Does translocation affect short‐term survival in a long‐lived species, the Spanish imperial eagle?

In long‐lived species, usually with deferred maturity and low release numbers, the success of conservation translocations is especially sensitive to survival and site fidelity during the prolonged establishment phase. Concurrent management actions usually implemented in threatened populations may al...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal conservation 2021-02, Vol.24 (1), p.38-50
Hauptverfasser: Muriel, R., Balbontín, J., Calabuig, C. P., Morlanes, V., Ferrer, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title Animal conservation
container_volume 24
creator Muriel, R.
Balbontín, J.
Calabuig, C. P.
Morlanes, V.
Ferrer, M.
description In long‐lived species, usually with deferred maturity and low release numbers, the success of conservation translocations is especially sensitive to survival and site fidelity during the prolonged establishment phase. Concurrent management actions usually implemented in threatened populations may also influence translocation‐related responses. Therefore, the specific performance of translocations should be ideally assessed on vital rates of comparable management groups while accounting for other conservation actions. In this study, we analysed the impact of translocation on the short‐term survival and the relative contribution of electrocution on power pylons by comparing translocated and wild‐reared radio‐tracked juvenile Spanish imperial eagles Aquila adalberti before and after the implementation of further long‐term conservation actions of the species and other generic measures in southern Spain. A multi‐event multi‐state capture–recapture approach accounting for tag retention was applied on a long‐term dataset of resightings and dead recoveries throughout the first 2 years after fledging. Survival probability was similar in translocated and contemporary non‐translocated eagles, but higher than in wild‐reared birds before the generalization of multi‐action plans from the 1980s. It was also higher during early dispersal than in the post‐fledging dependence period. Although mortality due to electrocution decreased in absolute terms after implementing anti‐electrocution measures, its relative contribution as the main mortality source did not differ between translocated and wild‐reared birds or between periods (65%). Our results show that when translocations are properly implemented, observed vital rates of released animals can be comparable to those of wild‐reared individuals subjected to similar generic management addressing mortality sources. As for any management action, post‐release monitoring should play a key role in translocation programmes, with emphasis on comparative studies analysing potential factors affecting survival under active management contexts. Determination of vital rates through long‐term monitoring is essential for translocation success assessment, particularly in long‐lived species with deferred maturity and prolonged establishment stages under general multi‐action management programs. Through a multi‐event capture‐recapture approach on a long‐term mixed data set, we show that short‐term survival of translocated Spanish imperial eag
doi_str_mv 10.1111/acv.12597
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2489981961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2489981961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-9a5513b7a0230f3fe5eb7949ea9c3edd0510783bd228e2831113ae606139b01e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQhi0EEqVw4A0scUIirSfO5hOqyipV4sBytZxk0rpK42CnQb3xCDwjT4JLuDKXGen_ZvsJOQc2AR9TVfQTCGORHpARRIkIIBXxoa95kgYi4uyYnDi3ZgzCjMOIVDcGHe2salxtCtVp01BVVVh01K2M7b4_vzq0G-q2tte9qqn2Oq1Ns_RKrXssqWux0OiuaLdC-tyqRrsV1ZsWrfY8qmWN16fkqFK1w7O_PCavd7cv84dg8XT_OJ8tgiIUqT9QxTHwPFUs5KziFcaYpyISqETBsSxZDCzNeF6GYYb7BwC4woQlwEXOAPmYXAxzW2vet-g6uTZb2_iVMowyITIQnh2Ty4EqrHHOYiVbqzfK7iQwubdRehvlr42enQ7sh65x9z8oZ_O3oeMHqxV13A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489981961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does translocation affect short‐term survival in a long‐lived species, the Spanish imperial eagle?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Muriel, R. ; Balbontín, J. ; Calabuig, C. P. ; Morlanes, V. ; Ferrer, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Muriel, R. ; Balbontín, J. ; Calabuig, C. P. ; Morlanes, V. ; Ferrer, M.</creatorcontrib><description>In long‐lived species, usually with deferred maturity and low release numbers, the success of conservation translocations is especially sensitive to survival and site fidelity during the prolonged establishment phase. Concurrent management actions usually implemented in threatened populations may also influence translocation‐related responses. Therefore, the specific performance of translocations should be ideally assessed on vital rates of comparable management groups while accounting for other conservation actions. In this study, we analysed the impact of translocation on the short‐term survival and the relative contribution of electrocution on power pylons by comparing translocated and wild‐reared radio‐tracked juvenile Spanish imperial eagles Aquila adalberti before and after the implementation of further long‐term conservation actions of the species and other generic measures in southern Spain. A multi‐event multi‐state capture–recapture approach accounting for tag retention was applied on a long‐term dataset of resightings and dead recoveries throughout the first 2 years after fledging. Survival probability was similar in translocated and contemporary non‐translocated eagles, but higher than in wild‐reared birds before the generalization of multi‐action plans from the 1980s. It was also higher during early dispersal than in the post‐fledging dependence period. Although mortality due to electrocution decreased in absolute terms after implementing anti‐electrocution measures, its relative contribution as the main mortality source did not differ between translocated and wild‐reared birds or between periods (65%). Our results show that when translocations are properly implemented, observed vital rates of released animals can be comparable to those of wild‐reared individuals subjected to similar generic management addressing mortality sources. As for any management action, post‐release monitoring should play a key role in translocation programmes, with emphasis on comparative studies analysing potential factors affecting survival under active management contexts. Determination of vital rates through long‐term monitoring is essential for translocation success assessment, particularly in long‐lived species with deferred maturity and prolonged establishment stages under general multi‐action management programs. Through a multi‐event capture‐recapture approach on a long‐term mixed data set, we show that short‐term survival of translocated Spanish imperial eagles was similar to non‐translocated contemporary eagles during post‐fledging and dispersal stages, whereas specific and general actions aimed at controlling mortality factors notably increased survival, despite electrocution on pylons still being the main mortality source. Therefore, translocations do not necessarily entail extra costs on survival when properly implemented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/acv.12597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>adaptive management ; Aquila adalberti ; Birds ; Capture-recapture studies ; capture–recapture ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Conservation ; Dispersal ; electrocution ; Electrocutions ; Habitat selection ; Impact analysis ; Juveniles ; Management ; Mortality ; multi‐event ; Probability theory ; Pylons ; radio‐tracking ; reintroduction ; Site fidelity ; Species ; Survival ; tag retention ; Threatened species ; Translocation ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Animal conservation, 2021-02, Vol.24 (1), p.38-50</ispartof><rights>2020 The Zoological Society of London</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Zoological Society of London</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-9a5513b7a0230f3fe5eb7949ea9c3edd0510783bd228e2831113ae606139b01e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-9a5513b7a0230f3fe5eb7949ea9c3edd0510783bd228e2831113ae606139b01e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4037-7438</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Facv.12597$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Facv.12597$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muriel, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balbontín, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calabuig, C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morlanes, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrer, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Does translocation affect short‐term survival in a long‐lived species, the Spanish imperial eagle?</title><title>Animal conservation</title><description>In long‐lived species, usually with deferred maturity and low release numbers, the success of conservation translocations is especially sensitive to survival and site fidelity during the prolonged establishment phase. Concurrent management actions usually implemented in threatened populations may also influence translocation‐related responses. Therefore, the specific performance of translocations should be ideally assessed on vital rates of comparable management groups while accounting for other conservation actions. In this study, we analysed the impact of translocation on the short‐term survival and the relative contribution of electrocution on power pylons by comparing translocated and wild‐reared radio‐tracked juvenile Spanish imperial eagles Aquila adalberti before and after the implementation of further long‐term conservation actions of the species and other generic measures in southern Spain. A multi‐event multi‐state capture–recapture approach accounting for tag retention was applied on a long‐term dataset of resightings and dead recoveries throughout the first 2 years after fledging. Survival probability was similar in translocated and contemporary non‐translocated eagles, but higher than in wild‐reared birds before the generalization of multi‐action plans from the 1980s. It was also higher during early dispersal than in the post‐fledging dependence period. Although mortality due to electrocution decreased in absolute terms after implementing anti‐electrocution measures, its relative contribution as the main mortality source did not differ between translocated and wild‐reared birds or between periods (65%). Our results show that when translocations are properly implemented, observed vital rates of released animals can be comparable to those of wild‐reared individuals subjected to similar generic management addressing mortality sources. As for any management action, post‐release monitoring should play a key role in translocation programmes, with emphasis on comparative studies analysing potential factors affecting survival under active management contexts. Determination of vital rates through long‐term monitoring is essential for translocation success assessment, particularly in long‐lived species with deferred maturity and prolonged establishment stages under general multi‐action management programs. Through a multi‐event capture‐recapture approach on a long‐term mixed data set, we show that short‐term survival of translocated Spanish imperial eagles was similar to non‐translocated contemporary eagles during post‐fledging and dispersal stages, whereas specific and general actions aimed at controlling mortality factors notably increased survival, despite electrocution on pylons still being the main mortality source. Therefore, translocations do not necessarily entail extra costs on survival when properly implemented.</description><subject>adaptive management</subject><subject>Aquila adalberti</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Capture-recapture studies</subject><subject>capture–recapture</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>electrocution</subject><subject>Electrocutions</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>multi‐event</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Pylons</subject><subject>radio‐tracking</subject><subject>reintroduction</subject><subject>Site fidelity</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>tag retention</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Translocation</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1367-9430</issn><issn>1469-1795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQhi0EEqVw4A0scUIirSfO5hOqyipV4sBytZxk0rpK42CnQb3xCDwjT4JLuDKXGen_ZvsJOQc2AR9TVfQTCGORHpARRIkIIBXxoa95kgYi4uyYnDi3ZgzCjMOIVDcGHe2salxtCtVp01BVVVh01K2M7b4_vzq0G-q2tte9qqn2Oq1Ns_RKrXssqWux0OiuaLdC-tyqRrsV1ZsWrfY8qmWN16fkqFK1w7O_PCavd7cv84dg8XT_OJ8tgiIUqT9QxTHwPFUs5KziFcaYpyISqETBsSxZDCzNeF6GYYb7BwC4woQlwEXOAPmYXAxzW2vet-g6uTZb2_iVMowyITIQnh2Ty4EqrHHOYiVbqzfK7iQwubdRehvlr42enQ7sh65x9z8oZ_O3oeMHqxV13A</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Muriel, R.</creator><creator>Balbontín, J.</creator><creator>Calabuig, C. P.</creator><creator>Morlanes, V.</creator><creator>Ferrer, M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4037-7438</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Does translocation affect short‐term survival in a long‐lived species, the Spanish imperial eagle?</title><author>Muriel, R. ; Balbontín, J. ; Calabuig, C. P. ; Morlanes, V. ; Ferrer, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2977-9a5513b7a0230f3fe5eb7949ea9c3edd0510783bd228e2831113ae606139b01e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>adaptive management</topic><topic>Aquila adalberti</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Capture-recapture studies</topic><topic>capture–recapture</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>electrocution</topic><topic>Electrocutions</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>multi‐event</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Pylons</topic><topic>radio‐tracking</topic><topic>reintroduction</topic><topic>Site fidelity</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>tag retention</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Translocation</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muriel, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balbontín, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calabuig, C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morlanes, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrer, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Animal conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muriel, R.</au><au>Balbontín, J.</au><au>Calabuig, C. P.</au><au>Morlanes, V.</au><au>Ferrer, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does translocation affect short‐term survival in a long‐lived species, the Spanish imperial eagle?</atitle><jtitle>Animal conservation</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>38-50</pages><issn>1367-9430</issn><eissn>1469-1795</eissn><abstract>In long‐lived species, usually with deferred maturity and low release numbers, the success of conservation translocations is especially sensitive to survival and site fidelity during the prolonged establishment phase. Concurrent management actions usually implemented in threatened populations may also influence translocation‐related responses. Therefore, the specific performance of translocations should be ideally assessed on vital rates of comparable management groups while accounting for other conservation actions. In this study, we analysed the impact of translocation on the short‐term survival and the relative contribution of electrocution on power pylons by comparing translocated and wild‐reared radio‐tracked juvenile Spanish imperial eagles Aquila adalberti before and after the implementation of further long‐term conservation actions of the species and other generic measures in southern Spain. A multi‐event multi‐state capture–recapture approach accounting for tag retention was applied on a long‐term dataset of resightings and dead recoveries throughout the first 2 years after fledging. Survival probability was similar in translocated and contemporary non‐translocated eagles, but higher than in wild‐reared birds before the generalization of multi‐action plans from the 1980s. It was also higher during early dispersal than in the post‐fledging dependence period. Although mortality due to electrocution decreased in absolute terms after implementing anti‐electrocution measures, its relative contribution as the main mortality source did not differ between translocated and wild‐reared birds or between periods (65%). Our results show that when translocations are properly implemented, observed vital rates of released animals can be comparable to those of wild‐reared individuals subjected to similar generic management addressing mortality sources. As for any management action, post‐release monitoring should play a key role in translocation programmes, with emphasis on comparative studies analysing potential factors affecting survival under active management contexts. Determination of vital rates through long‐term monitoring is essential for translocation success assessment, particularly in long‐lived species with deferred maturity and prolonged establishment stages under general multi‐action management programs. Through a multi‐event capture‐recapture approach on a long‐term mixed data set, we show that short‐term survival of translocated Spanish imperial eagles was similar to non‐translocated contemporary eagles during post‐fledging and dispersal stages, whereas specific and general actions aimed at controlling mortality factors notably increased survival, despite electrocution on pylons still being the main mortality source. Therefore, translocations do not necessarily entail extra costs on survival when properly implemented.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/acv.12597</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4037-7438</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1367-9430
ispartof Animal conservation, 2021-02, Vol.24 (1), p.38-50
issn 1367-9430
1469-1795
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2489981961
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects adaptive management
Aquila adalberti
Birds
Capture-recapture studies
capture–recapture
Comparative analysis
Comparative studies
Conservation
Dispersal
electrocution
Electrocutions
Habitat selection
Impact analysis
Juveniles
Management
Mortality
multi‐event
Probability theory
Pylons
radio‐tracking
reintroduction
Site fidelity
Species
Survival
tag retention
Threatened species
Translocation
Wildlife conservation
title Does translocation affect short‐term survival in a long‐lived species, the Spanish imperial eagle?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20translocation%20affect%20short%E2%80%90term%20survival%20in%20a%20long%E2%80%90lived%20species,%20the%20Spanish%20imperial%20eagle?&rft.jtitle=Animal%20conservation&rft.au=Muriel,%20R.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=38-50&rft.issn=1367-9430&rft.eissn=1469-1795&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/acv.12597&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2489981961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489981961&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true