Anarchism and the Indigenous Peoples of Guatemala: A Tenuous Relation

While the indigenous peoples of Guatemala and its history of anarchist thought are seldom studied together but there is merit to exploring the differences and convergences between the anarchist movement's perspectives on class and ethnicity and those of better understood liberal, socialist and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anarchist Studies 2020-09, Vol.28 (2), p.76-92
1. Verfasser: Monteflores, Omar Lucas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 92
container_issue 2
container_start_page 76
container_title Anarchist Studies
container_volume 28
creator Monteflores, Omar Lucas
description While the indigenous peoples of Guatemala and its history of anarchist thought are seldom studied together but there is merit to exploring the differences and convergences between the anarchist movement's perspectives on class and ethnicity and those of better understood liberal, socialist and communist traditions. Anarchists in Guatemala made tentative efforts to reach out to rural workers and peasants in the period between 1928 to 1932, but these efforts were circumscribed and largely unsuccessful. They did so under the influence of more structured movements in Mexico and Argentina, which incorporated visions of collective emancipation that would appeal to autonomous indigenous movements; however their brief embrace of these issues, interrupted by fierce repression by the state, was curtailed by the overwhelming urban base from which they intervened in labour and social struggles. The reasons for this failure lay in the history of Guatemalan race relations and the structural divisions between urban and rural society that endured during the transition from colonial to republican society, and which anarchists tied to overcome.
doi_str_mv 10.3898/AS.28.2.04
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_ingen</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2489023951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>lwish/as/2020/00000028/00000002/art00004</ingid><galeid>A646334373</galeid><sourcerecordid>A646334373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3c12ddf596370a46d00ce87743db0d7e9c9d6bdc4d1d0a2fe7b470064882fe93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhnMAiar0wh8gEieQNow_mticiKpSVlTaiq64jry2s2uUdRbbAdpfj0NWgj0gYR88tp95R_NRFC8IVExI8ba9r6ioaAX8SXFGa8YWgjbwrLiI0W2AUy5qwsRZcd16FfTOxX2pvCnTzpZLb9zW-mGM5Z0dDr2N5dCVN6NKdq969a5sy7X14_T_2fYqucE_L552qo_24nieF-sP1-urj4vb1c3yqr1daCZZWjBNqDHdpaxZA4rXBkBb0TScmQ2YxkotTb0xmhtiQNHONhveANRciHyR7Lx4NcsewvBttDHh12EMPkfEnJAEyuQlydTLmdqq3mIf9FaNMWJb81wGzhqWieovwvluSEHpvI3dOz1427n8fuLw-sQhM8n-TLPwp7vlf7PL1ZdT9s3M6jDEGGyHh-D2KjwgAZz6iO09UoEUgWf4_Qw7n9uT1J_k-x8u7lDlKgAFhN8re8HRQhXSZEwSq39IOH1UmWZlGhX8ToWnkyIBQSQSDjUa26mxT5hUwO0jRs5-AfsTu6s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489023951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anarchism and the Indigenous Peoples of Guatemala: A Tenuous Relation</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Monteflores, Omar Lucas</creator><creatorcontrib>Monteflores, Omar Lucas</creatorcontrib><description>While the indigenous peoples of Guatemala and its history of anarchist thought are seldom studied together but there is merit to exploring the differences and convergences between the anarchist movement's perspectives on class and ethnicity and those of better understood liberal, socialist and communist traditions. Anarchists in Guatemala made tentative efforts to reach out to rural workers and peasants in the period between 1928 to 1932, but these efforts were circumscribed and largely unsuccessful. They did so under the influence of more structured movements in Mexico and Argentina, which incorporated visions of collective emancipation that would appeal to autonomous indigenous movements; however their brief embrace of these issues, interrupted by fierce repression by the state, was curtailed by the overwhelming urban base from which they intervened in labour and social struggles. The reasons for this failure lay in the history of Guatemalan race relations and the structural divisions between urban and rural society that endured during the transition from colonial to republican society, and which anarchists tied to overcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2633-8270</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0967-3393</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3898/AS.28.2.04</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Lawrence &amp; Wishart</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Analysis ; Anarchism ; Colonialism ; Communism ; Emancipation ; Ethnicity ; Guatemala ; Hispanic Americans ; History ; Indigenous peoples ; Inequality ; Mayas ; Native peoples ; Peasants ; Political activity ; Race relations ; Rural areas ; Socialism ; Society ; Traditions ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Anarchist Studies, 2020-09, Vol.28 (2), p.76-92</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Lawrence &amp; Wishart Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Lawrence &amp; Wishart 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27325,27905,27906,33755</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monteflores, Omar Lucas</creatorcontrib><title>Anarchism and the Indigenous Peoples of Guatemala: A Tenuous Relation</title><title>Anarchist Studies</title><description>While the indigenous peoples of Guatemala and its history of anarchist thought are seldom studied together but there is merit to exploring the differences and convergences between the anarchist movement's perspectives on class and ethnicity and those of better understood liberal, socialist and communist traditions. Anarchists in Guatemala made tentative efforts to reach out to rural workers and peasants in the period between 1928 to 1932, but these efforts were circumscribed and largely unsuccessful. They did so under the influence of more structured movements in Mexico and Argentina, which incorporated visions of collective emancipation that would appeal to autonomous indigenous movements; however their brief embrace of these issues, interrupted by fierce repression by the state, was curtailed by the overwhelming urban base from which they intervened in labour and social struggles. The reasons for this failure lay in the history of Guatemalan race relations and the structural divisions between urban and rural society that endured during the transition from colonial to republican society, and which anarchists tied to overcome.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anarchism</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Communism</subject><subject>Emancipation</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Guatemala</subject><subject>Hispanic Americans</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Mayas</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Peasants</subject><subject>Political activity</subject><subject>Race relations</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Socialism</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>2633-8270</issn><issn>0967-3393</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>KPI</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhnMAiar0wh8gEieQNow_mticiKpSVlTaiq64jry2s2uUdRbbAdpfj0NWgj0gYR88tp95R_NRFC8IVExI8ba9r6ioaAX8SXFGa8YWgjbwrLiI0W2AUy5qwsRZcd16FfTOxX2pvCnTzpZLb9zW-mGM5Z0dDr2N5dCVN6NKdq969a5sy7X14_T_2fYqucE_L552qo_24nieF-sP1-urj4vb1c3yqr1daCZZWjBNqDHdpaxZA4rXBkBb0TScmQ2YxkotTb0xmhtiQNHONhveANRciHyR7Lx4NcsewvBttDHh12EMPkfEnJAEyuQlydTLmdqq3mIf9FaNMWJb81wGzhqWieovwvluSEHpvI3dOz1427n8fuLw-sQhM8n-TLPwp7vlf7PL1ZdT9s3M6jDEGGyHh-D2KjwgAZz6iO09UoEUgWf4_Qw7n9uT1J_k-x8u7lDlKgAFhN8re8HRQhXSZEwSq39IOH1UmWZlGhX8ToWnkyIBQSQSDjUa26mxT5hUwO0jRs5-AfsTu6s</recordid><startdate>20200922</startdate><enddate>20200922</enddate><creator>Monteflores, Omar Lucas</creator><general>Lawrence &amp; Wishart</general><general>Lawrence &amp; Wishart Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>KPI</scope><scope>ILR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>884</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0I</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200922</creationdate><title>Anarchism and the Indigenous Peoples of Guatemala: A Tenuous Relation</title><author>Monteflores, Omar Lucas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-3c12ddf596370a46d00ce87743db0d7e9c9d6bdc4d1d0a2fe7b470064882fe93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anarchism</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Communism</topic><topic>Emancipation</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Guatemala</topic><topic>Hispanic Americans</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Mayas</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Peasants</topic><topic>Political activity</topic><topic>Race relations</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Socialism</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monteflores, Omar Lucas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Global Issues</collection><collection>Gale Literature Resource Center</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK &amp; Ireland Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Anarchist Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monteflores, Omar Lucas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anarchism and the Indigenous Peoples of Guatemala: A Tenuous Relation</atitle><jtitle>Anarchist Studies</jtitle><date>2020-09-22</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>76</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>76-92</pages><issn>2633-8270</issn><issn>0967-3393</issn><abstract>While the indigenous peoples of Guatemala and its history of anarchist thought are seldom studied together but there is merit to exploring the differences and convergences between the anarchist movement's perspectives on class and ethnicity and those of better understood liberal, socialist and communist traditions. Anarchists in Guatemala made tentative efforts to reach out to rural workers and peasants in the period between 1928 to 1932, but these efforts were circumscribed and largely unsuccessful. They did so under the influence of more structured movements in Mexico and Argentina, which incorporated visions of collective emancipation that would appeal to autonomous indigenous movements; however their brief embrace of these issues, interrupted by fierce repression by the state, was curtailed by the overwhelming urban base from which they intervened in labour and social struggles. The reasons for this failure lay in the history of Guatemalan race relations and the structural divisions between urban and rural society that endured during the transition from colonial to republican society, and which anarchists tied to overcome.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Lawrence &amp; Wishart</pub><doi>10.3898/AS.28.2.04</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2633-8270
ispartof Anarchist Studies, 2020-09, Vol.28 (2), p.76-92
issn 2633-8270
0967-3393
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2489023951
source Sociological Abstracts; Political Science Complete
subjects Agricultural production
Analysis
Anarchism
Colonialism
Communism
Emancipation
Ethnicity
Guatemala
Hispanic Americans
History
Indigenous peoples
Inequality
Mayas
Native peoples
Peasants
Political activity
Race relations
Rural areas
Socialism
Society
Traditions
Workers
title Anarchism and the Indigenous Peoples of Guatemala: A Tenuous Relation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A25%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_ingen&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anarchism%20and%20the%20Indigenous%20Peoples%20of%20Guatemala:%20A%20Tenuous%20Relation&rft.jtitle=Anarchist%20Studies&rft.au=Monteflores,%20Omar%20Lucas&rft.date=2020-09-22&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=76&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=76-92&rft.issn=2633-8270&rft_id=info:doi/10.3898/AS.28.2.04&rft_dat=%3Cgale_ingen%3EA646334373%3C/gale_ingen%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489023951&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A646334373&rft_ingid=lwish/as/2020/00000028/00000002/art00004&rfr_iscdi=true