Optimization of an Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Underresolved Incompressible Flow Simulations

In engineering applications, resolution is often low. In these underresolved regions, the truncation error of the underlying numerical schemes strongly affects the solution. If the truncation error functions as a physically consistent subgrid-scale model (that is, it models the evolution of otherwis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIAA journal 2016-05, Vol.54 (5), p.1567-1577
Hauptverfasser: Schranner, Felix S, Rozov, Vladyslav, Adams, Nikolaus A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1577
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1567
container_title AIAA journal
container_volume 54
creator Schranner, Felix S
Rozov, Vladyslav
Adams, Nikolaus A
description In engineering applications, resolution is often low. In these underresolved regions, the truncation error of the underlying numerical schemes strongly affects the solution. If the truncation error functions as a physically consistent subgrid-scale model (that is, it models the evolution of otherwise resolved scales), resolution may remain low. Thereby, computational efficiency is improved. The sixth-order adaptive central-upwind weighted essentially nonoscillatory scheme with implicit scale separation, denoted as WENO-CU6-M1, potentially allows for physically consistent implicit subgrid-scale modeling, when shaped accordingly. In this work, finding an optimal formulation of WENO-CU6-M1 is considered within a deterministic design optimization framework. Possible surrogate modeling and sampling strategies are considered. Design optimization is based on evaluating the potential of a WENO-CU6-M1 scheme formulation to reproduce Kolmogorov scaling for a Taylor–Green vortex in its quasi-isotropic state. As in the absence of physical viscosity, kinetic energy dissipates exclusively due to the subgrid-scales, the Reynolds number is infinite, and the evolution of the flow is determined by proper subgrid-scale modeling. To complete the work, the effective numerical dissipation rate of the WENO-CU6-M1 model optimized for artificially compressible fluid flows is quantified, and it is compared to the original one. Not only is the zero viscosity limit considered, but the model behavior is benchmarked offdesign, for low to high Reynolds numbers. A comparison to an alternative explicit and implicit subgrid-scale model demonstrates its superior behavior for the chosen test flow.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.J054741
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2491307505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4312859931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-2fdcc862ca3f17a4168c29544f9d1264eb2da9538468f9d99e4a87c81c99b2633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UtLxDAQB_AgCq6Pg98gIIgeumbyanKUxcfKigcVvJVsmmqWtqlJV1k_vZXdgyh4Gmb4zTDwR-gIyJgK4OcwviWC5xy20AgEYxlT4nkbjQghkAEXdBftpbQYOporGKHFfdf7xn-a3ocWhwqbFk-brvbW93hm4ovLLstyhR98s6zX6M71r6HEVYj4qS1djC6F-t2VeNra0HRDm_y8dviqDh8_9tIB2qlMndzhpu6jp6vLx8lNNru_nk4uZplhXPcZrUprlaTWsApyw0EqS7XgvNIlUMndnJZGC6a4VMNIa8eNyq0Cq_WcSsb20en6bhfD29Klvmh8sq6uTevCMhWgFAeQXOqBHv-ii7CM7fBdQbkGRnJBxH8KlJREMcXooM7WysaQUnRV0UXfmLgqgBTf2RRQbLIZ7MnaGm_Mj2t_4Bdkm4ve</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1866083832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of an Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Underresolved Incompressible Flow Simulations</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schranner, Felix S ; Rozov, Vladyslav ; Adams, Nikolaus A</creator><creatorcontrib>Schranner, Felix S ; Rozov, Vladyslav ; Adams, Nikolaus A</creatorcontrib><description>In engineering applications, resolution is often low. In these underresolved regions, the truncation error of the underlying numerical schemes strongly affects the solution. If the truncation error functions as a physically consistent subgrid-scale model (that is, it models the evolution of otherwise resolved scales), resolution may remain low. Thereby, computational efficiency is improved. The sixth-order adaptive central-upwind weighted essentially nonoscillatory scheme with implicit scale separation, denoted as WENO-CU6-M1, potentially allows for physically consistent implicit subgrid-scale modeling, when shaped accordingly. In this work, finding an optimal formulation of WENO-CU6-M1 is considered within a deterministic design optimization framework. Possible surrogate modeling and sampling strategies are considered. Design optimization is based on evaluating the potential of a WENO-CU6-M1 scheme formulation to reproduce Kolmogorov scaling for a Taylor–Green vortex in its quasi-isotropic state. As in the absence of physical viscosity, kinetic energy dissipates exclusively due to the subgrid-scales, the Reynolds number is infinite, and the evolution of the flow is determined by proper subgrid-scale modeling. To complete the work, the effective numerical dissipation rate of the WENO-CU6-M1 model optimized for artificially compressible fluid flows is quantified, and it is compared to the original one. Not only is the zero viscosity limit considered, but the model behavior is benchmarked offdesign, for low to high Reynolds numbers. A comparison to an alternative explicit and implicit subgrid-scale model demonstrates its superior behavior for the chosen test flow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J054741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Compressible fluids ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Design optimization ; Error functions ; Evolution ; Flow simulation ; Fluid flow ; High Reynolds number ; Incompressible flow ; Kinetic energy ; Large eddy simulation ; Mathematical models ; Numerical dissipation ; Optimization ; Reynolds number ; Scale models ; Simulation ; Truncation errors ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2016-05, Vol.54 (5), p.1567-1577</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 by F. S. Schranner, V. Rozov, and N. A. Adams, Institute of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Technische Universität München. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal and internal use, on condition that the copier pay the per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC). All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the ISSN (print) or (online) to initiate your request.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 by F. S. Schranner, V. Rozov, and N. A. Adams, Institute of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Technische Universität München. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal and internal use, on condition that the copier pay the per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC). All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0001-1452 (print) or 1533-385X (online) to initiate your request.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 by F. S. Schranner, V. Rozov, and N. A. Adams, Institute of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Technische Universität München. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal and internal use, on condition that the copier pay the per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC). All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0001-1452 (print) or 1533-385X (online) to initiate your request.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-2fdcc862ca3f17a4168c29544f9d1264eb2da9538468f9d99e4a87c81c99b2633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-2fdcc862ca3f17a4168c29544f9d1264eb2da9538468f9d99e4a87c81c99b2633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schranner, Felix S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozov, Vladyslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Nikolaus A</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of an Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Underresolved Incompressible Flow Simulations</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>In engineering applications, resolution is often low. In these underresolved regions, the truncation error of the underlying numerical schemes strongly affects the solution. If the truncation error functions as a physically consistent subgrid-scale model (that is, it models the evolution of otherwise resolved scales), resolution may remain low. Thereby, computational efficiency is improved. The sixth-order adaptive central-upwind weighted essentially nonoscillatory scheme with implicit scale separation, denoted as WENO-CU6-M1, potentially allows for physically consistent implicit subgrid-scale modeling, when shaped accordingly. In this work, finding an optimal formulation of WENO-CU6-M1 is considered within a deterministic design optimization framework. Possible surrogate modeling and sampling strategies are considered. Design optimization is based on evaluating the potential of a WENO-CU6-M1 scheme formulation to reproduce Kolmogorov scaling for a Taylor–Green vortex in its quasi-isotropic state. As in the absence of physical viscosity, kinetic energy dissipates exclusively due to the subgrid-scales, the Reynolds number is infinite, and the evolution of the flow is determined by proper subgrid-scale modeling. To complete the work, the effective numerical dissipation rate of the WENO-CU6-M1 model optimized for artificially compressible fluid flows is quantified, and it is compared to the original one. Not only is the zero viscosity limit considered, but the model behavior is benchmarked offdesign, for low to high Reynolds numbers. A comparison to an alternative explicit and implicit subgrid-scale model demonstrates its superior behavior for the chosen test flow.</description><subject>Compressible fluids</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Error functions</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Flow simulation</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>High Reynolds number</subject><subject>Incompressible flow</subject><subject>Kinetic energy</subject><subject>Large eddy simulation</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical dissipation</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>Scale models</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Truncation errors</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90UtLxDAQB_AgCq6Pg98gIIgeumbyanKUxcfKigcVvJVsmmqWtqlJV1k_vZXdgyh4Gmb4zTDwR-gIyJgK4OcwviWC5xy20AgEYxlT4nkbjQghkAEXdBftpbQYOporGKHFfdf7xn-a3ocWhwqbFk-brvbW93hm4ovLLstyhR98s6zX6M71r6HEVYj4qS1djC6F-t2VeNra0HRDm_y8dviqDh8_9tIB2qlMndzhpu6jp6vLx8lNNru_nk4uZplhXPcZrUprlaTWsApyw0EqS7XgvNIlUMndnJZGC6a4VMNIa8eNyq0Cq_WcSsb20en6bhfD29Klvmh8sq6uTevCMhWgFAeQXOqBHv-ii7CM7fBdQbkGRnJBxH8KlJREMcXooM7WysaQUnRV0UXfmLgqgBTf2RRQbLIZ7MnaGm_Mj2t_4Bdkm4ve</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Schranner, Felix S</creator><creator>Rozov, Vladyslav</creator><creator>Adams, Nikolaus A</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Optimization of an Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Underresolved Incompressible Flow Simulations</title><author>Schranner, Felix S ; Rozov, Vladyslav ; Adams, Nikolaus A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-2fdcc862ca3f17a4168c29544f9d1264eb2da9538468f9d99e4a87c81c99b2633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Compressible fluids</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Error functions</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Flow simulation</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>High Reynolds number</topic><topic>Incompressible flow</topic><topic>Kinetic energy</topic><topic>Large eddy simulation</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical dissipation</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>Scale models</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Truncation errors</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schranner, Felix S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozov, Vladyslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Nikolaus A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schranner, Felix S</au><au>Rozov, Vladyslav</au><au>Adams, Nikolaus A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of an Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Underresolved Incompressible Flow Simulations</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1567</spage><epage>1577</epage><pages>1567-1577</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>In engineering applications, resolution is often low. In these underresolved regions, the truncation error of the underlying numerical schemes strongly affects the solution. If the truncation error functions as a physically consistent subgrid-scale model (that is, it models the evolution of otherwise resolved scales), resolution may remain low. Thereby, computational efficiency is improved. The sixth-order adaptive central-upwind weighted essentially nonoscillatory scheme with implicit scale separation, denoted as WENO-CU6-M1, potentially allows for physically consistent implicit subgrid-scale modeling, when shaped accordingly. In this work, finding an optimal formulation of WENO-CU6-M1 is considered within a deterministic design optimization framework. Possible surrogate modeling and sampling strategies are considered. Design optimization is based on evaluating the potential of a WENO-CU6-M1 scheme formulation to reproduce Kolmogorov scaling for a Taylor–Green vortex in its quasi-isotropic state. As in the absence of physical viscosity, kinetic energy dissipates exclusively due to the subgrid-scales, the Reynolds number is infinite, and the evolution of the flow is determined by proper subgrid-scale modeling. To complete the work, the effective numerical dissipation rate of the WENO-CU6-M1 model optimized for artificially compressible fluid flows is quantified, and it is compared to the original one. Not only is the zero viscosity limit considered, but the model behavior is benchmarked offdesign, for low to high Reynolds numbers. A comparison to an alternative explicit and implicit subgrid-scale model demonstrates its superior behavior for the chosen test flow.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J054741</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1452
ispartof AIAA journal, 2016-05, Vol.54 (5), p.1567-1577
issn 0001-1452
1533-385X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2491307505
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Compressible fluids
Computational fluid dynamics
Design optimization
Error functions
Evolution
Flow simulation
Fluid flow
High Reynolds number
Incompressible flow
Kinetic energy
Large eddy simulation
Mathematical models
Numerical dissipation
Optimization
Reynolds number
Scale models
Simulation
Truncation errors
Viscosity
title Optimization of an Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation Method for Underresolved Incompressible Flow Simulations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20an%20Implicit%20Large-Eddy%20Simulation%20Method%20for%20Underresolved%20Incompressible%20Flow%20Simulations&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Schranner,%20Felix%20S&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1567&rft.epage=1577&rft.pages=1567-1577&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J054741&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4312859931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1866083832&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true