Persistent Inequities in Cannabis Policy
Marijuana policy is slowly but steadily catching up to American preferences. Since 1996, 35 states have loosened cannabis laws. A supposed benefit of policy change, racial justice has too often been eclipsed by arguments touting the economic and personal liberty gains of legalization. [...]recently,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Judges' journal 2021-01, Vol.60 (1), p.9-13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | The Judges' journal |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Harris, Katharine Neill Martin, William |
description | Marijuana policy is slowly but steadily catching up to American preferences. Since 1996, 35 states have loosened cannabis laws. A supposed benefit of policy change, racial justice has too often been eclipsed by arguments touting the economic and personal liberty gains of legalization. [...]recently, the expectation that legalization will improve racial equity has been treated as a foregone conclusion, one requiring no additional action beyond legalization itself. Richard Nixon, first in his presidential campaign and then during his tenure in the White House, exploited and perpetuated white resentment over integration and civil rights by constructing drugs and crime as problems of the urban poor and minorities. Reflecting the changing attitudes on cannabis use, 11 states reduced penalties for cannabis possession between 1973 and 1978.16 But the ensuing intensification of the drug war halted further reforms, and state cannabis laws remained relatively stagnant until 1996, when California legalized cannabis for medical use. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2489352440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A651614492</galeid><sourcerecordid>A651614492</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1330-a1afee1b1730570feb96241abdcd8882efab322cec90f2e94a21af719947d8573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzU1LxDAQBuAgCtbV_1Dw4qWSTNImOS7Fj4UF96DnkqaTkqWbuk178N8bUBChzGGY4XlnLkgGrIJCS6EvSUapkAVoCdfkJsZjGrlmKiMPB5yijzOGOd8FPC9-9hhzH_LahGBaH_PDOHj7dUuunBki3v32Dfl4fnqvX4v928uu3u6LnnFOC8OMQ2Qtk5yWkjpsdQWCmbaznVIK0JmWA1i0mjpALQykhGRaC9mpUvINuf-5-zmN5wXj3BzHZQrpZQNCaV6CEPRP9WbAxgc3zpOxJx9ts61KVjEhNCRVrKgeA05mGAM6n9b__OOKT9XhyduVwDdYJGhU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489352440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Persistent Inequities in Cannabis Policy</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Harris, Katharine Neill ; Martin, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Harris, Katharine Neill ; Martin, William</creatorcontrib><description>Marijuana policy is slowly but steadily catching up to American preferences. Since 1996, 35 states have loosened cannabis laws. A supposed benefit of policy change, racial justice has too often been eclipsed by arguments touting the economic and personal liberty gains of legalization. [...]recently, the expectation that legalization will improve racial equity has been treated as a foregone conclusion, one requiring no additional action beyond legalization itself. Richard Nixon, first in his presidential campaign and then during his tenure in the White House, exploited and perpetuated white resentment over integration and civil rights by constructing drugs and crime as problems of the urban poor and minorities. Reflecting the changing attitudes on cannabis use, 11 states reduced penalties for cannabis possession between 1973 and 1978.16 But the ensuing intensification of the drug war halted further reforms, and state cannabis laws remained relatively stagnant until 1996, when California legalized cannabis for medical use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2972</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-9749</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Civil rights ; Clinics ; Convictions ; Criminal records ; Decriminalization ; Demographic aspects ; Drug legalization ; Drug trafficking ; Fines & penalties ; History ; Inequality ; Law enforcement ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legalization of narcotics ; Marijuana ; Medical marijuana ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Narcotics ; Narcotics, Control of ; Race discrimination ; Racial differences ; Racism ; Reforms ; Remedies ; Uniform Crime Reports</subject><ispartof>The Judges' journal, 2021-01, Vol.60 (1), p.9-13</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Winter 2021</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harris, Katharine Neill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, William</creatorcontrib><title>Persistent Inequities in Cannabis Policy</title><title>The Judges' journal</title><description>Marijuana policy is slowly but steadily catching up to American preferences. Since 1996, 35 states have loosened cannabis laws. A supposed benefit of policy change, racial justice has too often been eclipsed by arguments touting the economic and personal liberty gains of legalization. [...]recently, the expectation that legalization will improve racial equity has been treated as a foregone conclusion, one requiring no additional action beyond legalization itself. Richard Nixon, first in his presidential campaign and then during his tenure in the White House, exploited and perpetuated white resentment over integration and civil rights by constructing drugs and crime as problems of the urban poor and minorities. Reflecting the changing attitudes on cannabis use, 11 states reduced penalties for cannabis possession between 1973 and 1978.16 But the ensuing intensification of the drug war halted further reforms, and state cannabis laws remained relatively stagnant until 1996, when California legalized cannabis for medical use.</description><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Convictions</subject><subject>Criminal records</subject><subject>Decriminalization</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Drug legalization</subject><subject>Drug trafficking</subject><subject>Fines & penalties</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legalization of narcotics</subject><subject>Marijuana</subject><subject>Medical marijuana</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Narcotics, Control of</subject><subject>Race discrimination</subject><subject>Racial differences</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Remedies</subject><subject>Uniform Crime Reports</subject><issn>0047-2972</issn><issn>2162-9749</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptzU1LxDAQBuAgCtbV_1Dw4qWSTNImOS7Fj4UF96DnkqaTkqWbuk178N8bUBChzGGY4XlnLkgGrIJCS6EvSUapkAVoCdfkJsZjGrlmKiMPB5yijzOGOd8FPC9-9hhzH_LahGBaH_PDOHj7dUuunBki3v32Dfl4fnqvX4v928uu3u6LnnFOC8OMQ2Qtk5yWkjpsdQWCmbaznVIK0JmWA1i0mjpALQykhGRaC9mpUvINuf-5-zmN5wXj3BzHZQrpZQNCaV6CEPRP9WbAxgc3zpOxJx9ts61KVjEhNCRVrKgeA05mGAM6n9b__OOKT9XhyduVwDdYJGhU</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Harris, Katharine Neill</creator><creator>Martin, William</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Persistent Inequities in Cannabis Policy</title><author>Harris, Katharine Neill ; Martin, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1330-a1afee1b1730570feb96241abdcd8882efab322cec90f2e94a21af719947d8573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Convictions</topic><topic>Criminal records</topic><topic>Decriminalization</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Drug legalization</topic><topic>Drug trafficking</topic><topic>Fines & penalties</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legalization of narcotics</topic><topic>Marijuana</topic><topic>Medical marijuana</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Narcotics, Control of</topic><topic>Race discrimination</topic><topic>Racial differences</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Remedies</topic><topic>Uniform Crime Reports</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harris, Katharine Neill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, William</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Judges' journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harris, Katharine Neill</au><au>Martin, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Persistent Inequities in Cannabis Policy</atitle><jtitle>The Judges' journal</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>9-13</pages><issn>0047-2972</issn><eissn>2162-9749</eissn><abstract>Marijuana policy is slowly but steadily catching up to American preferences. Since 1996, 35 states have loosened cannabis laws. A supposed benefit of policy change, racial justice has too often been eclipsed by arguments touting the economic and personal liberty gains of legalization. [...]recently, the expectation that legalization will improve racial equity has been treated as a foregone conclusion, one requiring no additional action beyond legalization itself. Richard Nixon, first in his presidential campaign and then during his tenure in the White House, exploited and perpetuated white resentment over integration and civil rights by constructing drugs and crime as problems of the urban poor and minorities. Reflecting the changing attitudes on cannabis use, 11 states reduced penalties for cannabis possession between 1973 and 1978.16 But the ensuing intensification of the drug war halted further reforms, and state cannabis laws remained relatively stagnant until 1996, when California legalized cannabis for medical use.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-2972 |
ispartof | The Judges' journal, 2021-01, Vol.60 (1), p.9-13 |
issn | 0047-2972 2162-9749 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2489352440 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Civil rights Clinics Convictions Criminal records Decriminalization Demographic aspects Drug legalization Drug trafficking Fines & penalties History Inequality Law enforcement Laws, regulations and rules Legalization of narcotics Marijuana Medical marijuana Minority & ethnic groups Narcotics Narcotics, Control of Race discrimination Racial differences Racism Reforms Remedies Uniform Crime Reports |
title | Persistent Inequities in Cannabis Policy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T04%3A19%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Persistent%20Inequities%20in%20Cannabis%20Policy&rft.jtitle=The%20Judges'%20journal&rft.au=Harris,%20Katharine%20Neill&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=9-13&rft.issn=0047-2972&rft.eissn=2162-9749&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA651614492%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489352440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A651614492&rfr_iscdi=true |