Putting the humanity into inhuman systems: How human factors and ergonomics can be used to manage the risks associated with artificial general intelligence
The next generation of artificial intelligence, known as artificial general intelligence (AGI) could either revolutionize or destroy humanity. As the discipline which focuses on enhancing human health and wellbeing, human factors and ergonomics (HFE) has a crucial role to play in the conception, des...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries 2021-03, Vol.31 (2), p.223-236 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 236 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Salmon, Paul M. Carden, Tony Hancock, Peter A. |
description | The next generation of artificial intelligence, known as artificial general intelligence (AGI) could either revolutionize or destroy humanity. As the discipline which focuses on enhancing human health and wellbeing, human factors and ergonomics (HFE) has a crucial role to play in the conception, design, and operation of AGI systems. Despite this, there has been little examination as to how HFE can influence and direct this evolution. This study uses a hypothetical AGI system, Tegmark's “Prometheus,” to frame the role of HFE in managing the risks associated with AGI. Fifteen categories of HFE method are identified and their potential role in AGI system design is considered. The findings suggest that all categories of HFE method can contribute to AGI system design; however, areas where certain methods require extension are identified. It is concluded that HFE can and should contribute to AGI system design and immediate effort is required to facilitate this goal. In closing, we explicate some of the work required to embed HFE in wider multi‐disciplinary efforts aiming to create safe and efficient AGI systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hfm.20883 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2490009408</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2490009408</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3453-3664b2a53660c139d23c7de518cba3fe7b54f672ad1833a5461c48c3849450383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhiMEEqUw8AaWmBjS2rGdOGyoohSpCAaYLcdxEpckLrajKs_Cy-I2rCz33_k-_yf9UXSL4AJBmCybqlskkDF8Fs0QTWCc0pSchx7mMGYkQ5fRlXM7CCFGKJtFP--D97qvgW8UaIZO9NqPQPfehHKagRudV517ABtzmBBQCemNdUD0JVC2Nr3ptHRAhlWhwOBUCYJBIEWtTs5Wu6-AO2ekFj6sD9o3QFivKx1eWlCrXtmg4bJqWx1Gqa6ji0q0Tt386Tz6XD99rDbx9u35ZfW4jSUmFMc4TUmRCBoUSoTzMsEyKxVFTBYCVyorKKnSLBElYhgLSlIkCZOYkZxQiBmeR3eT796a70E5z3dmsH04yROSh6hyAo_U_URJa5yzquJ7qzthR44gP2bPQ_b8lH1glxN70K0a_wf5Zv06_fgFFIaHsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2490009408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Putting the humanity into inhuman systems: How human factors and ergonomics can be used to manage the risks associated with artificial general intelligence</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Salmon, Paul M. ; Carden, Tony ; Hancock, Peter A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Paul M. ; Carden, Tony ; Hancock, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><description>The next generation of artificial intelligence, known as artificial general intelligence (AGI) could either revolutionize or destroy humanity. As the discipline which focuses on enhancing human health and wellbeing, human factors and ergonomics (HFE) has a crucial role to play in the conception, design, and operation of AGI systems. Despite this, there has been little examination as to how HFE can influence and direct this evolution. This study uses a hypothetical AGI system, Tegmark's “Prometheus,” to frame the role of HFE in managing the risks associated with AGI. Fifteen categories of HFE method are identified and their potential role in AGI system design is considered. The findings suggest that all categories of HFE method can contribute to AGI system design; however, areas where certain methods require extension are identified. It is concluded that HFE can and should contribute to AGI system design and immediate effort is required to facilitate this goal. In closing, we explicate some of the work required to embed HFE in wider multi‐disciplinary efforts aiming to create safe and efficient AGI systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-8471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6564</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>artificial general intelligence ; Artificial intelligence ; Design ; Ergonomics ; Human factors ; Intelligence ; risk ; Risk management ; safety ; Systems design</subject><ispartof>Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries, 2021-03, Vol.31 (2), p.223-236</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3453-3664b2a53660c139d23c7de518cba3fe7b54f672ad1833a5461c48c3849450383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3453-3664b2a53660c139d23c7de518cba3fe7b54f672ad1833a5461c48c3849450383</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7403-0286</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhfm.20883$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhfm.20883$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carden, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><title>Putting the humanity into inhuman systems: How human factors and ergonomics can be used to manage the risks associated with artificial general intelligence</title><title>Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries</title><description>The next generation of artificial intelligence, known as artificial general intelligence (AGI) could either revolutionize or destroy humanity. As the discipline which focuses on enhancing human health and wellbeing, human factors and ergonomics (HFE) has a crucial role to play in the conception, design, and operation of AGI systems. Despite this, there has been little examination as to how HFE can influence and direct this evolution. This study uses a hypothetical AGI system, Tegmark's “Prometheus,” to frame the role of HFE in managing the risks associated with AGI. Fifteen categories of HFE method are identified and their potential role in AGI system design is considered. The findings suggest that all categories of HFE method can contribute to AGI system design; however, areas where certain methods require extension are identified. It is concluded that HFE can and should contribute to AGI system design and immediate effort is required to facilitate this goal. In closing, we explicate some of the work required to embed HFE in wider multi‐disciplinary efforts aiming to create safe and efficient AGI systems.</description><subject>artificial general intelligence</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><issn>1090-8471</issn><issn>1520-6564</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhiMEEqUw8AaWmBjS2rGdOGyoohSpCAaYLcdxEpckLrajKs_Cy-I2rCz33_k-_yf9UXSL4AJBmCybqlskkDF8Fs0QTWCc0pSchx7mMGYkQ5fRlXM7CCFGKJtFP--D97qvgW8UaIZO9NqPQPfehHKagRudV517ABtzmBBQCemNdUD0JVC2Nr3ptHRAhlWhwOBUCYJBIEWtTs5Wu6-AO2ekFj6sD9o3QFivKx1eWlCrXtmg4bJqWx1Gqa6ji0q0Tt386Tz6XD99rDbx9u35ZfW4jSUmFMc4TUmRCBoUSoTzMsEyKxVFTBYCVyorKKnSLBElYhgLSlIkCZOYkZxQiBmeR3eT796a70E5z3dmsH04yROSh6hyAo_U_URJa5yzquJ7qzthR44gP2bPQ_b8lH1glxN70K0a_wf5Zv06_fgFFIaHsg</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Salmon, Paul M.</creator><creator>Carden, Tony</creator><creator>Hancock, Peter A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7403-0286</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Putting the humanity into inhuman systems: How human factors and ergonomics can be used to manage the risks associated with artificial general intelligence</title><author>Salmon, Paul M. ; Carden, Tony ; Hancock, Peter A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3453-3664b2a53660c139d23c7de518cba3fe7b54f672ad1833a5461c48c3849450383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>artificial general intelligence</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carden, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salmon, Paul M.</au><au>Carden, Tony</au><au>Hancock, Peter A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Putting the humanity into inhuman systems: How human factors and ergonomics can be used to manage the risks associated with artificial general intelligence</atitle><jtitle>Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>223-236</pages><issn>1090-8471</issn><eissn>1520-6564</eissn><abstract>The next generation of artificial intelligence, known as artificial general intelligence (AGI) could either revolutionize or destroy humanity. As the discipline which focuses on enhancing human health and wellbeing, human factors and ergonomics (HFE) has a crucial role to play in the conception, design, and operation of AGI systems. Despite this, there has been little examination as to how HFE can influence and direct this evolution. This study uses a hypothetical AGI system, Tegmark's “Prometheus,” to frame the role of HFE in managing the risks associated with AGI. Fifteen categories of HFE method are identified and their potential role in AGI system design is considered. The findings suggest that all categories of HFE method can contribute to AGI system design; however, areas where certain methods require extension are identified. It is concluded that HFE can and should contribute to AGI system design and immediate effort is required to facilitate this goal. In closing, we explicate some of the work required to embed HFE in wider multi‐disciplinary efforts aiming to create safe and efficient AGI systems.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/hfm.20883</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7403-0286</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1090-8471 |
ispartof | Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries, 2021-03, Vol.31 (2), p.223-236 |
issn | 1090-8471 1520-6564 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2490009408 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | artificial general intelligence Artificial intelligence Design Ergonomics Human factors Intelligence risk Risk management safety Systems design |
title | Putting the humanity into inhuman systems: How human factors and ergonomics can be used to manage the risks associated with artificial general intelligence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T04%3A44%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Putting%20the%20humanity%20into%20inhuman%20systems:%20How%20human%20factors%20and%20ergonomics%20can%20be%20used%20to%20manage%20the%20risks%20associated%20with%20artificial%20general%20intelligence&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors%20and%20ergonomics%20in%20manufacturing%20&%20service%20industries&rft.au=Salmon,%20Paul%20M.&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=223-236&rft.issn=1090-8471&rft.eissn=1520-6564&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hfm.20883&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2490009408%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2490009408&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |