Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation
Introduction Patient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Drug safety 2019-11, Vol.42 (11), p.1343-1351 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1351 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1343 |
container_title | Drug safety |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | McGettigan, Patricia Olmo, Carla Alonso Plueschke, Kelly Castillon, Mireia Zondag, Daniel Nogueras Bahri, Priya Kurz, Xavier Mol, Peter G M |
description | Introduction Patient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-making, especially for products to treat rare diseases. Nevertheless, patient registries are greatly underused in regulatory assessments. Reasons include heterogeneity in registry design and in the data collected, even across registries for the same disease, as well as unreliable data quality and data sharing impediments. The Patient Registries Initiative was established by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to support registries in collecting data suitable to contribute to regulatory assessments, especially post-authorisation safety and effectiveness studies. Methods We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the published observations and recommendations from an initiativeled multi-stakeholder consultation and four disease-specific patient registry workshops. We identified the primary factors facilitating the use of registry data in regulatory assessments. We generated proposals on operational measures needed from stakeholders including registry holders, patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, marketing authorisation applicants and holders, and health technology assessment bodies for implementing these. Results Ten factors were identified as facilitating registry use for supporting regulatory assessments of medicinal products. Proposals on operational measures needed for implementation were categorised according to three themes: (1) nature of the data collected and registry quality assurance processes; (2) registry governance, informed consent, data protection and sharing; and (3) stakeholder communication and planning of benefit-risk assessments. Conclusions These are the first explicit proposals, from a regulatory perspective, on operational methods for increasing the use of patient registries in medicines regulation. They apply to registry holders, patients, regulators, marketing authorisation holders/applicants and healthcare stakeholders broadly, and their implementation would greatly facilitate the use of these valuable data sources in regulatory decision-making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40264-019-00848-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2491615787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491615787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1219-c1c65ac7c4946366814155f2e4c91358f626eeee0873756532d1cba36599ebe53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj09LAzEQxYMouFa_gKeA52gmfyaJt1paFVoqYs9lm52VLSWrm10_vwGdyxze-817w9gtyHuQ0j1kIxUaISEIKb3xIpyxCsAFAcGoc1ZJACNsALxkVzkfZXEp9BV7eqvHjtLI3-mzy-PQUX7k88R3qaFhytQUIffTEIm3_cA31HSxS5T58qc-TYXt0zW7aOtTppv_PWO71fJj8SLW2-fXxXwtIqjSK0JEW0cXTTCoET0YsLZVZGIAbX2LCqmM9E47i1arBuKh1mhDoANZPWN3f3e_hv57ojzuj6VYKpF7ZcpnYF1BfwGzoEtb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491615787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>McGettigan, Patricia ; Olmo, Carla Alonso ; Plueschke, Kelly ; Castillon, Mireia ; Zondag, Daniel Nogueras ; Bahri, Priya ; Kurz, Xavier ; Mol, Peter G M</creator><creatorcontrib>McGettigan, Patricia ; Olmo, Carla Alonso ; Plueschke, Kelly ; Castillon, Mireia ; Zondag, Daniel Nogueras ; Bahri, Priya ; Kurz, Xavier ; Mol, Peter G M</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Patient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-making, especially for products to treat rare diseases. Nevertheless, patient registries are greatly underused in regulatory assessments. Reasons include heterogeneity in registry design and in the data collected, even across registries for the same disease, as well as unreliable data quality and data sharing impediments. The Patient Registries Initiative was established by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to support registries in collecting data suitable to contribute to regulatory assessments, especially post-authorisation safety and effectiveness studies. Methods We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the published observations and recommendations from an initiativeled multi-stakeholder consultation and four disease-specific patient registry workshops. We identified the primary factors facilitating the use of registry data in regulatory assessments. We generated proposals on operational measures needed from stakeholders including registry holders, patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, marketing authorisation applicants and holders, and health technology assessment bodies for implementing these. Results Ten factors were identified as facilitating registry use for supporting regulatory assessments of medicinal products. Proposals on operational measures needed for implementation were categorised according to three themes: (1) nature of the data collected and registry quality assurance processes; (2) registry governance, informed consent, data protection and sharing; and (3) stakeholder communication and planning of benefit-risk assessments. Conclusions These are the first explicit proposals, from a regulatory perspective, on operational methods for increasing the use of patient registries in medicines regulation. They apply to registry holders, patients, regulators, marketing authorisation holders/applicants and healthcare stakeholders broadly, and their implementation would greatly facilitate the use of these valuable data sources in regulatory decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0114-5916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1942</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00848-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Auckland: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Communication ; Data collection ; Data retrieval ; Decision making ; Disease ; Effectiveness studies ; Health care ; Hemophilia ; Heterogeneity ; Information sharing ; Informed consent ; Marketing ; Medicine ; Patients ; Professional ethics ; Proposals ; Quality assurance ; Quality control ; Rare diseases ; Regulation ; Regulators ; Reimbursement ; Risk assessment ; Stakeholders ; Technology assessment ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Drug safety, 2019-11, Vol.42 (11), p.1343-1351</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Nov 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1219-c1c65ac7c4946366814155f2e4c91358f626eeee0873756532d1cba36599ebe53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGettigan, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmo, Carla Alonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plueschke, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillon, Mireia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zondag, Daniel Nogueras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahri, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, Peter G M</creatorcontrib><title>Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation</title><title>Drug safety</title><description>Introduction Patient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-making, especially for products to treat rare diseases. Nevertheless, patient registries are greatly underused in regulatory assessments. Reasons include heterogeneity in registry design and in the data collected, even across registries for the same disease, as well as unreliable data quality and data sharing impediments. The Patient Registries Initiative was established by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to support registries in collecting data suitable to contribute to regulatory assessments, especially post-authorisation safety and effectiveness studies. Methods We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the published observations and recommendations from an initiativeled multi-stakeholder consultation and four disease-specific patient registry workshops. We identified the primary factors facilitating the use of registry data in regulatory assessments. We generated proposals on operational measures needed from stakeholders including registry holders, patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, marketing authorisation applicants and holders, and health technology assessment bodies for implementing these. Results Ten factors were identified as facilitating registry use for supporting regulatory assessments of medicinal products. Proposals on operational measures needed for implementation were categorised according to three themes: (1) nature of the data collected and registry quality assurance processes; (2) registry governance, informed consent, data protection and sharing; and (3) stakeholder communication and planning of benefit-risk assessments. Conclusions These are the first explicit proposals, from a regulatory perspective, on operational methods for increasing the use of patient registries in medicines regulation. They apply to registry holders, patients, regulators, marketing authorisation holders/applicants and healthcare stakeholders broadly, and their implementation would greatly facilitate the use of these valuable data sources in regulatory decision-making.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data retrieval</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hemophilia</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Rare diseases</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulators</subject><subject>Reimbursement</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>0114-5916</issn><issn>1179-1942</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNotj09LAzEQxYMouFa_gKeA52gmfyaJt1paFVoqYs9lm52VLSWrm10_vwGdyxze-817w9gtyHuQ0j1kIxUaISEIKb3xIpyxCsAFAcGoc1ZJACNsALxkVzkfZXEp9BV7eqvHjtLI3-mzy-PQUX7k88R3qaFhytQUIffTEIm3_cA31HSxS5T58qc-TYXt0zW7aOtTppv_PWO71fJj8SLW2-fXxXwtIqjSK0JEW0cXTTCoET0YsLZVZGIAbX2LCqmM9E47i1arBuKh1mhDoANZPWN3f3e_hv57ojzuj6VYKpF7ZcpnYF1BfwGzoEtb</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>McGettigan, Patricia</creator><creator>Olmo, Carla Alonso</creator><creator>Plueschke, Kelly</creator><creator>Castillon, Mireia</creator><creator>Zondag, Daniel Nogueras</creator><creator>Bahri, Priya</creator><creator>Kurz, Xavier</creator><creator>Mol, Peter G M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation</title><author>McGettigan, Patricia ; Olmo, Carla Alonso ; Plueschke, Kelly ; Castillon, Mireia ; Zondag, Daniel Nogueras ; Bahri, Priya ; Kurz, Xavier ; Mol, Peter G M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1219-c1c65ac7c4946366814155f2e4c91358f626eeee0873756532d1cba36599ebe53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data retrieval</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hemophilia</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Rare diseases</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulators</topic><topic>Reimbursement</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGettigan, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmo, Carla Alonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plueschke, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillon, Mireia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zondag, Daniel Nogueras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahri, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, Peter G M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Drug safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGettigan, Patricia</au><au>Olmo, Carla Alonso</au><au>Plueschke, Kelly</au><au>Castillon, Mireia</au><au>Zondag, Daniel Nogueras</au><au>Bahri, Priya</au><au>Kurz, Xavier</au><au>Mol, Peter G M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Drug safety</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1343</spage><epage>1351</epage><pages>1343-1351</pages><issn>0114-5916</issn><eissn>1179-1942</eissn><abstract>Introduction Patient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-making, especially for products to treat rare diseases. Nevertheless, patient registries are greatly underused in regulatory assessments. Reasons include heterogeneity in registry design and in the data collected, even across registries for the same disease, as well as unreliable data quality and data sharing impediments. The Patient Registries Initiative was established by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to support registries in collecting data suitable to contribute to regulatory assessments, especially post-authorisation safety and effectiveness studies. Methods We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the published observations and recommendations from an initiativeled multi-stakeholder consultation and four disease-specific patient registry workshops. We identified the primary factors facilitating the use of registry data in regulatory assessments. We generated proposals on operational measures needed from stakeholders including registry holders, patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, marketing authorisation applicants and holders, and health technology assessment bodies for implementing these. Results Ten factors were identified as facilitating registry use for supporting regulatory assessments of medicinal products. Proposals on operational measures needed for implementation were categorised according to three themes: (1) nature of the data collected and registry quality assurance processes; (2) registry governance, informed consent, data protection and sharing; and (3) stakeholder communication and planning of benefit-risk assessments. Conclusions These are the first explicit proposals, from a regulatory perspective, on operational methods for increasing the use of patient registries in medicines regulation. They apply to registry holders, patients, regulators, marketing authorisation holders/applicants and healthcare stakeholders broadly, and their implementation would greatly facilitate the use of these valuable data sources in regulatory decision-making.</abstract><cop>Auckland</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s40264-019-00848-9</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0114-5916 |
ispartof | Drug safety, 2019-11, Vol.42 (11), p.1343-1351 |
issn | 0114-5916 1179-1942 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2491615787 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Collaboration Communication Data collection Data retrieval Decision making Disease Effectiveness studies Health care Hemophilia Heterogeneity Information sharing Informed consent Marketing Medicine Patients Professional ethics Proposals Quality assurance Quality control Rare diseases Regulation Regulators Reimbursement Risk assessment Stakeholders Technology assessment Workshops |
title | Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T06%3A48%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20Registries:%20An%20Underused%20Resource%20for%20Medicines%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Drug%20safety&rft.au=McGettigan,%20Patricia&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1343&rft.epage=1351&rft.pages=1343-1351&rft.issn=0114-5916&rft.eissn=1179-1942&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40264-019-00848-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2491615787%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491615787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |