Integration of DNA-Based Approaches in Aquatic Ecological Assessment Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Benthic macroinvertebrates are among the most used biological quality elements for assessing the condition of all types of aquatic ecosystems worldwide (i.e., fresh water, transitional, and marine). Current morphology-based assessments have several limitations that may be circumvented by using DNA-b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water (Basel) 2021-02, Vol.13 (3), p.331
Hauptverfasser: Duarte, Sofia, Leite, Barbara, Feio, Maria, Costa, Filipe, Filipe, Ana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 331
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 13
creator Duarte, Sofia
Leite, Barbara
Feio, Maria
Costa, Filipe
Filipe, Ana
description Benthic macroinvertebrates are among the most used biological quality elements for assessing the condition of all types of aquatic ecosystems worldwide (i.e., fresh water, transitional, and marine). Current morphology-based assessments have several limitations that may be circumvented by using DNA-based approaches. Here, we present a comprehensive review of 90 publications on the use of DNA metabarcoding of benthic macroinvertebrates in aquatic ecosystems bioassessments. Metabarcoding of bulk macrozoobenthos has been preferentially used in fresh waters, whereas in marine waters, environmental DNA (eDNA) from sediment and bulk communities from deployed artificial structures has been favored. DNA extraction has been done predominantly through commercial kits, and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) has been, by far, the most used marker, occasionally combined with others, namely, the 18S rRNA gene. Current limitations include the lack of standardized protocols and broad-coverage primers, the incompleteness of reference libraries, and the inability to reliably extrapolate abundance data. In addition, morphology versus DNA benchmarking of ecological status and biotic indexes are required to allow general worldwide implementation and higher end-user confidence. The increased sensitivity, high throughput, and faster execution of DNA metabarcoding can provide much higher spatial and temporal data resolution on aquatic ecological status, thereby being more responsive to immediate management needs.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w13030331
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2485414353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A791322672</galeid><sourcerecordid>A791322672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4e2d79660e47800cee46e69ef137c8e1c305bd003650ce31acfd3e01246744c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1PwzAMjRBITGMH_kEkThw6kjpN22M3BkwacGHnKkvdLtOWbEkH4t-TaQhhH_xkPz9_EHLL2RigZA9fHFh04BdkkLIcEiEEv_yHr8kohA2LJsqiyNiA4Nz22HnVG2epa-njW5VMVMCGVvu9d0qvMVBjaXU4Ro6mM-22rjNabWkVAoawQ9vTZTC2o5MI15HzqrR3xn6i73EVpTHckKtWbQOOfuOQLJ9mH9OXZPH-PJ9Wi0RDJvtEYNrkpZQMRV4wphGFRFliyyHXBXINLFs1jIHMYhG40m0DyHgqZC6ETmFI7s66cfXDEUNfb9zR2ziyTkWRCS4gg8gan1md2mJtbOt6r3T0BndGO4utifkqLzmkqcxPsvfnhnhXCB7beu_NTvnvmrP69Pn67_PwA6FsdGI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2485414353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integration of DNA-Based Approaches in Aquatic Ecological Assessment Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (Open access)</source><creator>Duarte, Sofia ; Leite, Barbara ; Feio, Maria ; Costa, Filipe ; Filipe, Ana</creator><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Sofia ; Leite, Barbara ; Feio, Maria ; Costa, Filipe ; Filipe, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>Benthic macroinvertebrates are among the most used biological quality elements for assessing the condition of all types of aquatic ecosystems worldwide (i.e., fresh water, transitional, and marine). Current morphology-based assessments have several limitations that may be circumvented by using DNA-based approaches. Here, we present a comprehensive review of 90 publications on the use of DNA metabarcoding of benthic macroinvertebrates in aquatic ecosystems bioassessments. Metabarcoding of bulk macrozoobenthos has been preferentially used in fresh waters, whereas in marine waters, environmental DNA (eDNA) from sediment and bulk communities from deployed artificial structures has been favored. DNA extraction has been done predominantly through commercial kits, and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) has been, by far, the most used marker, occasionally combined with others, namely, the 18S rRNA gene. Current limitations include the lack of standardized protocols and broad-coverage primers, the incompleteness of reference libraries, and the inability to reliably extrapolate abundance data. In addition, morphology versus DNA benchmarking of ecological status and biotic indexes are required to allow general worldwide implementation and higher end-user confidence. The increased sensitivity, high throughput, and faster execution of DNA metabarcoding can provide much higher spatial and temporal data resolution on aquatic ecological status, thereby being more responsive to immediate management needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w13030331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Biodiversity ; Clustering ; Cytochrome-c oxidase ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Fresh water ; Genes ; Identification ; Marine ecosystems ; Morphology ; Oxidases ; Quality assessment ; RNA ; rRNA 18S ; Sediments (Geology) ; Spatial data ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2021-02, Vol.13 (3), p.331</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4e2d79660e47800cee46e69ef137c8e1c305bd003650ce31acfd3e01246744c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4e2d79660e47800cee46e69ef137c8e1c305bd003650ce31acfd3e01246744c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0181-0676 ; 0000-0003-0362-6802 ; 0000-0001-7862-2676 ; 0000-0003-4440-1298 ; 0000-0001-5398-3942</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feio, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Filipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipe, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>Integration of DNA-Based Approaches in Aquatic Ecological Assessment Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>Benthic macroinvertebrates are among the most used biological quality elements for assessing the condition of all types of aquatic ecosystems worldwide (i.e., fresh water, transitional, and marine). Current morphology-based assessments have several limitations that may be circumvented by using DNA-based approaches. Here, we present a comprehensive review of 90 publications on the use of DNA metabarcoding of benthic macroinvertebrates in aquatic ecosystems bioassessments. Metabarcoding of bulk macrozoobenthos has been preferentially used in fresh waters, whereas in marine waters, environmental DNA (eDNA) from sediment and bulk communities from deployed artificial structures has been favored. DNA extraction has been done predominantly through commercial kits, and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) has been, by far, the most used marker, occasionally combined with others, namely, the 18S rRNA gene. Current limitations include the lack of standardized protocols and broad-coverage primers, the incompleteness of reference libraries, and the inability to reliably extrapolate abundance data. In addition, morphology versus DNA benchmarking of ecological status and biotic indexes are required to allow general worldwide implementation and higher end-user confidence. The increased sensitivity, high throughput, and faster execution of DNA metabarcoding can provide much higher spatial and temporal data resolution on aquatic ecological status, thereby being more responsive to immediate management needs.</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Cytochrome-c oxidase</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Oxidases</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>rRNA 18S</subject><subject>Sediments (Geology)</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1PwzAMjRBITGMH_kEkThw6kjpN22M3BkwacGHnKkvdLtOWbEkH4t-TaQhhH_xkPz9_EHLL2RigZA9fHFh04BdkkLIcEiEEv_yHr8kohA2LJsqiyNiA4Nz22HnVG2epa-njW5VMVMCGVvu9d0qvMVBjaXU4Ro6mM-22rjNabWkVAoawQ9vTZTC2o5MI15HzqrR3xn6i73EVpTHckKtWbQOOfuOQLJ9mH9OXZPH-PJ9Wi0RDJvtEYNrkpZQMRV4wphGFRFliyyHXBXINLFs1jIHMYhG40m0DyHgqZC6ETmFI7s66cfXDEUNfb9zR2ziyTkWRCS4gg8gan1md2mJtbOt6r3T0BndGO4utifkqLzmkqcxPsvfnhnhXCB7beu_NTvnvmrP69Pn67_PwA6FsdGI</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Duarte, Sofia</creator><creator>Leite, Barbara</creator><creator>Feio, Maria</creator><creator>Costa, Filipe</creator><creator>Filipe, Ana</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0181-0676</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0362-6802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-2676</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-1298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5398-3942</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Integration of DNA-Based Approaches in Aquatic Ecological Assessment Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates</title><author>Duarte, Sofia ; Leite, Barbara ; Feio, Maria ; Costa, Filipe ; Filipe, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4e2d79660e47800cee46e69ef137c8e1c305bd003650ce31acfd3e01246744c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Cytochrome-c oxidase</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Oxidases</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>rRNA 18S</topic><topic>Sediments (Geology)</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feio, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Filipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipe, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duarte, Sofia</au><au>Leite, Barbara</au><au>Feio, Maria</au><au>Costa, Filipe</au><au>Filipe, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integration of DNA-Based Approaches in Aquatic Ecological Assessment Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>331</spage><pages>331-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>Benthic macroinvertebrates are among the most used biological quality elements for assessing the condition of all types of aquatic ecosystems worldwide (i.e., fresh water, transitional, and marine). Current morphology-based assessments have several limitations that may be circumvented by using DNA-based approaches. Here, we present a comprehensive review of 90 publications on the use of DNA metabarcoding of benthic macroinvertebrates in aquatic ecosystems bioassessments. Metabarcoding of bulk macrozoobenthos has been preferentially used in fresh waters, whereas in marine waters, environmental DNA (eDNA) from sediment and bulk communities from deployed artificial structures has been favored. DNA extraction has been done predominantly through commercial kits, and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) has been, by far, the most used marker, occasionally combined with others, namely, the 18S rRNA gene. Current limitations include the lack of standardized protocols and broad-coverage primers, the incompleteness of reference libraries, and the inability to reliably extrapolate abundance data. In addition, morphology versus DNA benchmarking of ecological status and biotic indexes are required to allow general worldwide implementation and higher end-user confidence. The increased sensitivity, high throughput, and faster execution of DNA metabarcoding can provide much higher spatial and temporal data resolution on aquatic ecological status, thereby being more responsive to immediate management needs.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w13030331</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0181-0676</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0362-6802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-2676</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-1298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5398-3942</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2021-02, Vol.13 (3), p.331
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2485414353
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek (Open access)
subjects Aquatic ecosystems
Biodiversity
Clustering
Cytochrome-c oxidase
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
Fresh water
Genes
Identification
Marine ecosystems
Morphology
Oxidases
Quality assessment
RNA
rRNA 18S
Sediments (Geology)
Spatial data
Taxonomy
title Integration of DNA-Based Approaches in Aquatic Ecological Assessment Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A56%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integration%20of%20DNA-Based%20Approaches%20in%20Aquatic%20Ecological%20Assessment%20Using%20Benthic%20Macroinvertebrates&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Duarte,%20Sofia&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=331&rft.pages=331-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w13030331&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA791322672%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2485414353&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A791322672&rfr_iscdi=true