Evaluation of a Web-Based, ‘Purchase Event’ Intensive Monitoring Method for Pharmacovigilance of Natural Health Products: Lessons and Insights from Development Work in New Zealand

Introduction Intensive monitoring methods are used in pharmacovigilance for prescription medicines but have not yet been implemented for natural health products (NHPs). Objectives Our objective was to assess feasibility issues with a new ‘purchase event’ intensive monitoring method for pharmacovigil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug safety 2020-10, Vol.43 (10), p.981-998
Hauptverfasser: Barnes, Joanne, Sheridan, Jane L., Dong, Christine Yang, Härmark, Linda, Vohra, Sunita, Harrison-Woolrych, Mira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 998
container_issue 10
container_start_page 981
container_title Drug safety
container_volume 43
creator Barnes, Joanne
Sheridan, Jane L.
Dong, Christine Yang
Härmark, Linda
Vohra, Sunita
Harrison-Woolrych, Mira
description Introduction Intensive monitoring methods are used in pharmacovigilance for prescription medicines but have not yet been implemented for natural health products (NHPs). Objectives Our objective was to assess feasibility issues with a new ‘purchase event’ intensive monitoring method for pharmacovigilance of NHPs, including pharmacy and NHP purchaser recruitment rates, collection of NHP purchaser key patient identifier information for data linkage and quality and completeness of data. Methods For the Ginkgo study, 213 community pharmacies in the Auckland (Aotearoa New Zealand) District Health Board area were invited to participate. Staff in participating pharmacies ( n  = 3 [1.4%]) recorded ginkgo product sales and gave purchasers a study invitation card (October 2015–January 2016). Ginkgo purchaser participants were emailed links to web-based baseline and follow-up questionnaires about adverse events occurring during/after taking ginkgo. Participating pharmacists and consumers were invited to provide qualitative feedback about the study. For the NHP-Lite study, all NHPs were included for monitoring. Community pharmacies in the Green Cross Health network were invited to participate. Participating pharmacy staff gave all NHP purchasers a study invitation card over a 2-week period (May 2016). NHP purchaser participants were emailed links to web-based baseline, follow-up and feedback questionnaires. Results Few community pharmacists (Ginkgo study, n  = 3; NHP-Lite study, n  = 18) and NHP purchasers (Ginkgo study, n  = 0; NHP-Lite study, n  = 4) participated. Pharmacists (Ginkgo study, 3/3; NHP-Lite study, 11/18) described several reasons for participating and suggested ways to increase consumer recruitment, including simplifying study procedures. Conclusions These web-based, purchase event, intensive monitoring studies, with cohorts built through NHP purchases in pharmacies, identified substantial issues with recruiting pharmacists/pharmacies and NHP purchasers that, at present, render such studies unfeasible. Future studies need to consider other methods of recruiting NHP purchasers and develop a simple method for recording NHP purchases.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40264-020-00963-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2491986359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491986359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b96ac375c9961403e07bf3d6a1f43172dc598776dddf003c0824c3b6495478bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFu1DAUhi0EokPhAizQk9gSsGPHidnRMtBK0zILUCU2kWM7k5TEHmwnaHY9BpyE-_QkeJgCO1Z-lr73_dL7EXpK8EuCcfkqMJxzluEcZxgLTrPdPbQgpBQZESy_jxaYEJYVgvAj9CiEa4xxlfPqITqieSF4yYsF-rmc5TDJ2DsLrgUJV6bJTmQw-gXc3nxfT1516QfL2dh4e_MDzm00NvSzgQtn--h8bzdwYWLnNLTOw7qTfpTKzf2mH6RVZq-9lHHycoAzI4fYwdo7PakYXsPKhOBsAGl1Mod-08UArXcjvDWzGdx2TLFw5fwX6C1cmm_wOSkS_Rg9aOUQzJO79xh9erf8eHqWrT68Pz99s8oULYuYNYLL_aSE4IRhanDZtFRzSVpGSZlrVYiqLLnWusWYqnQgpmjDmShYWTWKHqPnB-_Wu6-TCbG-dpO3KbLOmSCi4rQQicoPlPIuBG_aeuv7UfpdTXC976o-dFWnrurfXdW7tPTsTj01o9F_V_6UkwB6AMJ2f2Xj_2X_R_sLqimj3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491986359</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a Web-Based, ‘Purchase Event’ Intensive Monitoring Method for Pharmacovigilance of Natural Health Products: Lessons and Insights from Development Work in New Zealand</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Barnes, Joanne ; Sheridan, Jane L. ; Dong, Christine Yang ; Härmark, Linda ; Vohra, Sunita ; Harrison-Woolrych, Mira</creator><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Joanne ; Sheridan, Jane L. ; Dong, Christine Yang ; Härmark, Linda ; Vohra, Sunita ; Harrison-Woolrych, Mira</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Intensive monitoring methods are used in pharmacovigilance for prescription medicines but have not yet been implemented for natural health products (NHPs). Objectives Our objective was to assess feasibility issues with a new ‘purchase event’ intensive monitoring method for pharmacovigilance of NHPs, including pharmacy and NHP purchaser recruitment rates, collection of NHP purchaser key patient identifier information for data linkage and quality and completeness of data. Methods For the Ginkgo study, 213 community pharmacies in the Auckland (Aotearoa New Zealand) District Health Board area were invited to participate. Staff in participating pharmacies ( n  = 3 [1.4%]) recorded ginkgo product sales and gave purchasers a study invitation card (October 2015–January 2016). Ginkgo purchaser participants were emailed links to web-based baseline and follow-up questionnaires about adverse events occurring during/after taking ginkgo. Participating pharmacists and consumers were invited to provide qualitative feedback about the study. For the NHP-Lite study, all NHPs were included for monitoring. Community pharmacies in the Green Cross Health network were invited to participate. Participating pharmacy staff gave all NHP purchasers a study invitation card over a 2-week period (May 2016). NHP purchaser participants were emailed links to web-based baseline, follow-up and feedback questionnaires. Results Few community pharmacists (Ginkgo study, n  = 3; NHP-Lite study, n  = 18) and NHP purchasers (Ginkgo study, n  = 0; NHP-Lite study, n  = 4) participated. Pharmacists (Ginkgo study, 3/3; NHP-Lite study, 11/18) described several reasons for participating and suggested ways to increase consumer recruitment, including simplifying study procedures. Conclusions These web-based, purchase event, intensive monitoring studies, with cohorts built through NHP purchases in pharmacies, identified substantial issues with recruiting pharmacists/pharmacies and NHP purchasers that, at present, render such studies unfeasible. Future studies need to consider other methods of recruiting NHP purchasers and develop a simple method for recording NHP purchases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0114-5916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1942</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00963-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32596765</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Dietary supplements ; Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance ; Drug stores ; Feedback ; Ginkgo ; Herbal medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Monitoring methods ; Original Research Article ; Pharmacists ; Pharmacology ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Pharmacovigilance ; Purchasing ; Questionnaires ; Recruitment</subject><ispartof>Drug safety, 2020-10, Vol.43 (10), p.981-998</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Oct 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b96ac375c9961403e07bf3d6a1f43172dc598776dddf003c0824c3b6495478bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b96ac375c9961403e07bf3d6a1f43172dc598776dddf003c0824c3b6495478bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9314-9298 ; 0000-0002-1522-8433 ; 0000-0002-0312-3095</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40264-020-00963-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40264-020-00963-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596765$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheridan, Jane L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Christine Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Härmark, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vohra, Sunita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison-Woolrych, Mira</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a Web-Based, ‘Purchase Event’ Intensive Monitoring Method for Pharmacovigilance of Natural Health Products: Lessons and Insights from Development Work in New Zealand</title><title>Drug safety</title><addtitle>Drug Saf</addtitle><addtitle>Drug Saf</addtitle><description>Introduction Intensive monitoring methods are used in pharmacovigilance for prescription medicines but have not yet been implemented for natural health products (NHPs). Objectives Our objective was to assess feasibility issues with a new ‘purchase event’ intensive monitoring method for pharmacovigilance of NHPs, including pharmacy and NHP purchaser recruitment rates, collection of NHP purchaser key patient identifier information for data linkage and quality and completeness of data. Methods For the Ginkgo study, 213 community pharmacies in the Auckland (Aotearoa New Zealand) District Health Board area were invited to participate. Staff in participating pharmacies ( n  = 3 [1.4%]) recorded ginkgo product sales and gave purchasers a study invitation card (October 2015–January 2016). Ginkgo purchaser participants were emailed links to web-based baseline and follow-up questionnaires about adverse events occurring during/after taking ginkgo. Participating pharmacists and consumers were invited to provide qualitative feedback about the study. For the NHP-Lite study, all NHPs were included for monitoring. Community pharmacies in the Green Cross Health network were invited to participate. Participating pharmacy staff gave all NHP purchasers a study invitation card over a 2-week period (May 2016). NHP purchaser participants were emailed links to web-based baseline, follow-up and feedback questionnaires. Results Few community pharmacists (Ginkgo study, n  = 3; NHP-Lite study, n  = 18) and NHP purchasers (Ginkgo study, n  = 0; NHP-Lite study, n  = 4) participated. Pharmacists (Ginkgo study, 3/3; NHP-Lite study, 11/18) described several reasons for participating and suggested ways to increase consumer recruitment, including simplifying study procedures. Conclusions These web-based, purchase event, intensive monitoring studies, with cohorts built through NHP purchases in pharmacies, identified substantial issues with recruiting pharmacists/pharmacies and NHP purchasers that, at present, render such studies unfeasible. Future studies need to consider other methods of recruiting NHP purchasers and develop a simple method for recording NHP purchases.</description><subject>Dietary supplements</subject><subject>Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Ginkgo</subject><subject>Herbal medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Pharmacovigilance</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><issn>0114-5916</issn><issn>1179-1942</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFu1DAUhi0EokPhAizQk9gSsGPHidnRMtBK0zILUCU2kWM7k5TEHmwnaHY9BpyE-_QkeJgCO1Z-lr73_dL7EXpK8EuCcfkqMJxzluEcZxgLTrPdPbQgpBQZESy_jxaYEJYVgvAj9CiEa4xxlfPqITqieSF4yYsF-rmc5TDJ2DsLrgUJV6bJTmQw-gXc3nxfT1516QfL2dh4e_MDzm00NvSzgQtn--h8bzdwYWLnNLTOw7qTfpTKzf2mH6RVZq-9lHHycoAzI4fYwdo7PakYXsPKhOBsAGl1Mod-08UArXcjvDWzGdx2TLFw5fwX6C1cmm_wOSkS_Rg9aOUQzJO79xh9erf8eHqWrT68Pz99s8oULYuYNYLL_aSE4IRhanDZtFRzSVpGSZlrVYiqLLnWusWYqnQgpmjDmShYWTWKHqPnB-_Wu6-TCbG-dpO3KbLOmSCi4rQQicoPlPIuBG_aeuv7UfpdTXC976o-dFWnrurfXdW7tPTsTj01o9F_V_6UkwB6AMJ2f2Xj_2X_R_sLqimj3g</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Barnes, Joanne</creator><creator>Sheridan, Jane L.</creator><creator>Dong, Christine Yang</creator><creator>Härmark, Linda</creator><creator>Vohra, Sunita</creator><creator>Harrison-Woolrych, Mira</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9314-9298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1522-8433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0312-3095</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a Web-Based, ‘Purchase Event’ Intensive Monitoring Method for Pharmacovigilance of Natural Health Products: Lessons and Insights from Development Work in New Zealand</title><author>Barnes, Joanne ; Sheridan, Jane L. ; Dong, Christine Yang ; Härmark, Linda ; Vohra, Sunita ; Harrison-Woolrych, Mira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b96ac375c9961403e07bf3d6a1f43172dc598776dddf003c0824c3b6495478bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Dietary supplements</topic><topic>Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Ginkgo</topic><topic>Herbal medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Pharmacovigilance</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheridan, Jane L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Christine Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Härmark, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vohra, Sunita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison-Woolrych, Mira</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Drug safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barnes, Joanne</au><au>Sheridan, Jane L.</au><au>Dong, Christine Yang</au><au>Härmark, Linda</au><au>Vohra, Sunita</au><au>Harrison-Woolrych, Mira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a Web-Based, ‘Purchase Event’ Intensive Monitoring Method for Pharmacovigilance of Natural Health Products: Lessons and Insights from Development Work in New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>Drug safety</jtitle><stitle>Drug Saf</stitle><addtitle>Drug Saf</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>981</spage><epage>998</epage><pages>981-998</pages><issn>0114-5916</issn><eissn>1179-1942</eissn><abstract>Introduction Intensive monitoring methods are used in pharmacovigilance for prescription medicines but have not yet been implemented for natural health products (NHPs). Objectives Our objective was to assess feasibility issues with a new ‘purchase event’ intensive monitoring method for pharmacovigilance of NHPs, including pharmacy and NHP purchaser recruitment rates, collection of NHP purchaser key patient identifier information for data linkage and quality and completeness of data. Methods For the Ginkgo study, 213 community pharmacies in the Auckland (Aotearoa New Zealand) District Health Board area were invited to participate. Staff in participating pharmacies ( n  = 3 [1.4%]) recorded ginkgo product sales and gave purchasers a study invitation card (October 2015–January 2016). Ginkgo purchaser participants were emailed links to web-based baseline and follow-up questionnaires about adverse events occurring during/after taking ginkgo. Participating pharmacists and consumers were invited to provide qualitative feedback about the study. For the NHP-Lite study, all NHPs were included for monitoring. Community pharmacies in the Green Cross Health network were invited to participate. Participating pharmacy staff gave all NHP purchasers a study invitation card over a 2-week period (May 2016). NHP purchaser participants were emailed links to web-based baseline, follow-up and feedback questionnaires. Results Few community pharmacists (Ginkgo study, n  = 3; NHP-Lite study, n  = 18) and NHP purchasers (Ginkgo study, n  = 0; NHP-Lite study, n  = 4) participated. Pharmacists (Ginkgo study, 3/3; NHP-Lite study, 11/18) described several reasons for participating and suggested ways to increase consumer recruitment, including simplifying study procedures. Conclusions These web-based, purchase event, intensive monitoring studies, with cohorts built through NHP purchases in pharmacies, identified substantial issues with recruiting pharmacists/pharmacies and NHP purchasers that, at present, render such studies unfeasible. Future studies need to consider other methods of recruiting NHP purchasers and develop a simple method for recording NHP purchases.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>32596765</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40264-020-00963-y</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9314-9298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1522-8433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0312-3095</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0114-5916
ispartof Drug safety, 2020-10, Vol.43 (10), p.981-998
issn 0114-5916
1179-1942
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2491986359
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Dietary supplements
Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance
Drug stores
Feedback
Ginkgo
Herbal medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Monitoring methods
Original Research Article
Pharmacists
Pharmacology
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Pharmacovigilance
Purchasing
Questionnaires
Recruitment
title Evaluation of a Web-Based, ‘Purchase Event’ Intensive Monitoring Method for Pharmacovigilance of Natural Health Products: Lessons and Insights from Development Work in New Zealand
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T05%3A11%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20Web-Based,%20%E2%80%98Purchase%20Event%E2%80%99%20Intensive%20Monitoring%20Method%20for%20Pharmacovigilance%20of%20Natural%20Health%20Products:%20Lessons%20and%20Insights%20from%20Development%20Work%20in%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=Drug%20safety&rft.au=Barnes,%20Joanne&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=981&rft.epage=998&rft.pages=981-998&rft.issn=0114-5916&rft.eissn=1179-1942&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40264-020-00963-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2491986359%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491986359&rft_id=info:pmid/32596765&rfr_iscdi=true