Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses

Purpose To report visual outcomes and patient-perceived satisfaction after trifocal or extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a real-world scenario. Methods Three months after bilateral cataract surgery, corrected and uncorrected visual acuity for far, intermediate and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International ophthalmology 2021, Vol.41 (1), p.163-172
Hauptverfasser: Rementería-Capelo, Laureano A., García-Pérez, Jorge L., Gros-Otero, Juan, Carrillo, Virginia, Pérez-Lanzac, Juan, Contreras, Inés
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 172
container_issue 1
container_start_page 163
container_title International ophthalmology
container_volume 41
creator Rementería-Capelo, Laureano A.
García-Pérez, Jorge L.
Gros-Otero, Juan
Carrillo, Virginia
Pérez-Lanzac, Juan
Contreras, Inés
description Purpose To report visual outcomes and patient-perceived satisfaction after trifocal or extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a real-world scenario. Methods Three months after bilateral cataract surgery, corrected and uncorrected visual acuity for far, intermediate and near distances and binocular defocus curves and contrast sensitivity were measured. The patients also completed the Catquest SF-9 questionnaire and reported on dysphotopsia and spectacle use. Results There were 23 patients in the Symfony, 32 patients in the Finevision and 36 patients in the Panoptix group. The percentage of eyes receiving a toric IOL was 41.2%. There were no differences in uncorrected binocular visual acuities, save for near vision, which was lower in the Symfony group. Binocular defocus curves for the trifocal IOLS were almost identical, while vision achieved with the Symfony IOL was significantly lower starting at − 1.5 D defocus. Contrast sensitivity, as well as the perception of halos and glare and the difficulty for night-driving was similar for all groups, except for contrast sensitivity at 6 cycles per degree, which was lower in the Symfony group compared to both Finevision and Panoptix. For near vision, only 47.6% of the Symfony patients reported being completely spectacle-free, compared to 93.3% and 94.4% for the Finevision and Panoptix groups. Conclusions Clinically relevant differences were only detected for near vision, with lower values for EDOF IOLs. In order to achieve patient satisfaction, it is imperative to explain the results expected with each IOL; for EDOF IOLs, patients should be advised that they may require near-spectacle correction.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10792-020-01563-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2481411841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2481411841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f542103c785bf6ade7147a0e69a27118f4dcff5cf875bda7fba9deaafa914d3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKJjEUhIM46K_jC7iQgOtobt3pXoqoMyAIw8w6nO6cSEv_nd8k7eUZ5qWNtpedq3OgvqqCIuRQ8BPBuTlNgptWMi4546KqFau3yEpURjFZK75NVlzUFasMF7tkL6U7znlr2nqH7CrZaC1VsyL__yCM7DHE0VF8gHGGPISJBk8fhjTDSCOmecyJwuTopog4ZZrKTR76N9SHSPEp4-TQ0QjTLb66fejnRIcpRyjfCJGOOCVMtA_rDcSC5kBzHApXShbtJ_nhYUx48H73yb_Li7_nv9j1zdXv87Nr1istM_OVloKr3jRV52twaIQ2wLFuQRohGq9d733V-8ZUnQPjO2gdAnhohXaqU_vkeMndxHA_Y8r2LsxxKpVW6kbokqFFoeRC9TGkFNHbTRzWEJ-t4PZ1f7vsb8v-9m1_WxfT0Xv03K3RfVo-Bi-AWoBUpLJV_Or-JvYFlhyUvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2481411841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Rementería-Capelo, Laureano A. ; García-Pérez, Jorge L. ; Gros-Otero, Juan ; Carrillo, Virginia ; Pérez-Lanzac, Juan ; Contreras, Inés</creator><creatorcontrib>Rementería-Capelo, Laureano A. ; García-Pérez, Jorge L. ; Gros-Otero, Juan ; Carrillo, Virginia ; Pérez-Lanzac, Juan ; Contreras, Inés</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To report visual outcomes and patient-perceived satisfaction after trifocal or extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a real-world scenario. Methods Three months after bilateral cataract surgery, corrected and uncorrected visual acuity for far, intermediate and near distances and binocular defocus curves and contrast sensitivity were measured. The patients also completed the Catquest SF-9 questionnaire and reported on dysphotopsia and spectacle use. Results There were 23 patients in the Symfony, 32 patients in the Finevision and 36 patients in the Panoptix group. The percentage of eyes receiving a toric IOL was 41.2%. There were no differences in uncorrected binocular visual acuities, save for near vision, which was lower in the Symfony group. Binocular defocus curves for the trifocal IOLS were almost identical, while vision achieved with the Symfony IOL was significantly lower starting at − 1.5 D defocus. Contrast sensitivity, as well as the perception of halos and glare and the difficulty for night-driving was similar for all groups, except for contrast sensitivity at 6 cycles per degree, which was lower in the Symfony group compared to both Finevision and Panoptix. For near vision, only 47.6% of the Symfony patients reported being completely spectacle-free, compared to 93.3% and 94.4% for the Finevision and Panoptix groups. Conclusions Clinically relevant differences were only detected for near vision, with lower values for EDOF IOLs. In order to achieve patient satisfaction, it is imperative to explain the results expected with each IOL; for EDOF IOLs, patients should be advised that they may require near-spectacle correction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01563-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32844238</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Binocular vision ; Cataracts ; Completeness ; Depth of field ; Eye (anatomy) ; Halos ; Intraocular lenses ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Ophthalmology ; Original Paper ; Patient satisfaction ; Sensitivity ; Surgery ; Visual acuity</subject><ispartof>International ophthalmology, 2021, Vol.41 (1), p.163-172</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f542103c785bf6ade7147a0e69a27118f4dcff5cf875bda7fba9deaafa914d3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f542103c785bf6ade7147a0e69a27118f4dcff5cf875bda7fba9deaafa914d3b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3524-9335</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10792-020-01563-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10792-020-01563-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32844238$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rementería-Capelo, Laureano A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Pérez, Jorge L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gros-Otero, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrillo, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Lanzac, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contreras, Inés</creatorcontrib><title>Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses</title><title>International ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose To report visual outcomes and patient-perceived satisfaction after trifocal or extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a real-world scenario. Methods Three months after bilateral cataract surgery, corrected and uncorrected visual acuity for far, intermediate and near distances and binocular defocus curves and contrast sensitivity were measured. The patients also completed the Catquest SF-9 questionnaire and reported on dysphotopsia and spectacle use. Results There were 23 patients in the Symfony, 32 patients in the Finevision and 36 patients in the Panoptix group. The percentage of eyes receiving a toric IOL was 41.2%. There were no differences in uncorrected binocular visual acuities, save for near vision, which was lower in the Symfony group. Binocular defocus curves for the trifocal IOLS were almost identical, while vision achieved with the Symfony IOL was significantly lower starting at − 1.5 D defocus. Contrast sensitivity, as well as the perception of halos and glare and the difficulty for night-driving was similar for all groups, except for contrast sensitivity at 6 cycles per degree, which was lower in the Symfony group compared to both Finevision and Panoptix. For near vision, only 47.6% of the Symfony patients reported being completely spectacle-free, compared to 93.3% and 94.4% for the Finevision and Panoptix groups. Conclusions Clinically relevant differences were only detected for near vision, with lower values for EDOF IOLs. In order to achieve patient satisfaction, it is imperative to explain the results expected with each IOL; for EDOF IOLs, patients should be advised that they may require near-spectacle correction.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Binocular vision</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Completeness</subject><subject>Depth of field</subject><subject>Eye (anatomy)</subject><subject>Halos</subject><subject>Intraocular lenses</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><issn>0165-5701</issn><issn>1573-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKJjEUhIM46K_jC7iQgOtobt3pXoqoMyAIw8w6nO6cSEv_nd8k7eUZ5qWNtpedq3OgvqqCIuRQ8BPBuTlNgptWMi4546KqFau3yEpURjFZK75NVlzUFasMF7tkL6U7znlr2nqH7CrZaC1VsyL__yCM7DHE0VF8gHGGPISJBk8fhjTDSCOmecyJwuTopog4ZZrKTR76N9SHSPEp4-TQ0QjTLb66fejnRIcpRyjfCJGOOCVMtA_rDcSC5kBzHApXShbtJ_nhYUx48H73yb_Li7_nv9j1zdXv87Nr1istM_OVloKr3jRV52twaIQ2wLFuQRohGq9d733V-8ZUnQPjO2gdAnhohXaqU_vkeMndxHA_Y8r2LsxxKpVW6kbokqFFoeRC9TGkFNHbTRzWEJ-t4PZ1f7vsb8v-9m1_WxfT0Xv03K3RfVo-Bi-AWoBUpLJV_Or-JvYFlhyUvg</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Rementería-Capelo, Laureano A.</creator><creator>García-Pérez, Jorge L.</creator><creator>Gros-Otero, Juan</creator><creator>Carrillo, Virginia</creator><creator>Pérez-Lanzac, Juan</creator><creator>Contreras, Inés</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-9335</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses</title><author>Rementería-Capelo, Laureano A. ; García-Pérez, Jorge L. ; Gros-Otero, Juan ; Carrillo, Virginia ; Pérez-Lanzac, Juan ; Contreras, Inés</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-f542103c785bf6ade7147a0e69a27118f4dcff5cf875bda7fba9deaafa914d3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Binocular vision</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Completeness</topic><topic>Depth of field</topic><topic>Eye (anatomy)</topic><topic>Halos</topic><topic>Intraocular lenses</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rementería-Capelo, Laureano A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Pérez, Jorge L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gros-Otero, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrillo, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Lanzac, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contreras, Inés</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rementería-Capelo, Laureano A.</au><au>García-Pérez, Jorge L.</au><au>Gros-Otero, Juan</au><au>Carrillo, Virginia</au><au>Pérez-Lanzac, Juan</au><au>Contreras, Inés</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses</atitle><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Int Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>163-172</pages><issn>0165-5701</issn><eissn>1573-2630</eissn><abstract>Purpose To report visual outcomes and patient-perceived satisfaction after trifocal or extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a real-world scenario. Methods Three months after bilateral cataract surgery, corrected and uncorrected visual acuity for far, intermediate and near distances and binocular defocus curves and contrast sensitivity were measured. The patients also completed the Catquest SF-9 questionnaire and reported on dysphotopsia and spectacle use. Results There were 23 patients in the Symfony, 32 patients in the Finevision and 36 patients in the Panoptix group. The percentage of eyes receiving a toric IOL was 41.2%. There were no differences in uncorrected binocular visual acuities, save for near vision, which was lower in the Symfony group. Binocular defocus curves for the trifocal IOLS were almost identical, while vision achieved with the Symfony IOL was significantly lower starting at − 1.5 D defocus. Contrast sensitivity, as well as the perception of halos and glare and the difficulty for night-driving was similar for all groups, except for contrast sensitivity at 6 cycles per degree, which was lower in the Symfony group compared to both Finevision and Panoptix. For near vision, only 47.6% of the Symfony patients reported being completely spectacle-free, compared to 93.3% and 94.4% for the Finevision and Panoptix groups. Conclusions Clinically relevant differences were only detected for near vision, with lower values for EDOF IOLs. In order to achieve patient satisfaction, it is imperative to explain the results expected with each IOL; for EDOF IOLs, patients should be advised that they may require near-spectacle correction.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>32844238</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10792-020-01563-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-9335</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5701
ispartof International ophthalmology, 2021, Vol.41 (1), p.163-172
issn 0165-5701
1573-2630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2481411841
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Acuity
Binocular vision
Cataracts
Completeness
Depth of field
Eye (anatomy)
Halos
Intraocular lenses
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Ophthalmology
Original Paper
Patient satisfaction
Sensitivity
Surgery
Visual acuity
title Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A17%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real-world%20evaluation%20of%20visual%20results%20and%20patient%20satisfaction%20for%20extended%20range%20of%20focus%20intraocular%20lenses%20compared%20to%20trifocal%20lenses&rft.jtitle=International%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Rementer%C3%ADa-Capelo,%20Laureano%20A.&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=163-172&rft.issn=0165-5701&rft.eissn=1573-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10792-020-01563-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2481411841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2481411841&rft_id=info:pmid/32844238&rfr_iscdi=true