Controls on soil microbial carbon use efficiency over long-term ecosystem development

Carbon use efficiency—the proportion of substrate carbon that is converted to microbial biomass—is an important control on many ecosystem properties including carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling. Although CUE varies widely across terrestrial ecosystems, a coherent understanding of edaphic cont...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biogeochemistry 2021-02, Vol.152 (2-3), p.309-325
Hauptverfasser: Oliver, Erin E., Houlton, Benjamin Z., Lipson, David A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 325
container_issue 2-3
container_start_page 309
container_title Biogeochemistry
container_volume 152
creator Oliver, Erin E.
Houlton, Benjamin Z.
Lipson, David A.
description Carbon use efficiency—the proportion of substrate carbon that is converted to microbial biomass—is an important control on many ecosystem properties including carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling. Although CUE varies widely across terrestrial ecosystems, a coherent understanding of edaphic controls on CUE is lacking, thereby limiting the accuracy of global carbon models. The objective of this study was to determine how microbial CUE changes with long-term soil development and nutrient availability. Soil was collected across the chronosequence and fertility gradient at Jug Handle State Natural Reserve (the “Ecological Staircase”) in Mendocino County, CA. These soils exhibit a range in pH (3.29–6.59), litter quantity and quality (litter C:N, 32–70), and clay content (14.13–87.30%), while other factors such as modern-day climate, potential biota, and parent material are common to all sites. CUE varied significantly with soil and ecosystem development; the relationship was unimodal over geological time with CUE peaking at intermediate aged soils. Soil organic matter (SOM) content and pH were the most important variables each accounting for 30% of the variation in CUE across sites. Soil pH had a quadratic relationship with CUE, peaking at pH 4.7. Litter carbon to phosphorus (C:P) and nitrogen to phosphorus (N:P) ratios were also significant factors (Pearson’s r = 0.57 and 0.39 respectively). These results demonstrate that CUE changes in complex ways with soil fertility and long-term ecosystem development, and that edaphic factors such as SOM, pH, and litter quality need to be taken into account when predicting CUE for a given system.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10533-021-00758-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2491635217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491635217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-8aa3a4e2806b8062d3b1d5713260e6b1089f3b3c6d18cec64890ca761c5f88b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9FMsknToyz-A8HLCt5Cmk6XLm2zJt2FfnujFbx5GIYZ3nvD_Ai5Bn4LnBd3CbiSknEBLI_KsOmELEAVkilQH6dkwUEbJpSW5-QipR3nvCy4XJD3dRjGGLpEw0BTaDvatz6GqnUd9S5WeXtISLFpWt_i4CcajhhpF4YtGzH2FH1IUxqxpzUesQv7Hofxkpw1rkt49duXZPP4sFk_s9e3p5f1_SvzEsqRGeekW6EwXFe5RC0rqFUBUmiOugJuykZW0usajEevV6bk3hUavGqMqeSS3Myx-xg-D5hGuwuHOOSLVqxK0FIJKLJKzKr8V0oRG7uPbe_iZIHbb3p2pmczPftDz07ZJGdTyuJhi_Ev-h_XF1PNc7c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491635217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Controls on soil microbial carbon use efficiency over long-term ecosystem development</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Oliver, Erin E. ; Houlton, Benjamin Z. ; Lipson, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Erin E. ; Houlton, Benjamin Z. ; Lipson, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>Carbon use efficiency—the proportion of substrate carbon that is converted to microbial biomass—is an important control on many ecosystem properties including carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling. Although CUE varies widely across terrestrial ecosystems, a coherent understanding of edaphic controls on CUE is lacking, thereby limiting the accuracy of global carbon models. The objective of this study was to determine how microbial CUE changes with long-term soil development and nutrient availability. Soil was collected across the chronosequence and fertility gradient at Jug Handle State Natural Reserve (the “Ecological Staircase”) in Mendocino County, CA. These soils exhibit a range in pH (3.29–6.59), litter quantity and quality (litter C:N, 32–70), and clay content (14.13–87.30%), while other factors such as modern-day climate, potential biota, and parent material are common to all sites. CUE varied significantly with soil and ecosystem development; the relationship was unimodal over geological time with CUE peaking at intermediate aged soils. Soil organic matter (SOM) content and pH were the most important variables each accounting for 30% of the variation in CUE across sites. Soil pH had a quadratic relationship with CUE, peaking at pH 4.7. Litter carbon to phosphorus (C:P) and nitrogen to phosphorus (N:P) ratios were also significant factors (Pearson’s r = 0.57 and 0.39 respectively). These results demonstrate that CUE changes in complex ways with soil fertility and long-term ecosystem development, and that edaphic factors such as SOM, pH, and litter quality need to be taken into account when predicting CUE for a given system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-2563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-515X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10533-021-00758-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Biogeosciences ; Biota ; Carbon ; Carbon cycle ; Carbon sequestration ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecological succession ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Chemistry ; Fertility ; Geological time ; Life Sciences ; Litter ; Microorganisms ; Mineral nutrients ; Model accuracy ; Nitrogen ; Nutrient availability ; Nutrient cycles ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; pH effects ; Phosphorus ; Soil ; Soil chemistry ; Soil fertility ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil organic matter ; Soil pH ; Soils ; Substrates ; Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><ispartof>Biogeochemistry, 2021-02, Vol.152 (2-3), p.309-325</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-8aa3a4e2806b8062d3b1d5713260e6b1089f3b3c6d18cec64890ca761c5f88b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-8aa3a4e2806b8062d3b1d5713260e6b1089f3b3c6d18cec64890ca761c5f88b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4530-1539 ; 0000-0002-1414-0261 ; 0000-0002-2700-2538</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10533-021-00758-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10533-021-00758-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houlton, Benjamin Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipson, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>Controls on soil microbial carbon use efficiency over long-term ecosystem development</title><title>Biogeochemistry</title><addtitle>Biogeochemistry</addtitle><description>Carbon use efficiency—the proportion of substrate carbon that is converted to microbial biomass—is an important control on many ecosystem properties including carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling. Although CUE varies widely across terrestrial ecosystems, a coherent understanding of edaphic controls on CUE is lacking, thereby limiting the accuracy of global carbon models. The objective of this study was to determine how microbial CUE changes with long-term soil development and nutrient availability. Soil was collected across the chronosequence and fertility gradient at Jug Handle State Natural Reserve (the “Ecological Staircase”) in Mendocino County, CA. These soils exhibit a range in pH (3.29–6.59), litter quantity and quality (litter C:N, 32–70), and clay content (14.13–87.30%), while other factors such as modern-day climate, potential biota, and parent material are common to all sites. CUE varied significantly with soil and ecosystem development; the relationship was unimodal over geological time with CUE peaking at intermediate aged soils. Soil organic matter (SOM) content and pH were the most important variables each accounting for 30% of the variation in CUE across sites. Soil pH had a quadratic relationship with CUE, peaking at pH 4.7. Litter carbon to phosphorus (C:P) and nitrogen to phosphorus (N:P) ratios were also significant factors (Pearson’s r = 0.57 and 0.39 respectively). These results demonstrate that CUE changes in complex ways with soil fertility and long-term ecosystem development, and that edaphic factors such as SOM, pH, and litter quality need to be taken into account when predicting CUE for a given system.</description><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological succession</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Geological time</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrient availability</subject><subject>Nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil pH</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><issn>0168-2563</issn><issn>1573-515X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9FMsknToyz-A8HLCt5Cmk6XLm2zJt2FfnujFbx5GIYZ3nvD_Ai5Bn4LnBd3CbiSknEBLI_KsOmELEAVkilQH6dkwUEbJpSW5-QipR3nvCy4XJD3dRjGGLpEw0BTaDvatz6GqnUd9S5WeXtISLFpWt_i4CcajhhpF4YtGzH2FH1IUxqxpzUesQv7Hofxkpw1rkt49duXZPP4sFk_s9e3p5f1_SvzEsqRGeekW6EwXFe5RC0rqFUBUmiOugJuykZW0usajEevV6bk3hUavGqMqeSS3Myx-xg-D5hGuwuHOOSLVqxK0FIJKLJKzKr8V0oRG7uPbe_iZIHbb3p2pmczPftDz07ZJGdTyuJhi_Ev-h_XF1PNc7c</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Oliver, Erin E.</creator><creator>Houlton, Benjamin Z.</creator><creator>Lipson, David A.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-1539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-0261</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-2538</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Controls on soil microbial carbon use efficiency over long-term ecosystem development</title><author>Oliver, Erin E. ; Houlton, Benjamin Z. ; Lipson, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-8aa3a4e2806b8062d3b1d5713260e6b1089f3b3c6d18cec64890ca761c5f88b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological succession</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Geological time</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrient availability</topic><topic>Nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil pH</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houlton, Benjamin Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipson, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oliver, Erin E.</au><au>Houlton, Benjamin Z.</au><au>Lipson, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Controls on soil microbial carbon use efficiency over long-term ecosystem development</atitle><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle><stitle>Biogeochemistry</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>2-3</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>309-325</pages><issn>0168-2563</issn><eissn>1573-515X</eissn><abstract>Carbon use efficiency—the proportion of substrate carbon that is converted to microbial biomass—is an important control on many ecosystem properties including carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling. Although CUE varies widely across terrestrial ecosystems, a coherent understanding of edaphic controls on CUE is lacking, thereby limiting the accuracy of global carbon models. The objective of this study was to determine how microbial CUE changes with long-term soil development and nutrient availability. Soil was collected across the chronosequence and fertility gradient at Jug Handle State Natural Reserve (the “Ecological Staircase”) in Mendocino County, CA. These soils exhibit a range in pH (3.29–6.59), litter quantity and quality (litter C:N, 32–70), and clay content (14.13–87.30%), while other factors such as modern-day climate, potential biota, and parent material are common to all sites. CUE varied significantly with soil and ecosystem development; the relationship was unimodal over geological time with CUE peaking at intermediate aged soils. Soil organic matter (SOM) content and pH were the most important variables each accounting for 30% of the variation in CUE across sites. Soil pH had a quadratic relationship with CUE, peaking at pH 4.7. Litter carbon to phosphorus (C:P) and nitrogen to phosphorus (N:P) ratios were also significant factors (Pearson’s r = 0.57 and 0.39 respectively). These results demonstrate that CUE changes in complex ways with soil fertility and long-term ecosystem development, and that edaphic factors such as SOM, pH, and litter quality need to be taken into account when predicting CUE for a given system.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10533-021-00758-y</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-1539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-0261</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-2538</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-2563
ispartof Biogeochemistry, 2021-02, Vol.152 (2-3), p.309-325
issn 0168-2563
1573-515X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2491635217
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Biogeosciences
Biota
Carbon
Carbon cycle
Carbon sequestration
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Ecological succession
Ecosystems
Environmental Chemistry
Fertility
Geological time
Life Sciences
Litter
Microorganisms
Mineral nutrients
Model accuracy
Nitrogen
Nutrient availability
Nutrient cycles
Organic matter
Organic soils
pH effects
Phosphorus
Soil
Soil chemistry
Soil fertility
Soil microorganisms
Soil organic matter
Soil pH
Soils
Substrates
Terrestrial ecosystems
title Controls on soil microbial carbon use efficiency over long-term ecosystem development
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Controls%20on%20soil%20microbial%20carbon%20use%20efficiency%20over%20long-term%20ecosystem%20development&rft.jtitle=Biogeochemistry&rft.au=Oliver,%20Erin%20E.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=2-3&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=309-325&rft.issn=0168-2563&rft.eissn=1573-515X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10533-021-00758-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2491635217%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491635217&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true