Optimization of an Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Underresolved Incompressible Flow Simulations
In engineering applications, resolution is often low. In these underresolved regions, the truncation error of the underlying numerical schemes strongly affects the solution. If the truncation error functions as a physically consistent subgrid-scale model (that is, it models the evolution of otherwis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIAA journal 2016-05, Vol.54 (5), p.1567-1577 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1577 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1567 |
container_title | AIAA journal |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Schranner, Felix S Rozov, Vladyslav Adams, Nikolaus A |
description | In engineering applications, resolution is often low. In these underresolved regions, the truncation error of the underlying numerical schemes strongly affects the solution. If the truncation error functions as a physically consistent subgrid-scale model (that is, it models the evolution of otherwise resolved scales), resolution may remain low. Thereby, computational efficiency is improved. The sixth-order adaptive central-upwind weighted essentially nonoscillatory scheme with implicit scale separation, denoted as WENO-CU6-M1, potentially allows for physically consistent implicit subgrid-scale modeling, when shaped accordingly. In this work, finding an optimal formulation of WENO-CU6-M1 is considered within a deterministic design optimization framework. Possible surrogate modeling and sampling strategies are considered. Design optimization is based on evaluating the potential of a WENO-CU6-M1 scheme formulation to reproduce Kolmogorov scaling for a Taylor–Green vortex in its quasi-isotropic state. As in the absence of physical viscosity, kinetic energy dissipates exclusively due to the subgrid-scales, the Reynolds number is infinite, and the evolution of the flow is determined by proper subgrid-scale modeling. To complete the work, the effective numerical dissipation rate of the WENO-CU6-M1 model optimized for artificially compressible fluid flows is quantified, and it is compared to the original one. Not only is the zero viscosity limit considered, but the model behavior is benchmarked offdesign, for low to high Reynolds numbers. A comparison to an alternative explicit and implicit subgrid-scale model demonstrates its superior behavior for the chosen test flow. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/1.J054741 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2491307505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4312859931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-2fdcc862ca3f17a4168c29544f9d1264eb2da9538468f9d99e4a87c81c99b2633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UtLxDAQB_AgCq6Pg98gIIgeumbyanKUxcfKigcVvJVsmmqWtqlJV1k_vZXdgyh4Gmb4zTDwR-gIyJgK4OcwviWC5xy20AgEYxlT4nkbjQghkAEXdBftpbQYOporGKHFfdf7xn-a3ocWhwqbFk-brvbW93hm4ovLLstyhR98s6zX6M71r6HEVYj4qS1djC6F-t2VeNra0HRDm_y8dviqDh8_9tIB2qlMndzhpu6jp6vLx8lNNru_nk4uZplhXPcZrUprlaTWsApyw0EqS7XgvNIlUMndnJZGC6a4VMNIa8eNyq0Cq_WcSsb20en6bhfD29Klvmh8sq6uTevCMhWgFAeQXOqBHv-ii7CM7fBdQbkGRnJBxH8KlJREMcXooM7WysaQUnRV0UXfmLgqgBTf2RRQbLIZ7MnaGm_Mj2t_4Bdkm4ve</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1866083832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of an Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Underresolved Incompressible Flow Simulations</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schranner, Felix S ; Rozov, Vladyslav ; Adams, Nikolaus A</creator><creatorcontrib>Schranner, Felix S ; Rozov, Vladyslav ; Adams, Nikolaus A</creatorcontrib><description>In engineering applications, resolution is often low. In these underresolved regions, the truncation error of the underlying numerical schemes strongly affects the solution. If the truncation error functions as a physically consistent subgrid-scale model (that is, it models the evolution of otherwise resolved scales), resolution may remain low. Thereby, computational efficiency is improved. The sixth-order adaptive central-upwind weighted essentially nonoscillatory scheme with implicit scale separation, denoted as WENO-CU6-M1, potentially allows for physically consistent implicit subgrid-scale modeling, when shaped accordingly. In this work, finding an optimal formulation of WENO-CU6-M1 is considered within a deterministic design optimization framework. Possible surrogate modeling and sampling strategies are considered. Design optimization is based on evaluating the potential of a WENO-CU6-M1 scheme formulation to reproduce Kolmogorov scaling for a Taylor–Green vortex in its quasi-isotropic state. As in the absence of physical viscosity, kinetic energy dissipates exclusively due to the subgrid-scales, the Reynolds number is infinite, and the evolution of the flow is determined by proper subgrid-scale modeling. To complete the work, the effective numerical dissipation rate of the WENO-CU6-M1 model optimized for artificially compressible fluid flows is quantified, and it is compared to the original one. Not only is the zero viscosity limit considered, but the model behavior is benchmarked offdesign, for low to high Reynolds numbers. A comparison to an alternative explicit and implicit subgrid-scale model demonstrates its superior behavior for the chosen test flow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J054741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Compressible fluids ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Design optimization ; Error functions ; Evolution ; Flow simulation ; Fluid flow ; High Reynolds number ; Incompressible flow ; Kinetic energy ; Large eddy simulation ; Mathematical models ; Numerical dissipation ; Optimization ; Reynolds number ; Scale models ; Simulation ; Truncation errors ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2016-05, Vol.54 (5), p.1567-1577</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 by F. S. Schranner, V. Rozov, and N. A. Adams, Institute of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Technische Universität München. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal and internal use, on condition that the copier pay the per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC). All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the ISSN (print) or (online) to initiate your request.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 by F. S. Schranner, V. Rozov, and N. A. Adams, Institute of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Technische Universität München. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal and internal use, on condition that the copier pay the per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC). All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0001-1452 (print) or 1533-385X (online) to initiate your request.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 by F. S. Schranner, V. Rozov, and N. A. Adams, Institute of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Technische Universität München. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal and internal use, on condition that the copier pay the per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC). All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0001-1452 (print) or 1533-385X (online) to initiate your request.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-2fdcc862ca3f17a4168c29544f9d1264eb2da9538468f9d99e4a87c81c99b2633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-2fdcc862ca3f17a4168c29544f9d1264eb2da9538468f9d99e4a87c81c99b2633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schranner, Felix S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozov, Vladyslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Nikolaus A</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of an Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Underresolved Incompressible Flow Simulations</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>In engineering applications, resolution is often low. In these underresolved regions, the truncation error of the underlying numerical schemes strongly affects the solution. If the truncation error functions as a physically consistent subgrid-scale model (that is, it models the evolution of otherwise resolved scales), resolution may remain low. Thereby, computational efficiency is improved. The sixth-order adaptive central-upwind weighted essentially nonoscillatory scheme with implicit scale separation, denoted as WENO-CU6-M1, potentially allows for physically consistent implicit subgrid-scale modeling, when shaped accordingly. In this work, finding an optimal formulation of WENO-CU6-M1 is considered within a deterministic design optimization framework. Possible surrogate modeling and sampling strategies are considered. Design optimization is based on evaluating the potential of a WENO-CU6-M1 scheme formulation to reproduce Kolmogorov scaling for a Taylor–Green vortex in its quasi-isotropic state. As in the absence of physical viscosity, kinetic energy dissipates exclusively due to the subgrid-scales, the Reynolds number is infinite, and the evolution of the flow is determined by proper subgrid-scale modeling. To complete the work, the effective numerical dissipation rate of the WENO-CU6-M1 model optimized for artificially compressible fluid flows is quantified, and it is compared to the original one. Not only is the zero viscosity limit considered, but the model behavior is benchmarked offdesign, for low to high Reynolds numbers. A comparison to an alternative explicit and implicit subgrid-scale model demonstrates its superior behavior for the chosen test flow.</description><subject>Compressible fluids</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Error functions</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Flow simulation</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>High Reynolds number</subject><subject>Incompressible flow</subject><subject>Kinetic energy</subject><subject>Large eddy simulation</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical dissipation</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>Scale models</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Truncation errors</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90UtLxDAQB_AgCq6Pg98gIIgeumbyanKUxcfKigcVvJVsmmqWtqlJV1k_vZXdgyh4Gmb4zTDwR-gIyJgK4OcwviWC5xy20AgEYxlT4nkbjQghkAEXdBftpbQYOporGKHFfdf7xn-a3ocWhwqbFk-brvbW93hm4ovLLstyhR98s6zX6M71r6HEVYj4qS1djC6F-t2VeNra0HRDm_y8dviqDh8_9tIB2qlMndzhpu6jp6vLx8lNNru_nk4uZplhXPcZrUprlaTWsApyw0EqS7XgvNIlUMndnJZGC6a4VMNIa8eNyq0Cq_WcSsb20en6bhfD29Klvmh8sq6uTevCMhWgFAeQXOqBHv-ii7CM7fBdQbkGRnJBxH8KlJREMcXooM7WysaQUnRV0UXfmLgqgBTf2RRQbLIZ7MnaGm_Mj2t_4Bdkm4ve</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Schranner, Felix S</creator><creator>Rozov, Vladyslav</creator><creator>Adams, Nikolaus A</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Optimization of an Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Underresolved Incompressible Flow Simulations</title><author>Schranner, Felix S ; Rozov, Vladyslav ; Adams, Nikolaus A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-2fdcc862ca3f17a4168c29544f9d1264eb2da9538468f9d99e4a87c81c99b2633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Compressible fluids</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Error functions</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Flow simulation</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>High Reynolds number</topic><topic>Incompressible flow</topic><topic>Kinetic energy</topic><topic>Large eddy simulation</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical dissipation</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>Scale models</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Truncation errors</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schranner, Felix S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozov, Vladyslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Nikolaus A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schranner, Felix S</au><au>Rozov, Vladyslav</au><au>Adams, Nikolaus A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of an Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Underresolved Incompressible Flow Simulations</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1567</spage><epage>1577</epage><pages>1567-1577</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>In engineering applications, resolution is often low. In these underresolved regions, the truncation error of the underlying numerical schemes strongly affects the solution. If the truncation error functions as a physically consistent subgrid-scale model (that is, it models the evolution of otherwise resolved scales), resolution may remain low. Thereby, computational efficiency is improved. The sixth-order adaptive central-upwind weighted essentially nonoscillatory scheme with implicit scale separation, denoted as WENO-CU6-M1, potentially allows for physically consistent implicit subgrid-scale modeling, when shaped accordingly. In this work, finding an optimal formulation of WENO-CU6-M1 is considered within a deterministic design optimization framework. Possible surrogate modeling and sampling strategies are considered. Design optimization is based on evaluating the potential of a WENO-CU6-M1 scheme formulation to reproduce Kolmogorov scaling for a Taylor–Green vortex in its quasi-isotropic state. As in the absence of physical viscosity, kinetic energy dissipates exclusively due to the subgrid-scales, the Reynolds number is infinite, and the evolution of the flow is determined by proper subgrid-scale modeling. To complete the work, the effective numerical dissipation rate of the WENO-CU6-M1 model optimized for artificially compressible fluid flows is quantified, and it is compared to the original one. Not only is the zero viscosity limit considered, but the model behavior is benchmarked offdesign, for low to high Reynolds numbers. A comparison to an alternative explicit and implicit subgrid-scale model demonstrates its superior behavior for the chosen test flow.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J054741</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-1452 |
ispartof | AIAA journal, 2016-05, Vol.54 (5), p.1567-1577 |
issn | 0001-1452 1533-385X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2491307505 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Compressible fluids Computational fluid dynamics Design optimization Error functions Evolution Flow simulation Fluid flow High Reynolds number Incompressible flow Kinetic energy Large eddy simulation Mathematical models Numerical dissipation Optimization Reynolds number Scale models Simulation Truncation errors Viscosity |
title | Optimization of an Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Underresolved Incompressible Flow Simulations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20an%20Implicit%20Large-Eddy%20Simulation%20Method%20for%20Underresolved%20Incompressible%20Flow%20Simulations&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Schranner,%20Felix%20S&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1567&rft.epage=1577&rft.pages=1567-1577&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J054741&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4312859931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1866083832&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |