Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3
Previous analyses of various standard candles observed by the Gaia satellite have reported statistically significant systematics in the parallaxes that have improved from ∼250 μ as in the first data release (DR1) to 50–80 μ as in the second data release (DR2). Here we examine the parallaxes newly re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Astrophysical journal. Letters 2021-02, Vol.907 (2), p.L33 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | L33 |
container_title | Astrophysical journal. Letters |
container_volume | 907 |
creator | Stassun, Keivan G. Torres, Guillermo |
description | Previous analyses of various standard candles observed by the Gaia satellite have reported statistically significant systematics in the parallaxes that have improved from ∼250
μ
as in the first data release (DR1) to 50–80
μ
as in the second data release (DR2). Here we examine the parallaxes newly reported in the Gaia early third data release (EDR3) using the same sample of benchmark eclipsing binaries (EBs) we used to assess the DR1 and DR2 parallaxes. We find a mean offset of −37 ± 20
μ
as (Gaia − EB), which decreases to −15 ± 18
μ
as after applying the corrections recommended by the Gaia Mission team; global systematics in the Gaia parallaxes have clearly improved and are no longer statistically significant for the EB sample, which spans 5 ≲
G
≲ 12 in brightness and 0.03–3 kpc in distance. We also find that the Renormalized Unit Weight Error (RUWE) goodness-of-fit statistic reported in Gaia DR3 is highly sensitive to unresolved companions (tertiaries in the case of our EB sample) as well as to photocenter motion of the binaries themselves. RUWE is nearly perfectly correlated (
r
2
= 0.82) with photocenter motions down to ≲0.1 mas, and surprisingly this correlation exists entirely within the nominal “good” RUWE range of 1.0–1.4. This suggests that RUWE values even slightly greater than 1.0 may signify unresolved binaries in Gaia, and that the RUWE value can serve as a quantitative predictor of the photocenter motion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_O3W</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2485096907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2485096907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6dc4c470d590eadb85cd07e108d9333fb09883e78454b6cea7b60f4d2d0b1033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM1pCYiL0EjuJM1IoBamIio-ByXJsh7qkdrBTif73pAoqC2K60-m9d3c_hE5juCSM5qMEaByxJCYjUSoh1B4a7Eb7ux7SQ3QUwhIggSxmA_Q2F17UtfjCz5vQ6pVojQxYWIXnC9c6qW2rPX5wrXE2YFfhsbZysRL-A09kbZpg7DseGyu80QEbi6fCCDy5eSLH6KASddAnP3WIXm8nL9d30exxen99NYskpXkbqUxJKmkOKi1AC1WyVCrIdQxMFYSQqoSCMaJzRlNaZlKLvMygoipRUMZAyBCd9bmNd59rHVq-dGtvu5U8oSyFIisg71TQq6R3IXhd8cab7o0Nj4FvAfItIb6lxXuAneWitxjX_Gb-Iz__Qy6aZc27A3jCZ4TwRlXkGyl-f7c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2485096907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3</title><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><creator>Stassun, Keivan G. ; Torres, Guillermo</creator><creatorcontrib>Stassun, Keivan G. ; Torres, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><description>Previous analyses of various standard candles observed by the Gaia satellite have reported statistically significant systematics in the parallaxes that have improved from ∼250
μ
as in the first data release (DR1) to 50–80
μ
as in the second data release (DR2). Here we examine the parallaxes newly reported in the Gaia early third data release (EDR3) using the same sample of benchmark eclipsing binaries (EBs) we used to assess the DR1 and DR2 parallaxes. We find a mean offset of −37 ± 20
μ
as (Gaia − EB), which decreases to −15 ± 18
μ
as after applying the corrections recommended by the Gaia Mission team; global systematics in the Gaia parallaxes have clearly improved and are no longer statistically significant for the EB sample, which spans 5 ≲
G
≲ 12 in brightness and 0.03–3 kpc in distance. We also find that the Renormalized Unit Weight Error (RUWE) goodness-of-fit statistic reported in Gaia DR3 is highly sensitive to unresolved companions (tertiaries in the case of our EB sample) as well as to photocenter motion of the binaries themselves. RUWE is nearly perfectly correlated (
r
2
= 0.82) with photocenter motions down to ≲0.1 mas, and surprisingly this correlation exists entirely within the nominal “good” RUWE range of 1.0–1.4. This suggests that RUWE values even slightly greater than 1.0 may signify unresolved binaries in Gaia, and that the RUWE value can serve as a quantitative predictor of the photocenter motion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-8205</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-8213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin: The American Astronomical Society</publisher><subject>Benchmarks ; Eclipsing binary stars ; Goodness of fit ; Parallax ; Satellite observation ; Stellar distance ; Stellar parallax ; Systematics</subject><ispartof>Astrophysical journal. Letters, 2021-02, Vol.907 (2), p.L33</ispartof><rights>2021. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright IOP Publishing Feb 01, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6dc4c470d590eadb85cd07e108d9333fb09883e78454b6cea7b60f4d2d0b1033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6dc4c470d590eadb85cd07e108d9333fb09883e78454b6cea7b60f4d2d0b1033</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3481-9052 ; 0000-0002-5286-0251</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38868,38890,53840,53867</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad$$EView_record_in_IOP_Publishing$$FView_record_in_$$GIOP_Publishing</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stassun, Keivan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><title>Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3</title><title>Astrophysical journal. Letters</title><addtitle>APJL</addtitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J. Lett</addtitle><description>Previous analyses of various standard candles observed by the Gaia satellite have reported statistically significant systematics in the parallaxes that have improved from ∼250
μ
as in the first data release (DR1) to 50–80
μ
as in the second data release (DR2). Here we examine the parallaxes newly reported in the Gaia early third data release (EDR3) using the same sample of benchmark eclipsing binaries (EBs) we used to assess the DR1 and DR2 parallaxes. We find a mean offset of −37 ± 20
μ
as (Gaia − EB), which decreases to −15 ± 18
μ
as after applying the corrections recommended by the Gaia Mission team; global systematics in the Gaia parallaxes have clearly improved and are no longer statistically significant for the EB sample, which spans 5 ≲
G
≲ 12 in brightness and 0.03–3 kpc in distance. We also find that the Renormalized Unit Weight Error (RUWE) goodness-of-fit statistic reported in Gaia DR3 is highly sensitive to unresolved companions (tertiaries in the case of our EB sample) as well as to photocenter motion of the binaries themselves. RUWE is nearly perfectly correlated (
r
2
= 0.82) with photocenter motions down to ≲0.1 mas, and surprisingly this correlation exists entirely within the nominal “good” RUWE range of 1.0–1.4. This suggests that RUWE values even slightly greater than 1.0 may signify unresolved binaries in Gaia, and that the RUWE value can serve as a quantitative predictor of the photocenter motion.</description><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Eclipsing binary stars</subject><subject>Goodness of fit</subject><subject>Parallax</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Stellar distance</subject><subject>Stellar parallax</subject><subject>Systematics</subject><issn>2041-8205</issn><issn>2041-8213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM1pCYiL0EjuJM1IoBamIio-ByXJsh7qkdrBTif73pAoqC2K60-m9d3c_hE5juCSM5qMEaByxJCYjUSoh1B4a7Eb7ux7SQ3QUwhIggSxmA_Q2F17UtfjCz5vQ6pVojQxYWIXnC9c6qW2rPX5wrXE2YFfhsbZysRL-A09kbZpg7DseGyu80QEbi6fCCDy5eSLH6KASddAnP3WIXm8nL9d30exxen99NYskpXkbqUxJKmkOKi1AC1WyVCrIdQxMFYSQqoSCMaJzRlNaZlKLvMygoipRUMZAyBCd9bmNd59rHVq-dGtvu5U8oSyFIisg71TQq6R3IXhd8cab7o0Nj4FvAfItIb6lxXuAneWitxjX_Gb-Iz__Qy6aZc27A3jCZ4TwRlXkGyl-f7c</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Stassun, Keivan G.</creator><creator>Torres, Guillermo</creator><general>The American Astronomical Society</general><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3481-9052</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5286-0251</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3</title><author>Stassun, Keivan G. ; Torres, Guillermo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6dc4c470d590eadb85cd07e108d9333fb09883e78454b6cea7b60f4d2d0b1033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Eclipsing binary stars</topic><topic>Goodness of fit</topic><topic>Parallax</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Stellar distance</topic><topic>Stellar parallax</topic><topic>Systematics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stassun, Keivan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Astrophysical journal. Letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stassun, Keivan G.</au><au>Torres, Guillermo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3</atitle><jtitle>Astrophysical journal. Letters</jtitle><stitle>APJL</stitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J. Lett</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>907</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>L33</spage><pages>L33-</pages><issn>2041-8205</issn><eissn>2041-8213</eissn><abstract>Previous analyses of various standard candles observed by the Gaia satellite have reported statistically significant systematics in the parallaxes that have improved from ∼250
μ
as in the first data release (DR1) to 50–80
μ
as in the second data release (DR2). Here we examine the parallaxes newly reported in the Gaia early third data release (EDR3) using the same sample of benchmark eclipsing binaries (EBs) we used to assess the DR1 and DR2 parallaxes. We find a mean offset of −37 ± 20
μ
as (Gaia − EB), which decreases to −15 ± 18
μ
as after applying the corrections recommended by the Gaia Mission team; global systematics in the Gaia parallaxes have clearly improved and are no longer statistically significant for the EB sample, which spans 5 ≲
G
≲ 12 in brightness and 0.03–3 kpc in distance. We also find that the Renormalized Unit Weight Error (RUWE) goodness-of-fit statistic reported in Gaia DR3 is highly sensitive to unresolved companions (tertiaries in the case of our EB sample) as well as to photocenter motion of the binaries themselves. RUWE is nearly perfectly correlated (
r
2
= 0.82) with photocenter motions down to ≲0.1 mas, and surprisingly this correlation exists entirely within the nominal “good” RUWE range of 1.0–1.4. This suggests that RUWE values even slightly greater than 1.0 may signify unresolved binaries in Gaia, and that the RUWE value can serve as a quantitative predictor of the photocenter motion.</abstract><cop>Austin</cop><pub>The American Astronomical Society</pub><doi>10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3481-9052</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5286-0251</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 2041-8205 |
ispartof | Astrophysical journal. Letters, 2021-02, Vol.907 (2), p.L33 |
issn | 2041-8205 2041-8213 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2485096907 |
source | Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles |
subjects | Benchmarks Eclipsing binary stars Goodness of fit Parallax Satellite observation Stellar distance Stellar parallax Systematics |
title | Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A59%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_O3W&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parallax%20Systematics%20and%20Photocenter%20Motions%20of%20Benchmark%20Eclipsing%20Binaries%20in%20Gaia%20EDR3&rft.jtitle=Astrophysical%20journal.%20Letters&rft.au=Stassun,%20Keivan%20G.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=907&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=L33&rft.pages=L33-&rft.issn=2041-8205&rft.eissn=2041-8213&rft_id=info:doi/10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_O3W%3E2485096907%3C/proquest_O3W%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2485096907&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |