Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale in employed Japanese family caregivers

Aim This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale (J‐CIWS) for use with employed Japanese family caregivers. Methods Permission was obtained from the developer of the original CIWS. The CIWS contains 20 items: 10 measuring care interface work (CIW) and 10 meas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geriatrics & gerontology international 2021-02, Vol.21 (2), p.254-261
Hauptverfasser: Sakka, Mariko, Kita, Sachiko, Sato, Iori, Soejima, Takafumi, Eguchi, Hisashi, Tokita, Masahito, Yamamoto‐Mitani, Noriko, Shimazu, Akihito, Kamibeppu, Kiyoko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 261
container_issue 2
container_start_page 254
container_title Geriatrics & gerontology international
container_volume 21
creator Sakka, Mariko
Kita, Sachiko
Sato, Iori
Soejima, Takafumi
Eguchi, Hisashi
Tokita, Masahito
Yamamoto‐Mitani, Noriko
Shimazu, Akihito
Kamibeppu, Kiyoko
description Aim This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale (J‐CIWS) for use with employed Japanese family caregivers. Methods Permission was obtained from the developer of the original CIWS. The CIWS contains 20 items: 10 measuring care interface work (CIW) and 10 measuring work interface care (WIC). Responses are measured on a five‐point Likert scale. The J‐CIWS was developed through forward‐ and back‐translation and cognitive interviews of employed family caregivers. An internet survey was conducted with 116 employed family caregivers, and 78 participants answered a retest. Questionnaire items included the J‐CIWS and demographic factors. Factor analysis was conducted to determine the J‐CIWS factor structure. Validity was assessed based on known‐groups, convergent and discriminant validity. Internal consistency was examined by calculating Cronbach's α. Test–retest reliability was examined by calculating the Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results The mean participant age was 50.3 years; 74 (63.8%) were male. The average weekly working and caregiving hours were 41.6 and 12.1 h, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original two‐factor model. High internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha >0.90) and sufficient test–retest reliability (weighted κ score >0.45) were demonstrated for both subscales. Convergent and discriminant validity were acceptable for the two subscales (CIW and WIC). Conclusions This study confirmed the usefulness of the CIWS within a Japanese context. The J‐CIWS may be useful for evaluating the extent of the conflict between work and care among employed family caregivers. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 254–261.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ggi.14082
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2486280445</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2486280445</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-fa816ca6bb1ec007553f0cf9463bbab2f3389580d05fe6f64f878948385a67853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EolAY-APIEhNDWju2E2dEFZSiSkh8iDFyknNwyUex06Is_HbSpoUJL-c7Pfec9CJ0QcmIdm-c52ZEOZH-ATqhnIceERE_3P65R4UMBujUuQUhNIwoPUYDxhiNuJAn6PsJCqMSU5imxarK8FoVJts0tcbNO-AHtVQVOMBrsM7U1X4-URZyszZVjmdVA1arFPBbbT_wc6oKwKbCUC6LuoXsz6FVaYoWp_1uJzxDR1oVDs53dYhe725fJvfe_HE6m9zMvZQT5ntaSRqkKkgSCikhoRBMk1RHPGBJohJfMyYjIUlGhIZAB1zLUEZcMilUEErBhuiq9y5t_bkC18SLemWr7mTscxn4knC-oa57KrW1cxZ0vLSmVLaNKYk3Scdd0vE26Y693BlXSQnZL7mPtgPGPfBlCmj_N8XT6axX_gBgeYhF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486280445</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale in employed Japanese family caregivers</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sakka, Mariko ; Kita, Sachiko ; Sato, Iori ; Soejima, Takafumi ; Eguchi, Hisashi ; Tokita, Masahito ; Yamamoto‐Mitani, Noriko ; Shimazu, Akihito ; Kamibeppu, Kiyoko</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakka, Mariko ; Kita, Sachiko ; Sato, Iori ; Soejima, Takafumi ; Eguchi, Hisashi ; Tokita, Masahito ; Yamamoto‐Mitani, Noriko ; Shimazu, Akihito ; Kamibeppu, Kiyoko</creatorcontrib><description>Aim This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale (J‐CIWS) for use with employed Japanese family caregivers. Methods Permission was obtained from the developer of the original CIWS. The CIWS contains 20 items: 10 measuring care interface work (CIW) and 10 measuring work interface care (WIC). Responses are measured on a five‐point Likert scale. The J‐CIWS was developed through forward‐ and back‐translation and cognitive interviews of employed family caregivers. An internet survey was conducted with 116 employed family caregivers, and 78 participants answered a retest. Questionnaire items included the J‐CIWS and demographic factors. Factor analysis was conducted to determine the J‐CIWS factor structure. Validity was assessed based on known‐groups, convergent and discriminant validity. Internal consistency was examined by calculating Cronbach's α. Test–retest reliability was examined by calculating the Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results The mean participant age was 50.3 years; 74 (63.8%) were male. The average weekly working and caregiving hours were 41.6 and 12.1 h, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original two‐factor model. High internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha &gt;0.90) and sufficient test–retest reliability (weighted κ score &gt;0.45) were demonstrated for both subscales. Convergent and discriminant validity were acceptable for the two subscales (CIW and WIC). Conclusions This study confirmed the usefulness of the CIWS within a Japanese context. The J‐CIWS may be useful for evaluating the extent of the conflict between work and care among employed family caregivers. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 254–261.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1444-1586</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1447-0594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ggi.14082</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33319458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Caregivers ; family caregivers ; Japanese version ; validation study ; Validity ; Work life balance</subject><ispartof>Geriatrics &amp; gerontology international, 2021-02, Vol.21 (2), p.254-261</ispartof><rights>2020 Japan Geriatrics Society</rights><rights>2020 Japan Geriatrics Society.</rights><rights>2021 Japan Geriatrics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-fa816ca6bb1ec007553f0cf9463bbab2f3389580d05fe6f64f878948385a67853</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6532-3690 ; 0000-0002-0694-8439 ; 0000-0002-1704-7011</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fggi.14082$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fggi.14082$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakka, Mariko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kita, Sachiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Iori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soejima, Takafumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eguchi, Hisashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokita, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto‐Mitani, Noriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimazu, Akihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamibeppu, Kiyoko</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale in employed Japanese family caregivers</title><title>Geriatrics &amp; gerontology international</title><addtitle>Geriatr Gerontol Int</addtitle><description>Aim This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale (J‐CIWS) for use with employed Japanese family caregivers. Methods Permission was obtained from the developer of the original CIWS. The CIWS contains 20 items: 10 measuring care interface work (CIW) and 10 measuring work interface care (WIC). Responses are measured on a five‐point Likert scale. The J‐CIWS was developed through forward‐ and back‐translation and cognitive interviews of employed family caregivers. An internet survey was conducted with 116 employed family caregivers, and 78 participants answered a retest. Questionnaire items included the J‐CIWS and demographic factors. Factor analysis was conducted to determine the J‐CIWS factor structure. Validity was assessed based on known‐groups, convergent and discriminant validity. Internal consistency was examined by calculating Cronbach's α. Test–retest reliability was examined by calculating the Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results The mean participant age was 50.3 years; 74 (63.8%) were male. The average weekly working and caregiving hours were 41.6 and 12.1 h, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original two‐factor model. High internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha &gt;0.90) and sufficient test–retest reliability (weighted κ score &gt;0.45) were demonstrated for both subscales. Convergent and discriminant validity were acceptable for the two subscales (CIW and WIC). Conclusions This study confirmed the usefulness of the CIWS within a Japanese context. The J‐CIWS may be useful for evaluating the extent of the conflict between work and care among employed family caregivers. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 254–261.</description><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>family caregivers</subject><subject>Japanese version</subject><subject>validation study</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Work life balance</subject><issn>1444-1586</issn><issn>1447-0594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EolAY-APIEhNDWju2E2dEFZSiSkh8iDFyknNwyUex06Is_HbSpoUJL-c7Pfec9CJ0QcmIdm-c52ZEOZH-ATqhnIceERE_3P65R4UMBujUuQUhNIwoPUYDxhiNuJAn6PsJCqMSU5imxarK8FoVJts0tcbNO-AHtVQVOMBrsM7U1X4-URZyszZVjmdVA1arFPBbbT_wc6oKwKbCUC6LuoXsz6FVaYoWp_1uJzxDR1oVDs53dYhe725fJvfe_HE6m9zMvZQT5ntaSRqkKkgSCikhoRBMk1RHPGBJohJfMyYjIUlGhIZAB1zLUEZcMilUEErBhuiq9y5t_bkC18SLemWr7mTscxn4knC-oa57KrW1cxZ0vLSmVLaNKYk3Scdd0vE26Y693BlXSQnZL7mPtgPGPfBlCmj_N8XT6axX_gBgeYhF</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Sakka, Mariko</creator><creator>Kita, Sachiko</creator><creator>Sato, Iori</creator><creator>Soejima, Takafumi</creator><creator>Eguchi, Hisashi</creator><creator>Tokita, Masahito</creator><creator>Yamamoto‐Mitani, Noriko</creator><creator>Shimazu, Akihito</creator><creator>Kamibeppu, Kiyoko</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6532-3690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0694-8439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1704-7011</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale in employed Japanese family caregivers</title><author>Sakka, Mariko ; Kita, Sachiko ; Sato, Iori ; Soejima, Takafumi ; Eguchi, Hisashi ; Tokita, Masahito ; Yamamoto‐Mitani, Noriko ; Shimazu, Akihito ; Kamibeppu, Kiyoko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4032-fa816ca6bb1ec007553f0cf9463bbab2f3389580d05fe6f64f878948385a67853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>family caregivers</topic><topic>Japanese version</topic><topic>validation study</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Work life balance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakka, Mariko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kita, Sachiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Iori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soejima, Takafumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eguchi, Hisashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokita, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto‐Mitani, Noriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimazu, Akihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamibeppu, Kiyoko</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Geriatrics &amp; gerontology international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakka, Mariko</au><au>Kita, Sachiko</au><au>Sato, Iori</au><au>Soejima, Takafumi</au><au>Eguchi, Hisashi</au><au>Tokita, Masahito</au><au>Yamamoto‐Mitani, Noriko</au><au>Shimazu, Akihito</au><au>Kamibeppu, Kiyoko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale in employed Japanese family caregivers</atitle><jtitle>Geriatrics &amp; gerontology international</jtitle><addtitle>Geriatr Gerontol Int</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>254</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>254-261</pages><issn>1444-1586</issn><eissn>1447-0594</eissn><abstract>Aim This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale (J‐CIWS) for use with employed Japanese family caregivers. Methods Permission was obtained from the developer of the original CIWS. The CIWS contains 20 items: 10 measuring care interface work (CIW) and 10 measuring work interface care (WIC). Responses are measured on a five‐point Likert scale. The J‐CIWS was developed through forward‐ and back‐translation and cognitive interviews of employed family caregivers. An internet survey was conducted with 116 employed family caregivers, and 78 participants answered a retest. Questionnaire items included the J‐CIWS and demographic factors. Factor analysis was conducted to determine the J‐CIWS factor structure. Validity was assessed based on known‐groups, convergent and discriminant validity. Internal consistency was examined by calculating Cronbach's α. Test–retest reliability was examined by calculating the Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results The mean participant age was 50.3 years; 74 (63.8%) were male. The average weekly working and caregiving hours were 41.6 and 12.1 h, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original two‐factor model. High internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha &gt;0.90) and sufficient test–retest reliability (weighted κ score &gt;0.45) were demonstrated for both subscales. Convergent and discriminant validity were acceptable for the two subscales (CIW and WIC). Conclusions This study confirmed the usefulness of the CIWS within a Japanese context. The J‐CIWS may be useful for evaluating the extent of the conflict between work and care among employed family caregivers. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 254–261.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>33319458</pmid><doi>10.1111/ggi.14082</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6532-3690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0694-8439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1704-7011</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1444-1586
ispartof Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2021-02, Vol.21 (2), p.254-261
issn 1444-1586
1447-0594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2486280445
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Caregivers
family caregivers
Japanese version
validation study
Validity
Work life balance
title Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale in employed Japanese family caregivers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A37%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20and%20validity%20of%20the%20Japanese%20version%20of%20the%20Caregiving%20Interface%20Work%20Scale%20in%20employed%20Japanese%20family%20caregivers&rft.jtitle=Geriatrics%20&%20gerontology%20international&rft.au=Sakka,%20Mariko&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=254&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=254-261&rft.issn=1444-1586&rft.eissn=1447-0594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ggi.14082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2486280445%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486280445&rft_id=info:pmid/33319458&rfr_iscdi=true