University Stormwater Management within Urban Environmental Regulatory Regimes: Barriers to Progressivity or Opportunities to Innovate?

U.S. public university campuses are held directly responsible for compliance with many of the same federal- and state-level environmental regulations as cities, including stormwater management. While operating as ‘cities within cities’ in many respects, campuses face unique constraints in achieving...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental management (New York) 2021, Vol.67 (1), p.12-25
Hauptverfasser: Pierce, Gregory, Gmoser-Daskalakis, Kyra, Jessup, Kelsey, Grant, Stanley B., Mehring, Andrew, Winfrey, Brandon, Rippy, Megan A., Feldman, David, Holden, Patricia, Ambrose, Richard, Levin, Lisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12
container_title Environmental management (New York)
container_volume 67
creator Pierce, Gregory
Gmoser-Daskalakis, Kyra
Jessup, Kelsey
Grant, Stanley B.
Mehring, Andrew
Winfrey, Brandon
Rippy, Megan A.
Feldman, David
Holden, Patricia
Ambrose, Richard
Levin, Lisa
description U.S. public university campuses are held directly responsible for compliance with many of the same federal- and state-level environmental regulations as cities, including stormwater management. While operating as ‘cities within cities’ in many respects, campuses face unique constraints in achieving stormwater regulatory compliance. To compare the abilities of campuses to comply with stormwater regulations to municipalities, we conduct mixed-methods research using primary data from five University of California (UC) campuses. Public universities constituted over 20% of California’s “nontraditional” permittees under the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) regulation regime in 2013. We utilize semi-structured interviews with campus and regulatory officials, a survey of campus students and staff around support and willingness to pay for innovative stormwater management, and content analysis of campus stormwater management documents to examine challenges to public university stormwater compliance. We find that, despite their progressive environmental practices in other areas like energy and water conservation, even as compared to cities, stormwater management practices on the evaluated campuses are constrained by several factors: infrastructure financing limitations, lack of transparent and coordinated decision-making, a lack of campus resident involvement, and regulatory inflexibility. Our study provides new insights, both for understanding campuses as sustainable ‘cities within cities’ and more broadly for urban environmental compliance regimes globally.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00267-020-01377-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2485326517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2485326517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-164201e2297a7dc6a1d88eb95a2f2d32e2596d4d5bbcb34112673f905e8cee013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOGzEUhi1URFLaF2CBLHU9rS_juXSDAEGLBAoqROrO8sycpI4ydjj2BOUJ-to4CYVdV-dI_036CDnh7CtnrPwWGBNFmTHBMsZlWWbygIx5LkWW5PoDGTNZ5BlX4veIfAxhwRiTVaWOyEhKrlheqTH5O3V2DRhs3NCH6LF_NhGQ3hln5tCDi_TZxj_W0Sk2xtErt7bo3VYwS_oL5sPSpNRm-9oewnd6YRBtKqTR03v0c4QQ7Hpb75FOViuPcXA2Wtg5bpzz67R49okczswywOfXe0ym11ePlz-z28mPm8vz26zNeR0zXuSCcRCiLk3ZtYXhXVVBUysjZqKTAoSqiy7vVNO0jcw5T4DkrGYKqhYgUTomX_a9K_RPA4SoF35Alya1SECkKBQvk0vsXS36EBBmeoW2N7jRnOkte71nrxN7vWOvZQqdvlYPTQ_dW-Qf7GSQe0NIkpsDvm__p_YFhguSNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2485326517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>University Stormwater Management within Urban Environmental Regulatory Regimes: Barriers to Progressivity or Opportunities to Innovate?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Pierce, Gregory ; Gmoser-Daskalakis, Kyra ; Jessup, Kelsey ; Grant, Stanley B. ; Mehring, Andrew ; Winfrey, Brandon ; Rippy, Megan A. ; Feldman, David ; Holden, Patricia ; Ambrose, Richard ; Levin, Lisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Gregory ; Gmoser-Daskalakis, Kyra ; Jessup, Kelsey ; Grant, Stanley B. ; Mehring, Andrew ; Winfrey, Brandon ; Rippy, Megan A. ; Feldman, David ; Holden, Patricia ; Ambrose, Richard ; Levin, Lisa</creatorcontrib><description>U.S. public university campuses are held directly responsible for compliance with many of the same federal- and state-level environmental regulations as cities, including stormwater management. While operating as ‘cities within cities’ in many respects, campuses face unique constraints in achieving stormwater regulatory compliance. To compare the abilities of campuses to comply with stormwater regulations to municipalities, we conduct mixed-methods research using primary data from five University of California (UC) campuses. Public universities constituted over 20% of California’s “nontraditional” permittees under the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) regulation regime in 2013. We utilize semi-structured interviews with campus and regulatory officials, a survey of campus students and staff around support and willingness to pay for innovative stormwater management, and content analysis of campus stormwater management documents to examine challenges to public university stormwater compliance. We find that, despite their progressive environmental practices in other areas like energy and water conservation, even as compared to cities, stormwater management practices on the evaluated campuses are constrained by several factors: infrastructure financing limitations, lack of transparent and coordinated decision-making, a lack of campus resident involvement, and regulatory inflexibility. Our study provides new insights, both for understanding campuses as sustainable ‘cities within cities’ and more broadly for urban environmental compliance regimes globally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01377-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33150485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Campuses ; Cities ; College campuses ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Compliance ; Constraints ; Content analysis ; Decision making ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Energy conservation ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental regulations ; Forestry Management ; Humans ; Mixed methods research ; Municipalities ; Nature Conservation ; Rain ; Regulation ; Regulations ; Separated sewers ; Sewer systems ; Storm sewers ; Stormwater ; Stormwater management ; Universities ; Waste Water Technology ; Water conservation ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 2021, Vol.67 (1), p.12-25</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-164201e2297a7dc6a1d88eb95a2f2d32e2596d4d5bbcb34112673f905e8cee013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-164201e2297a7dc6a1d88eb95a2f2d32e2596d4d5bbcb34112673f905e8cee013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00267-020-01377-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-020-01377-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33150485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gmoser-Daskalakis, Kyra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jessup, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Stanley B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehring, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winfrey, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippy, Megan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holden, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrose, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Lisa</creatorcontrib><title>University Stormwater Management within Urban Environmental Regulatory Regimes: Barriers to Progressivity or Opportunities to Innovate?</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><addtitle>Environmental Management</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><description>U.S. public university campuses are held directly responsible for compliance with many of the same federal- and state-level environmental regulations as cities, including stormwater management. While operating as ‘cities within cities’ in many respects, campuses face unique constraints in achieving stormwater regulatory compliance. To compare the abilities of campuses to comply with stormwater regulations to municipalities, we conduct mixed-methods research using primary data from five University of California (UC) campuses. Public universities constituted over 20% of California’s “nontraditional” permittees under the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) regulation regime in 2013. We utilize semi-structured interviews with campus and regulatory officials, a survey of campus students and staff around support and willingness to pay for innovative stormwater management, and content analysis of campus stormwater management documents to examine challenges to public university stormwater compliance. We find that, despite their progressive environmental practices in other areas like energy and water conservation, even as compared to cities, stormwater management practices on the evaluated campuses are constrained by several factors: infrastructure financing limitations, lack of transparent and coordinated decision-making, a lack of campus resident involvement, and regulatory inflexibility. Our study provides new insights, both for understanding campuses as sustainable ‘cities within cities’ and more broadly for urban environmental compliance regimes globally.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Campuses</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>College campuses</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>Forestry Management</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Separated sewers</subject><subject>Sewer systems</subject><subject>Storm sewers</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Stormwater management</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOGzEUhi1URFLaF2CBLHU9rS_juXSDAEGLBAoqROrO8sycpI4ydjj2BOUJ-to4CYVdV-dI_036CDnh7CtnrPwWGBNFmTHBMsZlWWbygIx5LkWW5PoDGTNZ5BlX4veIfAxhwRiTVaWOyEhKrlheqTH5O3V2DRhs3NCH6LF_NhGQ3hln5tCDi_TZxj_W0Sk2xtErt7bo3VYwS_oL5sPSpNRm-9oewnd6YRBtKqTR03v0c4QQ7Hpb75FOViuPcXA2Wtg5bpzz67R49okczswywOfXe0ym11ePlz-z28mPm8vz26zNeR0zXuSCcRCiLk3ZtYXhXVVBUysjZqKTAoSqiy7vVNO0jcw5T4DkrGYKqhYgUTomX_a9K_RPA4SoF35Alya1SECkKBQvk0vsXS36EBBmeoW2N7jRnOkte71nrxN7vWOvZQqdvlYPTQ_dW-Qf7GSQe0NIkpsDvm__p_YFhguSNQ</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Pierce, Gregory</creator><creator>Gmoser-Daskalakis, Kyra</creator><creator>Jessup, Kelsey</creator><creator>Grant, Stanley B.</creator><creator>Mehring, Andrew</creator><creator>Winfrey, Brandon</creator><creator>Rippy, Megan A.</creator><creator>Feldman, David</creator><creator>Holden, Patricia</creator><creator>Ambrose, Richard</creator><creator>Levin, Lisa</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>University Stormwater Management within Urban Environmental Regulatory Regimes: Barriers to Progressivity or Opportunities to Innovate?</title><author>Pierce, Gregory ; Gmoser-Daskalakis, Kyra ; Jessup, Kelsey ; Grant, Stanley B. ; Mehring, Andrew ; Winfrey, Brandon ; Rippy, Megan A. ; Feldman, David ; Holden, Patricia ; Ambrose, Richard ; Levin, Lisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-164201e2297a7dc6a1d88eb95a2f2d32e2596d4d5bbcb34112673f905e8cee013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Campuses</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>College campuses</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>Forestry Management</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Separated sewers</topic><topic>Sewer systems</topic><topic>Storm sewers</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Stormwater management</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gmoser-Daskalakis, Kyra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jessup, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Stanley B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehring, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winfrey, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippy, Megan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holden, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrose, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Lisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pierce, Gregory</au><au>Gmoser-Daskalakis, Kyra</au><au>Jessup, Kelsey</au><au>Grant, Stanley B.</au><au>Mehring, Andrew</au><au>Winfrey, Brandon</au><au>Rippy, Megan A.</au><au>Feldman, David</au><au>Holden, Patricia</au><au>Ambrose, Richard</au><au>Levin, Lisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>University Stormwater Management within Urban Environmental Regulatory Regimes: Barriers to Progressivity or Opportunities to Innovate?</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Environmental Management</stitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>12-25</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><abstract>U.S. public university campuses are held directly responsible for compliance with many of the same federal- and state-level environmental regulations as cities, including stormwater management. While operating as ‘cities within cities’ in many respects, campuses face unique constraints in achieving stormwater regulatory compliance. To compare the abilities of campuses to comply with stormwater regulations to municipalities, we conduct mixed-methods research using primary data from five University of California (UC) campuses. Public universities constituted over 20% of California’s “nontraditional” permittees under the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) regulation regime in 2013. We utilize semi-structured interviews with campus and regulatory officials, a survey of campus students and staff around support and willingness to pay for innovative stormwater management, and content analysis of campus stormwater management documents to examine challenges to public university stormwater compliance. We find that, despite their progressive environmental practices in other areas like energy and water conservation, even as compared to cities, stormwater management practices on the evaluated campuses are constrained by several factors: infrastructure financing limitations, lack of transparent and coordinated decision-making, a lack of campus resident involvement, and regulatory inflexibility. Our study provides new insights, both for understanding campuses as sustainable ‘cities within cities’ and more broadly for urban environmental compliance regimes globally.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33150485</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00267-020-01377-3</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-152X
ispartof Environmental management (New York), 2021, Vol.67 (1), p.12-25
issn 0364-152X
1432-1009
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2485326517
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Aquatic Pollution
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Campuses
Cities
College campuses
Colleges & universities
Compliance
Constraints
Content analysis
Decision making
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Energy conservation
Environment
Environmental Management
Environmental regulations
Forestry Management
Humans
Mixed methods research
Municipalities
Nature Conservation
Rain
Regulation
Regulations
Separated sewers
Sewer systems
Storm sewers
Stormwater
Stormwater management
Universities
Waste Water Technology
Water conservation
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
title University Stormwater Management within Urban Environmental Regulatory Regimes: Barriers to Progressivity or Opportunities to Innovate?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T09%3A54%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=University%20Stormwater%20Management%20within%20Urban%20Environmental%20Regulatory%20Regimes:%20Barriers%20to%20Progressivity%20or%20Opportunities%20to%20Innovate?&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Pierce,%20Gregory&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=12-25&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00267-020-01377-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2485326517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2485326517&rft_id=info:pmid/33150485&rfr_iscdi=true