Molecular confirmation of resistance to PPO inhibitors in Amaranthus tuberculatus and Amaranthus palmeri, and isolation of the G399A PPO2 substitution in A. palmeri

During the 2017 to 2019 growing seasons, samples of waterhemp and Palmer amaranth that had reportedly survived field-rate applications of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)–inhibiting herbicides were collected from the American Midwest and tested for target-site mutations known at the time to confer r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 2021-02, Vol.35 (1), p.99-105
Hauptverfasser: Montgomery, Jacob S., Giacomini, Darci A., Tranel, Patrick J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105
container_issue 1
container_start_page 99
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 35
creator Montgomery, Jacob S.
Giacomini, Darci A.
Tranel, Patrick J.
description During the 2017 to 2019 growing seasons, samples of waterhemp and Palmer amaranth that had reportedly survived field-rate applications of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)–inhibiting herbicides were collected from the American Midwest and tested for target-site mutations known at the time to confer resistance. Target-site resistance was identified in nearly all (135 of 145) tested common waterhemp populations but in only 8 of 13 Palmer amaranth populations. Follow-up research on one population of Palmer amaranth (W-8), which tested negative for all such mutations, confirmed it was resistant to lactofen, with a magnitude of resistance comparable to that conferred by the ΔG210 PPO2 mutation. Gene sequences from both isoforms of PPO (PPO1 and PPO2) were compared between W-8 and known PPO inhibitor–sensitive sequence. A glycine-to-alanine substitution at the 399th amino acid position (G399A) of PPO2, recently identified to reduce target-site herbicide sensitivity, was observed in a subset of resistant W-8 plants. Because no missense mutation completely delimited resistant and sensitive sequences, we initially suspected the presence of a secondary, non-target-site resistance mechanism in this population. To isolate G399A, a segregating F2 population was produced and screened with a delimiting rate of lactofen. χ2 goodness-of-fit analysis of dead/alive ratings indicated single-locus inheritance of resistance in the F2 population, and molecular markers for the W-8 parental PPO2 coding region co-segregated tightly, but not perfectly, with resistance. More research is needed to fully characterize Palmer amaranth PPO inhibitor–resistance mechanisms, which appear to be more diverse than those found in common waterhemp. Nomenclature: Lactofen; common waterhemp; Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer; Palmer amaranth; Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson
doi_str_mv 10.1017/wet.2020.86
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2482550159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27002889</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27002889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-5e055f0b6f77d971c4ec7144aed64442ce600606544c820b999d888ee5b9b51c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFrGzEQhUVIIU7aU88BQU-hXXckSyvpaEKbFlKSQwu9LZI8i2XWK1fSEvp_-kOrjdOQU0-S5j19w8wj5C2DJQOmPj5gWXLgsNTtCVkwKaHhSsApWYA20MBK_Twj5znvAFjLOSzIn29xQD8NNlEfxz6kvS0hjjT2NGEOudjRIy2R3t_f0TBugwslplyvdL23yY5lO2VaJodpppT6sOPmpXawwx5T-PBYDzkOzw3KFunNypj1DOc0Ty6XUKZHeeYv__19TV71dsj45um8ID8-f_p-_aW5vbv5er2-bdyKqdJIBCl7cG2v1MYo5gV6xYSwuGmFENxjC9BCK4XwmoMzxmy01ojSGSeZX12Qd0fuIcVfE-bS7eKUxtqy40Lzuk4mTXW9P7p8ijkn7LtDCnXe3x2Dbo6hqzF0cwydbqv78uje5bq4ZytXAFzrmXZ11F2IccT_sv4CPKmTkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2482550159</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Molecular confirmation of resistance to PPO inhibitors in Amaranthus tuberculatus and Amaranthus palmeri, and isolation of the G399A PPO2 substitution in A. palmeri</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Montgomery, Jacob S. ; Giacomini, Darci A. ; Tranel, Patrick J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Jacob S. ; Giacomini, Darci A. ; Tranel, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><description>During the 2017 to 2019 growing seasons, samples of waterhemp and Palmer amaranth that had reportedly survived field-rate applications of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)–inhibiting herbicides were collected from the American Midwest and tested for target-site mutations known at the time to confer resistance. Target-site resistance was identified in nearly all (135 of 145) tested common waterhemp populations but in only 8 of 13 Palmer amaranth populations. Follow-up research on one population of Palmer amaranth (W-8), which tested negative for all such mutations, confirmed it was resistant to lactofen, with a magnitude of resistance comparable to that conferred by the ΔG210 PPO2 mutation. Gene sequences from both isoforms of PPO (PPO1 and PPO2) were compared between W-8 and known PPO inhibitor–sensitive sequence. A glycine-to-alanine substitution at the 399th amino acid position (G399A) of PPO2, recently identified to reduce target-site herbicide sensitivity, was observed in a subset of resistant W-8 plants. Because no missense mutation completely delimited resistant and sensitive sequences, we initially suspected the presence of a secondary, non-target-site resistance mechanism in this population. To isolate G399A, a segregating F2 population was produced and screened with a delimiting rate of lactofen. χ2 goodness-of-fit analysis of dead/alive ratings indicated single-locus inheritance of resistance in the F2 population, and molecular markers for the W-8 parental PPO2 coding region co-segregated tightly, but not perfectly, with resistance. More research is needed to fully characterize Palmer amaranth PPO inhibitor–resistance mechanisms, which appear to be more diverse than those found in common waterhemp. Nomenclature: Lactofen; common waterhemp; Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer; Palmer amaranth; Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2020.86</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Alanine ; allele-specific markers ; Amaranth ; Amaranthus palmeri ; Amino acid substitution ; Amino acids ; Chi-square test ; Gene sequencing ; Glycine ; Goodness of fit ; Growing season ; Herbicides ; Heredity ; Hypotheses ; Inhibitors ; Isoforms ; Missense mutation ; Mutation ; Plant resistance ; Population ; Populations ; PPO-inhibiting herbicides ; PPO1 ; Protoporphyrinogen oxidase ; Seeds ; Statistical tests ; Substitutes ; Target recognition ; Target-site resistance</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2021-02, Vol.35 (1), p.99-105</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America.</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-5e055f0b6f77d971c4ec7144aed64442ce600606544c820b999d888ee5b9b51c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-5e055f0b6f77d971c4ec7144aed64442ce600606544c820b999d888ee5b9b51c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0666-4564</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Jacob S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giacomini, Darci A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tranel, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><title>Molecular confirmation of resistance to PPO inhibitors in Amaranthus tuberculatus and Amaranthus palmeri, and isolation of the G399A PPO2 substitution in A. palmeri</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>During the 2017 to 2019 growing seasons, samples of waterhemp and Palmer amaranth that had reportedly survived field-rate applications of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)–inhibiting herbicides were collected from the American Midwest and tested for target-site mutations known at the time to confer resistance. Target-site resistance was identified in nearly all (135 of 145) tested common waterhemp populations but in only 8 of 13 Palmer amaranth populations. Follow-up research on one population of Palmer amaranth (W-8), which tested negative for all such mutations, confirmed it was resistant to lactofen, with a magnitude of resistance comparable to that conferred by the ΔG210 PPO2 mutation. Gene sequences from both isoforms of PPO (PPO1 and PPO2) were compared between W-8 and known PPO inhibitor–sensitive sequence. A glycine-to-alanine substitution at the 399th amino acid position (G399A) of PPO2, recently identified to reduce target-site herbicide sensitivity, was observed in a subset of resistant W-8 plants. Because no missense mutation completely delimited resistant and sensitive sequences, we initially suspected the presence of a secondary, non-target-site resistance mechanism in this population. To isolate G399A, a segregating F2 population was produced and screened with a delimiting rate of lactofen. χ2 goodness-of-fit analysis of dead/alive ratings indicated single-locus inheritance of resistance in the F2 population, and molecular markers for the W-8 parental PPO2 coding region co-segregated tightly, but not perfectly, with resistance. More research is needed to fully characterize Palmer amaranth PPO inhibitor–resistance mechanisms, which appear to be more diverse than those found in common waterhemp. Nomenclature: Lactofen; common waterhemp; Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer; Palmer amaranth; Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson</description><subject>Alanine</subject><subject>allele-specific markers</subject><subject>Amaranth</subject><subject>Amaranthus palmeri</subject><subject>Amino acid substitution</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Glycine</subject><subject>Goodness of fit</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Heredity</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>Isoforms</subject><subject>Missense mutation</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Plant resistance</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>PPO-inhibiting herbicides</subject><subject>PPO1</subject><subject>Protoporphyrinogen oxidase</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Substitutes</subject><subject>Target recognition</subject><subject>Target-site resistance</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFrGzEQhUVIIU7aU88BQU-hXXckSyvpaEKbFlKSQwu9LZI8i2XWK1fSEvp_-kOrjdOQU0-S5j19w8wj5C2DJQOmPj5gWXLgsNTtCVkwKaHhSsApWYA20MBK_Twj5znvAFjLOSzIn29xQD8NNlEfxz6kvS0hjjT2NGEOudjRIy2R3t_f0TBugwslplyvdL23yY5lO2VaJodpppT6sOPmpXawwx5T-PBYDzkOzw3KFunNypj1DOc0Ty6XUKZHeeYv__19TV71dsj45um8ID8-f_p-_aW5vbv5er2-bdyKqdJIBCl7cG2v1MYo5gV6xYSwuGmFENxjC9BCK4XwmoMzxmy01ojSGSeZX12Qd0fuIcVfE-bS7eKUxtqy40Lzuk4mTXW9P7p8ijkn7LtDCnXe3x2Dbo6hqzF0cwydbqv78uje5bq4ZytXAFzrmXZ11F2IccT_sv4CPKmTkw</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Montgomery, Jacob S.</creator><creator>Giacomini, Darci A.</creator><creator>Tranel, Patrick J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0666-4564</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Molecular confirmation of resistance to PPO inhibitors in Amaranthus tuberculatus and Amaranthus palmeri, and isolation of the G399A PPO2 substitution in A. palmeri</title><author>Montgomery, Jacob S. ; Giacomini, Darci A. ; Tranel, Patrick J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-5e055f0b6f77d971c4ec7144aed64442ce600606544c820b999d888ee5b9b51c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alanine</topic><topic>allele-specific markers</topic><topic>Amaranth</topic><topic>Amaranthus palmeri</topic><topic>Amino acid substitution</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Glycine</topic><topic>Goodness of fit</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Heredity</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>Isoforms</topic><topic>Missense mutation</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Plant resistance</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>PPO-inhibiting herbicides</topic><topic>PPO1</topic><topic>Protoporphyrinogen oxidase</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Substitutes</topic><topic>Target recognition</topic><topic>Target-site resistance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Jacob S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giacomini, Darci A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tranel, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Montgomery, Jacob S.</au><au>Giacomini, Darci A.</au><au>Tranel, Patrick J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Molecular confirmation of resistance to PPO inhibitors in Amaranthus tuberculatus and Amaranthus palmeri, and isolation of the G399A PPO2 substitution in A. palmeri</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>99-105</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>During the 2017 to 2019 growing seasons, samples of waterhemp and Palmer amaranth that had reportedly survived field-rate applications of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)–inhibiting herbicides were collected from the American Midwest and tested for target-site mutations known at the time to confer resistance. Target-site resistance was identified in nearly all (135 of 145) tested common waterhemp populations but in only 8 of 13 Palmer amaranth populations. Follow-up research on one population of Palmer amaranth (W-8), which tested negative for all such mutations, confirmed it was resistant to lactofen, with a magnitude of resistance comparable to that conferred by the ΔG210 PPO2 mutation. Gene sequences from both isoforms of PPO (PPO1 and PPO2) were compared between W-8 and known PPO inhibitor–sensitive sequence. A glycine-to-alanine substitution at the 399th amino acid position (G399A) of PPO2, recently identified to reduce target-site herbicide sensitivity, was observed in a subset of resistant W-8 plants. Because no missense mutation completely delimited resistant and sensitive sequences, we initially suspected the presence of a secondary, non-target-site resistance mechanism in this population. To isolate G399A, a segregating F2 population was produced and screened with a delimiting rate of lactofen. χ2 goodness-of-fit analysis of dead/alive ratings indicated single-locus inheritance of resistance in the F2 population, and molecular markers for the W-8 parental PPO2 coding region co-segregated tightly, but not perfectly, with resistance. More research is needed to fully characterize Palmer amaranth PPO inhibitor–resistance mechanisms, which appear to be more diverse than those found in common waterhemp. Nomenclature: Lactofen; common waterhemp; Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer; Palmer amaranth; Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2020.86</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0666-4564</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2021-02, Vol.35 (1), p.99-105
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2482550159
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Alanine
allele-specific markers
Amaranth
Amaranthus palmeri
Amino acid substitution
Amino acids
Chi-square test
Gene sequencing
Glycine
Goodness of fit
Growing season
Herbicides
Heredity
Hypotheses
Inhibitors
Isoforms
Missense mutation
Mutation
Plant resistance
Population
Populations
PPO-inhibiting herbicides
PPO1
Protoporphyrinogen oxidase
Seeds
Statistical tests
Substitutes
Target recognition
Target-site resistance
title Molecular confirmation of resistance to PPO inhibitors in Amaranthus tuberculatus and Amaranthus palmeri, and isolation of the G399A PPO2 substitution in A. palmeri
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A12%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Molecular%20confirmation%20of%20resistance%20to%20PPO%20inhibitors%20in%20Amaranthus%20tuberculatus%20and%20Amaranthus%20palmeri,%20and%20isolation%20of%20the%20G399A%20PPO2%20substitution%20in%20A.%20palmeri&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Montgomery,%20Jacob%20S.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=99-105&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2020.86&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27002889%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2482550159&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27002889&rfr_iscdi=true