Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3

Previous analyses of various standard candles observed by the Gaia satellite have reported statistically significant systematics in the parallaxes that have improved from ∼250 μ as in the first data release (DR1) to 50–80 μ as in the second data release (DR2). Here we examine the parallaxes newly re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Astrophysical journal. Letters 2021-02, Vol.907 (2), p.L33
Hauptverfasser: Stassun, Keivan G., Torres, Guillermo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page L33
container_title Astrophysical journal. Letters
container_volume 907
creator Stassun, Keivan G.
Torres, Guillermo
description Previous analyses of various standard candles observed by the Gaia satellite have reported statistically significant systematics in the parallaxes that have improved from ∼250 μ as in the first data release (DR1) to 50–80 μ as in the second data release (DR2). Here we examine the parallaxes newly reported in the Gaia early third data release (EDR3) using the same sample of benchmark eclipsing binaries (EBs) we used to assess the DR1 and DR2 parallaxes. We find a mean offset of −37 ± 20 μ as (Gaia − EB), which decreases to −15 ± 18 μ as after applying the corrections recommended by the Gaia Mission team; global systematics in the Gaia parallaxes have clearly improved and are no longer statistically significant for the EB sample, which spans 5 ≲ G ≲ 12 in brightness and 0.03–3 kpc in distance. We also find that the Renormalized Unit Weight Error (RUWE) goodness-of-fit statistic reported in Gaia DR3 is highly sensitive to unresolved companions (tertiaries in the case of our EB sample) as well as to photocenter motion of the binaries themselves. RUWE is nearly perfectly correlated ( r 2 = 0.82) with photocenter motions down to ≲0.1 mas, and surprisingly this correlation exists entirely within the nominal “good” RUWE range of 1.0–1.4. This suggests that RUWE values even slightly greater than 1.0 may signify unresolved binaries in Gaia, and that the RUWE value can serve as a quantitative predictor of the photocenter motion.
doi_str_mv 10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_O3W</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2485096907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2485096907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6dc4c470d590eadb85cd07e108d9333fb09883e78454b6cea7b60f4d2d0b1033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM1pCYiL0EjuJM1IoBamIio-ByXJsh7qkdrBTif73pAoqC2K60-m9d3c_hE5juCSM5qMEaByxJCYjUSoh1B4a7Eb7ux7SQ3QUwhIggSxmA_Q2F17UtfjCz5vQ6pVojQxYWIXnC9c6qW2rPX5wrXE2YFfhsbZysRL-A09kbZpg7DseGyu80QEbi6fCCDy5eSLH6KASddAnP3WIXm8nL9d30exxen99NYskpXkbqUxJKmkOKi1AC1WyVCrIdQxMFYSQqoSCMaJzRlNaZlKLvMygoipRUMZAyBCd9bmNd59rHVq-dGtvu5U8oSyFIisg71TQq6R3IXhd8cab7o0Nj4FvAfItIb6lxXuAneWitxjX_Gb-Iz__Qy6aZc27A3jCZ4TwRlXkGyl-f7c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2485096907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3</title><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><creator>Stassun, Keivan G. ; Torres, Guillermo</creator><creatorcontrib>Stassun, Keivan G. ; Torres, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><description>Previous analyses of various standard candles observed by the Gaia satellite have reported statistically significant systematics in the parallaxes that have improved from ∼250 μ as in the first data release (DR1) to 50–80 μ as in the second data release (DR2). Here we examine the parallaxes newly reported in the Gaia early third data release (EDR3) using the same sample of benchmark eclipsing binaries (EBs) we used to assess the DR1 and DR2 parallaxes. We find a mean offset of −37 ± 20 μ as (Gaia − EB), which decreases to −15 ± 18 μ as after applying the corrections recommended by the Gaia Mission team; global systematics in the Gaia parallaxes have clearly improved and are no longer statistically significant for the EB sample, which spans 5 ≲ G ≲ 12 in brightness and 0.03–3 kpc in distance. We also find that the Renormalized Unit Weight Error (RUWE) goodness-of-fit statistic reported in Gaia DR3 is highly sensitive to unresolved companions (tertiaries in the case of our EB sample) as well as to photocenter motion of the binaries themselves. RUWE is nearly perfectly correlated ( r 2 = 0.82) with photocenter motions down to ≲0.1 mas, and surprisingly this correlation exists entirely within the nominal “good” RUWE range of 1.0–1.4. This suggests that RUWE values even slightly greater than 1.0 may signify unresolved binaries in Gaia, and that the RUWE value can serve as a quantitative predictor of the photocenter motion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-8205</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-8213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin: The American Astronomical Society</publisher><subject>Benchmarks ; Eclipsing binary stars ; Goodness of fit ; Parallax ; Satellite observation ; Stellar distance ; Stellar parallax ; Systematics</subject><ispartof>Astrophysical journal. Letters, 2021-02, Vol.907 (2), p.L33</ispartof><rights>2021. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright IOP Publishing Feb 01, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6dc4c470d590eadb85cd07e108d9333fb09883e78454b6cea7b60f4d2d0b1033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6dc4c470d590eadb85cd07e108d9333fb09883e78454b6cea7b60f4d2d0b1033</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3481-9052 ; 0000-0002-5286-0251</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38868,38890,53840,53867</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad$$EView_record_in_IOP_Publishing$$FView_record_in_$$GIOP_Publishing</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stassun, Keivan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><title>Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3</title><title>Astrophysical journal. Letters</title><addtitle>APJL</addtitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J. Lett</addtitle><description>Previous analyses of various standard candles observed by the Gaia satellite have reported statistically significant systematics in the parallaxes that have improved from ∼250 μ as in the first data release (DR1) to 50–80 μ as in the second data release (DR2). Here we examine the parallaxes newly reported in the Gaia early third data release (EDR3) using the same sample of benchmark eclipsing binaries (EBs) we used to assess the DR1 and DR2 parallaxes. We find a mean offset of −37 ± 20 μ as (Gaia − EB), which decreases to −15 ± 18 μ as after applying the corrections recommended by the Gaia Mission team; global systematics in the Gaia parallaxes have clearly improved and are no longer statistically significant for the EB sample, which spans 5 ≲ G ≲ 12 in brightness and 0.03–3 kpc in distance. We also find that the Renormalized Unit Weight Error (RUWE) goodness-of-fit statistic reported in Gaia DR3 is highly sensitive to unresolved companions (tertiaries in the case of our EB sample) as well as to photocenter motion of the binaries themselves. RUWE is nearly perfectly correlated ( r 2 = 0.82) with photocenter motions down to ≲0.1 mas, and surprisingly this correlation exists entirely within the nominal “good” RUWE range of 1.0–1.4. This suggests that RUWE values even slightly greater than 1.0 may signify unresolved binaries in Gaia, and that the RUWE value can serve as a quantitative predictor of the photocenter motion.</description><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Eclipsing binary stars</subject><subject>Goodness of fit</subject><subject>Parallax</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Stellar distance</subject><subject>Stellar parallax</subject><subject>Systematics</subject><issn>2041-8205</issn><issn>2041-8213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM1pCYiL0EjuJM1IoBamIio-ByXJsh7qkdrBTif73pAoqC2K60-m9d3c_hE5juCSM5qMEaByxJCYjUSoh1B4a7Eb7ux7SQ3QUwhIggSxmA_Q2F17UtfjCz5vQ6pVojQxYWIXnC9c6qW2rPX5wrXE2YFfhsbZysRL-A09kbZpg7DseGyu80QEbi6fCCDy5eSLH6KASddAnP3WIXm8nL9d30exxen99NYskpXkbqUxJKmkOKi1AC1WyVCrIdQxMFYSQqoSCMaJzRlNaZlKLvMygoipRUMZAyBCd9bmNd59rHVq-dGtvu5U8oSyFIisg71TQq6R3IXhd8cab7o0Nj4FvAfItIb6lxXuAneWitxjX_Gb-Iz__Qy6aZc27A3jCZ4TwRlXkGyl-f7c</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Stassun, Keivan G.</creator><creator>Torres, Guillermo</creator><general>The American Astronomical Society</general><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3481-9052</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5286-0251</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3</title><author>Stassun, Keivan G. ; Torres, Guillermo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d6dc4c470d590eadb85cd07e108d9333fb09883e78454b6cea7b60f4d2d0b1033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Eclipsing binary stars</topic><topic>Goodness of fit</topic><topic>Parallax</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Stellar distance</topic><topic>Stellar parallax</topic><topic>Systematics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stassun, Keivan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Astrophysical journal. Letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stassun, Keivan G.</au><au>Torres, Guillermo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3</atitle><jtitle>Astrophysical journal. Letters</jtitle><stitle>APJL</stitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J. Lett</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>907</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>L33</spage><pages>L33-</pages><issn>2041-8205</issn><eissn>2041-8213</eissn><abstract>Previous analyses of various standard candles observed by the Gaia satellite have reported statistically significant systematics in the parallaxes that have improved from ∼250 μ as in the first data release (DR1) to 50–80 μ as in the second data release (DR2). Here we examine the parallaxes newly reported in the Gaia early third data release (EDR3) using the same sample of benchmark eclipsing binaries (EBs) we used to assess the DR1 and DR2 parallaxes. We find a mean offset of −37 ± 20 μ as (Gaia − EB), which decreases to −15 ± 18 μ as after applying the corrections recommended by the Gaia Mission team; global systematics in the Gaia parallaxes have clearly improved and are no longer statistically significant for the EB sample, which spans 5 ≲ G ≲ 12 in brightness and 0.03–3 kpc in distance. We also find that the Renormalized Unit Weight Error (RUWE) goodness-of-fit statistic reported in Gaia DR3 is highly sensitive to unresolved companions (tertiaries in the case of our EB sample) as well as to photocenter motion of the binaries themselves. RUWE is nearly perfectly correlated ( r 2 = 0.82) with photocenter motions down to ≲0.1 mas, and surprisingly this correlation exists entirely within the nominal “good” RUWE range of 1.0–1.4. This suggests that RUWE values even slightly greater than 1.0 may signify unresolved binaries in Gaia, and that the RUWE value can serve as a quantitative predictor of the photocenter motion.</abstract><cop>Austin</cop><pub>The American Astronomical Society</pub><doi>10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3481-9052</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5286-0251</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2041-8205
ispartof Astrophysical journal. Letters, 2021-02, Vol.907 (2), p.L33
issn 2041-8205
2041-8213
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2485096907
source Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles
subjects Benchmarks
Eclipsing binary stars
Goodness of fit
Parallax
Satellite observation
Stellar distance
Stellar parallax
Systematics
title Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A59%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_O3W&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parallax%20Systematics%20and%20Photocenter%20Motions%20of%20Benchmark%20Eclipsing%20Binaries%20in%20Gaia%20EDR3&rft.jtitle=Astrophysical%20journal.%20Letters&rft.au=Stassun,%20Keivan%20G.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=907&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=L33&rft.pages=L33-&rft.issn=2041-8205&rft.eissn=2041-8213&rft_id=info:doi/10.3847/2041-8213/abdaad&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_O3W%3E2485096907%3C/proquest_O3W%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2485096907&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true