Imeglimin Does Not Induce Clinically Relevant Pharmacokinetic Interactions When Combined with Either Metformin or Sitagliptin in Healthy Subjects
Background and Objectives Imeglimin (IMEG) is the first in a novel class of oral glucose-lowering agents with a unique mechanism of action targeting mitochondrial bioenergetics. We assessed whether repeated co-administration of IMEG and either metformin (MET) or sitagliptin (SITA) would influence th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical pharmacokinetics 2020-10, Vol.59 (10), p.1261-1271 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1271 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1261 |
container_title | Clinical pharmacokinetics |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Fouqueray, Pascale Perrimond-Dauchy, Sandrine Bolze, Sébastien |
description | Background and Objectives
Imeglimin (IMEG) is the first in a novel class of oral glucose-lowering agents with a unique mechanism of action targeting mitochondrial bioenergetics. We assessed whether repeated co-administration of IMEG and either metformin (MET) or sitagliptin (SITA) would influence the pharmacokinetics of either MET or SITA in healthy Caucasian men.
Methods
Healthy Caucasian men received either MET 850 mg twice daily with placebo (
n
= 16) or SITA 100 mg once daily with placebo (
n
= 16) on days 1–6, followed by MET 850 mg twice daily with IMEG 1500 mg twice daily or SITA 100 mg once daily with IMEG 1500 mg twice daily on days 7–12. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from blood and urine; levels of all compounds were evaluated using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.
Results
Systemic exposure (AUC
0–τ
area under the plasma concentration-time curve over a dosing interval and maximum concentration) to MET was 14% and 10% lower, respectively, when administered with IMEG. Approximately 40% of MET was excreted unchanged in urine, decreasing to 34% when given with IMEG. The 90% confidence intervals for AUC
0–τ
and maximum concentration indicated no effect of co-administration on systemic exposure to MET. Mean AUC
0–τ
and maximum concentration of SITA were similar with or without IMEG. Median times to maximum concentration were 0.7 and 1.0 h and mean elimination half-lives were 8.2 and 8.7 h with and without IMEG, respectively. Systemic exposure to IMEG was similar to previous phase I studies.
Conclusions
Co-administration of IMEG with MET or SITA did not result in clinically relevant changes in systemic exposure to MET or SITA, although minor reductions in exposure (AUC
0–τ
and maximum concentration) and renal elimination were noted when MET was given with IMEG vs placebo.
Clinical Trial Registration
EudraCT2009-014520-40 (MET-IMEG DDI) and EudraCT2010-022926-34 (SITA-IMEG DDI) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40262-020-00886-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2489782262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2489782262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-dd13187931444a9321ccd9e79d25e451bae2ac9a266ebf1abbc28ac7a264fe193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1O3DAQha0KVBbaF-hFZYnrgP82iS-rhZaV-FNp1UvLcSast4m92A4oj8EbY7pQ7pAsW-P55hxpDkJfKDmihFTHURBWsoIwUhBS12UxfUAzSitZUMnKHTQjnLJiLku-h_ZjXJNMMUI-oj3OWEWEIDP0uBzgtreDdfjEQ8SXPuGla0cDeNFbZ43u-wn_hB7utUv4eqXDoI3_ax0kazKaIGiTrHcR_1mBwws_NLnZ4gebVvg0XxDwBaTOh2cTH_CNTTpbblIu8zkD3afVhG_GZg0mxU9ot9N9hM8v7wH6_f301-KsOL_6sVx8Oy8Mr-apaFvKaV1JToUQWnJGjWklVLJlcxBz2mhg2kjNyhKajuqmMazWpsofogMq-QE63Opugr8bISa19mNw2VIxUcuqZnm5mWJbygQfY4BObYIddJgUJeo5BbVNQeUU1L8U1JSHvr5Ij80A7f-R17VngG-BmFvuFsKb9zuyT-8Nldc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489782262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imeglimin Does Not Induce Clinically Relevant Pharmacokinetic Interactions When Combined with Either Metformin or Sitagliptin in Healthy Subjects</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Fouqueray, Pascale ; Perrimond-Dauchy, Sandrine ; Bolze, Sébastien</creator><creatorcontrib>Fouqueray, Pascale ; Perrimond-Dauchy, Sandrine ; Bolze, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives
Imeglimin (IMEG) is the first in a novel class of oral glucose-lowering agents with a unique mechanism of action targeting mitochondrial bioenergetics. We assessed whether repeated co-administration of IMEG and either metformin (MET) or sitagliptin (SITA) would influence the pharmacokinetics of either MET or SITA in healthy Caucasian men.
Methods
Healthy Caucasian men received either MET 850 mg twice daily with placebo (
n
= 16) or SITA 100 mg once daily with placebo (
n
= 16) on days 1–6, followed by MET 850 mg twice daily with IMEG 1500 mg twice daily or SITA 100 mg once daily with IMEG 1500 mg twice daily on days 7–12. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from blood and urine; levels of all compounds were evaluated using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.
Results
Systemic exposure (AUC
0–τ
area under the plasma concentration-time curve over a dosing interval and maximum concentration) to MET was 14% and 10% lower, respectively, when administered with IMEG. Approximately 40% of MET was excreted unchanged in urine, decreasing to 34% when given with IMEG. The 90% confidence intervals for AUC
0–τ
and maximum concentration indicated no effect of co-administration on systemic exposure to MET. Mean AUC
0–τ
and maximum concentration of SITA were similar with or without IMEG. Median times to maximum concentration were 0.7 and 1.0 h and mean elimination half-lives were 8.2 and 8.7 h with and without IMEG, respectively. Systemic exposure to IMEG was similar to previous phase I studies.
Conclusions
Co-administration of IMEG with MET or SITA did not result in clinically relevant changes in systemic exposure to MET or SITA, although minor reductions in exposure (AUC
0–τ
and maximum concentration) and renal elimination were noted when MET was given with IMEG vs placebo.
Clinical Trial Registration
EudraCT2009-014520-40 (MET-IMEG DDI) and EudraCT2010-022926-34 (SITA-IMEG DDI)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0312-5963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40262-020-00886-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32270440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Antidiabetics ; Bioenergetics ; Blood pressure ; Chromatography ; Drug dosages ; Drug interactions ; EudraCT ; EudraCT2009-014520-40 ; EudraCT2010-022926-34 ; Glucose ; Insulin ; Internal Medicine ; Mass spectrometry ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Research Article ; Pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Pharmacotherapy ; Plasma ; Salt ; Sample size ; Scientific imaging ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020-10, Vol.59 (10), p.1261-1271</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Oct 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-dd13187931444a9321ccd9e79d25e451bae2ac9a266ebf1abbc28ac7a264fe193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-dd13187931444a9321ccd9e79d25e451bae2ac9a266ebf1abbc28ac7a264fe193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40262-020-00886-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40262-020-00886-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32270440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fouqueray, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrimond-Dauchy, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolze, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><title>Imeglimin Does Not Induce Clinically Relevant Pharmacokinetic Interactions When Combined with Either Metformin or Sitagliptin in Healthy Subjects</title><title>Clinical pharmacokinetics</title><addtitle>Clin Pharmacokinet</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Pharmacokinet</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives
Imeglimin (IMEG) is the first in a novel class of oral glucose-lowering agents with a unique mechanism of action targeting mitochondrial bioenergetics. We assessed whether repeated co-administration of IMEG and either metformin (MET) or sitagliptin (SITA) would influence the pharmacokinetics of either MET or SITA in healthy Caucasian men.
Methods
Healthy Caucasian men received either MET 850 mg twice daily with placebo (
n
= 16) or SITA 100 mg once daily with placebo (
n
= 16) on days 1–6, followed by MET 850 mg twice daily with IMEG 1500 mg twice daily or SITA 100 mg once daily with IMEG 1500 mg twice daily on days 7–12. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from blood and urine; levels of all compounds were evaluated using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.
Results
Systemic exposure (AUC
0–τ
area under the plasma concentration-time curve over a dosing interval and maximum concentration) to MET was 14% and 10% lower, respectively, when administered with IMEG. Approximately 40% of MET was excreted unchanged in urine, decreasing to 34% when given with IMEG. The 90% confidence intervals for AUC
0–τ
and maximum concentration indicated no effect of co-administration on systemic exposure to MET. Mean AUC
0–τ
and maximum concentration of SITA were similar with or without IMEG. Median times to maximum concentration were 0.7 and 1.0 h and mean elimination half-lives were 8.2 and 8.7 h with and without IMEG, respectively. Systemic exposure to IMEG was similar to previous phase I studies.
Conclusions
Co-administration of IMEG with MET or SITA did not result in clinically relevant changes in systemic exposure to MET or SITA, although minor reductions in exposure (AUC
0–τ
and maximum concentration) and renal elimination were noted when MET was given with IMEG vs placebo.
Clinical Trial Registration
EudraCT2009-014520-40 (MET-IMEG DDI) and EudraCT2010-022926-34 (SITA-IMEG DDI)</description><subject>Antidiabetics</subject><subject>Bioenergetics</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug interactions</subject><subject>EudraCT</subject><subject>EudraCT2009-014520-40</subject><subject>EudraCT2010-022926-34</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Pharmacotherapy</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Salt</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0312-5963</issn><issn>1179-1926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1O3DAQha0KVBbaF-hFZYnrgP82iS-rhZaV-FNp1UvLcSast4m92A4oj8EbY7pQ7pAsW-P55hxpDkJfKDmihFTHURBWsoIwUhBS12UxfUAzSitZUMnKHTQjnLJiLku-h_ZjXJNMMUI-oj3OWEWEIDP0uBzgtreDdfjEQ8SXPuGla0cDeNFbZ43u-wn_hB7utUv4eqXDoI3_ax0kazKaIGiTrHcR_1mBwws_NLnZ4gebVvg0XxDwBaTOh2cTH_CNTTpbblIu8zkD3afVhG_GZg0mxU9ot9N9hM8v7wH6_f301-KsOL_6sVx8Oy8Mr-apaFvKaV1JToUQWnJGjWklVLJlcxBz2mhg2kjNyhKajuqmMazWpsofogMq-QE63Opugr8bISa19mNw2VIxUcuqZnm5mWJbygQfY4BObYIddJgUJeo5BbVNQeUU1L8U1JSHvr5Ij80A7f-R17VngG-BmFvuFsKb9zuyT-8Nldc</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Fouqueray, Pascale</creator><creator>Perrimond-Dauchy, Sandrine</creator><creator>Bolze, Sébastien</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Imeglimin Does Not Induce Clinically Relevant Pharmacokinetic Interactions When Combined with Either Metformin or Sitagliptin in Healthy Subjects</title><author>Fouqueray, Pascale ; Perrimond-Dauchy, Sandrine ; Bolze, Sébastien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-dd13187931444a9321ccd9e79d25e451bae2ac9a266ebf1abbc28ac7a264fe193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antidiabetics</topic><topic>Bioenergetics</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug interactions</topic><topic>EudraCT</topic><topic>EudraCT2009-014520-40</topic><topic>EudraCT2010-022926-34</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Pharmacotherapy</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Salt</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fouqueray, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrimond-Dauchy, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolze, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Clinical pharmacokinetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fouqueray, Pascale</au><au>Perrimond-Dauchy, Sandrine</au><au>Bolze, Sébastien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imeglimin Does Not Induce Clinically Relevant Pharmacokinetic Interactions When Combined with Either Metformin or Sitagliptin in Healthy Subjects</atitle><jtitle>Clinical pharmacokinetics</jtitle><stitle>Clin Pharmacokinet</stitle><addtitle>Clin Pharmacokinet</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1261</spage><epage>1271</epage><pages>1261-1271</pages><issn>0312-5963</issn><eissn>1179-1926</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives
Imeglimin (IMEG) is the first in a novel class of oral glucose-lowering agents with a unique mechanism of action targeting mitochondrial bioenergetics. We assessed whether repeated co-administration of IMEG and either metformin (MET) or sitagliptin (SITA) would influence the pharmacokinetics of either MET or SITA in healthy Caucasian men.
Methods
Healthy Caucasian men received either MET 850 mg twice daily with placebo (
n
= 16) or SITA 100 mg once daily with placebo (
n
= 16) on days 1–6, followed by MET 850 mg twice daily with IMEG 1500 mg twice daily or SITA 100 mg once daily with IMEG 1500 mg twice daily on days 7–12. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from blood and urine; levels of all compounds were evaluated using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.
Results
Systemic exposure (AUC
0–τ
area under the plasma concentration-time curve over a dosing interval and maximum concentration) to MET was 14% and 10% lower, respectively, when administered with IMEG. Approximately 40% of MET was excreted unchanged in urine, decreasing to 34% when given with IMEG. The 90% confidence intervals for AUC
0–τ
and maximum concentration indicated no effect of co-administration on systemic exposure to MET. Mean AUC
0–τ
and maximum concentration of SITA were similar with or without IMEG. Median times to maximum concentration were 0.7 and 1.0 h and mean elimination half-lives were 8.2 and 8.7 h with and without IMEG, respectively. Systemic exposure to IMEG was similar to previous phase I studies.
Conclusions
Co-administration of IMEG with MET or SITA did not result in clinically relevant changes in systemic exposure to MET or SITA, although minor reductions in exposure (AUC
0–τ
and maximum concentration) and renal elimination were noted when MET was given with IMEG vs placebo.
Clinical Trial Registration
EudraCT2009-014520-40 (MET-IMEG DDI) and EudraCT2010-022926-34 (SITA-IMEG DDI)</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>32270440</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40262-020-00886-y</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0312-5963 |
ispartof | Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2020-10, Vol.59 (10), p.1261-1271 |
issn | 0312-5963 1179-1926 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2489782262 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Antidiabetics Bioenergetics Blood pressure Chromatography Drug dosages Drug interactions EudraCT EudraCT2009-014520-40 EudraCT2010-022926-34 Glucose Insulin Internal Medicine Mass spectrometry Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Research Article Pharmacokinetics Pharmacology/Toxicology Pharmacotherapy Plasma Salt Sample size Scientific imaging Urine |
title | Imeglimin Does Not Induce Clinically Relevant Pharmacokinetic Interactions When Combined with Either Metformin or Sitagliptin in Healthy Subjects |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A59%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imeglimin%20Does%20Not%20Induce%20Clinically%20Relevant%20Pharmacokinetic%20Interactions%20When%20Combined%20with%20Either%20Metformin%20or%20Sitagliptin%20in%20Healthy%20Subjects&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20pharmacokinetics&rft.au=Fouqueray,%20Pascale&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1261&rft.epage=1271&rft.pages=1261-1271&rft.issn=0312-5963&rft.eissn=1179-1926&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40262-020-00886-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2489782262%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489782262&rft_id=info:pmid/32270440&rfr_iscdi=true |