Analysis of multi‐objective optimization: a technical proposal for energy and comfort management in buildings

Summary Buildings around the world account for about one‐third of the energy consumption. Enough energy is required to maintain the comfort level for the occupants. Recently, the rise in global temperature resulting in climate change is associated with the comfort level for both outdoor and indoor o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International transactions on electrical energy systems 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Malik, Muhammad Zeeshan, Shaikh, Pervez Hameed, Khatri, Shoaib Ahmed, Shaikh, Muhammad Shuaib, Baloch, Mazhar Hussain, Shaikh, Faheemullah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title International transactions on electrical energy systems
container_volume 31
creator Malik, Muhammad Zeeshan
Shaikh, Pervez Hameed
Khatri, Shoaib Ahmed
Shaikh, Muhammad Shuaib
Baloch, Mazhar Hussain
Shaikh, Faheemullah
description Summary Buildings around the world account for about one‐third of the energy consumption. Enough energy is required to maintain the comfort level for the occupants. Recently, the rise in global temperature resulting in climate change is associated with the comfort level for both outdoor and indoor of the buildings. Thus, providing acceptable comfort levels within buildings has become significant. The comfortable indoor environment of building requires energy for the operation of various appliances. A smart and energy efficient approach is the need of an hour to reduce energy consumption and attain comfortable indoor environment. The building energy and comfort management system (BECMS) model incorporating trade‐off between energy consumption and comfort has already been focused in previous studies. However, limited analyses have been observed in comparing the most efficient population‐based algorithm for BECMS. In this paper, a comparative study has been carried out using three different optimization techniques including multi‐objective genetic algorithm (MOGA), hybrid MOGA (HMOGA), and multi‐objective particle swarm optimization method (MOPSO) for optimal energy and comfort management in buildings. These optimization techniques have been widely employed to solve various optimization problems. The significant contribution of this article identifies the best suited algorithm in attaining best optimized solution of energy and comfort in a building. The comparative analysis of the three optimization techniques shows that MOPSO outperforms and attains maximum comfort level and higher energy savings. The detailed block architecture of the proposed building energy and comfort management system framework.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2050-7038.12736
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2484357711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2484357711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3116-c868de55841caf5a0ccdbbd297337313efd8a3d9b73165ab9d59a170b91027843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUD1PwzAQtRBIVNCZ1RJzWjtO4oStqsqHVAmGMluO7RRXiR1sFxQmfgK_kV-CSxBi45a7e_fe6e4BcIHRDCOUzlOUo4QiUs5wSklxBCa_yPGf-hRMvd-hGFWGMS0nwC4MbwevPbQN7PZt0J_vH7beKRH0i4K2D7rTbzxoa64gh0GJJ6MFb2HvbG99LBrroDLKbQfIjYTCdhEJsOOGb1WnTIDawHqvW6nN1p-Dk4a3Xk1_8hl4vF5tlrfJ-v7mbrlYJ4JgXCSiLEqp8rzMsOBNzpEQsq5lWlFCKMFENbLkRFZ1bIqc15XMK44pqiuMUlpm5Axcjnvjnc975QPb2b2Lv3qWZnGeU4pxZM1HlnDWe6ca1jvdcTcwjNjBWHawjh2sY9_GRkUxKl51q4b_6Gy1WT2Mwi-Wrnx8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2484357711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of multi‐objective optimization: a technical proposal for energy and comfort management in buildings</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Malik, Muhammad Zeeshan ; Shaikh, Pervez Hameed ; Khatri, Shoaib Ahmed ; Shaikh, Muhammad Shuaib ; Baloch, Mazhar Hussain ; Shaikh, Faheemullah</creator><creatorcontrib>Malik, Muhammad Zeeshan ; Shaikh, Pervez Hameed ; Khatri, Shoaib Ahmed ; Shaikh, Muhammad Shuaib ; Baloch, Mazhar Hussain ; Shaikh, Faheemullah</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Buildings around the world account for about one‐third of the energy consumption. Enough energy is required to maintain the comfort level for the occupants. Recently, the rise in global temperature resulting in climate change is associated with the comfort level for both outdoor and indoor of the buildings. Thus, providing acceptable comfort levels within buildings has become significant. The comfortable indoor environment of building requires energy for the operation of various appliances. A smart and energy efficient approach is the need of an hour to reduce energy consumption and attain comfortable indoor environment. The building energy and comfort management system (BECMS) model incorporating trade‐off between energy consumption and comfort has already been focused in previous studies. However, limited analyses have been observed in comparing the most efficient population‐based algorithm for BECMS. In this paper, a comparative study has been carried out using three different optimization techniques including multi‐objective genetic algorithm (MOGA), hybrid MOGA (HMOGA), and multi‐objective particle swarm optimization method (MOPSO) for optimal energy and comfort management in buildings. These optimization techniques have been widely employed to solve various optimization problems. The significant contribution of this article identifies the best suited algorithm in attaining best optimized solution of energy and comfort in a building. The comparative analysis of the three optimization techniques shows that MOPSO outperforms and attains maximum comfort level and higher energy savings. The detailed block architecture of the proposed building energy and comfort management system framework.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-7038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-7038</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2050-7038.12736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; building ; Buildings ; Climate change ; Comfort ; Comparative studies ; energy ; Energy conservation ; Energy consumption ; Energy efficiency ; Genetic algorithms ; Global temperatures ; Indoor environments ; management ; optimization ; Optimization techniques ; Particle swarm optimization</subject><ispartof>International transactions on electrical energy systems, 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3116-c868de55841caf5a0ccdbbd297337313efd8a3d9b73165ab9d59a170b91027843</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8269-9841 ; 0000-0002-6472-2622</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2050-7038.12736$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2050-7038.12736$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malik, Muhammad Zeeshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Pervez Hameed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khatri, Shoaib Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Muhammad Shuaib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baloch, Mazhar Hussain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Faheemullah</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of multi‐objective optimization: a technical proposal for energy and comfort management in buildings</title><title>International transactions on electrical energy systems</title><description>Summary Buildings around the world account for about one‐third of the energy consumption. Enough energy is required to maintain the comfort level for the occupants. Recently, the rise in global temperature resulting in climate change is associated with the comfort level for both outdoor and indoor of the buildings. Thus, providing acceptable comfort levels within buildings has become significant. The comfortable indoor environment of building requires energy for the operation of various appliances. A smart and energy efficient approach is the need of an hour to reduce energy consumption and attain comfortable indoor environment. The building energy and comfort management system (BECMS) model incorporating trade‐off between energy consumption and comfort has already been focused in previous studies. However, limited analyses have been observed in comparing the most efficient population‐based algorithm for BECMS. In this paper, a comparative study has been carried out using three different optimization techniques including multi‐objective genetic algorithm (MOGA), hybrid MOGA (HMOGA), and multi‐objective particle swarm optimization method (MOPSO) for optimal energy and comfort management in buildings. These optimization techniques have been widely employed to solve various optimization problems. The significant contribution of this article identifies the best suited algorithm in attaining best optimized solution of energy and comfort in a building. The comparative analysis of the three optimization techniques shows that MOPSO outperforms and attains maximum comfort level and higher energy savings. The detailed block architecture of the proposed building energy and comfort management system framework.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>building</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Comfort</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Global temperatures</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>management</subject><subject>optimization</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Particle swarm optimization</subject><issn>2050-7038</issn><issn>2050-7038</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUD1PwzAQtRBIVNCZ1RJzWjtO4oStqsqHVAmGMluO7RRXiR1sFxQmfgK_kV-CSxBi45a7e_fe6e4BcIHRDCOUzlOUo4QiUs5wSklxBCa_yPGf-hRMvd-hGFWGMS0nwC4MbwevPbQN7PZt0J_vH7beKRH0i4K2D7rTbzxoa64gh0GJJ6MFb2HvbG99LBrroDLKbQfIjYTCdhEJsOOGb1WnTIDawHqvW6nN1p-Dk4a3Xk1_8hl4vF5tlrfJ-v7mbrlYJ4JgXCSiLEqp8rzMsOBNzpEQsq5lWlFCKMFENbLkRFZ1bIqc15XMK44pqiuMUlpm5Axcjnvjnc975QPb2b2Lv3qWZnGeU4pxZM1HlnDWe6ca1jvdcTcwjNjBWHawjh2sY9_GRkUxKl51q4b_6Gy1WT2Mwi-Wrnx8</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Malik, Muhammad Zeeshan</creator><creator>Shaikh, Pervez Hameed</creator><creator>Khatri, Shoaib Ahmed</creator><creator>Shaikh, Muhammad Shuaib</creator><creator>Baloch, Mazhar Hussain</creator><creator>Shaikh, Faheemullah</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8269-9841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6472-2622</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Analysis of multi‐objective optimization: a technical proposal for energy and comfort management in buildings</title><author>Malik, Muhammad Zeeshan ; Shaikh, Pervez Hameed ; Khatri, Shoaib Ahmed ; Shaikh, Muhammad Shuaib ; Baloch, Mazhar Hussain ; Shaikh, Faheemullah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3116-c868de55841caf5a0ccdbbd297337313efd8a3d9b73165ab9d59a170b91027843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>building</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Comfort</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Global temperatures</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>management</topic><topic>optimization</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Particle swarm optimization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malik, Muhammad Zeeshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Pervez Hameed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khatri, Shoaib Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Muhammad Shuaib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baloch, Mazhar Hussain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Faheemullah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>International transactions on electrical energy systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malik, Muhammad Zeeshan</au><au>Shaikh, Pervez Hameed</au><au>Khatri, Shoaib Ahmed</au><au>Shaikh, Muhammad Shuaib</au><au>Baloch, Mazhar Hussain</au><au>Shaikh, Faheemullah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of multi‐objective optimization: a technical proposal for energy and comfort management in buildings</atitle><jtitle>International transactions on electrical energy systems</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2050-7038</issn><eissn>2050-7038</eissn><abstract>Summary Buildings around the world account for about one‐third of the energy consumption. Enough energy is required to maintain the comfort level for the occupants. Recently, the rise in global temperature resulting in climate change is associated with the comfort level for both outdoor and indoor of the buildings. Thus, providing acceptable comfort levels within buildings has become significant. The comfortable indoor environment of building requires energy for the operation of various appliances. A smart and energy efficient approach is the need of an hour to reduce energy consumption and attain comfortable indoor environment. The building energy and comfort management system (BECMS) model incorporating trade‐off between energy consumption and comfort has already been focused in previous studies. However, limited analyses have been observed in comparing the most efficient population‐based algorithm for BECMS. In this paper, a comparative study has been carried out using three different optimization techniques including multi‐objective genetic algorithm (MOGA), hybrid MOGA (HMOGA), and multi‐objective particle swarm optimization method (MOPSO) for optimal energy and comfort management in buildings. These optimization techniques have been widely employed to solve various optimization problems. The significant contribution of this article identifies the best suited algorithm in attaining best optimized solution of energy and comfort in a building. The comparative analysis of the three optimization techniques shows that MOPSO outperforms and attains maximum comfort level and higher energy savings. The detailed block architecture of the proposed building energy and comfort management system framework.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1002/2050-7038.12736</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8269-9841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6472-2622</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2050-7038
ispartof International transactions on electrical energy systems, 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.n/a
issn 2050-7038
2050-7038
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2484357711
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Algorithms
building
Buildings
Climate change
Comfort
Comparative studies
energy
Energy conservation
Energy consumption
Energy efficiency
Genetic algorithms
Global temperatures
Indoor environments
management
optimization
Optimization techniques
Particle swarm optimization
title Analysis of multi‐objective optimization: a technical proposal for energy and comfort management in buildings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A19%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20multi%E2%80%90objective%20optimization:%20a%20technical%20proposal%20for%20energy%20and%20comfort%20management%20in%20buildings&rft.jtitle=International%20transactions%20on%20electrical%20energy%20systems&rft.au=Malik,%20Muhammad%20Zeeshan&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2050-7038&rft.eissn=2050-7038&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2050-7038.12736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2484357711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2484357711&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true