Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate community responses to drying in chalk streams
Temporary streams are dynamic ecosystems that shift between wet and dry states and include the ‘winterbourne’ chalk streams of south England. Our understanding of temporary stream biodiversity is biased, with most research to date exploring aquatic invertebrate communities in benthic sediments durin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water and environment journal : WEJ 2021-02, Vol.35 (1), p.229-241 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 241 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | Water and environment journal : WEJ |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Bunting, George England, Judy Gething, Kieran Sykes, Tim Webb, Jon Stubbington, Rachel |
description | Temporary streams are dynamic ecosystems that shift between wet and dry states and include the ‘winterbourne’ chalk streams of south England. Our understanding of temporary stream biodiversity is biased, with most research to date exploring aquatic invertebrate communities in benthic sediments during flowing phases. We surveyed the invertebrate communities of the Candover Brook chalk stream, comparing aquatic (benthic, hyporheic) and terrestrial communities in reaches with different flow permanence regimes. We used kick and Bou–Rouch sampling methods to collect aquatic invertebrates, and compared the terrestrial communities characterised by pitfall traps and ground searches and in different seasons. Although aquatic taxa richness was lower in temporary compared to perennial reaches, the total biodiversity of temporary stream channels was enhanced by contributions from both aquatic and terrestrial species, including several of conservation interest. We recommend that both aquatic and terrestrial communities should be considered in research and monitoring to characterise the biodiversity and ecological quality of temporary streams. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/wej.12621 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2487827123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487827123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3851-fe995d4dec8a4137ddcfbd745d82ea69555f70cd7613be3b85faa1b6db1b5f3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A8ssWKRNo7j2FlWVXmpEgtALC3HnoBDHq2dUOXvMQSxYzYz0pw7d3QRuiTxgoRaHqBakCRLyBGaEZ7yKGM5Pf6bBTtFZ95XcZzyPMtm6Gm1H1RvNVatwT04B753VtXYtp_geiic6gHrrmmG1vYjDvtd13rwuO-wcaNt3wKK9buqP3CQgmr8OTopVe3h4rfP0cvN5nl9F20fb-_Xq22kqWAkKiHPmUkNaKFSQrkxuiwMT5kRCagsZ4yVPNaGZ4QWQAvBSqVIkZmCFKykis7R1XR357r9EB6XVTe4NljKJBVcJJwkNFDXE6Vd572DUu6cbZQbJYnld2YyZCZ_MgvscmIPtobxf1C-bh4mxRfg_2_d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487827123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate community responses to drying in chalk streams</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Bunting, George ; England, Judy ; Gething, Kieran ; Sykes, Tim ; Webb, Jon ; Stubbington, Rachel</creator><creatorcontrib>Bunting, George ; England, Judy ; Gething, Kieran ; Sykes, Tim ; Webb, Jon ; Stubbington, Rachel</creatorcontrib><description>Temporary streams are dynamic ecosystems that shift between wet and dry states and include the ‘winterbourne’ chalk streams of south England. Our understanding of temporary stream biodiversity is biased, with most research to date exploring aquatic invertebrate communities in benthic sediments during flowing phases. We surveyed the invertebrate communities of the Candover Brook chalk stream, comparing aquatic (benthic, hyporheic) and terrestrial communities in reaches with different flow permanence regimes. We used kick and Bou–Rouch sampling methods to collect aquatic invertebrates, and compared the terrestrial communities characterised by pitfall traps and ground searches and in different seasons. Although aquatic taxa richness was lower in temporary compared to perennial reaches, the total biodiversity of temporary stream channels was enhanced by contributions from both aquatic and terrestrial species, including several of conservation interest. We recommend that both aquatic and terrestrial communities should be considered in research and monitoring to characterise the biodiversity and ecological quality of temporary streams.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-6585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-6593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/wej.12621</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquatic invertebrates ; Aquatic organisms ; Benthos ; Biodiversity ; biomonitoring ; Chalk ; Drying ; ecological status assessment ; Environmental monitoring ; intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (IRES) ; Intermittent streams ; Invertebrates ; macroinvertebrate ; Permanence ; Pitfall traps ; Rivers ; Sampling ; Sampling methods ; Sediments ; Streams ; temporary river ; temporary stream ; Terrestrial environments ; Water Framework Directive ; Wildlife conservation ; winterbourne stream</subject><ispartof>Water and environment journal : WEJ, 2021-02, Vol.35 (1), p.229-241</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Water and Environment Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3851-fe995d4dec8a4137ddcfbd745d82ea69555f70cd7613be3b85faa1b6db1b5f3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3851-fe995d4dec8a4137ddcfbd745d82ea69555f70cd7613be3b85faa1b6db1b5f3a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5247-4812 ; 0000-0002-0665-0368 ; 0000-0001-8475-5109 ; 0000-0002-4997-0249</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fwej.12621$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fwej.12621$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bunting, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>England, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gething, Kieran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stubbington, Rachel</creatorcontrib><title>Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate community responses to drying in chalk streams</title><title>Water and environment journal : WEJ</title><description>Temporary streams are dynamic ecosystems that shift between wet and dry states and include the ‘winterbourne’ chalk streams of south England. Our understanding of temporary stream biodiversity is biased, with most research to date exploring aquatic invertebrate communities in benthic sediments during flowing phases. We surveyed the invertebrate communities of the Candover Brook chalk stream, comparing aquatic (benthic, hyporheic) and terrestrial communities in reaches with different flow permanence regimes. We used kick and Bou–Rouch sampling methods to collect aquatic invertebrates, and compared the terrestrial communities characterised by pitfall traps and ground searches and in different seasons. Although aquatic taxa richness was lower in temporary compared to perennial reaches, the total biodiversity of temporary stream channels was enhanced by contributions from both aquatic and terrestrial species, including several of conservation interest. We recommend that both aquatic and terrestrial communities should be considered in research and monitoring to characterise the biodiversity and ecological quality of temporary streams.</description><subject>Aquatic invertebrates</subject><subject>Aquatic organisms</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biomonitoring</subject><subject>Chalk</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>ecological status assessment</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (IRES)</subject><subject>Intermittent streams</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>macroinvertebrate</subject><subject>Permanence</subject><subject>Pitfall traps</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>temporary river</subject><subject>temporary stream</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Water Framework Directive</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>winterbourne stream</subject><issn>1747-6585</issn><issn>1747-6593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A8ssWKRNo7j2FlWVXmpEgtALC3HnoBDHq2dUOXvMQSxYzYz0pw7d3QRuiTxgoRaHqBakCRLyBGaEZ7yKGM5Pf6bBTtFZ95XcZzyPMtm6Gm1H1RvNVatwT04B753VtXYtp_geiic6gHrrmmG1vYjDvtd13rwuO-wcaNt3wKK9buqP3CQgmr8OTopVe3h4rfP0cvN5nl9F20fb-_Xq22kqWAkKiHPmUkNaKFSQrkxuiwMT5kRCagsZ4yVPNaGZ4QWQAvBSqVIkZmCFKykis7R1XR357r9EB6XVTe4NljKJBVcJJwkNFDXE6Vd572DUu6cbZQbJYnld2YyZCZ_MgvscmIPtobxf1C-bh4mxRfg_2_d</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Bunting, George</creator><creator>England, Judy</creator><creator>Gething, Kieran</creator><creator>Sykes, Tim</creator><creator>Webb, Jon</creator><creator>Stubbington, Rachel</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-4812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-0368</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8475-5109</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4997-0249</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate community responses to drying in chalk streams</title><author>Bunting, George ; England, Judy ; Gething, Kieran ; Sykes, Tim ; Webb, Jon ; Stubbington, Rachel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3851-fe995d4dec8a4137ddcfbd745d82ea69555f70cd7613be3b85faa1b6db1b5f3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic invertebrates</topic><topic>Aquatic organisms</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biomonitoring</topic><topic>Chalk</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>ecological status assessment</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (IRES)</topic><topic>Intermittent streams</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>macroinvertebrate</topic><topic>Permanence</topic><topic>Pitfall traps</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>temporary river</topic><topic>temporary stream</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Water Framework Directive</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>winterbourne stream</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bunting, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>England, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gething, Kieran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stubbington, Rachel</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water and environment journal : WEJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bunting, George</au><au>England, Judy</au><au>Gething, Kieran</au><au>Sykes, Tim</au><au>Webb, Jon</au><au>Stubbington, Rachel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate community responses to drying in chalk streams</atitle><jtitle>Water and environment journal : WEJ</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>229-241</pages><issn>1747-6585</issn><eissn>1747-6593</eissn><abstract>Temporary streams are dynamic ecosystems that shift between wet and dry states and include the ‘winterbourne’ chalk streams of south England. Our understanding of temporary stream biodiversity is biased, with most research to date exploring aquatic invertebrate communities in benthic sediments during flowing phases. We surveyed the invertebrate communities of the Candover Brook chalk stream, comparing aquatic (benthic, hyporheic) and terrestrial communities in reaches with different flow permanence regimes. We used kick and Bou–Rouch sampling methods to collect aquatic invertebrates, and compared the terrestrial communities characterised by pitfall traps and ground searches and in different seasons. Although aquatic taxa richness was lower in temporary compared to perennial reaches, the total biodiversity of temporary stream channels was enhanced by contributions from both aquatic and terrestrial species, including several of conservation interest. We recommend that both aquatic and terrestrial communities should be considered in research and monitoring to characterise the biodiversity and ecological quality of temporary streams.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/wej.12621</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5247-4812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-0368</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8475-5109</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4997-0249</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-6585 |
ispartof | Water and environment journal : WEJ, 2021-02, Vol.35 (1), p.229-241 |
issn | 1747-6585 1747-6593 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2487827123 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Aquatic invertebrates Aquatic organisms Benthos Biodiversity biomonitoring Chalk Drying ecological status assessment Environmental monitoring intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (IRES) Intermittent streams Invertebrates macroinvertebrate Permanence Pitfall traps Rivers Sampling Sampling methods Sediments Streams temporary river temporary stream Terrestrial environments Water Framework Directive Wildlife conservation winterbourne stream |
title | Aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate community responses to drying in chalk streams |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T12%3A04%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aquatic%20and%20terrestrial%20invertebrate%20community%20responses%20to%20drying%20in%20chalk%20streams&rft.jtitle=Water%20and%20environment%20journal%20:%20WEJ&rft.au=Bunting,%20George&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=229-241&rft.issn=1747-6585&rft.eissn=1747-6593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/wej.12621&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2487827123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487827123&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |