021-03, Vol.45 (1), p.53-66 |
| issn | 0191-5886 1573-3653 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2492122091 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Behavior Behavioral Science and Psychology Original Paper Personality and Social Psychology Psychology Social Sciences Sociology Validity |
| title | Predictive Validity of Thin Slices of Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviors: Comparison of Slice Lengths and Rating Methodologies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A29%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictive%20Validity%20of%20Thin%20Slices%20of%20Verbal%20and%20Nonverbal%20Behaviors:%20Comparison%20of%20Slice%20Lengths%20and%20Rating%20Methodologies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nonverbal%20behavior&rft.au=Wang,%20Michael%20Z.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=53-66&rft.issn=0191-5886&rft.eissn=1573-3653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10919-020-00343-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2492122091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492122091&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |