Heterogeneity of macrophyte banks affects the structure of fish communities in flooded habitats of the Amazon Basin

In freshwater ecosystems, macrophyte contribute to habitat heterogeneity with their varying structural forms, ranging from free submerged to rooted species. Macrophytes provide substrates that support fish populations, providing food and refuge from predators, especially in semi-lentic environments,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquatic ecology 2021-03, Vol.55 (1), p.215-226
Hauptverfasser: Nonato, Flávia Alessandra Silva, Michelan, Thaisa Sala, Freitas, Pâmela Virgolino, Maia, Calebe, Montag, Luciano Fogaça de Assis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 226
container_issue 1
container_start_page 215
container_title Aquatic ecology
container_volume 55
creator Nonato, Flávia Alessandra Silva
Michelan, Thaisa Sala
Freitas, Pâmela Virgolino
Maia, Calebe
Montag, Luciano Fogaça de Assis
description In freshwater ecosystems, macrophyte contribute to habitat heterogeneity with their varying structural forms, ranging from free submerged to rooted species. Macrophytes provide substrates that support fish populations, providing food and refuge from predators, especially in semi-lentic environments, like river floodplains, which tend to provide little shelter for small fish. We investigated how the species richness, abundance, and morphological traits of the fish communities of river floodplains in the Amazon region are affected by the heterogeneity of macrophyte beds, based on the relative contribution of each plant species present in these beds. Simple linear regressions were used to investigate the relationship between macrophyte bed heterogeneity and fish species richness, abundance, and morphological traits, evaluated using a community-weighted mean index analysis (CWM). We recorded 16 aquatic macrophyte species and 21 fish species at 34 study sites. Eichhornia azurea and Eichhornia crassipes dominated the macrophyte beds, while the most abundant fish species were Hemigrammus ocellifer and Laimosemion strigatus . The results of the linear regressions of the heterogeneity of the macrophyte beds were only significant for two morphological traits, both linked to fish locomotion. Our results indicate that the heterogeneity of the macrophyte beds acts an environmental filter for the fish species with a high degree of maneuverability, given that these species are able to swim within the macrophyte structures. Although this does not affect the richness and abundance of the fish, the macrophyte beds favor certain species that use this vegetation during the different stages of their life cycle, which present distinct adaptations. The heterogeneity provided by the aquatic macrophytes is thus important to a range of different fish species, by providing shelter and protection for the smaller species with morphological traits that permit their survival in this environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10452-020-09823-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2490402654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A652157221</galeid><sourcerecordid>A652157221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-f1e7f4731b489bbecd6e0d31cd77230f94cb049c6855d4b76a939ba13c1238363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1JIMk2fyAnQc7ejr78cdyGNiks9NKehSyP1krX0kaSD9tfX21c6K3oIDE8j2aYt6oeKGwpQPspURCS1cCghr5jvBYfqlsqW15LyuRVefOuqZnsupvqLqVXAOihZbdVesGMMRzQo8tnEiyZtYnhNJ0zkkH7X4loa9HkRPKEJOW4mLxEvJDWpYmYMM-Ld9lhIs4TewxhxJFMenBZF6twF3E369_Bk886Of-xurb6mPD-772pfn798uPppd5_f_72tNvXhssu15Zia0XL6SC6fhjQjA3CyKkZ25ZxsL0wA4jeNJ2UoxjaRve8HzTlhjLe8YZvqsf131MMbwumrF7DEn1pqZjoQQBrpCjUdqUO-ojKeRty1KacEWdngkfrSn3XSFb2yRgtAluFsqeUIlp1im7W8awoqEsaak1DlTTUexrq0oWvUiqwP2D8N8t_rD8iYo3H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2490402654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heterogeneity of macrophyte banks affects the structure of fish communities in flooded habitats of the Amazon Basin</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Nonato, Flávia Alessandra Silva ; Michelan, Thaisa Sala ; Freitas, Pâmela Virgolino ; Maia, Calebe ; Montag, Luciano Fogaça de Assis</creator><creatorcontrib>Nonato, Flávia Alessandra Silva ; Michelan, Thaisa Sala ; Freitas, Pâmela Virgolino ; Maia, Calebe ; Montag, Luciano Fogaça de Assis</creatorcontrib><description>In freshwater ecosystems, macrophyte contribute to habitat heterogeneity with their varying structural forms, ranging from free submerged to rooted species. Macrophytes provide substrates that support fish populations, providing food and refuge from predators, especially in semi-lentic environments, like river floodplains, which tend to provide little shelter for small fish. We investigated how the species richness, abundance, and morphological traits of the fish communities of river floodplains in the Amazon region are affected by the heterogeneity of macrophyte beds, based on the relative contribution of each plant species present in these beds. Simple linear regressions were used to investigate the relationship between macrophyte bed heterogeneity and fish species richness, abundance, and morphological traits, evaluated using a community-weighted mean index analysis (CWM). We recorded 16 aquatic macrophyte species and 21 fish species at 34 study sites. Eichhornia azurea and Eichhornia crassipes dominated the macrophyte beds, while the most abundant fish species were Hemigrammus ocellifer and Laimosemion strigatus . The results of the linear regressions of the heterogeneity of the macrophyte beds were only significant for two morphological traits, both linked to fish locomotion. Our results indicate that the heterogeneity of the macrophyte beds acts an environmental filter for the fish species with a high degree of maneuverability, given that these species are able to swim within the macrophyte structures. Although this does not affect the richness and abundance of the fish, the macrophyte beds favor certain species that use this vegetation during the different stages of their life cycle, which present distinct adaptations. The heterogeneity provided by the aquatic macrophytes is thus important to a range of different fish species, by providing shelter and protection for the smaller species with morphological traits that permit their survival in this environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-2588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10452-020-09823-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Adaptation ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic plants ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecosystems ; Fish ; Fish populations ; Fishes ; Floodplains ; Freshwater ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Freshwater plants ; Heterogeneity ; Inland water environment ; Life cycle ; Life cycles ; Life Sciences ; Locomotion ; Macrophytes ; Maneuverability ; Manoeuvrability ; Morphology ; Plant species ; Predators ; Regression analysis ; River basins ; Rivers ; Shelters ; Species richness ; Structural forms ; Substrates ; Survival ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Aquatic ecology, 2021-03, Vol.55 (1), p.215-226</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-f1e7f4731b489bbecd6e0d31cd77230f94cb049c6855d4b76a939ba13c1238363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-f1e7f4731b489bbecd6e0d31cd77230f94cb049c6855d4b76a939ba13c1238363</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9013-1503 ; 0000-0001-9370-6747 ; 0000-0001-8763-0694 ; 0000-0001-9416-0758 ; 0000-0001-8208-5877</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10452-020-09823-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10452-020-09823-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nonato, Flávia Alessandra Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelan, Thaisa Sala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Pâmela Virgolino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Calebe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Luciano Fogaça de Assis</creatorcontrib><title>Heterogeneity of macrophyte banks affects the structure of fish communities in flooded habitats of the Amazon Basin</title><title>Aquatic ecology</title><addtitle>Aquat Ecol</addtitle><description>In freshwater ecosystems, macrophyte contribute to habitat heterogeneity with their varying structural forms, ranging from free submerged to rooted species. Macrophytes provide substrates that support fish populations, providing food and refuge from predators, especially in semi-lentic environments, like river floodplains, which tend to provide little shelter for small fish. We investigated how the species richness, abundance, and morphological traits of the fish communities of river floodplains in the Amazon region are affected by the heterogeneity of macrophyte beds, based on the relative contribution of each plant species present in these beds. Simple linear regressions were used to investigate the relationship between macrophyte bed heterogeneity and fish species richness, abundance, and morphological traits, evaluated using a community-weighted mean index analysis (CWM). We recorded 16 aquatic macrophyte species and 21 fish species at 34 study sites. Eichhornia azurea and Eichhornia crassipes dominated the macrophyte beds, while the most abundant fish species were Hemigrammus ocellifer and Laimosemion strigatus . The results of the linear regressions of the heterogeneity of the macrophyte beds were only significant for two morphological traits, both linked to fish locomotion. Our results indicate that the heterogeneity of the macrophyte beds acts an environmental filter for the fish species with a high degree of maneuverability, given that these species are able to swim within the macrophyte structures. Although this does not affect the richness and abundance of the fish, the macrophyte beds favor certain species that use this vegetation during the different stages of their life cycle, which present distinct adaptations. The heterogeneity provided by the aquatic macrophytes is thus important to a range of different fish species, by providing shelter and protection for the smaller species with morphological traits that permit their survival in this environment.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish populations</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Floodplains</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater plants</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Life cycle</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Locomotion</subject><subject>Macrophytes</subject><subject>Maneuverability</subject><subject>Manoeuvrability</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Shelters</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Structural forms</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1386-2588</issn><issn>1573-5125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1JIMk2fyAnQc7ejr78cdyGNiks9NKehSyP1krX0kaSD9tfX21c6K3oIDE8j2aYt6oeKGwpQPspURCS1cCghr5jvBYfqlsqW15LyuRVefOuqZnsupvqLqVXAOihZbdVesGMMRzQo8tnEiyZtYnhNJ0zkkH7X4loa9HkRPKEJOW4mLxEvJDWpYmYMM-Ld9lhIs4TewxhxJFMenBZF6twF3E369_Bk886Of-xurb6mPD-772pfn798uPppd5_f_72tNvXhssu15Zia0XL6SC6fhjQjA3CyKkZ25ZxsL0wA4jeNJ2UoxjaRve8HzTlhjLe8YZvqsf131MMbwumrF7DEn1pqZjoQQBrpCjUdqUO-ojKeRty1KacEWdngkfrSn3XSFb2yRgtAluFsqeUIlp1im7W8awoqEsaak1DlTTUexrq0oWvUiqwP2D8N8t_rD8iYo3H</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Nonato, Flávia Alessandra Silva</creator><creator>Michelan, Thaisa Sala</creator><creator>Freitas, Pâmela Virgolino</creator><creator>Maia, Calebe</creator><creator>Montag, Luciano Fogaça de Assis</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9013-1503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9370-6747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8763-0694</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-0758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8208-5877</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Heterogeneity of macrophyte banks affects the structure of fish communities in flooded habitats of the Amazon Basin</title><author>Nonato, Flávia Alessandra Silva ; Michelan, Thaisa Sala ; Freitas, Pâmela Virgolino ; Maia, Calebe ; Montag, Luciano Fogaça de Assis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-f1e7f4731b489bbecd6e0d31cd77230f94cb049c6855d4b76a939ba13c1238363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish populations</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Floodplains</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater plants</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Life cycle</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Locomotion</topic><topic>Macrophytes</topic><topic>Maneuverability</topic><topic>Manoeuvrability</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Shelters</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Structural forms</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nonato, Flávia Alessandra Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelan, Thaisa Sala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Pâmela Virgolino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Calebe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montag, Luciano Fogaça de Assis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Aquatic ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nonato, Flávia Alessandra Silva</au><au>Michelan, Thaisa Sala</au><au>Freitas, Pâmela Virgolino</au><au>Maia, Calebe</au><au>Montag, Luciano Fogaça de Assis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heterogeneity of macrophyte banks affects the structure of fish communities in flooded habitats of the Amazon Basin</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic ecology</jtitle><stitle>Aquat Ecol</stitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>215-226</pages><issn>1386-2588</issn><eissn>1573-5125</eissn><abstract>In freshwater ecosystems, macrophyte contribute to habitat heterogeneity with their varying structural forms, ranging from free submerged to rooted species. Macrophytes provide substrates that support fish populations, providing food and refuge from predators, especially in semi-lentic environments, like river floodplains, which tend to provide little shelter for small fish. We investigated how the species richness, abundance, and morphological traits of the fish communities of river floodplains in the Amazon region are affected by the heterogeneity of macrophyte beds, based on the relative contribution of each plant species present in these beds. Simple linear regressions were used to investigate the relationship between macrophyte bed heterogeneity and fish species richness, abundance, and morphological traits, evaluated using a community-weighted mean index analysis (CWM). We recorded 16 aquatic macrophyte species and 21 fish species at 34 study sites. Eichhornia azurea and Eichhornia crassipes dominated the macrophyte beds, while the most abundant fish species were Hemigrammus ocellifer and Laimosemion strigatus . The results of the linear regressions of the heterogeneity of the macrophyte beds were only significant for two morphological traits, both linked to fish locomotion. Our results indicate that the heterogeneity of the macrophyte beds acts an environmental filter for the fish species with a high degree of maneuverability, given that these species are able to swim within the macrophyte structures. Although this does not affect the richness and abundance of the fish, the macrophyte beds favor certain species that use this vegetation during the different stages of their life cycle, which present distinct adaptations. The heterogeneity provided by the aquatic macrophytes is thus important to a range of different fish species, by providing shelter and protection for the smaller species with morphological traits that permit their survival in this environment.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10452-020-09823-4</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9013-1503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9370-6747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8763-0694</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-0758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8208-5877</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1386-2588
ispartof Aquatic ecology, 2021-03, Vol.55 (1), p.215-226
issn 1386-2588
1573-5125
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2490402654
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Abundance
Adaptation
Aquatic ecosystems
Aquatic plants
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Ecosystems
Fish
Fish populations
Fishes
Floodplains
Freshwater
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Freshwater ecosystems
Freshwater plants
Heterogeneity
Inland water environment
Life cycle
Life cycles
Life Sciences
Locomotion
Macrophytes
Maneuverability
Manoeuvrability
Morphology
Plant species
Predators
Regression analysis
River basins
Rivers
Shelters
Species richness
Structural forms
Substrates
Survival
Wildlife conservation
title Heterogeneity of macrophyte banks affects the structure of fish communities in flooded habitats of the Amazon Basin
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A05%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heterogeneity%20of%20macrophyte%20banks%20affects%20the%20structure%20of%20fish%20communities%20in%20flooded%20habitats%20of%20the%20Amazon%20Basin&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20ecology&rft.au=Nonato,%20Fl%C3%A1via%20Alessandra%20Silva&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=215-226&rft.issn=1386-2588&rft.eissn=1573-5125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10452-020-09823-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA652157221%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2490402654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A652157221&rfr_iscdi=true