On‑site sensing of pesticides using point‑of‑care biosensors: a review

Ever increasing demand for food and agricultural resources have led to escalation of pesticide poisoning and environmental hazards. An efficient system for pesticide detection is a constant endeavour and several technologies are working hand in hand to generate effective biosensors for various class...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental chemistry letters 2021-02, Vol.19 (1), p.345-354
Hauptverfasser: Kalyani, Neeti, Goel, Surbhi, Jaiswal, Swati
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 354
container_issue 1
container_start_page 345
container_title Environmental chemistry letters
container_volume 19
creator Kalyani, Neeti
Goel, Surbhi
Jaiswal, Swati
description Ever increasing demand for food and agricultural resources have led to escalation of pesticide poisoning and environmental hazards. An efficient system for pesticide detection is a constant endeavour and several technologies are working hand in hand to generate effective biosensors for various classes of pesticides. Innovative technologies are being developed for pesticides detection which overcome issues such as time and costs involved in sample preparation. Moreover, improvements in ease of operation and better sensitivity have been achieved using techniques such as fluorescence spectroscopy and electrochemical methods. Many tools such as aptamers, gold nanoparticles, quantum dots, molecularly imprinted polymers and, antibodies are used to develop hybrid biosensors where the sensitivity is increased several folds and limit of detection is as low as 0.1 pM. The time of detection is reduced to minutes along with simultaneous detection of multiple pesticides using the biosensors. We reviewed the latest biosensors developed which can be utilized for on-site sensing and optical biosensors are at the forefront of technology with advantages such as easy protocols, simple operation, high sensitivity, broad linearity range and cost-effectiveness. Colorimetric and fluorescence biosensors have rapid detection of pesticides with 90% recovery in food and serum samples. Chemiluminescence utilising biosensors have low detection time while photoluminescent sensors are highly sensitive and can be easily combined with smartphones for real-time detection. Many commercially available Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) substrates are also present. For a cost-effective point-of-care biosensor, sample pre-treatment and expensive instrumentation are few hurdles that are conquered in electrochemical sensors. With amperometric, impedimetric and potentiometric techniques used in these biosensors, a low detection limit and time is observed in agriculture, water and food samples containing variety of pesticides. The review covers all the major techniques which can potentially be used for the development of point-of care biosensors such as, colorimetric, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, photoluminescence, surface enhanced Raman scattering and electrochemical in detailed and up-to-date analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10311-020-01070-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2486624373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2486624373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-8108088a337d99740621138e574cbf1fc9bd2341368142c5419820d225f233f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisTbMIw-HHap4SZW6gbWVJnblCuJgpyB2_AK_yJeQNgh2bGZGo3vujK4QpwjnCFBcRARGlEAgAaEAiXtigjmC5DzH_d8540NxFOMagKggmoj5ov36-IyuN0k0bXTtKvE26UzsXe0aE5PNbtd51_aD0Nuh1FUwydL5LeBDvEyqJJhXZ96OxYGtnqI5-elT8Xhz_TC7k_PF7f3sai5rxrKXCkGBUhVz0ZRlkUJOiKxMVqT10qKty2VDnCLnClOqsxRLRdAQZZaYLfNUnI2-XfAvm-FXvfab0A4nNaUqzynlYquiUVUHH2MwVnfBPVfhXSPobWp6TE0PqeldahoHiEcoDuJ2ZcKf9T_UN7xecB8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486624373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On‑site sensing of pesticides using point‑of‑care biosensors: a review</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Kalyani, Neeti ; Goel, Surbhi ; Jaiswal, Swati</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalyani, Neeti ; Goel, Surbhi ; Jaiswal, Swati</creatorcontrib><description>Ever increasing demand for food and agricultural resources have led to escalation of pesticide poisoning and environmental hazards. An efficient system for pesticide detection is a constant endeavour and several technologies are working hand in hand to generate effective biosensors for various classes of pesticides. Innovative technologies are being developed for pesticides detection which overcome issues such as time and costs involved in sample preparation. Moreover, improvements in ease of operation and better sensitivity have been achieved using techniques such as fluorescence spectroscopy and electrochemical methods. Many tools such as aptamers, gold nanoparticles, quantum dots, molecularly imprinted polymers and, antibodies are used to develop hybrid biosensors where the sensitivity is increased several folds and limit of detection is as low as 0.1 pM. The time of detection is reduced to minutes along with simultaneous detection of multiple pesticides using the biosensors. We reviewed the latest biosensors developed which can be utilized for on-site sensing and optical biosensors are at the forefront of technology with advantages such as easy protocols, simple operation, high sensitivity, broad linearity range and cost-effectiveness. Colorimetric and fluorescence biosensors have rapid detection of pesticides with 90% recovery in food and serum samples. Chemiluminescence utilising biosensors have low detection time while photoluminescent sensors are highly sensitive and can be easily combined with smartphones for real-time detection. Many commercially available Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) substrates are also present. For a cost-effective point-of-care biosensor, sample pre-treatment and expensive instrumentation are few hurdles that are conquered in electrochemical sensors. With amperometric, impedimetric and potentiometric techniques used in these biosensors, a low detection limit and time is observed in agriculture, water and food samples containing variety of pesticides. The review covers all the major techniques which can potentially be used for the development of point-of care biosensors such as, colorimetric, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, photoluminescence, surface enhanced Raman scattering and electrochemical in detailed and up-to-date analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1610-3653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1610-3661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10311-020-01070-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural resources ; Analytical Chemistry ; Analytical methods ; Antibodies ; Aptamers ; Biosensors ; Chemical sensors ; Chemiluminescence ; Colorimetry ; Detection ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Electrical measurement ; Electrochemistry ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental hazards ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescence spectroscopy ; Food ; Foods ; Geochemistry ; Imprinted polymers ; Instrumentation ; Linearity ; Nanoparticles ; Pesticides ; Photoluminescence ; Photons ; Pollution ; Polymers ; Pretreatment ; Quantum dots ; Raman spectra ; Review ; Sample preparation ; Sensitivity ; Sensors ; Serum ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>Environmental chemistry letters, 2021-02, Vol.19 (1), p.345-354</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-8108088a337d99740621138e574cbf1fc9bd2341368142c5419820d225f233f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-8108088a337d99740621138e574cbf1fc9bd2341368142c5419820d225f233f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8102-3930</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10311-020-01070-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10311-020-01070-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalyani, Neeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goel, Surbhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaiswal, Swati</creatorcontrib><title>On‑site sensing of pesticides using point‑of‑care biosensors: a review</title><title>Environmental chemistry letters</title><addtitle>Environ Chem Lett</addtitle><description>Ever increasing demand for food and agricultural resources have led to escalation of pesticide poisoning and environmental hazards. An efficient system for pesticide detection is a constant endeavour and several technologies are working hand in hand to generate effective biosensors for various classes of pesticides. Innovative technologies are being developed for pesticides detection which overcome issues such as time and costs involved in sample preparation. Moreover, improvements in ease of operation and better sensitivity have been achieved using techniques such as fluorescence spectroscopy and electrochemical methods. Many tools such as aptamers, gold nanoparticles, quantum dots, molecularly imprinted polymers and, antibodies are used to develop hybrid biosensors where the sensitivity is increased several folds and limit of detection is as low as 0.1 pM. The time of detection is reduced to minutes along with simultaneous detection of multiple pesticides using the biosensors. We reviewed the latest biosensors developed which can be utilized for on-site sensing and optical biosensors are at the forefront of technology with advantages such as easy protocols, simple operation, high sensitivity, broad linearity range and cost-effectiveness. Colorimetric and fluorescence biosensors have rapid detection of pesticides with 90% recovery in food and serum samples. Chemiluminescence utilising biosensors have low detection time while photoluminescent sensors are highly sensitive and can be easily combined with smartphones for real-time detection. Many commercially available Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) substrates are also present. For a cost-effective point-of-care biosensor, sample pre-treatment and expensive instrumentation are few hurdles that are conquered in electrochemical sensors. With amperometric, impedimetric and potentiometric techniques used in these biosensors, a low detection limit and time is observed in agriculture, water and food samples containing variety of pesticides. The review covers all the major techniques which can potentially be used for the development of point-of care biosensors such as, colorimetric, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, photoluminescence, surface enhanced Raman scattering and electrochemical in detailed and up-to-date analysis.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural resources</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Analytical methods</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Aptamers</subject><subject>Biosensors</subject><subject>Chemical sensors</subject><subject>Chemiluminescence</subject><subject>Colorimetry</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Electrical measurement</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental hazards</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescence spectroscopy</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Imprinted polymers</subject><subject>Instrumentation</subject><subject>Linearity</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Photoluminescence</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Pretreatment</subject><subject>Quantum dots</subject><subject>Raman spectra</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sample preparation</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Serum</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>1610-3653</issn><issn>1610-3661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisTbMIw-HHap4SZW6gbWVJnblCuJgpyB2_AK_yJeQNgh2bGZGo3vujK4QpwjnCFBcRARGlEAgAaEAiXtigjmC5DzH_d8540NxFOMagKggmoj5ov36-IyuN0k0bXTtKvE26UzsXe0aE5PNbtd51_aD0Nuh1FUwydL5LeBDvEyqJJhXZ96OxYGtnqI5-elT8Xhz_TC7k_PF7f3sai5rxrKXCkGBUhVz0ZRlkUJOiKxMVqT10qKty2VDnCLnClOqsxRLRdAQZZaYLfNUnI2-XfAvm-FXvfab0A4nNaUqzynlYquiUVUHH2MwVnfBPVfhXSPobWp6TE0PqeldahoHiEcoDuJ2ZcKf9T_UN7xecB8</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Kalyani, Neeti</creator><creator>Goel, Surbhi</creator><creator>Jaiswal, Swati</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8102-3930</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>On‑site sensing of pesticides using point‑of‑care biosensors: a review</title><author>Kalyani, Neeti ; Goel, Surbhi ; Jaiswal, Swati</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-8108088a337d99740621138e574cbf1fc9bd2341368142c5419820d225f233f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural resources</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Analytical methods</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Aptamers</topic><topic>Biosensors</topic><topic>Chemical sensors</topic><topic>Chemiluminescence</topic><topic>Colorimetry</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Electrical measurement</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental hazards</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescence spectroscopy</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Imprinted polymers</topic><topic>Instrumentation</topic><topic>Linearity</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Photoluminescence</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Pretreatment</topic><topic>Quantum dots</topic><topic>Raman spectra</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sample preparation</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Serum</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalyani, Neeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goel, Surbhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaiswal, Swati</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental chemistry letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalyani, Neeti</au><au>Goel, Surbhi</au><au>Jaiswal, Swati</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On‑site sensing of pesticides using point‑of‑care biosensors: a review</atitle><jtitle>Environmental chemistry letters</jtitle><stitle>Environ Chem Lett</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>345-354</pages><issn>1610-3653</issn><eissn>1610-3661</eissn><abstract>Ever increasing demand for food and agricultural resources have led to escalation of pesticide poisoning and environmental hazards. An efficient system for pesticide detection is a constant endeavour and several technologies are working hand in hand to generate effective biosensors for various classes of pesticides. Innovative technologies are being developed for pesticides detection which overcome issues such as time and costs involved in sample preparation. Moreover, improvements in ease of operation and better sensitivity have been achieved using techniques such as fluorescence spectroscopy and electrochemical methods. Many tools such as aptamers, gold nanoparticles, quantum dots, molecularly imprinted polymers and, antibodies are used to develop hybrid biosensors where the sensitivity is increased several folds and limit of detection is as low as 0.1 pM. The time of detection is reduced to minutes along with simultaneous detection of multiple pesticides using the biosensors. We reviewed the latest biosensors developed which can be utilized for on-site sensing and optical biosensors are at the forefront of technology with advantages such as easy protocols, simple operation, high sensitivity, broad linearity range and cost-effectiveness. Colorimetric and fluorescence biosensors have rapid detection of pesticides with 90% recovery in food and serum samples. Chemiluminescence utilising biosensors have low detection time while photoluminescent sensors are highly sensitive and can be easily combined with smartphones for real-time detection. Many commercially available Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) substrates are also present. For a cost-effective point-of-care biosensor, sample pre-treatment and expensive instrumentation are few hurdles that are conquered in electrochemical sensors. With amperometric, impedimetric and potentiometric techniques used in these biosensors, a low detection limit and time is observed in agriculture, water and food samples containing variety of pesticides. The review covers all the major techniques which can potentially be used for the development of point-of care biosensors such as, colorimetric, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, photoluminescence, surface enhanced Raman scattering and electrochemical in detailed and up-to-date analysis.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10311-020-01070-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8102-3930</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1610-3653
ispartof Environmental chemistry letters, 2021-02, Vol.19 (1), p.345-354
issn 1610-3653
1610-3661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2486624373
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Agricultural economics
Agricultural resources
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical methods
Antibodies
Aptamers
Biosensors
Chemical sensors
Chemiluminescence
Colorimetry
Detection
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecotoxicology
Electrical measurement
Electrochemistry
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental hazards
Fluorescence
Fluorescence spectroscopy
Food
Foods
Geochemistry
Imprinted polymers
Instrumentation
Linearity
Nanoparticles
Pesticides
Photoluminescence
Photons
Pollution
Polymers
Pretreatment
Quantum dots
Raman spectra
Review
Sample preparation
Sensitivity
Sensors
Serum
Substrates
title On‑site sensing of pesticides using point‑of‑care biosensors: a review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A16%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%E2%80%91site%20sensing%20of%20pesticides%20using%20point%E2%80%91of%E2%80%91care%20biosensors:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20chemistry%20letters&rft.au=Kalyani,%20Neeti&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=345-354&rft.issn=1610-3653&rft.eissn=1610-3661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10311-020-01070-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2486624373%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486624373&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true