Evaluating Mode Selection Methods for Component Mode Synthesis
Component mode synthesis is a popular reduced-order modeling technique with a substructuring strategy in structural dynamics. The ideal goal of component mode synthesis is to construct compact reduced models with adequate accuracy for specific intended applications. In this paper, five a priori mode...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIAA journal 2016-09, Vol.54 (9), p.2852-2863 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2863 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2852 |
container_title | AIAA journal |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Kim, Soo Min Kim, Jin-Gyun Chae, Soo-Won Park, K. C |
description | Component mode synthesis is a popular reduced-order modeling technique with a substructuring strategy in structural dynamics. The ideal goal of component mode synthesis is to construct compact reduced models with adequate accuracy for specific intended applications. In this paper, five a priori mode selection methods plus an a posteriori mode selection method have been evaluated as applied to several representative structural dynamics problems to assess their relative merits. The present evaluation offers a guideline for the informed use of these methods, and it is hoped that it will provide a basis for the further development and/or unification of several mode selection methods. Although there is no clear winner for all the problem classes studied, a slight edge of an a posteriori method over the a priori methods is demonstrated for a certain class of problems, provided the analyst is willing to allow extra computational overhead. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/1.J054936 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2491330413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491330413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a288t-43ef5ed1e50f4db24312a70d89071953f43af62d1735cb55ff734c67430117673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpl0M9LwzAUB_AgCtbqwf-gIAgeOvPykqa9CDLmLzY8qOAtZG3iOrpmJtlg_72VDTx4eY8HH74PvoRcAh0xAfwWRi9U8AqLI5KAQMyxFJ_HJKGUQg5csFNyFsJyuJgsISF3k63uNjq2_Vc2c43J3kxn6ti6PpuZuHBNyKzz2dit1q43fTygXR8XJrThnJxY3QVzcdgp-XiYvI-f8unr4_P4fpprVpYx52isMA0YQS1v5owjMC1pU1ZUQiXQctS2YA1IFPVcCGsl8rqQHCmALCSm5Gqfu_bue2NCVEu38f3wUjFeASLlw0jJzV7V3oXgjVVr36603ymg6rceBepQz2Cv91a3Wv-l_Yc_rdZgyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491330413</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Mode Selection Methods for Component Mode Synthesis</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kim, Soo Min ; Kim, Jin-Gyun ; Chae, Soo-Won ; Park, K. C</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Soo Min ; Kim, Jin-Gyun ; Chae, Soo-Won ; Park, K. C</creatorcontrib><description>Component mode synthesis is a popular reduced-order modeling technique with a substructuring strategy in structural dynamics. The ideal goal of component mode synthesis is to construct compact reduced models with adequate accuracy for specific intended applications. In this paper, five a priori mode selection methods plus an a posteriori mode selection method have been evaluated as applied to several representative structural dynamics problems to assess their relative merits. The present evaluation offers a guideline for the informed use of these methods, and it is hoped that it will provide a basis for the further development and/or unification of several mode selection methods. Although there is no clear winner for all the problem classes studied, a slight edge of an a posteriori method over the a priori methods is demonstrated for a certain class of problems, provided the analyst is willing to allow extra computational overhead.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J054936</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Component mode synthesis ; Dynamic structural analysis ; Evaluation ; Modal choice ; Model accuracy ; Reduced order models ; Substructures</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2016-09, Vol.54 (9), p.2852-2863</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. Copies of this paper may be made for personal and internal use, on condition that the copier pay the per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC). All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the ISSN (print) or (online) to initiate your request.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. Copies of this paper may be made for personal and internal use, on condition that the copier pay the per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC). All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0001-1452 (print) or 1533-385X (online) to initiate your request.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a288t-43ef5ed1e50f4db24312a70d89071953f43af62d1735cb55ff734c67430117673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a288t-43ef5ed1e50f4db24312a70d89071953f43af62d1735cb55ff734c67430117673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Soo Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin-Gyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Soo-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, K. C</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Mode Selection Methods for Component Mode Synthesis</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>Component mode synthesis is a popular reduced-order modeling technique with a substructuring strategy in structural dynamics. The ideal goal of component mode synthesis is to construct compact reduced models with adequate accuracy for specific intended applications. In this paper, five a priori mode selection methods plus an a posteriori mode selection method have been evaluated as applied to several representative structural dynamics problems to assess their relative merits. The present evaluation offers a guideline for the informed use of these methods, and it is hoped that it will provide a basis for the further development and/or unification of several mode selection methods. Although there is no clear winner for all the problem classes studied, a slight edge of an a posteriori method over the a priori methods is demonstrated for a certain class of problems, provided the analyst is willing to allow extra computational overhead.</description><subject>Component mode synthesis</subject><subject>Dynamic structural analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Modal choice</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Reduced order models</subject><subject>Substructures</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpl0M9LwzAUB_AgCtbqwf-gIAgeOvPykqa9CDLmLzY8qOAtZG3iOrpmJtlg_72VDTx4eY8HH74PvoRcAh0xAfwWRi9U8AqLI5KAQMyxFJ_HJKGUQg5csFNyFsJyuJgsISF3k63uNjq2_Vc2c43J3kxn6ti6PpuZuHBNyKzz2dit1q43fTygXR8XJrThnJxY3QVzcdgp-XiYvI-f8unr4_P4fpprVpYx52isMA0YQS1v5owjMC1pU1ZUQiXQctS2YA1IFPVcCGsl8rqQHCmALCSm5Gqfu_bue2NCVEu38f3wUjFeASLlw0jJzV7V3oXgjVVr36603ymg6rceBepQz2Cv91a3Wv-l_Yc_rdZgyA</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Kim, Soo Min</creator><creator>Kim, Jin-Gyun</creator><creator>Chae, Soo-Won</creator><creator>Park, K. C</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Evaluating Mode Selection Methods for Component Mode Synthesis</title><author>Kim, Soo Min ; Kim, Jin-Gyun ; Chae, Soo-Won ; Park, K. C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a288t-43ef5ed1e50f4db24312a70d89071953f43af62d1735cb55ff734c67430117673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Component mode synthesis</topic><topic>Dynamic structural analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Modal choice</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Reduced order models</topic><topic>Substructures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Soo Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin-Gyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Soo-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, K. C</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Soo Min</au><au>Kim, Jin-Gyun</au><au>Chae, Soo-Won</au><au>Park, K. C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Mode Selection Methods for Component Mode Synthesis</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2852</spage><epage>2863</epage><pages>2852-2863</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>Component mode synthesis is a popular reduced-order modeling technique with a substructuring strategy in structural dynamics. The ideal goal of component mode synthesis is to construct compact reduced models with adequate accuracy for specific intended applications. In this paper, five a priori mode selection methods plus an a posteriori mode selection method have been evaluated as applied to several representative structural dynamics problems to assess their relative merits. The present evaluation offers a guideline for the informed use of these methods, and it is hoped that it will provide a basis for the further development and/or unification of several mode selection methods. Although there is no clear winner for all the problem classes studied, a slight edge of an a posteriori method over the a priori methods is demonstrated for a certain class of problems, provided the analyst is willing to allow extra computational overhead.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J054936</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-1452 |
ispartof | AIAA journal, 2016-09, Vol.54 (9), p.2852-2863 |
issn | 0001-1452 1533-385X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2491330413 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Component mode synthesis Dynamic structural analysis Evaluation Modal choice Model accuracy Reduced order models Substructures |
title | Evaluating Mode Selection Methods for Component Mode Synthesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A50%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Mode%20Selection%20Methods%20for%20Component%20Mode%20Synthesis&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Kim,%20Soo%20Min&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2852&rft.epage=2863&rft.pages=2852-2863&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J054936&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2491330413%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491330413&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |