Measuring proboscis length in Lepidoptera: a review
Mouthpart morphologies relate to diet range. Differences among or within species may result in resource partitioning and speciation. In plant-pollinator interactions, mouthpart length has an important role in foraging efficiency, resource partitioning and pollination, hence measuring nectarivorous i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zoomorphology 2021-03, Vol.140 (1), p.1-15 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 15 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Zoomorphology |
container_volume | 140 |
creator | Vajna, Flóra Kis, János Szigeti, Viktor |
description | Mouthpart morphologies relate to diet range. Differences among or within species may result in resource partitioning and speciation. In plant-pollinator interactions, mouthpart length has an important role in foraging efficiency, resource partitioning and pollination, hence measuring nectarivorous insect mouthparts’ morphological variation is important. Most adult lepidopterans feed on nectars and participate in pollination. Although a vast range of studies applied morphometric measurements on lepidopteran proboscis (tongue) length, general recommendations on methodologies are scarce. We review available proboscis length measurement methodologies for Lepidoptera. Focusing on how proboscides have been measured, how accurate the measurements were, and how were these constrained by sampling effort, we searched for research articles investigating lepidopteran proboscis length and extracted variables on the aims of measurements, preparation and measurement methodology, and descriptive statistics. Different methods were used both for preparation and measurements. Many of the 135 reviewed papers did not provide descriptions of the procedures applied. Research aims were different among studies. Forty-four percent of the studies measured dead specimens, 13% measured living specimens, and 43% were unclear. Fifteen percent of the studies used callipers, 9% rulers, 1% millimetre scales, 4% ocular micrometers, 3% drawings and 14% photographs; 55% were non-informative. We emphasise the importance to provide detailed descriptions on the methods applied. Providing guidelines for future sampling and measurements, we encourage fellow researchers planning measurements to take into account the effect of specimen preparation techniques on the results, define landmarks, consider resolution, accuracy, precision, choose an appropriate sample size and report details on methodology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00435-020-00507-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2491634717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491634717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-3f2c57e9735465b3032117227253116cf8641ef673117e586670ab7882adefff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWD_-gKcFz9FJJh9bb1L8gooXhd5Cup3ULXV3TbaK_fWmruDN0zDM-74z8zB2JuBCANjLBKBQc5DAATRYvt1jI6FQcolqts9GYPNICpwdsqOUVgBCGYUjho_k0ybWzbLoYjtvU1WnYk3Nsn8t6qaYUlcv2q6n6K8KX0T6qOnzhB0Ev050-luP2cvtzfPknk-f7h4m11NeocGeY5CVtjS2qJXRcwSUQlgprdQohKlCaZSgYGzuLOnSGAt-bstS-gWFEPCYnQ-5-bL3DaXerdpNbPJKJ9VYGFRW2KySg6qKbUqRguti_ebjlxPgdnDcAMdlOO4HjttmEw6m1O1-p_gX_Y_rG-y-ZaY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491634717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring proboscis length in Lepidoptera: a review</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Vajna, Flóra ; Kis, János ; Szigeti, Viktor</creator><creatorcontrib>Vajna, Flóra ; Kis, János ; Szigeti, Viktor</creatorcontrib><description>Mouthpart morphologies relate to diet range. Differences among or within species may result in resource partitioning and speciation. In plant-pollinator interactions, mouthpart length has an important role in foraging efficiency, resource partitioning and pollination, hence measuring nectarivorous insect mouthparts’ morphological variation is important. Most adult lepidopterans feed on nectars and participate in pollination. Although a vast range of studies applied morphometric measurements on lepidopteran proboscis (tongue) length, general recommendations on methodologies are scarce. We review available proboscis length measurement methodologies for Lepidoptera. Focusing on how proboscides have been measured, how accurate the measurements were, and how were these constrained by sampling effort, we searched for research articles investigating lepidopteran proboscis length and extracted variables on the aims of measurements, preparation and measurement methodology, and descriptive statistics. Different methods were used both for preparation and measurements. Many of the 135 reviewed papers did not provide descriptions of the procedures applied. Research aims were different among studies. Forty-four percent of the studies measured dead specimens, 13% measured living specimens, and 43% were unclear. Fifteen percent of the studies used callipers, 9% rulers, 1% millimetre scales, 4% ocular micrometers, 3% drawings and 14% photographs; 55% were non-informative. We emphasise the importance to provide detailed descriptions on the methods applied. Providing guidelines for future sampling and measurements, we encourage fellow researchers planning measurements to take into account the effect of specimen preparation techniques on the results, define landmarks, consider resolution, accuracy, precision, choose an appropriate sample size and report details on methodology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-213X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-234X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00435-020-00507-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal Anatomy ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Developmental Biology ; Evolutionary Biology ; Foraging ; Histology ; Length ; Lepidoptera ; Life Sciences ; Measurement ; Morphology ; Morphometry ; Mouth ; Mouthparts ; Plant reproduction ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Proboscis ; Resource partitioning ; Review ; Sampling ; Speciation ; Specimen preparation ; Statistical methods</subject><ispartof>Zoomorphology, 2021-03, Vol.140 (1), p.1-15</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-3f2c57e9735465b3032117227253116cf8641ef673117e586670ab7882adefff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-3f2c57e9735465b3032117227253116cf8641ef673117e586670ab7882adefff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6435-9341 ; 0000-0001-9354-1292 ; 0000-0003-4451-855X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00435-020-00507-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00435-020-00507-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vajna, Flóra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kis, János</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szigeti, Viktor</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring proboscis length in Lepidoptera: a review</title><title>Zoomorphology</title><addtitle>Zoomorphology</addtitle><description>Mouthpart morphologies relate to diet range. Differences among or within species may result in resource partitioning and speciation. In plant-pollinator interactions, mouthpart length has an important role in foraging efficiency, resource partitioning and pollination, hence measuring nectarivorous insect mouthparts’ morphological variation is important. Most adult lepidopterans feed on nectars and participate in pollination. Although a vast range of studies applied morphometric measurements on lepidopteran proboscis (tongue) length, general recommendations on methodologies are scarce. We review available proboscis length measurement methodologies for Lepidoptera. Focusing on how proboscides have been measured, how accurate the measurements were, and how were these constrained by sampling effort, we searched for research articles investigating lepidopteran proboscis length and extracted variables on the aims of measurements, preparation and measurement methodology, and descriptive statistics. Different methods were used both for preparation and measurements. Many of the 135 reviewed papers did not provide descriptions of the procedures applied. Research aims were different among studies. Forty-four percent of the studies measured dead specimens, 13% measured living specimens, and 43% were unclear. Fifteen percent of the studies used callipers, 9% rulers, 1% millimetre scales, 4% ocular micrometers, 3% drawings and 14% photographs; 55% were non-informative. We emphasise the importance to provide detailed descriptions on the methods applied. Providing guidelines for future sampling and measurements, we encourage fellow researchers planning measurements to take into account the effect of specimen preparation techniques on the results, define landmarks, consider resolution, accuracy, precision, choose an appropriate sample size and report details on methodology.</description><subject>Animal Anatomy</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Length</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Morphometry</subject><subject>Mouth</subject><subject>Mouthparts</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Proboscis</subject><subject>Resource partitioning</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>Specimen preparation</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><issn>0720-213X</issn><issn>1432-234X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWD_-gKcFz9FJJh9bb1L8gooXhd5Cup3ULXV3TbaK_fWmruDN0zDM-74z8zB2JuBCANjLBKBQc5DAATRYvt1jI6FQcolqts9GYPNICpwdsqOUVgBCGYUjho_k0ybWzbLoYjtvU1WnYk3Nsn8t6qaYUlcv2q6n6K8KX0T6qOnzhB0Ev050-luP2cvtzfPknk-f7h4m11NeocGeY5CVtjS2qJXRcwSUQlgprdQohKlCaZSgYGzuLOnSGAt-bstS-gWFEPCYnQ-5-bL3DaXerdpNbPJKJ9VYGFRW2KySg6qKbUqRguti_ebjlxPgdnDcAMdlOO4HjttmEw6m1O1-p_gX_Y_rG-y-ZaY</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Vajna, Flóra</creator><creator>Kis, János</creator><creator>Szigeti, Viktor</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6435-9341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9354-1292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4451-855X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Measuring proboscis length in Lepidoptera: a review</title><author>Vajna, Flóra ; Kis, János ; Szigeti, Viktor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-3f2c57e9735465b3032117227253116cf8641ef673117e586670ab7882adefff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animal Anatomy</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Length</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Morphometry</topic><topic>Mouth</topic><topic>Mouthparts</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Proboscis</topic><topic>Resource partitioning</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>Specimen preparation</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vajna, Flóra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kis, János</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szigeti, Viktor</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Zoomorphology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vajna, Flóra</au><au>Kis, János</au><au>Szigeti, Viktor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring proboscis length in Lepidoptera: a review</atitle><jtitle>Zoomorphology</jtitle><stitle>Zoomorphology</stitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>140</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>0720-213X</issn><eissn>1432-234X</eissn><abstract>Mouthpart morphologies relate to diet range. Differences among or within species may result in resource partitioning and speciation. In plant-pollinator interactions, mouthpart length has an important role in foraging efficiency, resource partitioning and pollination, hence measuring nectarivorous insect mouthparts’ morphological variation is important. Most adult lepidopterans feed on nectars and participate in pollination. Although a vast range of studies applied morphometric measurements on lepidopteran proboscis (tongue) length, general recommendations on methodologies are scarce. We review available proboscis length measurement methodologies for Lepidoptera. Focusing on how proboscides have been measured, how accurate the measurements were, and how were these constrained by sampling effort, we searched for research articles investigating lepidopteran proboscis length and extracted variables on the aims of measurements, preparation and measurement methodology, and descriptive statistics. Different methods were used both for preparation and measurements. Many of the 135 reviewed papers did not provide descriptions of the procedures applied. Research aims were different among studies. Forty-four percent of the studies measured dead specimens, 13% measured living specimens, and 43% were unclear. Fifteen percent of the studies used callipers, 9% rulers, 1% millimetre scales, 4% ocular micrometers, 3% drawings and 14% photographs; 55% were non-informative. We emphasise the importance to provide detailed descriptions on the methods applied. Providing guidelines for future sampling and measurements, we encourage fellow researchers planning measurements to take into account the effect of specimen preparation techniques on the results, define landmarks, consider resolution, accuracy, precision, choose an appropriate sample size and report details on methodology.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00435-020-00507-z</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6435-9341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9354-1292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4451-855X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-213X |
ispartof | Zoomorphology, 2021-03, Vol.140 (1), p.1-15 |
issn | 0720-213X 1432-234X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2491634717 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Animal Anatomy Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Biomedical and Life Sciences Developmental Biology Evolutionary Biology Foraging Histology Length Lepidoptera Life Sciences Measurement Morphology Morphometry Mouth Mouthparts Plant reproduction Pollination Pollinators Proboscis Resource partitioning Review Sampling Speciation Specimen preparation Statistical methods |
title | Measuring proboscis length in Lepidoptera: a review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A53%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20proboscis%20length%20in%20Lepidoptera:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Zoomorphology&rft.au=Vajna,%20Fl%C3%B3ra&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=140&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=0720-213X&rft.eissn=1432-234X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00435-020-00507-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2491634717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491634717&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |