The Score Is 4-0: FCC Media Ownership Policy, Prometheus Radio Project, and Judicial Review
Media ownership continues to be an important democratic issue mired in a complicated policy limbo. The relationship between the control of media outlets, the sources of information, and the range of viewpoint diversity available to citizens has been at the center of a continuing legal impasse betwee...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Federal communications law journal 2020-12, Vol.73 (1), p.99-0_8 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 0_8 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 99 |
| container_title | Federal communications law journal |
| container_volume | 73 |
| creator | Terry, Christopher Schmitz, Stephen Silberberg, Eliezer Joseph |
| description | Media ownership continues to be an important democratic issue mired in a complicated policy limbo. The relationship between the control of media outlets, the sources of information, and the range of viewpoint diversity available to citizens has been at the center of a continuing legal impasse between the FCC and the courts. Even in the Internet age, access to local news and information is an important element in maximizing political participation, and so broadcasting retains a central role in the media use of everyday Americans. Here, Terry et al. trace the implementation of FCC media ownership policy since the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 19969 through the FCC's continuing legal battle with the Prometheus Radio Project. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2491981202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491981202</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24919812023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNis0KgkAYAJcoyH7e4YOuCqtuml0lqSAS89ZBFv3CFXNtV5PevoIeoNPAzIyI4bi-ZzG29sfEoLbnWr5HvSmZaV1R-hEsMMg1LREuuVQIBw3MoluIwhBOWAgO56FBpUvRQixrkb9MiJW8Y1diryHhhZBfUWHemcCbAo59IXLBa0jwKXBYkMmN1xqXP87JKtql4d5qlXz0qLuskr1qPilzWGAHG9uhjvvf9Qbp_0Gm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491981202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Score Is 4-0: FCC Media Ownership Policy, Prometheus Radio Project, and Judicial Review</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Terry, Christopher ; Schmitz, Stephen ; Silberberg, Eliezer Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Terry, Christopher ; Schmitz, Stephen ; Silberberg, Eliezer Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>Media ownership continues to be an important democratic issue mired in a complicated policy limbo. The relationship between the control of media outlets, the sources of information, and the range of viewpoint diversity available to citizens has been at the center of a continuing legal impasse between the FCC and the courts. Even in the Internet age, access to local news and information is an important element in maximizing political participation, and so broadcasting retains a central role in the media use of everyday Americans. Here, Terry et al. trace the implementation of FCC media ownership policy since the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 19969 through the FCC's continuing legal battle with the Prometheus Radio Project.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-7606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-4457</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: George Washington University, National Law Center</publisher><subject>Access ; Broadcasting ; Federal regulation ; Internet ; Internet access ; Judicial reviews ; Mass media effects ; News media ; Ownership ; Political participation ; Radio ; Telecommunications policy ; Workplace diversity</subject><ispartof>Federal communications law journal, 2020-12, Vol.73 (1), p.99-0_8</ispartof><rights>Copyright George Washington University, National Law Center Dec 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terry, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silberberg, Eliezer Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>The Score Is 4-0: FCC Media Ownership Policy, Prometheus Radio Project, and Judicial Review</title><title>Federal communications law journal</title><description>Media ownership continues to be an important democratic issue mired in a complicated policy limbo. The relationship between the control of media outlets, the sources of information, and the range of viewpoint diversity available to citizens has been at the center of a continuing legal impasse between the FCC and the courts. Even in the Internet age, access to local news and information is an important element in maximizing political participation, and so broadcasting retains a central role in the media use of everyday Americans. Here, Terry et al. trace the implementation of FCC media ownership policy since the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 19969 through the FCC's continuing legal battle with the Prometheus Radio Project.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Broadcasting</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Mass media effects</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Radio</subject><subject>Telecommunications policy</subject><subject>Workplace diversity</subject><issn>0163-7606</issn><issn>2376-4457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNis0KgkAYAJcoyH7e4YOuCqtuml0lqSAS89ZBFv3CFXNtV5PevoIeoNPAzIyI4bi-ZzG29sfEoLbnWr5HvSmZaV1R-hEsMMg1LREuuVQIBw3MoluIwhBOWAgO56FBpUvRQixrkb9MiJW8Y1diryHhhZBfUWHemcCbAo59IXLBa0jwKXBYkMmN1xqXP87JKtql4d5qlXz0qLuskr1qPilzWGAHG9uhjvvf9Qbp_0Gm</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Terry, Christopher</creator><creator>Schmitz, Stephen</creator><creator>Silberberg, Eliezer Joseph</creator><general>George Washington University, National Law Center</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>The Score Is 4-0: FCC Media Ownership Policy, Prometheus Radio Project, and Judicial Review</title><author>Terry, Christopher ; Schmitz, Stephen ; Silberberg, Eliezer Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24919812023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Broadcasting</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Mass media effects</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Radio</topic><topic>Telecommunications policy</topic><topic>Workplace diversity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terry, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silberberg, Eliezer Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Federal communications law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terry, Christopher</au><au>Schmitz, Stephen</au><au>Silberberg, Eliezer Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Score Is 4-0: FCC Media Ownership Policy, Prometheus Radio Project, and Judicial Review</atitle><jtitle>Federal communications law journal</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>0_8</epage><pages>99-0_8</pages><issn>0163-7606</issn><eissn>2376-4457</eissn><abstract>Media ownership continues to be an important democratic issue mired in a complicated policy limbo. The relationship between the control of media outlets, the sources of information, and the range of viewpoint diversity available to citizens has been at the center of a continuing legal impasse between the FCC and the courts. Even in the Internet age, access to local news and information is an important element in maximizing political participation, and so broadcasting retains a central role in the media use of everyday Americans. Here, Terry et al. trace the implementation of FCC media ownership policy since the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 19969 through the FCC's continuing legal battle with the Prometheus Radio Project.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>George Washington University, National Law Center</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0163-7606 |
| ispartof | Federal communications law journal, 2020-12, Vol.73 (1), p.99-0_8 |
| issn | 0163-7606 2376-4457 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2491981202 |
| source | PAIS Index; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Access Broadcasting Federal regulation Internet Internet access Judicial reviews Mass media effects News media Ownership Political participation Radio Telecommunications policy Workplace diversity |
| title | The Score Is 4-0: FCC Media Ownership Policy, Prometheus Radio Project, and Judicial Review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A49%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Score%20Is%204-0:%20FCC%20Media%20Ownership%20Policy,%20Prometheus%20Radio%20Project,%20and%20Judicial%20Review&rft.jtitle=Federal%20communications%20law%20journal&rft.au=Terry,%20Christopher&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=0_8&rft.pages=99-0_8&rft.issn=0163-7606&rft.eissn=2376-4457&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2491981202%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491981202&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |