Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation

Introduction Patient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug safety 2019-11, Vol.42 (11), p.1343-1351
Hauptverfasser: McGettigan, Patricia, Olmo, Carla Alonso, Plueschke, Kelly, Castillon, Mireia, Zondag, Daniel Nogueras, Bahri, Priya, Kurz, Xavier, Mol, Peter G M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1351
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1343
container_title Drug safety
container_volume 42
creator McGettigan, Patricia
Olmo, Carla Alonso
Plueschke, Kelly
Castillon, Mireia
Zondag, Daniel Nogueras
Bahri, Priya
Kurz, Xavier
Mol, Peter G M
description Introduction Patient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-making, especially for products to treat rare diseases. Nevertheless, patient registries are greatly underused in regulatory assessments. Reasons include heterogeneity in registry design and in the data collected, even across registries for the same disease, as well as unreliable data quality and data sharing impediments. The Patient Registries Initiative was established by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to support registries in collecting data suitable to contribute to regulatory assessments, especially post-authorisation safety and effectiveness studies. Methods We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the published observations and recommendations from an initiativeled multi-stakeholder consultation and four disease-specific patient registry workshops. We identified the primary factors facilitating the use of registry data in regulatory assessments. We generated proposals on operational measures needed from stakeholders including registry holders, patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, marketing authorisation applicants and holders, and health technology assessment bodies for implementing these. Results Ten factors were identified as facilitating registry use for supporting regulatory assessments of medicinal products. Proposals on operational measures needed for implementation were categorised according to three themes: (1) nature of the data collected and registry quality assurance processes; (2) registry governance, informed consent, data protection and sharing; and (3) stakeholder communication and planning of benefit-risk assessments. Conclusions These are the first explicit proposals, from a regulatory perspective, on operational methods for increasing the use of patient registries in medicines regulation. They apply to registry holders, patients, regulators, marketing authorisation holders/applicants and healthcare stakeholders broadly, and their implementation would greatly facilitate the use of these valuable data sources in regulatory decision-making.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40264-019-00848-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2491615787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491615787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1219-c1c65ac7c4946366814155f2e4c91358f626eeee0873756532d1cba36599ebe53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj09LAzEQxYMouFa_gKeA52gmfyaJt1paFVoqYs9lm52VLSWrm10_vwGdyxze-817w9gtyHuQ0j1kIxUaISEIKb3xIpyxCsAFAcGoc1ZJACNsALxkVzkfZXEp9BV7eqvHjtLI3-mzy-PQUX7k88R3qaFhytQUIffTEIm3_cA31HSxS5T58qc-TYXt0zW7aOtTppv_PWO71fJj8SLW2-fXxXwtIqjSK0JEW0cXTTCoET0YsLZVZGIAbX2LCqmM9E47i1arBuKh1mhDoANZPWN3f3e_hv57ojzuj6VYKpF7ZcpnYF1BfwGzoEtb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491615787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>McGettigan, Patricia ; Olmo, Carla Alonso ; Plueschke, Kelly ; Castillon, Mireia ; Zondag, Daniel Nogueras ; Bahri, Priya ; Kurz, Xavier ; Mol, Peter G M</creator><creatorcontrib>McGettigan, Patricia ; Olmo, Carla Alonso ; Plueschke, Kelly ; Castillon, Mireia ; Zondag, Daniel Nogueras ; Bahri, Priya ; Kurz, Xavier ; Mol, Peter G M</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Patient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-making, especially for products to treat rare diseases. Nevertheless, patient registries are greatly underused in regulatory assessments. Reasons include heterogeneity in registry design and in the data collected, even across registries for the same disease, as well as unreliable data quality and data sharing impediments. The Patient Registries Initiative was established by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to support registries in collecting data suitable to contribute to regulatory assessments, especially post-authorisation safety and effectiveness studies. Methods We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the published observations and recommendations from an initiativeled multi-stakeholder consultation and four disease-specific patient registry workshops. We identified the primary factors facilitating the use of registry data in regulatory assessments. We generated proposals on operational measures needed from stakeholders including registry holders, patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, marketing authorisation applicants and holders, and health technology assessment bodies for implementing these. Results Ten factors were identified as facilitating registry use for supporting regulatory assessments of medicinal products. Proposals on operational measures needed for implementation were categorised according to three themes: (1) nature of the data collected and registry quality assurance processes; (2) registry governance, informed consent, data protection and sharing; and (3) stakeholder communication and planning of benefit-risk assessments. Conclusions These are the first explicit proposals, from a regulatory perspective, on operational methods for increasing the use of patient registries in medicines regulation. They apply to registry holders, patients, regulators, marketing authorisation holders/applicants and healthcare stakeholders broadly, and their implementation would greatly facilitate the use of these valuable data sources in regulatory decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0114-5916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1942</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40264-019-00848-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Auckland: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Communication ; Data collection ; Data retrieval ; Decision making ; Disease ; Effectiveness studies ; Health care ; Hemophilia ; Heterogeneity ; Information sharing ; Informed consent ; Marketing ; Medicine ; Patients ; Professional ethics ; Proposals ; Quality assurance ; Quality control ; Rare diseases ; Regulation ; Regulators ; Reimbursement ; Risk assessment ; Stakeholders ; Technology assessment ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Drug safety, 2019-11, Vol.42 (11), p.1343-1351</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Nov 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1219-c1c65ac7c4946366814155f2e4c91358f626eeee0873756532d1cba36599ebe53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGettigan, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmo, Carla Alonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plueschke, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillon, Mireia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zondag, Daniel Nogueras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahri, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, Peter G M</creatorcontrib><title>Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation</title><title>Drug safety</title><description>Introduction Patient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-making, especially for products to treat rare diseases. Nevertheless, patient registries are greatly underused in regulatory assessments. Reasons include heterogeneity in registry design and in the data collected, even across registries for the same disease, as well as unreliable data quality and data sharing impediments. The Patient Registries Initiative was established by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to support registries in collecting data suitable to contribute to regulatory assessments, especially post-authorisation safety and effectiveness studies. Methods We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the published observations and recommendations from an initiativeled multi-stakeholder consultation and four disease-specific patient registry workshops. We identified the primary factors facilitating the use of registry data in regulatory assessments. We generated proposals on operational measures needed from stakeholders including registry holders, patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, marketing authorisation applicants and holders, and health technology assessment bodies for implementing these. Results Ten factors were identified as facilitating registry use for supporting regulatory assessments of medicinal products. Proposals on operational measures needed for implementation were categorised according to three themes: (1) nature of the data collected and registry quality assurance processes; (2) registry governance, informed consent, data protection and sharing; and (3) stakeholder communication and planning of benefit-risk assessments. Conclusions These are the first explicit proposals, from a regulatory perspective, on operational methods for increasing the use of patient registries in medicines regulation. They apply to registry holders, patients, regulators, marketing authorisation holders/applicants and healthcare stakeholders broadly, and their implementation would greatly facilitate the use of these valuable data sources in regulatory decision-making.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data retrieval</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hemophilia</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Rare diseases</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulators</subject><subject>Reimbursement</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>0114-5916</issn><issn>1179-1942</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNotj09LAzEQxYMouFa_gKeA52gmfyaJt1paFVoqYs9lm52VLSWrm10_vwGdyxze-817w9gtyHuQ0j1kIxUaISEIKb3xIpyxCsAFAcGoc1ZJACNsALxkVzkfZXEp9BV7eqvHjtLI3-mzy-PQUX7k88R3qaFhytQUIffTEIm3_cA31HSxS5T58qc-TYXt0zW7aOtTppv_PWO71fJj8SLW2-fXxXwtIqjSK0JEW0cXTTCoET0YsLZVZGIAbX2LCqmM9E47i1arBuKh1mhDoANZPWN3f3e_hv57ojzuj6VYKpF7ZcpnYF1BfwGzoEtb</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>McGettigan, Patricia</creator><creator>Olmo, Carla Alonso</creator><creator>Plueschke, Kelly</creator><creator>Castillon, Mireia</creator><creator>Zondag, Daniel Nogueras</creator><creator>Bahri, Priya</creator><creator>Kurz, Xavier</creator><creator>Mol, Peter G M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation</title><author>McGettigan, Patricia ; Olmo, Carla Alonso ; Plueschke, Kelly ; Castillon, Mireia ; Zondag, Daniel Nogueras ; Bahri, Priya ; Kurz, Xavier ; Mol, Peter G M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1219-c1c65ac7c4946366814155f2e4c91358f626eeee0873756532d1cba36599ebe53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data retrieval</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hemophilia</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Rare diseases</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulators</topic><topic>Reimbursement</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGettigan, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmo, Carla Alonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plueschke, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillon, Mireia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zondag, Daniel Nogueras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahri, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, Peter G M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Drug safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGettigan, Patricia</au><au>Olmo, Carla Alonso</au><au>Plueschke, Kelly</au><au>Castillon, Mireia</au><au>Zondag, Daniel Nogueras</au><au>Bahri, Priya</au><au>Kurz, Xavier</au><au>Mol, Peter G M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Drug safety</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1343</spage><epage>1351</epage><pages>1343-1351</pages><issn>0114-5916</issn><eissn>1179-1942</eissn><abstract>Introduction Patient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-making, especially for products to treat rare diseases. Nevertheless, patient registries are greatly underused in regulatory assessments. Reasons include heterogeneity in registry design and in the data collected, even across registries for the same disease, as well as unreliable data quality and data sharing impediments. The Patient Registries Initiative was established by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to support registries in collecting data suitable to contribute to regulatory assessments, especially post-authorisation safety and effectiveness studies. Methods We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the published observations and recommendations from an initiativeled multi-stakeholder consultation and four disease-specific patient registry workshops. We identified the primary factors facilitating the use of registry data in regulatory assessments. We generated proposals on operational measures needed from stakeholders including registry holders, patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, marketing authorisation applicants and holders, and health technology assessment bodies for implementing these. Results Ten factors were identified as facilitating registry use for supporting regulatory assessments of medicinal products. Proposals on operational measures needed for implementation were categorised according to three themes: (1) nature of the data collected and registry quality assurance processes; (2) registry governance, informed consent, data protection and sharing; and (3) stakeholder communication and planning of benefit-risk assessments. Conclusions These are the first explicit proposals, from a regulatory perspective, on operational methods for increasing the use of patient registries in medicines regulation. They apply to registry holders, patients, regulators, marketing authorisation holders/applicants and healthcare stakeholders broadly, and their implementation would greatly facilitate the use of these valuable data sources in regulatory decision-making.</abstract><cop>Auckland</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s40264-019-00848-9</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0114-5916
ispartof Drug safety, 2019-11, Vol.42 (11), p.1343-1351
issn 0114-5916
1179-1942
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2491615787
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Collaboration
Communication
Data collection
Data retrieval
Decision making
Disease
Effectiveness studies
Health care
Hemophilia
Heterogeneity
Information sharing
Informed consent
Marketing
Medicine
Patients
Professional ethics
Proposals
Quality assurance
Quality control
Rare diseases
Regulation
Regulators
Reimbursement
Risk assessment
Stakeholders
Technology assessment
Workshops
title Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T06%3A48%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20Registries:%20An%20Underused%20Resource%20for%20Medicines%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Drug%20safety&rft.au=McGettigan,%20Patricia&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1343&rft.epage=1351&rft.pages=1343-1351&rft.issn=0114-5916&rft.eissn=1179-1942&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40264-019-00848-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2491615787%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491615787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true