Evaluation of climate simulations produced with the Brazilian global atmospheric model version 1.2

This paper presents an evaluation of climate simulations produced by the Brazilian Global Atmospheric Model version 1.2 (BAM-1.2) of the Center for Weather Forecast and Climate Studies (CPTEC). The model was run over the 1975–2017 period at two spatial resolutions, corresponding to ~ 180 and ~ 100 k...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Climate dynamics 2021-02, Vol.56 (3-4), p.873-898
Hauptverfasser: Coelho, Caio A. S., de Souza, Dayana C., Kubota, Paulo Y., Costa, Simone M. S., Menezes, Layrson, Guimarães, Bruno S., Figueroa, Silvio N., Bonatti, José P., Cavalcanti, Iracema F. A., Sampaio, Gilvan, Klingaman, Nicholas P., Baker, Jessica C. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 898
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 873
container_title Climate dynamics
container_volume 56
creator Coelho, Caio A. S.
de Souza, Dayana C.
Kubota, Paulo Y.
Costa, Simone M. S.
Menezes, Layrson
Guimarães, Bruno S.
Figueroa, Silvio N.
Bonatti, José P.
Cavalcanti, Iracema F. A.
Sampaio, Gilvan
Klingaman, Nicholas P.
Baker, Jessica C. A.
description This paper presents an evaluation of climate simulations produced by the Brazilian Global Atmospheric Model version 1.2 (BAM-1.2) of the Center for Weather Forecast and Climate Studies (CPTEC). The model was run over the 1975–2017 period at two spatial resolutions, corresponding to ~ 180 and ~ 100 km, both with 42 vertical levels, following most of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) protocol. In this protocol, observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) are used as boundary conditions for the atmospheric model. Four ensemble members were run for each of the two resolutions. A series of diagnostics was computed for assessing the model’s ability to represent the top of the atmosphere (TOA) radiation, atmospheric temperature, circulation and precipitation climatological features. The representation of precipitation interannual variability, El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) precipitation teleconnections, the Madden and Julian Oscillation (MJO) and daily precipitation characteristics was also assessed. The model at both resolutions reproduced many observed temperature, atmospheric circulation and precipitation climatological features, despite several identified biases. The model atmosphere was found to be more transparent than the observations, leading to misrepresentation of cloud-radiation interactions. The net cloud radiative forcing, which produces a cooling effect on the global mean climate at the TOA, was well represented by the model. This was found to be due to the compensation between both weaker longwave cloud radiative forcing (LWCRF) and shortwave cloud radiative forcing (SWCRF) in the model compared to the observations. The model capability to represent inter-annual precipitation variability at both resolutions was found to be linked to the adequate representation of ENSO teleconnections. However, the model produced weaker than observed convective activity associated with the MJO. Light daily precipitation over the southeast of South America and other climatologically similar regions was diagnosed to be overestimated, and heavy daily precipitation underestimated by the model. Increasing spatial resolution helped to slightly reduce some of the diagnosed biases. The performed evaluation identified model aspects that need to be improved. These include the representation of polar continental surface and sea ice albedo, stratospheric ozone, low marine clouds, and daily precipitation features, which were found to be larger and last longe
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00382-020-05508-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2487256477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A651234341</galeid><sourcerecordid>A651234341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-f8277feea7a5d60267e9eca831c38908bb15d36cff542ca1e3d98a71e4d148083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhhtRcFz9A54CguChx3x20sd1WXVhQfDjHDLpynSWdGdM0rvqrzczLehcJIeCl-etVNXbNC8J3hKM5duMMVO0xRS3WAisWvWo2RDOqqR6_rjZ4J7hVgopnjbPcr7DmPBO0k2zu743YTHFxxlFh2zwkymAsp-WcFIzOqQ4LBYG9ODLiMoI6F0yv3zwZkb7EHcmIFOmmA8jJG_RFAcI6B5SPvYkW_q8eeJMyPDiT71ovr2__nr1sb399OHm6vK2tXWU0jpFpXQARhoxdJh2EnqwRjFimeqx2u2IGFhnnROcWkOADb0ykgAfCFdYsYvm1dq3Dvx9gVz0XVzSXL_UlCtJRcelrNR2pfYmgPaziyUZW98Ak7dxBuerftkJQhlnnFTDmzNDZQr8KHuz5Kxvvnw-Z1__w45gQhlzDMvpkOcgXUGbYs4JnD6kevn0UxOsj4nqNVFdE9WnRPVxQbaacoXnPaS_C_7H9RuUaqIv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487256477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of climate simulations produced with the Brazilian global atmospheric model version 1.2</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Coelho, Caio A. S. ; de Souza, Dayana C. ; Kubota, Paulo Y. ; Costa, Simone M. S. ; Menezes, Layrson ; Guimarães, Bruno S. ; Figueroa, Silvio N. ; Bonatti, José P. ; Cavalcanti, Iracema F. A. ; Sampaio, Gilvan ; Klingaman, Nicholas P. ; Baker, Jessica C. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Caio A. S. ; de Souza, Dayana C. ; Kubota, Paulo Y. ; Costa, Simone M. S. ; Menezes, Layrson ; Guimarães, Bruno S. ; Figueroa, Silvio N. ; Bonatti, José P. ; Cavalcanti, Iracema F. A. ; Sampaio, Gilvan ; Klingaman, Nicholas P. ; Baker, Jessica C. A.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents an evaluation of climate simulations produced by the Brazilian Global Atmospheric Model version 1.2 (BAM-1.2) of the Center for Weather Forecast and Climate Studies (CPTEC). The model was run over the 1975–2017 period at two spatial resolutions, corresponding to ~ 180 and ~ 100 km, both with 42 vertical levels, following most of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) protocol. In this protocol, observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) are used as boundary conditions for the atmospheric model. Four ensemble members were run for each of the two resolutions. A series of diagnostics was computed for assessing the model’s ability to represent the top of the atmosphere (TOA) radiation, atmospheric temperature, circulation and precipitation climatological features. The representation of precipitation interannual variability, El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) precipitation teleconnections, the Madden and Julian Oscillation (MJO) and daily precipitation characteristics was also assessed. The model at both resolutions reproduced many observed temperature, atmospheric circulation and precipitation climatological features, despite several identified biases. The model atmosphere was found to be more transparent than the observations, leading to misrepresentation of cloud-radiation interactions. The net cloud radiative forcing, which produces a cooling effect on the global mean climate at the TOA, was well represented by the model. This was found to be due to the compensation between both weaker longwave cloud radiative forcing (LWCRF) and shortwave cloud radiative forcing (SWCRF) in the model compared to the observations. The model capability to represent inter-annual precipitation variability at both resolutions was found to be linked to the adequate representation of ENSO teleconnections. However, the model produced weaker than observed convective activity associated with the MJO. Light daily precipitation over the southeast of South America and other climatologically similar regions was diagnosed to be overestimated, and heavy daily precipitation underestimated by the model. Increasing spatial resolution helped to slightly reduce some of the diagnosed biases. The performed evaluation identified model aspects that need to be improved. These include the representation of polar continental surface and sea ice albedo, stratospheric ozone, low marine clouds, and daily precipitation features, which were found to be larger and last longer than the observed features.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-7575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0894</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00382-020-05508-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Albedo ; Albedo (solar) ; Annual precipitation ; Atmosphere ; Atmospheric circulation ; Atmospheric models ; Atmospheric temperature ; Boundary conditions ; Climate ; Climate effects ; Climate models ; Climate studies ; Climatology ; Clouds ; Convective activity ; Cooling effects ; Daily ; Daily precipitation ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; El Nino ; El Nino phenomena ; El Nino-Southern Oscillation event ; Evaluation ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Global temperature changes ; Identification ; Interannual oscillation ; Interannual variability ; Intercomparison ; Madden-Julian oscillation ; Numerical weather forecasting ; Oceanography ; Ozone ; Precipitation ; Precipitation variability ; Radiation ; Radiation-cloud interactions ; Radiative forcing ; Representations ; Sea ice ; Sea surface ; Sea surface temperature ; Short wave radiation ; Southern Oscillation ; Spatial discrimination ; Spatial resolution ; Surface temperature ; Teleconnections ; Variability ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Climate dynamics, 2021-02, Vol.56 (3-4), p.873-898</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-f8277feea7a5d60267e9eca831c38908bb15d36cff542ca1e3d98a71e4d148083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-f8277feea7a5d60267e9eca831c38908bb15d36cff542ca1e3d98a71e4d148083</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9695-5113</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00382-020-05508-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00382-020-05508-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927,41490,42559,51321</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Caio A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Dayana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubota, Paulo Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Simone M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menezes, Layrson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, Bruno S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueroa, Silvio N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonatti, José P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalcanti, Iracema F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampaio, Gilvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klingaman, Nicholas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jessica C. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of climate simulations produced with the Brazilian global atmospheric model version 1.2</title><title>Climate dynamics</title><addtitle>Clim Dyn</addtitle><description>This paper presents an evaluation of climate simulations produced by the Brazilian Global Atmospheric Model version 1.2 (BAM-1.2) of the Center for Weather Forecast and Climate Studies (CPTEC). The model was run over the 1975–2017 period at two spatial resolutions, corresponding to ~ 180 and ~ 100 km, both with 42 vertical levels, following most of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) protocol. In this protocol, observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) are used as boundary conditions for the atmospheric model. Four ensemble members were run for each of the two resolutions. A series of diagnostics was computed for assessing the model’s ability to represent the top of the atmosphere (TOA) radiation, atmospheric temperature, circulation and precipitation climatological features. The representation of precipitation interannual variability, El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) precipitation teleconnections, the Madden and Julian Oscillation (MJO) and daily precipitation characteristics was also assessed. The model at both resolutions reproduced many observed temperature, atmospheric circulation and precipitation climatological features, despite several identified biases. The model atmosphere was found to be more transparent than the observations, leading to misrepresentation of cloud-radiation interactions. The net cloud radiative forcing, which produces a cooling effect on the global mean climate at the TOA, was well represented by the model. This was found to be due to the compensation between both weaker longwave cloud radiative forcing (LWCRF) and shortwave cloud radiative forcing (SWCRF) in the model compared to the observations. The model capability to represent inter-annual precipitation variability at both resolutions was found to be linked to the adequate representation of ENSO teleconnections. However, the model produced weaker than observed convective activity associated with the MJO. Light daily precipitation over the southeast of South America and other climatologically similar regions was diagnosed to be overestimated, and heavy daily precipitation underestimated by the model. Increasing spatial resolution helped to slightly reduce some of the diagnosed biases. The performed evaluation identified model aspects that need to be improved. These include the representation of polar continental surface and sea ice albedo, stratospheric ozone, low marine clouds, and daily precipitation features, which were found to be larger and last longer than the observed features.</description><subject>Albedo</subject><subject>Albedo (solar)</subject><subject>Annual precipitation</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Atmospheric circulation</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Atmospheric temperature</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climate studies</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Convective activity</subject><subject>Cooling effects</subject><subject>Daily</subject><subject>Daily precipitation</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>El Nino</subject><subject>El Nino phenomena</subject><subject>El Nino-Southern Oscillation event</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Global temperature changes</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Interannual oscillation</subject><subject>Interannual variability</subject><subject>Intercomparison</subject><subject>Madden-Julian oscillation</subject><subject>Numerical weather forecasting</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Ozone</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation variability</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation-cloud interactions</subject><subject>Radiative forcing</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Sea ice</subject><subject>Sea surface</subject><subject>Sea surface temperature</subject><subject>Short wave radiation</subject><subject>Southern Oscillation</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Teleconnections</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0930-7575</issn><issn>1432-0894</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhhtRcFz9A54CguChx3x20sd1WXVhQfDjHDLpynSWdGdM0rvqrzczLehcJIeCl-etVNXbNC8J3hKM5duMMVO0xRS3WAisWvWo2RDOqqR6_rjZ4J7hVgopnjbPcr7DmPBO0k2zu743YTHFxxlFh2zwkymAsp-WcFIzOqQ4LBYG9ODLiMoI6F0yv3zwZkb7EHcmIFOmmA8jJG_RFAcI6B5SPvYkW_q8eeJMyPDiT71ovr2__nr1sb399OHm6vK2tXWU0jpFpXQARhoxdJh2EnqwRjFimeqx2u2IGFhnnROcWkOADb0ykgAfCFdYsYvm1dq3Dvx9gVz0XVzSXL_UlCtJRcelrNR2pfYmgPaziyUZW98Ak7dxBuerftkJQhlnnFTDmzNDZQr8KHuz5Kxvvnw-Z1__w45gQhlzDMvpkOcgXUGbYs4JnD6kevn0UxOsj4nqNVFdE9WnRPVxQbaacoXnPaS_C_7H9RuUaqIv</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Coelho, Caio A. S.</creator><creator>de Souza, Dayana C.</creator><creator>Kubota, Paulo Y.</creator><creator>Costa, Simone M. S.</creator><creator>Menezes, Layrson</creator><creator>Guimarães, Bruno S.</creator><creator>Figueroa, Silvio N.</creator><creator>Bonatti, José P.</creator><creator>Cavalcanti, Iracema F. A.</creator><creator>Sampaio, Gilvan</creator><creator>Klingaman, Nicholas P.</creator><creator>Baker, Jessica C. A.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9695-5113</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of climate simulations produced with the Brazilian global atmospheric model version 1.2</title><author>Coelho, Caio A. S. ; de Souza, Dayana C. ; Kubota, Paulo Y. ; Costa, Simone M. S. ; Menezes, Layrson ; Guimarães, Bruno S. ; Figueroa, Silvio N. ; Bonatti, José P. ; Cavalcanti, Iracema F. A. ; Sampaio, Gilvan ; Klingaman, Nicholas P. ; Baker, Jessica C. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-f8277feea7a5d60267e9eca831c38908bb15d36cff542ca1e3d98a71e4d148083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Albedo</topic><topic>Albedo (solar)</topic><topic>Annual precipitation</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Atmospheric circulation</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Atmospheric temperature</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climate studies</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Convective activity</topic><topic>Cooling effects</topic><topic>Daily</topic><topic>Daily precipitation</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>El Nino</topic><topic>El Nino phenomena</topic><topic>El Nino-Southern Oscillation event</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Global temperature changes</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Interannual oscillation</topic><topic>Interannual variability</topic><topic>Intercomparison</topic><topic>Madden-Julian oscillation</topic><topic>Numerical weather forecasting</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Ozone</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation variability</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation-cloud interactions</topic><topic>Radiative forcing</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Sea ice</topic><topic>Sea surface</topic><topic>Sea surface temperature</topic><topic>Short wave radiation</topic><topic>Southern Oscillation</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Teleconnections</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Caio A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Dayana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubota, Paulo Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Simone M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menezes, Layrson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, Bruno S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueroa, Silvio N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonatti, José P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalcanti, Iracema F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampaio, Gilvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klingaman, Nicholas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jessica C. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Climate dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coelho, Caio A. S.</au><au>de Souza, Dayana C.</au><au>Kubota, Paulo Y.</au><au>Costa, Simone M. S.</au><au>Menezes, Layrson</au><au>Guimarães, Bruno S.</au><au>Figueroa, Silvio N.</au><au>Bonatti, José P.</au><au>Cavalcanti, Iracema F. A.</au><au>Sampaio, Gilvan</au><au>Klingaman, Nicholas P.</au><au>Baker, Jessica C. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of climate simulations produced with the Brazilian global atmospheric model version 1.2</atitle><jtitle>Climate dynamics</jtitle><stitle>Clim Dyn</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>873</spage><epage>898</epage><pages>873-898</pages><issn>0930-7575</issn><eissn>1432-0894</eissn><abstract>This paper presents an evaluation of climate simulations produced by the Brazilian Global Atmospheric Model version 1.2 (BAM-1.2) of the Center for Weather Forecast and Climate Studies (CPTEC). The model was run over the 1975–2017 period at two spatial resolutions, corresponding to ~ 180 and ~ 100 km, both with 42 vertical levels, following most of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) protocol. In this protocol, observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) are used as boundary conditions for the atmospheric model. Four ensemble members were run for each of the two resolutions. A series of diagnostics was computed for assessing the model’s ability to represent the top of the atmosphere (TOA) radiation, atmospheric temperature, circulation and precipitation climatological features. The representation of precipitation interannual variability, El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) precipitation teleconnections, the Madden and Julian Oscillation (MJO) and daily precipitation characteristics was also assessed. The model at both resolutions reproduced many observed temperature, atmospheric circulation and precipitation climatological features, despite several identified biases. The model atmosphere was found to be more transparent than the observations, leading to misrepresentation of cloud-radiation interactions. The net cloud radiative forcing, which produces a cooling effect on the global mean climate at the TOA, was well represented by the model. This was found to be due to the compensation between both weaker longwave cloud radiative forcing (LWCRF) and shortwave cloud radiative forcing (SWCRF) in the model compared to the observations. The model capability to represent inter-annual precipitation variability at both resolutions was found to be linked to the adequate representation of ENSO teleconnections. However, the model produced weaker than observed convective activity associated with the MJO. Light daily precipitation over the southeast of South America and other climatologically similar regions was diagnosed to be overestimated, and heavy daily precipitation underestimated by the model. Increasing spatial resolution helped to slightly reduce some of the diagnosed biases. The performed evaluation identified model aspects that need to be improved. These include the representation of polar continental surface and sea ice albedo, stratospheric ozone, low marine clouds, and daily precipitation features, which were found to be larger and last longer than the observed features.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00382-020-05508-8</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9695-5113</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-7575
ispartof Climate dynamics, 2021-02, Vol.56 (3-4), p.873-898
issn 0930-7575
1432-0894
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2487256477
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Albedo
Albedo (solar)
Annual precipitation
Atmosphere
Atmospheric circulation
Atmospheric models
Atmospheric temperature
Boundary conditions
Climate
Climate effects
Climate models
Climate studies
Climatology
Clouds
Convective activity
Cooling effects
Daily
Daily precipitation
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
El Nino
El Nino phenomena
El Nino-Southern Oscillation event
Evaluation
Geophysics/Geodesy
Global temperature changes
Identification
Interannual oscillation
Interannual variability
Intercomparison
Madden-Julian oscillation
Numerical weather forecasting
Oceanography
Ozone
Precipitation
Precipitation variability
Radiation
Radiation-cloud interactions
Radiative forcing
Representations
Sea ice
Sea surface
Sea surface temperature
Short wave radiation
Southern Oscillation
Spatial discrimination
Spatial resolution
Surface temperature
Teleconnections
Variability
Weather forecasting
title Evaluation of climate simulations produced with the Brazilian global atmospheric model version 1.2
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A43%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20climate%20simulations%20produced%20with%20the%20Brazilian%20global%20atmospheric%20model%20version%201.2&rft.jtitle=Climate%20dynamics&rft.au=Coelho,%20Caio%20A.%20S.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=873&rft.epage=898&rft.pages=873-898&rft.issn=0930-7575&rft.eissn=1432-0894&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00382-020-05508-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA651234341%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487256477&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A651234341&rfr_iscdi=true