Persistent Inequities in Cannabis Policy

Marijuana policy is slowly but steadily catching up to American preferences. Since 1996, 35 states have loosened cannabis laws. A supposed benefit of policy change, racial justice has too often been eclipsed by arguments touting the economic and personal liberty gains of legalization. [...]recently,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Judges' journal 2021-01, Vol.60 (1), p.9-13
Hauptverfasser: Harris, Katharine Neill, Martin, William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 9
container_title The Judges' journal
container_volume 60
creator Harris, Katharine Neill
Martin, William
description Marijuana policy is slowly but steadily catching up to American preferences. Since 1996, 35 states have loosened cannabis laws. A supposed benefit of policy change, racial justice has too often been eclipsed by arguments touting the economic and personal liberty gains of legalization. [...]recently, the expectation that legalization will improve racial equity has been treated as a foregone conclusion, one requiring no additional action beyond legalization itself. Richard Nixon, first in his presidential campaign and then during his tenure in the White House, exploited and perpetuated white resentment over integration and civil rights by constructing drugs and crime as problems of the urban poor and minorities. Reflecting the changing attitudes on cannabis use, 11 states reduced penalties for cannabis possession between 1973 and 1978.16 But the ensuing intensification of the drug war halted further reforms, and state cannabis laws remained relatively stagnant until 1996, when California legalized cannabis for medical use.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2489352440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A651614492</galeid><sourcerecordid>A651614492</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1330-a1afee1b1730570feb96241abdcd8882efab322cec90f2e94a21af719947d8573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzU1LxDAQBuAgCtbV_1Dw4qWSTNImOS7Fj4UF96DnkqaTkqWbuk178N8bUBChzGGY4XlnLkgGrIJCS6EvSUapkAVoCdfkJsZjGrlmKiMPB5yijzOGOd8FPC9-9hhzH_LahGBaH_PDOHj7dUuunBki3v32Dfl4fnqvX4v928uu3u6LnnFOC8OMQ2Qtk5yWkjpsdQWCmbaznVIK0JmWA1i0mjpALQykhGRaC9mpUvINuf-5-zmN5wXj3BzHZQrpZQNCaV6CEPRP9WbAxgc3zpOxJx9ts61KVjEhNCRVrKgeA05mGAM6n9b__OOKT9XhyduVwDdYJGhU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489352440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Persistent Inequities in Cannabis Policy</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Harris, Katharine Neill ; Martin, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Harris, Katharine Neill ; Martin, William</creatorcontrib><description>Marijuana policy is slowly but steadily catching up to American preferences. Since 1996, 35 states have loosened cannabis laws. A supposed benefit of policy change, racial justice has too often been eclipsed by arguments touting the economic and personal liberty gains of legalization. [...]recently, the expectation that legalization will improve racial equity has been treated as a foregone conclusion, one requiring no additional action beyond legalization itself. Richard Nixon, first in his presidential campaign and then during his tenure in the White House, exploited and perpetuated white resentment over integration and civil rights by constructing drugs and crime as problems of the urban poor and minorities. Reflecting the changing attitudes on cannabis use, 11 states reduced penalties for cannabis possession between 1973 and 1978.16 But the ensuing intensification of the drug war halted further reforms, and state cannabis laws remained relatively stagnant until 1996, when California legalized cannabis for medical use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2972</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-9749</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Civil rights ; Clinics ; Convictions ; Criminal records ; Decriminalization ; Demographic aspects ; Drug legalization ; Drug trafficking ; Fines &amp; penalties ; History ; Inequality ; Law enforcement ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legalization of narcotics ; Marijuana ; Medical marijuana ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Narcotics ; Narcotics, Control of ; Race discrimination ; Racial differences ; Racism ; Reforms ; Remedies ; Uniform Crime Reports</subject><ispartof>The Judges' journal, 2021-01, Vol.60 (1), p.9-13</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Winter 2021</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harris, Katharine Neill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, William</creatorcontrib><title>Persistent Inequities in Cannabis Policy</title><title>The Judges' journal</title><description>Marijuana policy is slowly but steadily catching up to American preferences. Since 1996, 35 states have loosened cannabis laws. A supposed benefit of policy change, racial justice has too often been eclipsed by arguments touting the economic and personal liberty gains of legalization. [...]recently, the expectation that legalization will improve racial equity has been treated as a foregone conclusion, one requiring no additional action beyond legalization itself. Richard Nixon, first in his presidential campaign and then during his tenure in the White House, exploited and perpetuated white resentment over integration and civil rights by constructing drugs and crime as problems of the urban poor and minorities. Reflecting the changing attitudes on cannabis use, 11 states reduced penalties for cannabis possession between 1973 and 1978.16 But the ensuing intensification of the drug war halted further reforms, and state cannabis laws remained relatively stagnant until 1996, when California legalized cannabis for medical use.</description><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Convictions</subject><subject>Criminal records</subject><subject>Decriminalization</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Drug legalization</subject><subject>Drug trafficking</subject><subject>Fines &amp; penalties</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legalization of narcotics</subject><subject>Marijuana</subject><subject>Medical marijuana</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Narcotics, Control of</subject><subject>Race discrimination</subject><subject>Racial differences</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Remedies</subject><subject>Uniform Crime Reports</subject><issn>0047-2972</issn><issn>2162-9749</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptzU1LxDAQBuAgCtbV_1Dw4qWSTNImOS7Fj4UF96DnkqaTkqWbuk178N8bUBChzGGY4XlnLkgGrIJCS6EvSUapkAVoCdfkJsZjGrlmKiMPB5yijzOGOd8FPC9-9hhzH_LahGBaH_PDOHj7dUuunBki3v32Dfl4fnqvX4v928uu3u6LnnFOC8OMQ2Qtk5yWkjpsdQWCmbaznVIK0JmWA1i0mjpALQykhGRaC9mpUvINuf-5-zmN5wXj3BzHZQrpZQNCaV6CEPRP9WbAxgc3zpOxJx9ts61KVjEhNCRVrKgeA05mGAM6n9b__OOKT9XhyduVwDdYJGhU</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Harris, Katharine Neill</creator><creator>Martin, William</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Persistent Inequities in Cannabis Policy</title><author>Harris, Katharine Neill ; Martin, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1330-a1afee1b1730570feb96241abdcd8882efab322cec90f2e94a21af719947d8573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Convictions</topic><topic>Criminal records</topic><topic>Decriminalization</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Drug legalization</topic><topic>Drug trafficking</topic><topic>Fines &amp; penalties</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legalization of narcotics</topic><topic>Marijuana</topic><topic>Medical marijuana</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Narcotics, Control of</topic><topic>Race discrimination</topic><topic>Racial differences</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Remedies</topic><topic>Uniform Crime Reports</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harris, Katharine Neill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, William</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Judges' journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harris, Katharine Neill</au><au>Martin, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Persistent Inequities in Cannabis Policy</atitle><jtitle>The Judges' journal</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>9-13</pages><issn>0047-2972</issn><eissn>2162-9749</eissn><abstract>Marijuana policy is slowly but steadily catching up to American preferences. Since 1996, 35 states have loosened cannabis laws. A supposed benefit of policy change, racial justice has too often been eclipsed by arguments touting the economic and personal liberty gains of legalization. [...]recently, the expectation that legalization will improve racial equity has been treated as a foregone conclusion, one requiring no additional action beyond legalization itself. Richard Nixon, first in his presidential campaign and then during his tenure in the White House, exploited and perpetuated white resentment over integration and civil rights by constructing drugs and crime as problems of the urban poor and minorities. Reflecting the changing attitudes on cannabis use, 11 states reduced penalties for cannabis possession between 1973 and 1978.16 But the ensuing intensification of the drug war halted further reforms, and state cannabis laws remained relatively stagnant until 1996, when California legalized cannabis for medical use.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2972
ispartof The Judges' journal, 2021-01, Vol.60 (1), p.9-13
issn 0047-2972
2162-9749
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2489352440
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Civil rights
Clinics
Convictions
Criminal records
Decriminalization
Demographic aspects
Drug legalization
Drug trafficking
Fines & penalties
History
Inequality
Law enforcement
Laws, regulations and rules
Legalization of narcotics
Marijuana
Medical marijuana
Minority & ethnic groups
Narcotics
Narcotics, Control of
Race discrimination
Racial differences
Racism
Reforms
Remedies
Uniform Crime Reports
title Persistent Inequities in Cannabis Policy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T04%3A19%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Persistent%20Inequities%20in%20Cannabis%20Policy&rft.jtitle=The%20Judges'%20journal&rft.au=Harris,%20Katharine%20Neill&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=9-13&rft.issn=0047-2972&rft.eissn=2162-9749&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA651614492%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489352440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A651614492&rfr_iscdi=true