Unpacking the idea of democratic community consent-based siting for energy infrastructure
We highlight issues relevant to a consent-based siting process for energy facilities with the intent to inform government officials, planners, and stakeholders on potential critical issues and challenges associated with such a process. In this paper we trace the history and meaning of "consent&...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of risk research 2020-11, Vol.24 (1), p.94-109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 109 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 94 |
container_title | Journal of risk research |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Webler, Thomas Tuler, Seth |
description | We highlight issues relevant to a consent-based siting process for energy facilities with the intent to inform government officials, planners, and stakeholders on potential critical issues and challenges associated with such a process. In this paper we trace the history and meaning of "consent" in the academic literature associated with medical ethics, research ethics, international development, and political theory. We identify key themes and challenges to consider in the design of a consent-based process for energy-related facilities. Successful design and implementation of a consent-based process that communities and stakeholders find legitimate, effective, and practical will require careful reflection and attention to procedures for operationalizing core principles of consent and addressing challenges that can undermine them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13669877.2020.1843068 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2488080480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2488080480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c958da92fbd06b3e853e4a7f36bd9d06f4464a8699d1aaa01d3a2f693ee2b75b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QQi4nppMMpnMTim-oODGLlyFTB41tZPUJIPMvzelunV1D5dz7uV8AFxjtMCIo1tMGOt42y5qVJcVpwQxfgJmmDJWUcrwadHFUx1M5-AipS1CmBNcz8D72u-l-nR-A_OHgU4bCYOF2gxBRZmdgioMw-hdnoryyfhc9TIZDZPLh5QNERpv4maCztsoU46jymM0l-DMyl0yV79zDtaPD2_L52r1-vSyvF9VihCeK9U1XMuutr1GrCeGN8RQ2VrCet2VlS0FqOSs6zSWUiKsiawt64gxdd82PZmDm-PdfQxfo0lZbMMYfXkpasp5AUQ5Kq7m6FIxpBSNFfvoBhkngZE4UBR_FMWBovilWHJ3x1wpF-Igv0PcaZHltAuxtPXKJUH-P_EDcCx6rQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2488080480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unpacking the idea of democratic community consent-based siting for energy infrastructure</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>Webler, Thomas ; Tuler, Seth</creator><creatorcontrib>Webler, Thomas ; Tuler, Seth</creatorcontrib><description>We highlight issues relevant to a consent-based siting process for energy facilities with the intent to inform government officials, planners, and stakeholders on potential critical issues and challenges associated with such a process. In this paper we trace the history and meaning of "consent" in the academic literature associated with medical ethics, research ethics, international development, and political theory. We identify key themes and challenges to consider in the design of a consent-based process for energy-related facilities. Successful design and implementation of a consent-based process that communities and stakeholders find legitimate, effective, and practical will require careful reflection and attention to procedures for operationalizing core principles of consent and addressing challenges that can undermine them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9877</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4461</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1843068</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Community engagement ; Consent ; energy democracy ; facility siting ; Infrastructure ; Medical ethics ; Research ethics ; Siting ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Journal of risk research, 2020-11, Vol.24 (1), p.94-109</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c958da92fbd06b3e853e4a7f36bd9d06f4464a8699d1aaa01d3a2f693ee2b75b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c958da92fbd06b3e853e4a7f36bd9d06f4464a8699d1aaa01d3a2f693ee2b75b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13669877.2020.1843068$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13669877.2020.1843068$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Webler, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuler, Seth</creatorcontrib><title>Unpacking the idea of democratic community consent-based siting for energy infrastructure</title><title>Journal of risk research</title><description>We highlight issues relevant to a consent-based siting process for energy facilities with the intent to inform government officials, planners, and stakeholders on potential critical issues and challenges associated with such a process. In this paper we trace the history and meaning of "consent" in the academic literature associated with medical ethics, research ethics, international development, and political theory. We identify key themes and challenges to consider in the design of a consent-based process for energy-related facilities. Successful design and implementation of a consent-based process that communities and stakeholders find legitimate, effective, and practical will require careful reflection and attention to procedures for operationalizing core principles of consent and addressing challenges that can undermine them.</description><subject>Community engagement</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>energy democracy</subject><subject>facility siting</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Siting</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>1366-9877</issn><issn>1466-4461</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QQi4nppMMpnMTim-oODGLlyFTB41tZPUJIPMvzelunV1D5dz7uV8AFxjtMCIo1tMGOt42y5qVJcVpwQxfgJmmDJWUcrwadHFUx1M5-AipS1CmBNcz8D72u-l-nR-A_OHgU4bCYOF2gxBRZmdgioMw-hdnoryyfhc9TIZDZPLh5QNERpv4maCztsoU46jymM0l-DMyl0yV79zDtaPD2_L52r1-vSyvF9VihCeK9U1XMuutr1GrCeGN8RQ2VrCet2VlS0FqOSs6zSWUiKsiawt64gxdd82PZmDm-PdfQxfo0lZbMMYfXkpasp5AUQ5Kq7m6FIxpBSNFfvoBhkngZE4UBR_FMWBovilWHJ3x1wpF-Igv0PcaZHltAuxtPXKJUH-P_EDcCx6rQ</recordid><startdate>20201104</startdate><enddate>20201104</enddate><creator>Webler, Thomas</creator><creator>Tuler, Seth</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201104</creationdate><title>Unpacking the idea of democratic community consent-based siting for energy infrastructure</title><author>Webler, Thomas ; Tuler, Seth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c958da92fbd06b3e853e4a7f36bd9d06f4464a8699d1aaa01d3a2f693ee2b75b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Community engagement</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>energy democracy</topic><topic>facility siting</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Siting</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Webler, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuler, Seth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of risk research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Webler, Thomas</au><au>Tuler, Seth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unpacking the idea of democratic community consent-based siting for energy infrastructure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of risk research</jtitle><date>2020-11-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>94-109</pages><issn>1366-9877</issn><eissn>1466-4461</eissn><abstract>We highlight issues relevant to a consent-based siting process for energy facilities with the intent to inform government officials, planners, and stakeholders on potential critical issues and challenges associated with such a process. In this paper we trace the history and meaning of "consent" in the academic literature associated with medical ethics, research ethics, international development, and political theory. We identify key themes and challenges to consider in the design of a consent-based process for energy-related facilities. Successful design and implementation of a consent-based process that communities and stakeholders find legitimate, effective, and practical will require careful reflection and attention to procedures for operationalizing core principles of consent and addressing challenges that can undermine them.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13669877.2020.1843068</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-9877 |
ispartof | Journal of risk research, 2020-11, Vol.24 (1), p.94-109 |
issn | 1366-9877 1466-4461 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2488080480 |
source | Business Source Complete; Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles) |
subjects | Community engagement Consent energy democracy facility siting Infrastructure Medical ethics Research ethics Siting Stakeholders |
title | Unpacking the idea of democratic community consent-based siting for energy infrastructure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A44%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unpacking%20the%20idea%20of%20democratic%20community%20consent-based%20siting%20for%20energy%20infrastructure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20risk%20research&rft.au=Webler,%20Thomas&rft.date=2020-11-04&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=94-109&rft.issn=1366-9877&rft.eissn=1466-4461&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13669877.2020.1843068&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2488080480%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2488080480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |