Rebuilding Tree Cover in Deforested Cocoa Landscapes in Côte d’Ivoire: Factors Affecting the Choice of Species Planted

Intensive cocoa production in Côte d’Ivoire, the world’s leading cocoa producer, has grown at the expense of forest cover. To reverse this trend, the country has adopted a “zero deforestation” agricultural policy and committed to rehabilitating its forest cover through the planting of high-value tre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forests 2021-02, Vol.12 (2), p.198
Hauptverfasser: Atangana, Alain R., Gnangoh, Juvenal Zahoui, Yao, Allegra Kouassi, Kouakou, Thomas d’Aquin, Mian Ndri Nda, Anatole, Kouamé, Christophe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 198
container_title Forests
container_volume 12
creator Atangana, Alain R.
Gnangoh, Juvenal Zahoui
Yao, Allegra Kouassi
Kouakou, Thomas d’Aquin
Mian Ndri Nda, Anatole
Kouamé, Christophe
description Intensive cocoa production in Côte d’Ivoire, the world’s leading cocoa producer, has grown at the expense of forest cover. To reverse this trend, the country has adopted a “zero deforestation” agricultural policy and committed to rehabilitating its forest cover through the planting of high-value tree species in cocoa landscapes using a participatory approach. However, little is known regarding the factors influencing farmers’ introduction of high-value tree species to cocoa landscapes. We tested the hypothesis that ten previously reported factors to influence agroforestry system adoption to predict the number and choice of tree species that farmers introduce to cocoa farms. We interviewed 683 households in the cocoa-producing zone of Côte d’Ivoire and counted tree species on their cocoa farms. On average, two tree species were recorded per surveyed farm. Generalized Poisson regression models revealed that, in the cocoa production area, experience in tree planting and expected benefits, including income and food, influence tree species introduction through planting or “retention” when clearing land for cocoa establishment. The age of the farmer also influenced (p = 0.017) farmers’ tree species planting on cocoa farms. Fewer tree species were introduced into current intensive cocoa-production areas than in “old cocoa-loops” and forested areas. The number of tree species introduced to cocoa farms increased with expected benefits and experience in tree planting. The number of planted tree species also increased with farmers’ age. Tree species were mostly selected for the provision of shade to cocoa, production of useful tree products (38%), and income from the sale of these products (7%). Fruit tree species were the most planted, while timber tree species were mostly spared when clearing land for cocoa production.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/f12020198
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2488850689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2488850689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-f81a982155d72c1f196fd505c7527c06ef78025960040799dff65a3e840b7dec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFKAzEQhoMoWGoPvkHAk4dqkt1sEm9ltVooKFrPS5pM7Ja6WZNtoTdfw_fwDXwTn8SUijiXGWb--Yb5ETql5CLLFLl0lBFGqJIHqEeVUsNcEXH4rz5GgxiXJAUXUrG8h7aPMF_XK1s3L3gWAHDpNxBw3eBrcD5A7MCmnvEaT3Vjo9EtxN24_PrsANvv94_JxtcBrvBYm86HiEfOgel2wG6ReAtfG8De4acWTJ2WH1a6SdQTdOT0KsLgN_fR8_hmVt4Np_e3k3I0HRqmWDd0kmolGeXcCmaoo6pwlhNuBGfCkAKckIRxVRCSE6GUda7gOgOZk7mwYLI-Ottz2-Df1umhaunXoUknK5ZLKTkppEqq873KBB9jAFe1oX7VYVtRUu3Mrf7MzX4AqAFsRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2488850689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rebuilding Tree Cover in Deforested Cocoa Landscapes in Côte d’Ivoire: Factors Affecting the Choice of Species Planted</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Atangana, Alain R. ; Gnangoh, Juvenal Zahoui ; Yao, Allegra Kouassi ; Kouakou, Thomas d’Aquin ; Mian Ndri Nda, Anatole ; Kouamé, Christophe</creator><creatorcontrib>Atangana, Alain R. ; Gnangoh, Juvenal Zahoui ; Yao, Allegra Kouassi ; Kouakou, Thomas d’Aquin ; Mian Ndri Nda, Anatole ; Kouamé, Christophe</creatorcontrib><description>Intensive cocoa production in Côte d’Ivoire, the world’s leading cocoa producer, has grown at the expense of forest cover. To reverse this trend, the country has adopted a “zero deforestation” agricultural policy and committed to rehabilitating its forest cover through the planting of high-value tree species in cocoa landscapes using a participatory approach. However, little is known regarding the factors influencing farmers’ introduction of high-value tree species to cocoa landscapes. We tested the hypothesis that ten previously reported factors to influence agroforestry system adoption to predict the number and choice of tree species that farmers introduce to cocoa farms. We interviewed 683 households in the cocoa-producing zone of Côte d’Ivoire and counted tree species on their cocoa farms. On average, two tree species were recorded per surveyed farm. Generalized Poisson regression models revealed that, in the cocoa production area, experience in tree planting and expected benefits, including income and food, influence tree species introduction through planting or “retention” when clearing land for cocoa establishment. The age of the farmer also influenced (p = 0.017) farmers’ tree species planting on cocoa farms. Fewer tree species were introduced into current intensive cocoa-production areas than in “old cocoa-loops” and forested areas. The number of tree species introduced to cocoa farms increased with expected benefits and experience in tree planting. The number of planted tree species also increased with farmers’ age. Tree species were mostly selected for the provision of shade to cocoa, production of useful tree products (38%), and income from the sale of these products (7%). Fruit tree species were the most planted, while timber tree species were mostly spared when clearing land for cocoa production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/f12020198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural policy ; Agriculture ; Agroforestry ; Biodiversity ; Cocoa ; Deforestation ; Domestication ; Farmers ; Farms ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Forest growth ; Forests ; Fruit trees ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Households ; Income ; Introduced species ; Land clearance ; Landscape ; Plant species introduction ; Planting ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Timber ; Tree planting ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Forests, 2021-02, Vol.12 (2), p.198</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-f81a982155d72c1f196fd505c7527c06ef78025960040799dff65a3e840b7dec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-f81a982155d72c1f196fd505c7527c06ef78025960040799dff65a3e840b7dec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atangana, Alain R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnangoh, Juvenal Zahoui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Allegra Kouassi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouakou, Thomas d’Aquin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mian Ndri Nda, Anatole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouamé, Christophe</creatorcontrib><title>Rebuilding Tree Cover in Deforested Cocoa Landscapes in Côte d’Ivoire: Factors Affecting the Choice of Species Planted</title><title>Forests</title><description>Intensive cocoa production in Côte d’Ivoire, the world’s leading cocoa producer, has grown at the expense of forest cover. To reverse this trend, the country has adopted a “zero deforestation” agricultural policy and committed to rehabilitating its forest cover through the planting of high-value tree species in cocoa landscapes using a participatory approach. However, little is known regarding the factors influencing farmers’ introduction of high-value tree species to cocoa landscapes. We tested the hypothesis that ten previously reported factors to influence agroforestry system adoption to predict the number and choice of tree species that farmers introduce to cocoa farms. We interviewed 683 households in the cocoa-producing zone of Côte d’Ivoire and counted tree species on their cocoa farms. On average, two tree species were recorded per surveyed farm. Generalized Poisson regression models revealed that, in the cocoa production area, experience in tree planting and expected benefits, including income and food, influence tree species introduction through planting or “retention” when clearing land for cocoa establishment. The age of the farmer also influenced (p = 0.017) farmers’ tree species planting on cocoa farms. Fewer tree species were introduced into current intensive cocoa-production areas than in “old cocoa-loops” and forested areas. The number of tree species introduced to cocoa farms increased with expected benefits and experience in tree planting. The number of planted tree species also increased with farmers’ age. Tree species were mostly selected for the provision of shade to cocoa, production of useful tree products (38%), and income from the sale of these products (7%). Fruit tree species were the most planted, while timber tree species were mostly spared when clearing land for cocoa production.</description><subject>Agricultural policy</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Cocoa</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Domestication</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Forest growth</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fruit trees</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Land clearance</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Plant species introduction</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Tree planting</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>1999-4907</issn><issn>1999-4907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFKAzEQhoMoWGoPvkHAk4dqkt1sEm9ltVooKFrPS5pM7Ja6WZNtoTdfw_fwDXwTn8SUijiXGWb--Yb5ETql5CLLFLl0lBFGqJIHqEeVUsNcEXH4rz5GgxiXJAUXUrG8h7aPMF_XK1s3L3gWAHDpNxBw3eBrcD5A7MCmnvEaT3Vjo9EtxN24_PrsANvv94_JxtcBrvBYm86HiEfOgel2wG6ReAtfG8De4acWTJ2WH1a6SdQTdOT0KsLgN_fR8_hmVt4Np_e3k3I0HRqmWDd0kmolGeXcCmaoo6pwlhNuBGfCkAKckIRxVRCSE6GUda7gOgOZk7mwYLI-Ottz2-Df1umhaunXoUknK5ZLKTkppEqq873KBB9jAFe1oX7VYVtRUu3Mrf7MzX4AqAFsRQ</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Atangana, Alain R.</creator><creator>Gnangoh, Juvenal Zahoui</creator><creator>Yao, Allegra Kouassi</creator><creator>Kouakou, Thomas d’Aquin</creator><creator>Mian Ndri Nda, Anatole</creator><creator>Kouamé, Christophe</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Rebuilding Tree Cover in Deforested Cocoa Landscapes in Côte d’Ivoire: Factors Affecting the Choice of Species Planted</title><author>Atangana, Alain R. ; Gnangoh, Juvenal Zahoui ; Yao, Allegra Kouassi ; Kouakou, Thomas d’Aquin ; Mian Ndri Nda, Anatole ; Kouamé, Christophe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-f81a982155d72c1f196fd505c7527c06ef78025960040799dff65a3e840b7dec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural policy</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Cocoa</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Domestication</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Forest growth</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fruit trees</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Land clearance</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Plant species introduction</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Tree planting</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atangana, Alain R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnangoh, Juvenal Zahoui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Allegra Kouassi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouakou, Thomas d’Aquin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mian Ndri Nda, Anatole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouamé, Christophe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Forests</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atangana, Alain R.</au><au>Gnangoh, Juvenal Zahoui</au><au>Yao, Allegra Kouassi</au><au>Kouakou, Thomas d’Aquin</au><au>Mian Ndri Nda, Anatole</au><au>Kouamé, Christophe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rebuilding Tree Cover in Deforested Cocoa Landscapes in Côte d’Ivoire: Factors Affecting the Choice of Species Planted</atitle><jtitle>Forests</jtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>198</spage><pages>198-</pages><issn>1999-4907</issn><eissn>1999-4907</eissn><abstract>Intensive cocoa production in Côte d’Ivoire, the world’s leading cocoa producer, has grown at the expense of forest cover. To reverse this trend, the country has adopted a “zero deforestation” agricultural policy and committed to rehabilitating its forest cover through the planting of high-value tree species in cocoa landscapes using a participatory approach. However, little is known regarding the factors influencing farmers’ introduction of high-value tree species to cocoa landscapes. We tested the hypothesis that ten previously reported factors to influence agroforestry system adoption to predict the number and choice of tree species that farmers introduce to cocoa farms. We interviewed 683 households in the cocoa-producing zone of Côte d’Ivoire and counted tree species on their cocoa farms. On average, two tree species were recorded per surveyed farm. Generalized Poisson regression models revealed that, in the cocoa production area, experience in tree planting and expected benefits, including income and food, influence tree species introduction through planting or “retention” when clearing land for cocoa establishment. The age of the farmer also influenced (p = 0.017) farmers’ tree species planting on cocoa farms. Fewer tree species were introduced into current intensive cocoa-production areas than in “old cocoa-loops” and forested areas. The number of tree species introduced to cocoa farms increased with expected benefits and experience in tree planting. The number of planted tree species also increased with farmers’ age. Tree species were mostly selected for the provision of shade to cocoa, production of useful tree products (38%), and income from the sale of these products (7%). Fruit tree species were the most planted, while timber tree species were mostly spared when clearing land for cocoa production.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/f12020198</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1999-4907
ispartof Forests, 2021-02, Vol.12 (2), p.198
issn 1999-4907
1999-4907
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2488850689
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Agricultural policy
Agriculture
Agroforestry
Biodiversity
Cocoa
Deforestation
Domestication
Farmers
Farms
Flowers & plants
Forest growth
Forests
Fruit trees
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
Households
Income
Introduced species
Land clearance
Landscape
Plant species introduction
Planting
Regression analysis
Regression models
Timber
Tree planting
Trees
title Rebuilding Tree Cover in Deforested Cocoa Landscapes in Côte d’Ivoire: Factors Affecting the Choice of Species Planted
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A32%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rebuilding%20Tree%20Cover%20in%20Deforested%20Cocoa%20Landscapes%20in%20C%C3%B4te%20d%E2%80%99Ivoire:%20Factors%20Affecting%20the%20Choice%20of%20Species%20Planted&rft.jtitle=Forests&rft.au=Atangana,%20Alain%20R.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.pages=198-&rft.issn=1999-4907&rft.eissn=1999-4907&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/f12020198&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2488850689%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2488850689&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true