Fermentative characteristics and chemical composition of cochineal nopal cactus silage containing chemical and microbial additives
The objective of this study was to evaluate the fermentative characteristics and chemical composition of cochineal nopal cactus silage additives with urea or Lactobacillus buchneri (LB), as well as the association of both additives in four storage times (7, 15, 60 and 120 days) and during aerobic st...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of agricultural science 2020-09, Vol.158 (7), p.574-582 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 582 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 574 |
| container_title | The Journal of agricultural science |
| container_volume | 158 |
| creator | Sá, W. C. C. S. Santos, E. M. de Oliveira, J. S. de Araujo, G. G. L. Perazzo, A. F. da Silva, A. L. Pereira, D. M. César Neto, J. M. Santos, F. N. S. Leite, G. M. |
| description | The objective of this study was to evaluate the fermentative characteristics and chemical composition of cochineal nopal cactus silage additives with urea or Lactobacillus buchneri (LB), as well as the association of both additives in four storage times (7, 15, 60 and 120 days) and during aerobic stability, with evaluations at 0, 48 and 96 h. Four silages were used: no additive, addition of 2% urea, addition of LB and addition of 2% urea and LB. The study was divided into two experiments: the first experiment evaluated the silages at different storage times, and the second experiment evaluated the silages during the aerobic stability test. In both experiments, the experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (4 × 4 and 4 × 3) with three replicates per treatment. After the ensiling process, lactic acid bacteria predominated in all treatments. The concentration of lactic acid increased significantly from 60 days of ensiling. The concentration of acetic acid varied significantly between the storage times only for the silages treated with urea and LB alone. The silage treated with urea maintained a constant pH value up to 120 days of storage. During the 96 h aerobic stability test, no breaking in the stability of silages was observed. The exclusive or associated use of urea and LB promotes improvement in the fermentative characteristics of cochineal nopal cactus silage, without major alterations in the chemical composition or interfering with the aerobic stability of the silages. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0021859620000829 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2481464956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859620000829</cupid><sourcerecordid>2481464956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-591b56b93d21ea81d1f86700396d3cddaf817f49c5de46a759f8e2e0f78735043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OAyEUhYnRxFp9AHeTuB6FmWGApWmsmjRxoa4nDD8tTQdGmJq49cm9pCZdGFkAl3POd8lF6JrgW4IJu3vFuCKcirbCsHglTtCMNK0oKeynaJblMuvn6CKlLXgYFnyGvpcmDsZPcnKfplAbGaWaTHRpcioV0mt4M4NTcleoMIwhuckFXwQLpdo4b0DwYcwyBPepSG4n10AKwHTe-fURkGlwi6F3udLa5abpEp1ZuUvm6veco_flw9viqVy9PD4v7lelqgmbSipIT9te1LoiRnKiieUtw7gWra6V1tJywmwjFNWmaSWjwnJTGWwZZzXFTT1HNwfuGMPH3qSp24Z99NCyqxoOY2oEbcFFDi74Z0rR2G6MbpDxqyO4y6Pu_owaMvVvRg59dHptjuj_Uz-LaYLG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2481464956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fermentative characteristics and chemical composition of cochineal nopal cactus silage containing chemical and microbial additives</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Sá, W. C. C. S. ; Santos, E. M. ; de Oliveira, J. S. ; de Araujo, G. G. L. ; Perazzo, A. F. ; da Silva, A. L. ; Pereira, D. M. ; César Neto, J. M. ; Santos, F. N. S. ; Leite, G. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sá, W. C. C. S. ; Santos, E. M. ; de Oliveira, J. S. ; de Araujo, G. G. L. ; Perazzo, A. F. ; da Silva, A. L. ; Pereira, D. M. ; César Neto, J. M. ; Santos, F. N. S. ; Leite, G. M.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to evaluate the fermentative characteristics and chemical composition of cochineal nopal cactus silage additives with urea or Lactobacillus buchneri (LB), as well as the association of both additives in four storage times (7, 15, 60 and 120 days) and during aerobic stability, with evaluations at 0, 48 and 96 h. Four silages were used: no additive, addition of 2% urea, addition of LB and addition of 2% urea and LB. The study was divided into two experiments: the first experiment evaluated the silages at different storage times, and the second experiment evaluated the silages during the aerobic stability test. In both experiments, the experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (4 × 4 and 4 × 3) with three replicates per treatment. After the ensiling process, lactic acid bacteria predominated in all treatments. The concentration of lactic acid increased significantly from 60 days of ensiling. The concentration of acetic acid varied significantly between the storage times only for the silages treated with urea and LB alone. The silage treated with urea maintained a constant pH value up to 120 days of storage. During the 96 h aerobic stability test, no breaking in the stability of silages was observed. The exclusive or associated use of urea and LB promotes improvement in the fermentative characteristics of cochineal nopal cactus silage, without major alterations in the chemical composition or interfering with the aerobic stability of the silages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859620000829</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Acetic acid ; Acids ; Additives ; Bacteria ; Chemical composition ; Crops and Soils Research Paper ; Design of experiments ; Experimental design ; Experiments ; Fermentation ; Laboratories ; Lactic acid ; Lactic acid bacteria ; Microorganisms ; Opuntia cochenillifera ; Silage ; Stability analysis ; Stability tests ; Urea ; Ureas</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 2020-09, Vol.158 (7), p.574-582</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-591b56b93d21ea81d1f86700396d3cddaf817f49c5de46a759f8e2e0f78735043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-591b56b93d21ea81d1f86700396d3cddaf817f49c5de46a759f8e2e0f78735043</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6968-1738 ; 0000-0001-6735-8187 ; 0000-0003-0567-7371</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859620000829/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27923,27924,55627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sá, W. C. C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Araujo, G. G. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perazzo, A. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>César Neto, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, F. N. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, G. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Fermentative characteristics and chemical composition of cochineal nopal cactus silage containing chemical and microbial additives</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to evaluate the fermentative characteristics and chemical composition of cochineal nopal cactus silage additives with urea or Lactobacillus buchneri (LB), as well as the association of both additives in four storage times (7, 15, 60 and 120 days) and during aerobic stability, with evaluations at 0, 48 and 96 h. Four silages were used: no additive, addition of 2% urea, addition of LB and addition of 2% urea and LB. The study was divided into two experiments: the first experiment evaluated the silages at different storage times, and the second experiment evaluated the silages during the aerobic stability test. In both experiments, the experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (4 × 4 and 4 × 3) with three replicates per treatment. After the ensiling process, lactic acid bacteria predominated in all treatments. The concentration of lactic acid increased significantly from 60 days of ensiling. The concentration of acetic acid varied significantly between the storage times only for the silages treated with urea and LB alone. The silage treated with urea maintained a constant pH value up to 120 days of storage. During the 96 h aerobic stability test, no breaking in the stability of silages was observed. The exclusive or associated use of urea and LB promotes improvement in the fermentative characteristics of cochineal nopal cactus silage, without major alterations in the chemical composition or interfering with the aerobic stability of the silages.</description><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Crops and Soils Research Paper</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>Lactic acid bacteria</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Opuntia cochenillifera</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Stability tests</subject><subject>Urea</subject><subject>Ureas</subject><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OAyEUhYnRxFp9AHeTuB6FmWGApWmsmjRxoa4nDD8tTQdGmJq49cm9pCZdGFkAl3POd8lF6JrgW4IJu3vFuCKcirbCsHglTtCMNK0oKeynaJblMuvn6CKlLXgYFnyGvpcmDsZPcnKfplAbGaWaTHRpcioV0mt4M4NTcleoMIwhuckFXwQLpdo4b0DwYcwyBPepSG4n10AKwHTe-fURkGlwi6F3udLa5abpEp1ZuUvm6veco_flw9viqVy9PD4v7lelqgmbSipIT9te1LoiRnKiieUtw7gWra6V1tJywmwjFNWmaSWjwnJTGWwZZzXFTT1HNwfuGMPH3qSp24Z99NCyqxoOY2oEbcFFDi74Z0rR2G6MbpDxqyO4y6Pu_owaMvVvRg59dHptjuj_Uz-LaYLG</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Sá, W. C. C. S.</creator><creator>Santos, E. M.</creator><creator>de Oliveira, J. S.</creator><creator>de Araujo, G. G. L.</creator><creator>Perazzo, A. F.</creator><creator>da Silva, A. L.</creator><creator>Pereira, D. M.</creator><creator>César Neto, J. M.</creator><creator>Santos, F. N. S.</creator><creator>Leite, G. M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6968-1738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6735-8187</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-7371</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Fermentative characteristics and chemical composition of cochineal nopal cactus silage containing chemical and microbial additives</title><author>Sá, W. C. C. S. ; Santos, E. M. ; de Oliveira, J. S. ; de Araujo, G. G. L. ; Perazzo, A. F. ; da Silva, A. L. ; Pereira, D. M. ; César Neto, J. M. ; Santos, F. N. S. ; Leite, G. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-591b56b93d21ea81d1f86700396d3cddaf817f49c5de46a759f8e2e0f78735043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Crops and Soils Research Paper</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>Lactic acid bacteria</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Opuntia cochenillifera</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Stability tests</topic><topic>Urea</topic><topic>Ureas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sá, W. C. C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Araujo, G. G. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perazzo, A. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>César Neto, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, F. N. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, G. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sá, W. C. C. S.</au><au>Santos, E. M.</au><au>de Oliveira, J. S.</au><au>de Araujo, G. G. L.</au><au>Perazzo, A. F.</au><au>da Silva, A. L.</au><au>Pereira, D. M.</au><au>César Neto, J. M.</au><au>Santos, F. N. S.</au><au>Leite, G. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fermentative characteristics and chemical composition of cochineal nopal cactus silage containing chemical and microbial additives</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>158</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>574</spage><epage>582</epage><pages>574-582</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to evaluate the fermentative characteristics and chemical composition of cochineal nopal cactus silage additives with urea or Lactobacillus buchneri (LB), as well as the association of both additives in four storage times (7, 15, 60 and 120 days) and during aerobic stability, with evaluations at 0, 48 and 96 h. Four silages were used: no additive, addition of 2% urea, addition of LB and addition of 2% urea and LB. The study was divided into two experiments: the first experiment evaluated the silages at different storage times, and the second experiment evaluated the silages during the aerobic stability test. In both experiments, the experimental design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme (4 × 4 and 4 × 3) with three replicates per treatment. After the ensiling process, lactic acid bacteria predominated in all treatments. The concentration of lactic acid increased significantly from 60 days of ensiling. The concentration of acetic acid varied significantly between the storage times only for the silages treated with urea and LB alone. The silage treated with urea maintained a constant pH value up to 120 days of storage. During the 96 h aerobic stability test, no breaking in the stability of silages was observed. The exclusive or associated use of urea and LB promotes improvement in the fermentative characteristics of cochineal nopal cactus silage, without major alterations in the chemical composition or interfering with the aerobic stability of the silages.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859620000829</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6968-1738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6735-8187</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-7371</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-8596 |
| ispartof | The Journal of agricultural science, 2020-09, Vol.158 (7), p.574-582 |
| issn | 0021-8596 1469-5146 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2481464956 |
| source | Cambridge Journals |
| subjects | Acetic acid Acids Additives Bacteria Chemical composition Crops and Soils Research Paper Design of experiments Experimental design Experiments Fermentation Laboratories Lactic acid Lactic acid bacteria Microorganisms Opuntia cochenillifera Silage Stability analysis Stability tests Urea Ureas |
| title | Fermentative characteristics and chemical composition of cochineal nopal cactus silage containing chemical and microbial additives |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A09%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fermentative%20characteristics%20and%20chemical%20composition%20of%20cochineal%20nopal%20cactus%20silage%20containing%20chemical%20and%20microbial%20additives&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=S%C3%A1,%20W.%20C.%20C.%20S.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=158&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=574&rft.epage=582&rft.pages=574-582&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859620000829&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2481464956%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2481464956&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859620000829&rfr_iscdi=true |