Integrating across knowledge systems to drive action on chronic biological invasions

Designing and implementing long-term management strategies for chronic biological invasions is amongst the most vexing ecological research problems. Two key challenges to resolving this problem are: (a) integrating science-based and values-based (e.g. spiritual, cultural, economic and ethical) knowl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological invasions 2021-02, Vol.23 (2), p.407-432
Hauptverfasser: Mason, Norman W. H., Burge, Olivia, Price, Robbie, Sprague, Rowan, Dymond, John, Watt, Mike, Roberts, Tessa, Paul, Thomas, Richardson, Brian, Rolando, Carol, Wyse, Sarah, Hulme, Philip E., Stahlmann-Brown, Pike, Awatere, Shaun, Peltzer, Duane A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 432
container_issue 2
container_start_page 407
container_title Biological invasions
container_volume 23
creator Mason, Norman W. H.
Burge, Olivia
Price, Robbie
Sprague, Rowan
Dymond, John
Watt, Mike
Roberts, Tessa
Paul, Thomas
Richardson, Brian
Rolando, Carol
Wyse, Sarah
Hulme, Philip E.
Stahlmann-Brown, Pike
Awatere, Shaun
Peltzer, Duane A.
description Designing and implementing long-term management strategies for chronic biological invasions is amongst the most vexing ecological research problems. Two key challenges to resolving this problem are: (a) integrating science-based and values-based (e.g. spiritual, cultural, economic and ethical) knowledge sources and (b) developing durable knowledge generation and curation platforms to co-ordinate long-term research efforts. We begin by identifying knowledge sources (stakeholder values, forecasts of invader spread and impacts, management technologies and operational logistics) to guide the high-level actions (governance framework design, selection of ethical management technologies, definition of long-term objectives, design of management strategies and operational plans implementing strategies) required for management of chronic invasions. We use exotic conifer invasions in New Zealand as an example. Next, we propose a transdisciplinary knowledge ecology framework where each knowledge source is represented by a separate knowledge generation and curation platform (i.e. knowledge ecosystem) and linked through high-level actions. We detail the structure and function of a single knowledge ecosystem (forecasting spread and impacts), and document two case studies to illustrate how knowledge ecosystems might (a) increase participation of individual researchers within long-term research efforts, and (b) facilitate inclusion of non-researchers in developing a common knowledge base. Finally, we propose a set of guidelines for combining science-based and values-based reasoning in decision-making via localised governance structures. We suggest that viewing knowledge ecologies as an integrated collection of distinct knowledge ecosystems offers a promising approach for identifying, generating, curating and integrating the knowledge sources needed to improve management of chronic biological invasions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10530-020-02388-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2486620285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2486620285</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-5606205935bcfd225ba0bfe05f22467f517c0bf74ee9b674ca0f83c18f0de1943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BTwHPq5Ovze5Rih-Fgpd6Dtlsdk1tk5psK_33pl3BmzDDDDPvvWEeQrcE7gmAfEgEBIMC6DFZVRXkDE2IkKwgvOTnuWeVLJjg8hJdpbQCgFqCmKDl3A-2j3pwvsfaxJAS_vThe23b3uJ0SIPdJDwE3Ea3txkxuOBxDvMRg3cGNy6sQ--MXmPn9zrldbpGF51eJ3vzW6fo_flpOXstFm8v89njojCM1EMhSigpiJqJxnQtpaLR0HQWREcpL2UniDR5ILm1dVNKbjR0FTOk6qC1pOZsiu5G3W0MXzubBrUKu-jzSUV5VWZxWomMoiPq9F20ndpGt9HxoAioo3tqdE9l99TJPUUyiY2klMG-t_FP-h_WDwiacx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486620285</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating across knowledge systems to drive action on chronic biological invasions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mason, Norman W. H. ; Burge, Olivia ; Price, Robbie ; Sprague, Rowan ; Dymond, John ; Watt, Mike ; Roberts, Tessa ; Paul, Thomas ; Richardson, Brian ; Rolando, Carol ; Wyse, Sarah ; Hulme, Philip E. ; Stahlmann-Brown, Pike ; Awatere, Shaun ; Peltzer, Duane A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mason, Norman W. H. ; Burge, Olivia ; Price, Robbie ; Sprague, Rowan ; Dymond, John ; Watt, Mike ; Roberts, Tessa ; Paul, Thomas ; Richardson, Brian ; Rolando, Carol ; Wyse, Sarah ; Hulme, Philip E. ; Stahlmann-Brown, Pike ; Awatere, Shaun ; Peltzer, Duane A.</creatorcontrib><description>Designing and implementing long-term management strategies for chronic biological invasions is amongst the most vexing ecological research problems. Two key challenges to resolving this problem are: (a) integrating science-based and values-based (e.g. spiritual, cultural, economic and ethical) knowledge sources and (b) developing durable knowledge generation and curation platforms to co-ordinate long-term research efforts. We begin by identifying knowledge sources (stakeholder values, forecasts of invader spread and impacts, management technologies and operational logistics) to guide the high-level actions (governance framework design, selection of ethical management technologies, definition of long-term objectives, design of management strategies and operational plans implementing strategies) required for management of chronic invasions. We use exotic conifer invasions in New Zealand as an example. Next, we propose a transdisciplinary knowledge ecology framework where each knowledge source is represented by a separate knowledge generation and curation platform (i.e. knowledge ecosystem) and linked through high-level actions. We detail the structure and function of a single knowledge ecosystem (forecasting spread and impacts), and document two case studies to illustrate how knowledge ecosystems might (a) increase participation of individual researchers within long-term research efforts, and (b) facilitate inclusion of non-researchers in developing a common knowledge base. Finally, we propose a set of guidelines for combining science-based and values-based reasoning in decision-making via localised governance structures. We suggest that viewing knowledge ecologies as an integrated collection of distinct knowledge ecosystems offers a promising approach for identifying, generating, curating and integrating the knowledge sources needed to improve management of chronic biological invasions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-020-02388-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Case studies ; Decision making ; Developmental Biology ; Ecological research ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Ethics ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Invasions ; Knowledge ; Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence) ; Knowledge representation ; Life Sciences ; Logistics ; Management ; Perspectives and Paradigms ; Plant Sciences ; Structure-function relationships</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2021-02, Vol.23 (2), p.407-432</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-5606205935bcfd225ba0bfe05f22467f517c0bf74ee9b674ca0f83c18f0de1943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-5606205935bcfd225ba0bfe05f22467f517c0bf74ee9b674ca0f83c18f0de1943</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6445-4285</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-020-02388-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-020-02388-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mason, Norman W. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burge, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Robbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprague, Rowan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dymond, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watt, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Tessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolando, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyse, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahlmann-Brown, Pike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awatere, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peltzer, Duane A.</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating across knowledge systems to drive action on chronic biological invasions</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>Designing and implementing long-term management strategies for chronic biological invasions is amongst the most vexing ecological research problems. Two key challenges to resolving this problem are: (a) integrating science-based and values-based (e.g. spiritual, cultural, economic and ethical) knowledge sources and (b) developing durable knowledge generation and curation platforms to co-ordinate long-term research efforts. We begin by identifying knowledge sources (stakeholder values, forecasts of invader spread and impacts, management technologies and operational logistics) to guide the high-level actions (governance framework design, selection of ethical management technologies, definition of long-term objectives, design of management strategies and operational plans implementing strategies) required for management of chronic invasions. We use exotic conifer invasions in New Zealand as an example. Next, we propose a transdisciplinary knowledge ecology framework where each knowledge source is represented by a separate knowledge generation and curation platform (i.e. knowledge ecosystem) and linked through high-level actions. We detail the structure and function of a single knowledge ecosystem (forecasting spread and impacts), and document two case studies to illustrate how knowledge ecosystems might (a) increase participation of individual researchers within long-term research efforts, and (b) facilitate inclusion of non-researchers in developing a common knowledge base. Finally, we propose a set of guidelines for combining science-based and values-based reasoning in decision-making via localised governance structures. We suggest that viewing knowledge ecologies as an integrated collection of distinct knowledge ecosystems offers a promising approach for identifying, generating, curating and integrating the knowledge sources needed to improve management of chronic biological invasions.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Ecological research</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Invasions</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)</subject><subject>Knowledge representation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Perspectives and Paradigms</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BTwHPq5Ovze5Rih-Fgpd6Dtlsdk1tk5psK_33pl3BmzDDDDPvvWEeQrcE7gmAfEgEBIMC6DFZVRXkDE2IkKwgvOTnuWeVLJjg8hJdpbQCgFqCmKDl3A-2j3pwvsfaxJAS_vThe23b3uJ0SIPdJDwE3Ea3txkxuOBxDvMRg3cGNy6sQ--MXmPn9zrldbpGF51eJ3vzW6fo_flpOXstFm8v89njojCM1EMhSigpiJqJxnQtpaLR0HQWREcpL2UniDR5ILm1dVNKbjR0FTOk6qC1pOZsiu5G3W0MXzubBrUKu-jzSUV5VWZxWomMoiPq9F20ndpGt9HxoAioo3tqdE9l99TJPUUyiY2klMG-t_FP-h_WDwiacx0</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Mason, Norman W. H.</creator><creator>Burge, Olivia</creator><creator>Price, Robbie</creator><creator>Sprague, Rowan</creator><creator>Dymond, John</creator><creator>Watt, Mike</creator><creator>Roberts, Tessa</creator><creator>Paul, Thomas</creator><creator>Richardson, Brian</creator><creator>Rolando, Carol</creator><creator>Wyse, Sarah</creator><creator>Hulme, Philip E.</creator><creator>Stahlmann-Brown, Pike</creator><creator>Awatere, Shaun</creator><creator>Peltzer, Duane A.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-4285</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Integrating across knowledge systems to drive action on chronic biological invasions</title><author>Mason, Norman W. H. ; Burge, Olivia ; Price, Robbie ; Sprague, Rowan ; Dymond, John ; Watt, Mike ; Roberts, Tessa ; Paul, Thomas ; Richardson, Brian ; Rolando, Carol ; Wyse, Sarah ; Hulme, Philip E. ; Stahlmann-Brown, Pike ; Awatere, Shaun ; Peltzer, Duane A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-5606205935bcfd225ba0bfe05f22467f517c0bf74ee9b674ca0f83c18f0de1943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Ecological research</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Invasions</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)</topic><topic>Knowledge representation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Perspectives and Paradigms</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mason, Norman W. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burge, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Robbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprague, Rowan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dymond, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watt, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Tessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolando, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyse, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahlmann-Brown, Pike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awatere, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peltzer, Duane A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mason, Norman W. H.</au><au>Burge, Olivia</au><au>Price, Robbie</au><au>Sprague, Rowan</au><au>Dymond, John</au><au>Watt, Mike</au><au>Roberts, Tessa</au><au>Paul, Thomas</au><au>Richardson, Brian</au><au>Rolando, Carol</au><au>Wyse, Sarah</au><au>Hulme, Philip E.</au><au>Stahlmann-Brown, Pike</au><au>Awatere, Shaun</au><au>Peltzer, Duane A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating across knowledge systems to drive action on chronic biological invasions</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>432</epage><pages>407-432</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>Designing and implementing long-term management strategies for chronic biological invasions is amongst the most vexing ecological research problems. Two key challenges to resolving this problem are: (a) integrating science-based and values-based (e.g. spiritual, cultural, economic and ethical) knowledge sources and (b) developing durable knowledge generation and curation platforms to co-ordinate long-term research efforts. We begin by identifying knowledge sources (stakeholder values, forecasts of invader spread and impacts, management technologies and operational logistics) to guide the high-level actions (governance framework design, selection of ethical management technologies, definition of long-term objectives, design of management strategies and operational plans implementing strategies) required for management of chronic invasions. We use exotic conifer invasions in New Zealand as an example. Next, we propose a transdisciplinary knowledge ecology framework where each knowledge source is represented by a separate knowledge generation and curation platform (i.e. knowledge ecosystem) and linked through high-level actions. We detail the structure and function of a single knowledge ecosystem (forecasting spread and impacts), and document two case studies to illustrate how knowledge ecosystems might (a) increase participation of individual researchers within long-term research efforts, and (b) facilitate inclusion of non-researchers in developing a common knowledge base. Finally, we propose a set of guidelines for combining science-based and values-based reasoning in decision-making via localised governance structures. We suggest that viewing knowledge ecologies as an integrated collection of distinct knowledge ecosystems offers a promising approach for identifying, generating, curating and integrating the knowledge sources needed to improve management of chronic biological invasions.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-020-02388-1</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-4285</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-3547
ispartof Biological invasions, 2021-02, Vol.23 (2), p.407-432
issn 1387-3547
1573-1464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2486620285
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Case studies
Decision making
Developmental Biology
Ecological research
Ecology
Ecosystems
Ethics
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Invasions
Knowledge
Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence)
Knowledge representation
Life Sciences
Logistics
Management
Perspectives and Paradigms
Plant Sciences
Structure-function relationships
title Integrating across knowledge systems to drive action on chronic biological invasions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A06%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20across%20knowledge%20systems%20to%20drive%20action%20on%20chronic%20biological%20invasions&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Mason,%20Norman%20W.%20H.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=432&rft.pages=407-432&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-020-02388-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2486620285%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486620285&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true