Blog Highlight

Apple’s policy became the standard for the industry as other app stores followed its example.9 The list of developers dissatisfied with Apple’s level of commission fees, coupled with a prohibition to use other payment mechanisms, is long.10 A growing number of apps—including Netflix, Amazon’s Kindle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CoRe : European competition and regulatory law review 2021-01, Vol.5 (1), p.79-85
1. Verfasser: Bostoen, Friso
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 85
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title CoRe : European competition and regulatory law review
container_volume 5
creator Bostoen, Friso
description Apple’s policy became the standard for the industry as other app stores followed its example.9 The list of developers dissatisfied with Apple’s level of commission fees, coupled with a prohibition to use other payment mechanisms, is long.10 A growing number of apps—including Netflix, Amazon’s Kindle, and Google’s YouTube TV—have simply disabled IAP, making it impossible for consumers to purchase/subscribe within the app.11 A new e-mail app, HEY, tried to disable IAP as well but was kicked out of the App Store for doing so because it did not qualify as reader app.12 And Facebook alleges it is prohibited from even informing users about App Store fees.13 Until recently, Apple could say that its IAP policy was applied equally to all developers. The Gaming Industry—and Epic’s Plans for It The gaming industry is big—perhaps surprisingly so. Since 2016, it has been larger than the music industry and box office combined. The long game is to create a so-called ‘metaverse’, ‘a shared, virtual space that’s persistently online and active, even without people logging in’, complete with its own economy, jobs, shopping and media to consume.23 (Science fiction fans will recognize the concept from Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash or Ernest Cline’s Ready Player One.) With Fortnite, Epic is closer than anyone to such a metaverse: it is already hosting live events including concerts and movies, while the game proceeds in ‘seasons’. After the First Shots, the First Battle Days after Epic submitted its complaint to the US District Court, it filed a motion for a temporary restraining order.26 Apple had not only removed Fortnite from the App Store but also revoked all developer tools, which makes updates to other programs—including the Unreal Engine—impossible.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2488106457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2488106457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24881064573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjU00DU2NLFgQWJzMPAWF2cZGBgYWRoZWZibcTLwOeXkpyt4ZKZn5ABxCQ8Da1piTnEqL5TmZlB2cw1x9tAtKMovLE0tLonPyi8tygNKxRuZWFgYGpiZmJobE6cKAHfxKAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2488106457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blog Highlight</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Bostoen, Friso</creator><creatorcontrib>Bostoen, Friso</creatorcontrib><description>Apple’s policy became the standard for the industry as other app stores followed its example.9 The list of developers dissatisfied with Apple’s level of commission fees, coupled with a prohibition to use other payment mechanisms, is long.10 A growing number of apps—including Netflix, Amazon’s Kindle, and Google’s YouTube TV—have simply disabled IAP, making it impossible for consumers to purchase/subscribe within the app.11 A new e-mail app, HEY, tried to disable IAP as well but was kicked out of the App Store for doing so because it did not qualify as reader app.12 And Facebook alleges it is prohibited from even informing users about App Store fees.13 Until recently, Apple could say that its IAP policy was applied equally to all developers. The Gaming Industry—and Epic’s Plans for It The gaming industry is big—perhaps surprisingly so. Since 2016, it has been larger than the music industry and box office combined. The long game is to create a so-called ‘metaverse’, ‘a shared, virtual space that’s persistently online and active, even without people logging in’, complete with its own economy, jobs, shopping and media to consume.23 (Science fiction fans will recognize the concept from Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash or Ernest Cline’s Ready Player One.) With Fortnite, Epic is closer than anyone to such a metaverse: it is already hosting live events including concerts and movies, while the game proceeds in ‘seasons’. After the First Shots, the First Battle Days after Epic submitted its complaint to the US District Court, it filed a motion for a temporary restraining order.26 Apple had not only removed Fortnite from the App Store but also revoked all developer tools, which makes updates to other programs—including the Unreal Engine—impossible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2510-3148</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2510-3148</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH</publisher><subject>Antitrust ; Electronic book readers ; Fees &amp; charges ; Games ; Personal computers ; Restraining orders ; Subscriptions</subject><ispartof>CoRe : European competition and regulatory law review, 2021-01, Vol.5 (1), p.79-85</ispartof><rights>Copyright Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 2021</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bostoen, Friso</creatorcontrib><title>Blog Highlight</title><title>CoRe : European competition and regulatory law review</title><description>Apple’s policy became the standard for the industry as other app stores followed its example.9 The list of developers dissatisfied with Apple’s level of commission fees, coupled with a prohibition to use other payment mechanisms, is long.10 A growing number of apps—including Netflix, Amazon’s Kindle, and Google’s YouTube TV—have simply disabled IAP, making it impossible for consumers to purchase/subscribe within the app.11 A new e-mail app, HEY, tried to disable IAP as well but was kicked out of the App Store for doing so because it did not qualify as reader app.12 And Facebook alleges it is prohibited from even informing users about App Store fees.13 Until recently, Apple could say that its IAP policy was applied equally to all developers. The Gaming Industry—and Epic’s Plans for It The gaming industry is big—perhaps surprisingly so. Since 2016, it has been larger than the music industry and box office combined. The long game is to create a so-called ‘metaverse’, ‘a shared, virtual space that’s persistently online and active, even without people logging in’, complete with its own economy, jobs, shopping and media to consume.23 (Science fiction fans will recognize the concept from Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash or Ernest Cline’s Ready Player One.) With Fortnite, Epic is closer than anyone to such a metaverse: it is already hosting live events including concerts and movies, while the game proceeds in ‘seasons’. After the First Shots, the First Battle Days after Epic submitted its complaint to the US District Court, it filed a motion for a temporary restraining order.26 Apple had not only removed Fortnite from the App Store but also revoked all developer tools, which makes updates to other programs—including the Unreal Engine—impossible.</description><subject>Antitrust</subject><subject>Electronic book readers</subject><subject>Fees &amp; charges</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Personal computers</subject><subject>Restraining orders</subject><subject>Subscriptions</subject><issn>2510-3148</issn><issn>2510-3148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjU00DU2NLFgQWJzMPAWF2cZGBgYWRoZWZibcTLwOeXkpyt4ZKZn5ABxCQ8Da1piTnEqL5TmZlB2cw1x9tAtKMovLE0tLonPyi8tygNKxRuZWFgYGpiZmJobE6cKAHfxKAA</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Bostoen, Friso</creator><general>Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Blog Highlight</title><author>Bostoen, Friso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24881064573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antitrust</topic><topic>Electronic book readers</topic><topic>Fees &amp; charges</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Personal computers</topic><topic>Restraining orders</topic><topic>Subscriptions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bostoen, Friso</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>CoRe : European competition and regulatory law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bostoen, Friso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blog Highlight</atitle><jtitle>CoRe : European competition and regulatory law review</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>79-85</pages><issn>2510-3148</issn><eissn>2510-3148</eissn><abstract>Apple’s policy became the standard for the industry as other app stores followed its example.9 The list of developers dissatisfied with Apple’s level of commission fees, coupled with a prohibition to use other payment mechanisms, is long.10 A growing number of apps—including Netflix, Amazon’s Kindle, and Google’s YouTube TV—have simply disabled IAP, making it impossible for consumers to purchase/subscribe within the app.11 A new e-mail app, HEY, tried to disable IAP as well but was kicked out of the App Store for doing so because it did not qualify as reader app.12 And Facebook alleges it is prohibited from even informing users about App Store fees.13 Until recently, Apple could say that its IAP policy was applied equally to all developers. The Gaming Industry—and Epic’s Plans for It The gaming industry is big—perhaps surprisingly so. Since 2016, it has been larger than the music industry and box office combined. The long game is to create a so-called ‘metaverse’, ‘a shared, virtual space that’s persistently online and active, even without people logging in’, complete with its own economy, jobs, shopping and media to consume.23 (Science fiction fans will recognize the concept from Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash or Ernest Cline’s Ready Player One.) With Fortnite, Epic is closer than anyone to such a metaverse: it is already hosting live events including concerts and movies, while the game proceeds in ‘seasons’. After the First Shots, the First Battle Days after Epic submitted its complaint to the US District Court, it filed a motion for a temporary restraining order.26 Apple had not only removed Fortnite from the App Store but also revoked all developer tools, which makes updates to other programs—including the Unreal Engine—impossible.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2510-3148
ispartof CoRe : European competition and regulatory law review, 2021-01, Vol.5 (1), p.79-85
issn 2510-3148
2510-3148
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2488106457
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Antitrust
Electronic book readers
Fees & charges
Games
Personal computers
Restraining orders
Subscriptions
title Blog Highlight
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T17%3A13%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blog%20Highlight&rft.jtitle=CoRe%20:%20European%20competition%20and%20regulatory%20law%20review&rft.au=Bostoen,%20Friso&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=79-85&rft.issn=2510-3148&rft.eissn=2510-3148&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2488106457%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2488106457&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true