On‑site sensing of pesticides using point‑of‑care biosensors: a review
Ever increasing demand for food and agricultural resources have led to escalation of pesticide poisoning and environmental hazards. An efficient system for pesticide detection is a constant endeavour and several technologies are working hand in hand to generate effective biosensors for various class...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental chemistry letters 2021-02, Vol.19 (1), p.345-354 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 354 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 345 |
container_title | Environmental chemistry letters |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Kalyani, Neeti Goel, Surbhi Jaiswal, Swati |
description | Ever increasing demand for food and agricultural resources have led to escalation of pesticide poisoning and environmental hazards. An efficient system for pesticide detection is a constant endeavour and several technologies are working hand in hand to generate effective biosensors for various classes of pesticides. Innovative technologies are being developed for pesticides detection which overcome issues such as time and costs involved in sample preparation. Moreover, improvements in ease of operation and better sensitivity have been achieved using techniques such as fluorescence spectroscopy and electrochemical methods. Many tools such as aptamers, gold nanoparticles, quantum dots, molecularly imprinted polymers and, antibodies are used to develop hybrid biosensors where the sensitivity is increased several folds and limit of detection is as low as 0.1 pM. The time of detection is reduced to minutes along with simultaneous detection of multiple pesticides using the biosensors. We reviewed the latest biosensors developed which can be utilized for on-site sensing and optical biosensors are at the forefront of technology with advantages such as easy protocols, simple operation, high sensitivity, broad linearity range and cost-effectiveness. Colorimetric and fluorescence biosensors have rapid detection of pesticides with 90% recovery in food and serum samples. Chemiluminescence utilising biosensors have low detection time while photoluminescent sensors are highly sensitive and can be easily combined with smartphones for real-time detection. Many commercially available Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) substrates are also present. For a cost-effective point-of-care biosensor, sample pre-treatment and expensive instrumentation are few hurdles that are conquered in electrochemical sensors. With amperometric, impedimetric and potentiometric techniques used in these biosensors, a low detection limit and time is observed in agriculture, water and food samples containing variety of pesticides. The review covers all the major techniques which can potentially be used for the development of point-of care biosensors such as, colorimetric, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, photoluminescence, surface enhanced Raman scattering and electrochemical in detailed and up-to-date analysis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10311-020-01070-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2486624373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2486624373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-8108088a337d99740621138e574cbf1fc9bd2341368142c5419820d225f233f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisTbMIw-HHap4SZW6gbWVJnblCuJgpyB2_AK_yJeQNgh2bGZGo3vujK4QpwjnCFBcRARGlEAgAaEAiXtigjmC5DzH_d8540NxFOMagKggmoj5ov36-IyuN0k0bXTtKvE26UzsXe0aE5PNbtd51_aD0Nuh1FUwydL5LeBDvEyqJJhXZ96OxYGtnqI5-elT8Xhz_TC7k_PF7f3sai5rxrKXCkGBUhVz0ZRlkUJOiKxMVqT10qKty2VDnCLnClOqsxRLRdAQZZaYLfNUnI2-XfAvm-FXvfab0A4nNaUqzynlYquiUVUHH2MwVnfBPVfhXSPobWp6TE0PqeldahoHiEcoDuJ2ZcKf9T_UN7xecB8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486624373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On‑site sensing of pesticides using point‑of‑care biosensors: a review</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Kalyani, Neeti ; Goel, Surbhi ; Jaiswal, Swati</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalyani, Neeti ; Goel, Surbhi ; Jaiswal, Swati</creatorcontrib><description>Ever increasing demand for food and agricultural resources have led to escalation of pesticide poisoning and environmental hazards. An efficient system for pesticide detection is a constant endeavour and several technologies are working hand in hand to generate effective biosensors for various classes of pesticides. Innovative technologies are being developed for pesticides detection which overcome issues such as time and costs involved in sample preparation. Moreover, improvements in ease of operation and better sensitivity have been achieved using techniques such as fluorescence spectroscopy and electrochemical methods. Many tools such as aptamers, gold nanoparticles, quantum dots, molecularly imprinted polymers and, antibodies are used to develop hybrid biosensors where the sensitivity is increased several folds and limit of detection is as low as 0.1 pM. The time of detection is reduced to minutes along with simultaneous detection of multiple pesticides using the biosensors. We reviewed the latest biosensors developed which can be utilized for on-site sensing and optical biosensors are at the forefront of technology with advantages such as easy protocols, simple operation, high sensitivity, broad linearity range and cost-effectiveness. Colorimetric and fluorescence biosensors have rapid detection of pesticides with 90% recovery in food and serum samples. Chemiluminescence utilising biosensors have low detection time while photoluminescent sensors are highly sensitive and can be easily combined with smartphones for real-time detection. Many commercially available Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) substrates are also present. For a cost-effective point-of-care biosensor, sample pre-treatment and expensive instrumentation are few hurdles that are conquered in electrochemical sensors. With amperometric, impedimetric and potentiometric techniques used in these biosensors, a low detection limit and time is observed in agriculture, water and food samples containing variety of pesticides. The review covers all the major techniques which can potentially be used for the development of point-of care biosensors such as, colorimetric, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, photoluminescence, surface enhanced Raman scattering and electrochemical in detailed and up-to-date analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1610-3653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1610-3661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10311-020-01070-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural resources ; Analytical Chemistry ; Analytical methods ; Antibodies ; Aptamers ; Biosensors ; Chemical sensors ; Chemiluminescence ; Colorimetry ; Detection ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Electrical measurement ; Electrochemistry ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental hazards ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescence spectroscopy ; Food ; Foods ; Geochemistry ; Imprinted polymers ; Instrumentation ; Linearity ; Nanoparticles ; Pesticides ; Photoluminescence ; Photons ; Pollution ; Polymers ; Pretreatment ; Quantum dots ; Raman spectra ; Review ; Sample preparation ; Sensitivity ; Sensors ; Serum ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>Environmental chemistry letters, 2021-02, Vol.19 (1), p.345-354</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-8108088a337d99740621138e574cbf1fc9bd2341368142c5419820d225f233f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-8108088a337d99740621138e574cbf1fc9bd2341368142c5419820d225f233f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8102-3930</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10311-020-01070-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10311-020-01070-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalyani, Neeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goel, Surbhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaiswal, Swati</creatorcontrib><title>On‑site sensing of pesticides using point‑of‑care biosensors: a review</title><title>Environmental chemistry letters</title><addtitle>Environ Chem Lett</addtitle><description>Ever increasing demand for food and agricultural resources have led to escalation of pesticide poisoning and environmental hazards. An efficient system for pesticide detection is a constant endeavour and several technologies are working hand in hand to generate effective biosensors for various classes of pesticides. Innovative technologies are being developed for pesticides detection which overcome issues such as time and costs involved in sample preparation. Moreover, improvements in ease of operation and better sensitivity have been achieved using techniques such as fluorescence spectroscopy and electrochemical methods. Many tools such as aptamers, gold nanoparticles, quantum dots, molecularly imprinted polymers and, antibodies are used to develop hybrid biosensors where the sensitivity is increased several folds and limit of detection is as low as 0.1 pM. The time of detection is reduced to minutes along with simultaneous detection of multiple pesticides using the biosensors. We reviewed the latest biosensors developed which can be utilized for on-site sensing and optical biosensors are at the forefront of technology with advantages such as easy protocols, simple operation, high sensitivity, broad linearity range and cost-effectiveness. Colorimetric and fluorescence biosensors have rapid detection of pesticides with 90% recovery in food and serum samples. Chemiluminescence utilising biosensors have low detection time while photoluminescent sensors are highly sensitive and can be easily combined with smartphones for real-time detection. Many commercially available Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) substrates are also present. For a cost-effective point-of-care biosensor, sample pre-treatment and expensive instrumentation are few hurdles that are conquered in electrochemical sensors. With amperometric, impedimetric and potentiometric techniques used in these biosensors, a low detection limit and time is observed in agriculture, water and food samples containing variety of pesticides. The review covers all the major techniques which can potentially be used for the development of point-of care biosensors such as, colorimetric, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, photoluminescence, surface enhanced Raman scattering and electrochemical in detailed and up-to-date analysis.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural resources</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Analytical methods</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Aptamers</subject><subject>Biosensors</subject><subject>Chemical sensors</subject><subject>Chemiluminescence</subject><subject>Colorimetry</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Electrical measurement</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental hazards</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescence spectroscopy</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Imprinted polymers</subject><subject>Instrumentation</subject><subject>Linearity</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Photoluminescence</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Pretreatment</subject><subject>Quantum dots</subject><subject>Raman spectra</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sample preparation</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Serum</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>1610-3653</issn><issn>1610-3661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisTbMIw-HHap4SZW6gbWVJnblCuJgpyB2_AK_yJeQNgh2bGZGo3vujK4QpwjnCFBcRARGlEAgAaEAiXtigjmC5DzH_d8540NxFOMagKggmoj5ov36-IyuN0k0bXTtKvE26UzsXe0aE5PNbtd51_aD0Nuh1FUwydL5LeBDvEyqJJhXZ96OxYGtnqI5-elT8Xhz_TC7k_PF7f3sai5rxrKXCkGBUhVz0ZRlkUJOiKxMVqT10qKty2VDnCLnClOqsxRLRdAQZZaYLfNUnI2-XfAvm-FXvfab0A4nNaUqzynlYquiUVUHH2MwVnfBPVfhXSPobWp6TE0PqeldahoHiEcoDuJ2ZcKf9T_UN7xecB8</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Kalyani, Neeti</creator><creator>Goel, Surbhi</creator><creator>Jaiswal, Swati</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8102-3930</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>On‑site sensing of pesticides using point‑of‑care biosensors: a review</title><author>Kalyani, Neeti ; Goel, Surbhi ; Jaiswal, Swati</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-8108088a337d99740621138e574cbf1fc9bd2341368142c5419820d225f233f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural resources</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Analytical methods</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Aptamers</topic><topic>Biosensors</topic><topic>Chemical sensors</topic><topic>Chemiluminescence</topic><topic>Colorimetry</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Electrical measurement</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental hazards</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescence spectroscopy</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Imprinted polymers</topic><topic>Instrumentation</topic><topic>Linearity</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Photoluminescence</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Pretreatment</topic><topic>Quantum dots</topic><topic>Raman spectra</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sample preparation</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Serum</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalyani, Neeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goel, Surbhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaiswal, Swati</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental chemistry letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalyani, Neeti</au><au>Goel, Surbhi</au><au>Jaiswal, Swati</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On‑site sensing of pesticides using point‑of‑care biosensors: a review</atitle><jtitle>Environmental chemistry letters</jtitle><stitle>Environ Chem Lett</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>345-354</pages><issn>1610-3653</issn><eissn>1610-3661</eissn><abstract>Ever increasing demand for food and agricultural resources have led to escalation of pesticide poisoning and environmental hazards. An efficient system for pesticide detection is a constant endeavour and several technologies are working hand in hand to generate effective biosensors for various classes of pesticides. Innovative technologies are being developed for pesticides detection which overcome issues such as time and costs involved in sample preparation. Moreover, improvements in ease of operation and better sensitivity have been achieved using techniques such as fluorescence spectroscopy and electrochemical methods. Many tools such as aptamers, gold nanoparticles, quantum dots, molecularly imprinted polymers and, antibodies are used to develop hybrid biosensors where the sensitivity is increased several folds and limit of detection is as low as 0.1 pM. The time of detection is reduced to minutes along with simultaneous detection of multiple pesticides using the biosensors. We reviewed the latest biosensors developed which can be utilized for on-site sensing and optical biosensors are at the forefront of technology with advantages such as easy protocols, simple operation, high sensitivity, broad linearity range and cost-effectiveness. Colorimetric and fluorescence biosensors have rapid detection of pesticides with 90% recovery in food and serum samples. Chemiluminescence utilising biosensors have low detection time while photoluminescent sensors are highly sensitive and can be easily combined with smartphones for real-time detection. Many commercially available Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) substrates are also present. For a cost-effective point-of-care biosensor, sample pre-treatment and expensive instrumentation are few hurdles that are conquered in electrochemical sensors. With amperometric, impedimetric and potentiometric techniques used in these biosensors, a low detection limit and time is observed in agriculture, water and food samples containing variety of pesticides. The review covers all the major techniques which can potentially be used for the development of point-of care biosensors such as, colorimetric, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, photoluminescence, surface enhanced Raman scattering and electrochemical in detailed and up-to-date analysis.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10311-020-01070-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8102-3930</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1610-3653 |
ispartof | Environmental chemistry letters, 2021-02, Vol.19 (1), p.345-354 |
issn | 1610-3653 1610-3661 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2486624373 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Agricultural economics Agricultural resources Analytical Chemistry Analytical methods Antibodies Aptamers Biosensors Chemical sensors Chemiluminescence Colorimetry Detection Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Electrical measurement Electrochemistry Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental hazards Fluorescence Fluorescence spectroscopy Food Foods Geochemistry Imprinted polymers Instrumentation Linearity Nanoparticles Pesticides Photoluminescence Photons Pollution Polymers Pretreatment Quantum dots Raman spectra Review Sample preparation Sensitivity Sensors Serum Substrates |
title | On‑site sensing of pesticides using point‑of‑care biosensors: a review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A16%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%E2%80%91site%20sensing%20of%20pesticides%20using%20point%E2%80%91of%E2%80%91care%20biosensors:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20chemistry%20letters&rft.au=Kalyani,%20Neeti&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=345-354&rft.issn=1610-3653&rft.eissn=1610-3661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10311-020-01070-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2486624373%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486624373&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |