Continuous grazing disrupts desert grass-soil seed bank composition under variable rainfall
Long-term field studies help unveil mechanisms of grass soil seed bank (SSB) persistence and resilience. We wonder whether grazing is a disruptive force that changes grass SSB composition and size, while heavy rainfall is a positive bottom-up force that restores the grass SSB in grazed areas of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant ecology 2021-02, Vol.222 (2), p.247-259 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 259 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 247 |
container_title | Plant ecology |
container_volume | 222 |
creator | Marone, Luis Pol, Rodrigo G. |
description | Long-term field studies help unveil mechanisms of grass soil seed bank (SSB) persistence and resilience. We wonder whether grazing is a disruptive force that changes grass SSB composition and size, while heavy rainfall is a positive bottom-up force that restores the grass SSB in grazed areas of the Monte desert, Argentina. We used core sampling to study the grass SSB in cattle-free (17 year) and grazed (10 year) grasslands. The SSB size in cattle-free sites usually responded in a continuous positive fashion to rainfall, and the proportion of palatable grasses in the SSB was similar among years. Most grass species formed a transient SSB, but the presence of a stand of perennial plants would prevent their local extinction. In contrast, the SSB size in the grazed habitats showed a threshold response to rainfall (i.e. it did not increase under low-moderate rainfall), the seeds of palatable grasses were always scarce, and the proportion of seeds of less palatable grasses increased under extreme rainy conditions. Seed production from grasses that grew tillers from axillary buds during a drought was zero, suggesting that the bank of plants could have a role in the replenishment of the grass SSB only in mesic years. Within the time span assessed here, continuous heavy grazing together with scarce as well as heavy rainfall were disruptive forces that reduced the number and proportion of seeds from palatable grasses in the SSB, which are also the species preferred by seed-eating animals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11258-020-01102-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2488177077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A651597000</galeid><jstor_id>27296373</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A651597000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-863f5dc6b81dfd134c92da8ab9d43f26ee9dde71e0946f49979158c0af751c3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpoem2f6AQEOTsRB-WJR3DkqaFQC_tqQehlcaLtl5po7EDya-vUofmVnQYMXofzfAQ8pmzS86YvkLOhTIdE6xjnDPR9W_IGVdadoop8bbdpVHtWer35APigbGGSXVGfm1LnlNeyoJ0X_1TynsaE9blNCONgFDn5z5ihyVNFAEi3fn8m4ZyPBVMcyqZLjlCpQ--Jr-bgFaf8uin6SN51wrCp5e6IT-_3PzYfu3uvt9-217fdUEaNndmkKOKYdgZHsfIZR-siN74nY29HMUAYGMEzYHZfhh7a7XlygTmR614kCA35GL991TL_QI4u0NZam4jneiN4VozrVvqck3t_QSubVjm6kM7EY4plAxjav3rQXFlNWt2NkSsQKgFscLoTjUdfX10nLln62617pp199e66xskVwhbOO-hvu7yX-p8pQ44l_pvjtDCDlJL-QeTiI-k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2488177077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continuous grazing disrupts desert grass-soil seed bank composition under variable rainfall</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Marone, Luis ; Pol, Rodrigo G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marone, Luis ; Pol, Rodrigo G.</creatorcontrib><description>Long-term field studies help unveil mechanisms of grass soil seed bank (SSB) persistence and resilience. We wonder whether grazing is a disruptive force that changes grass SSB composition and size, while heavy rainfall is a positive bottom-up force that restores the grass SSB in grazed areas of the Monte desert, Argentina. We used core sampling to study the grass SSB in cattle-free (17 year) and grazed (10 year) grasslands. The SSB size in cattle-free sites usually responded in a continuous positive fashion to rainfall, and the proportion of palatable grasses in the SSB was similar among years. Most grass species formed a transient SSB, but the presence of a stand of perennial plants would prevent their local extinction. In contrast, the SSB size in the grazed habitats showed a threshold response to rainfall (i.e. it did not increase under low-moderate rainfall), the seeds of palatable grasses were always scarce, and the proportion of seeds of less palatable grasses increased under extreme rainy conditions. Seed production from grasses that grew tillers from axillary buds during a drought was zero, suggesting that the bank of plants could have a role in the replenishment of the grass SSB only in mesic years. Within the time span assessed here, continuous heavy grazing together with scarce as well as heavy rainfall were disruptive forces that reduced the number and proportion of seeds from palatable grasses in the SSB, which are also the species preferred by seed-eating animals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-0237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11258-020-01102-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Applied Ecology ; Banks (Finance) ; Biodiversity ; Biological diversity conservation ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cattle ; Community & Population Ecology ; Composition ; Continuous grazing ; Core sampling ; Desert soils ; Deserts ; Drought ; Ecology ; Extreme weather ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Grazing ; Life Sciences ; Plant Ecology ; Rain and rainfall ; Rainfall ; Replenishment ; Seed banks ; Seeds ; Soils ; Species extinction ; Terrestial Ecology ; Tillers</subject><ispartof>Plant ecology, 2021-02, Vol.222 (2), p.247-259</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-863f5dc6b81dfd134c92da8ab9d43f26ee9dde71e0946f49979158c0af751c3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-863f5dc6b81dfd134c92da8ab9d43f26ee9dde71e0946f49979158c0af751c3e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6773-643X ; 0000-0002-3129-0608</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11258-020-01102-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11258-020-01102-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marone, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pol, Rodrigo G.</creatorcontrib><title>Continuous grazing disrupts desert grass-soil seed bank composition under variable rainfall</title><title>Plant ecology</title><addtitle>Plant Ecol</addtitle><description>Long-term field studies help unveil mechanisms of grass soil seed bank (SSB) persistence and resilience. We wonder whether grazing is a disruptive force that changes grass SSB composition and size, while heavy rainfall is a positive bottom-up force that restores the grass SSB in grazed areas of the Monte desert, Argentina. We used core sampling to study the grass SSB in cattle-free (17 year) and grazed (10 year) grasslands. The SSB size in cattle-free sites usually responded in a continuous positive fashion to rainfall, and the proportion of palatable grasses in the SSB was similar among years. Most grass species formed a transient SSB, but the presence of a stand of perennial plants would prevent their local extinction. In contrast, the SSB size in the grazed habitats showed a threshold response to rainfall (i.e. it did not increase under low-moderate rainfall), the seeds of palatable grasses were always scarce, and the proportion of seeds of less palatable grasses increased under extreme rainy conditions. Seed production from grasses that grew tillers from axillary buds during a drought was zero, suggesting that the bank of plants could have a role in the replenishment of the grass SSB only in mesic years. Within the time span assessed here, continuous heavy grazing together with scarce as well as heavy rainfall were disruptive forces that reduced the number and proportion of seeds from palatable grasses in the SSB, which are also the species preferred by seed-eating animals.</description><subject>Applied Ecology</subject><subject>Banks (Finance)</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological diversity conservation</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Community & Population Ecology</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Continuous grazing</subject><subject>Core sampling</subject><subject>Desert soils</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Rain and rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Replenishment</subject><subject>Seed banks</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Terrestial Ecology</subject><subject>Tillers</subject><issn>1385-0237</issn><issn>1573-5052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpoem2f6AQEOTsRB-WJR3DkqaFQC_tqQehlcaLtl5po7EDya-vUofmVnQYMXofzfAQ8pmzS86YvkLOhTIdE6xjnDPR9W_IGVdadoop8bbdpVHtWer35APigbGGSXVGfm1LnlNeyoJ0X_1TynsaE9blNCONgFDn5z5ihyVNFAEi3fn8m4ZyPBVMcyqZLjlCpQ--Jr-bgFaf8uin6SN51wrCp5e6IT-_3PzYfu3uvt9-217fdUEaNndmkKOKYdgZHsfIZR-siN74nY29HMUAYGMEzYHZfhh7a7XlygTmR614kCA35GL991TL_QI4u0NZam4jneiN4VozrVvqck3t_QSubVjm6kM7EY4plAxjav3rQXFlNWt2NkSsQKgFscLoTjUdfX10nLln62617pp199e66xskVwhbOO-hvu7yX-p8pQ44l_pvjtDCDlJL-QeTiI-k</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Marone, Luis</creator><creator>Pol, Rodrigo G.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6773-643X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3129-0608</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Continuous grazing disrupts desert grass-soil seed bank composition under variable rainfall</title><author>Marone, Luis ; Pol, Rodrigo G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-863f5dc6b81dfd134c92da8ab9d43f26ee9dde71e0946f49979158c0af751c3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Applied Ecology</topic><topic>Banks (Finance)</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological diversity conservation</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Community & Population Ecology</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Continuous grazing</topic><topic>Core sampling</topic><topic>Desert soils</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Rain and rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Replenishment</topic><topic>Seed banks</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Terrestial Ecology</topic><topic>Tillers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marone, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pol, Rodrigo G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marone, Luis</au><au>Pol, Rodrigo G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continuous grazing disrupts desert grass-soil seed bank composition under variable rainfall</atitle><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle><stitle>Plant Ecol</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>222</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>247-259</pages><issn>1385-0237</issn><eissn>1573-5052</eissn><abstract>Long-term field studies help unveil mechanisms of grass soil seed bank (SSB) persistence and resilience. We wonder whether grazing is a disruptive force that changes grass SSB composition and size, while heavy rainfall is a positive bottom-up force that restores the grass SSB in grazed areas of the Monte desert, Argentina. We used core sampling to study the grass SSB in cattle-free (17 year) and grazed (10 year) grasslands. The SSB size in cattle-free sites usually responded in a continuous positive fashion to rainfall, and the proportion of palatable grasses in the SSB was similar among years. Most grass species formed a transient SSB, but the presence of a stand of perennial plants would prevent their local extinction. In contrast, the SSB size in the grazed habitats showed a threshold response to rainfall (i.e. it did not increase under low-moderate rainfall), the seeds of palatable grasses were always scarce, and the proportion of seeds of less palatable grasses increased under extreme rainy conditions. Seed production from grasses that grew tillers from axillary buds during a drought was zero, suggesting that the bank of plants could have a role in the replenishment of the grass SSB only in mesic years. Within the time span assessed here, continuous heavy grazing together with scarce as well as heavy rainfall were disruptive forces that reduced the number and proportion of seeds from palatable grasses in the SSB, which are also the species preferred by seed-eating animals.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11258-020-01102-4</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6773-643X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3129-0608</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1385-0237 |
ispartof | Plant ecology, 2021-02, Vol.222 (2), p.247-259 |
issn | 1385-0237 1573-5052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2488177077 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Applied Ecology Banks (Finance) Biodiversity Biological diversity conservation Biomedical and Life Sciences Cattle Community & Population Ecology Composition Continuous grazing Core sampling Desert soils Deserts Drought Ecology Extreme weather Grasses Grasslands Grazing Life Sciences Plant Ecology Rain and rainfall Rainfall Replenishment Seed banks Seeds Soils Species extinction Terrestial Ecology Tillers |
title | Continuous grazing disrupts desert grass-soil seed bank composition under variable rainfall |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A20%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continuous%20grazing%20disrupts%20desert%20grass-soil%20seed%20bank%20composition%20under%20variable%20rainfall&rft.jtitle=Plant%20ecology&rft.au=Marone,%20Luis&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=222&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=247-259&rft.issn=1385-0237&rft.eissn=1573-5052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11258-020-01102-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA651597000%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2488177077&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A651597000&rft_jstor_id=27296373&rfr_iscdi=true |