A review of leader-follower joint optimization problems and mathematical models for product design and development
Product design and development (PDD) involves various types of tradeoffs, for which multi-objective optimization has been a prevailing approach. Complex PDD optimization problems are associated with multidisciplinary decision makers and may encompass different levels of the design decision hierarchy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2019-08, Vol.103 (9-12), p.3405-3424 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3424 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9-12 |
container_start_page | 3405 |
container_title | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Du, Gang Zhang, Yingying Liu, Xiaojie Jiao, Roger J. Xia, Yi Li, Yan |
description | Product design and development (PDD) involves various types of tradeoffs, for which multi-objective optimization has been a prevailing approach. Complex PDD optimization problems are associated with multidisciplinary decision makers and may encompass different levels of the design decision hierarchy. A practical concern is that many conflicting goals with diverse decision variables have to compete to arrive at equilibrium solutions, entailing a paradigm of leader-follower joint optimization (LFJO). In line with a typical decision chain of engineering optimization, comprising such consecutive stages as problem formation, optimization modeling, model solution, and optimization evaluation, this paper provides a state-of-the-art review of the LFJO problems that are widely observed in the PDD literature, along with a survey of LFJO mathematical modeling methods. Also reviewed is the status quo of bilevel programming (BLP) models for LFJO problems with focus on their engineering implications for PDD. The paper also reviews the prevailing algorithms for solving BLP mathematical models, as well as common practice of LFJO model evaluation in the PDD literature. Finally, the critical issues of LFJO problems and outlook for further research are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00170-019-03612-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2490871368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2266801825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-4ab4b16a5ab19c812b6676fbc3f125649e8c4ca3367b7cfbdcb28a73a65f7f6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMouH78AU8Bz9F8tJP0uIhfIHjRc0jSiXZpmzXpKvrr7bqCNy8zl-d9Z-Ah5EzwC8G5viycC80ZFw3jCoRksEcWolKKKS7qfbLgEgxTGswhOSplNeMgwCxIXtKM7x1-0BRpj67FzGLq-_SBma5SN040radu6L7c1KWRrnPyPQ6FurGlg5tecR5dcD0dUot9oTHlLdRuwkRbLN3L-IO2-I59Wg84TifkILq-4OnvPibPN9dPV3fs4fH2_mr5wIJq-MQq5ysvwNXOiyYYIT2AhuiDikLWUDVoQhWcUqC9DtG3wUvjtHJQRx2hVcfkfNc7v_O2wTLZVdrkcT5pZdVwo4UC8y8lAQwXRtYzJXdUyKmUjNGucze4_GkFt1sDdmfAzgbsjwELc0jtQmWGxxfMf9X_pL4BMXGKvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2266801825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of leader-follower joint optimization problems and mathematical models for product design and development</title><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Du, Gang ; Zhang, Yingying ; Liu, Xiaojie ; Jiao, Roger J. ; Xia, Yi ; Li, Yan</creator><creatorcontrib>Du, Gang ; Zhang, Yingying ; Liu, Xiaojie ; Jiao, Roger J. ; Xia, Yi ; Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><description>Product design and development (PDD) involves various types of tradeoffs, for which multi-objective optimization has been a prevailing approach. Complex PDD optimization problems are associated with multidisciplinary decision makers and may encompass different levels of the design decision hierarchy. A practical concern is that many conflicting goals with diverse decision variables have to compete to arrive at equilibrium solutions, entailing a paradigm of leader-follower joint optimization (LFJO). In line with a typical decision chain of engineering optimization, comprising such consecutive stages as problem formation, optimization modeling, model solution, and optimization evaluation, this paper provides a state-of-the-art review of the LFJO problems that are widely observed in the PDD literature, along with a survey of LFJO mathematical modeling methods. Also reviewed is the status quo of bilevel programming (BLP) models for LFJO problems with focus on their engineering implications for PDD. The paper also reviews the prevailing algorithms for solving BLP mathematical models, as well as common practice of LFJO model evaluation in the PDD literature. Finally, the critical issues of LFJO problems and outlook for further research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03612-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; CAE) and Design ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Engineering ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Mathematical models ; Mechanical Engineering ; Media Management ; Multiple objective analysis ; Optimization ; Original Article ; Product design ; State-of-the-art reviews</subject><ispartof>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2019-08, Vol.103 (9-12), p.3405-3424</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-4ab4b16a5ab19c812b6676fbc3f125649e8c4ca3367b7cfbdcb28a73a65f7f6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-4ab4b16a5ab19c812b6676fbc3f125649e8c4ca3367b7cfbdcb28a73a65f7f6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00170-019-03612-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00170-019-03612-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Du, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yingying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Roger J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><title>A review of leader-follower joint optimization problems and mathematical models for product design and development</title><title>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</title><addtitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</addtitle><description>Product design and development (PDD) involves various types of tradeoffs, for which multi-objective optimization has been a prevailing approach. Complex PDD optimization problems are associated with multidisciplinary decision makers and may encompass different levels of the design decision hierarchy. A practical concern is that many conflicting goals with diverse decision variables have to compete to arrive at equilibrium solutions, entailing a paradigm of leader-follower joint optimization (LFJO). In line with a typical decision chain of engineering optimization, comprising such consecutive stages as problem formation, optimization modeling, model solution, and optimization evaluation, this paper provides a state-of-the-art review of the LFJO problems that are widely observed in the PDD literature, along with a survey of LFJO mathematical modeling methods. Also reviewed is the status quo of bilevel programming (BLP) models for LFJO problems with focus on their engineering implications for PDD. The paper also reviews the prevailing algorithms for solving BLP mathematical models, as well as common practice of LFJO model evaluation in the PDD literature. Finally, the critical issues of LFJO problems and outlook for further research are discussed.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Media Management</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Product design</subject><subject>State-of-the-art reviews</subject><issn>0268-3768</issn><issn>1433-3015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMouH78AU8Bz9F8tJP0uIhfIHjRc0jSiXZpmzXpKvrr7bqCNy8zl-d9Z-Ah5EzwC8G5viycC80ZFw3jCoRksEcWolKKKS7qfbLgEgxTGswhOSplNeMgwCxIXtKM7x1-0BRpj67FzGLq-_SBma5SN040radu6L7c1KWRrnPyPQ6FurGlg5tecR5dcD0dUot9oTHlLdRuwkRbLN3L-IO2-I59Wg84TifkILq-4OnvPibPN9dPV3fs4fH2_mr5wIJq-MQq5ysvwNXOiyYYIT2AhuiDikLWUDVoQhWcUqC9DtG3wUvjtHJQRx2hVcfkfNc7v_O2wTLZVdrkcT5pZdVwo4UC8y8lAQwXRtYzJXdUyKmUjNGucze4_GkFt1sDdmfAzgbsjwELc0jtQmWGxxfMf9X_pL4BMXGKvg</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Du, Gang</creator><creator>Zhang, Yingying</creator><creator>Liu, Xiaojie</creator><creator>Jiao, Roger J.</creator><creator>Xia, Yi</creator><creator>Li, Yan</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>A review of leader-follower joint optimization problems and mathematical models for product design and development</title><author>Du, Gang ; Zhang, Yingying ; Liu, Xiaojie ; Jiao, Roger J. ; Xia, Yi ; Li, Yan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-4ab4b16a5ab19c812b6676fbc3f125649e8c4ca3367b7cfbdcb28a73a65f7f6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Media Management</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Product design</topic><topic>State-of-the-art reviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Du, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yingying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Roger J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Du, Gang</au><au>Zhang, Yingying</au><au>Liu, Xiaojie</au><au>Jiao, Roger J.</au><au>Xia, Yi</au><au>Li, Yan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of leader-follower joint optimization problems and mathematical models for product design and development</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle><stitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</stitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>9-12</issue><spage>3405</spage><epage>3424</epage><pages>3405-3424</pages><issn>0268-3768</issn><eissn>1433-3015</eissn><abstract>Product design and development (PDD) involves various types of tradeoffs, for which multi-objective optimization has been a prevailing approach. Complex PDD optimization problems are associated with multidisciplinary decision makers and may encompass different levels of the design decision hierarchy. A practical concern is that many conflicting goals with diverse decision variables have to compete to arrive at equilibrium solutions, entailing a paradigm of leader-follower joint optimization (LFJO). In line with a typical decision chain of engineering optimization, comprising such consecutive stages as problem formation, optimization modeling, model solution, and optimization evaluation, this paper provides a state-of-the-art review of the LFJO problems that are widely observed in the PDD literature, along with a survey of LFJO mathematical modeling methods. Also reviewed is the status quo of bilevel programming (BLP) models for LFJO problems with focus on their engineering implications for PDD. The paper also reviews the prevailing algorithms for solving BLP mathematical models, as well as common practice of LFJO model evaluation in the PDD literature. Finally, the critical issues of LFJO problems and outlook for further research are discussed.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00170-019-03612-6</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-3768 |
ispartof | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2019-08, Vol.103 (9-12), p.3405-3424 |
issn | 0268-3768 1433-3015 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2490871368 |
source | SpringerNature Complete Journals |
subjects | Algorithms CAE) and Design Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD Engineering Industrial and Production Engineering Mathematical models Mechanical Engineering Media Management Multiple objective analysis Optimization Original Article Product design State-of-the-art reviews |
title | A review of leader-follower joint optimization problems and mathematical models for product design and development |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T10%3A23%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20leader-follower%20joint%20optimization%20problems%20and%20mathematical%20models%20for%20product%20design%20and%20development&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology&rft.au=Du,%20Gang&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=9-12&rft.spage=3405&rft.epage=3424&rft.pages=3405-3424&rft.issn=0268-3768&rft.eissn=1433-3015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00170-019-03612-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2266801825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2266801825&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |