Statistically downscaled precipitation sensitivity to gridded observation data and downscaling technique

Future climate projections illuminate our understanding of the climate system and generate data products often used in climate impact assessments. Statistical downscaling (SD) is commonly used to address biases in global climate models (GCM) and to translate large‐scale projected changes to the high...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of climatology 2021-02, Vol.41 (2), p.980-1001
Hauptverfasser: Wootten, Adrienne M., Dixon, Keith W., Adams‐Smith, Dennis J., McPherson, Renee A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1001
container_issue 2
container_start_page 980
container_title International journal of climatology
container_volume 41
creator Wootten, Adrienne M.
Dixon, Keith W.
Adams‐Smith, Dennis J.
McPherson, Renee A.
description Future climate projections illuminate our understanding of the climate system and generate data products often used in climate impact assessments. Statistical downscaling (SD) is commonly used to address biases in global climate models (GCM) and to translate large‐scale projected changes to the higher spatial resolutions desired for regional and local scale studies. However, downscaled climate projections are sensitive to method configuration and input data source choices made during the downscaling process that can affect a projection's ultimate suitability for particular impact assessments. Quantifying how changes in inputs or parameters affect SD‐generated projections of precipitation is critical for improving these datasets and their use by impacts researchers. Through analysis of a systematically designed set of 18 statistically downscaled future daily precipitation projections for the south‐central United States, this study aims to improve the guidance available to impacts researchers. Two statistical processing techniques are examined: a ratio delta downscaling technique and an equi‐ratio quantile mapping method. The projections are generated using as input results from three GCMs forced with representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5 and three gridded observation‐based data products. Sensitivity analyses identify differences in the values of precipitation variables among the projections and the underlying reasons for the differences.Results indicate that differences in how observational station data are converted to gridded daily observational products can markedly affect statistically downscaled future projections of wet‐day frequency, intensity of precipitation extremes, and the length of multi‐day wet and dry periods. The choice of downscaling technique also can affect the climate change signal for variables of interest, in some cases causing change signals to reverse sign. Hence, this study provides illustrations and explanations for some downscaled precipitation projection differences that users may encounter, as well as evidence of symptoms that can affect user decisions. Statistical downscaling techniques are frequently used to translate changes from global climate models to local scales. However, there is no standard practice with respect to downscaling technique or creating the gridded observations used for training. This study demonstrates that multiple precipitation variables are sensitive to the training observations and the downsca
doi_str_mv 10.1002/joc.6716
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2481364288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2481364288</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3276-2d997e47e51cd2e7036ba30a3579290ab58d419f1b00d09150e9cd79b45aca053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq-BMCXrxsnexXkqMUPyn0oJ5DNknblHWzJmnL_ntTV7x5moF5ZgZehK4JzAhAfrd1alZTUp-gCQFOMwDGTtEEGOcZKwk7RxchbAGAc1JP0OYtymhDtEq27YC1O3QhtUbj3htle3scuw4H0wUb7d7GAUeH195qnZBrgvH7kWgZJZad_jtiuzWORm06-7Uzl-hsJdtgrn7rFH08PrzPn7PF8ullfr_IVJHTOss159SU1FRE6dxQKOpGFiCLivKcg2wqpkvCV6QB0MBJBYYrTXlTVlJJqIopuhnv9t6ltyGKrdv5Lr0UeclIUZc5Y0ndjkp5F4I3K9F7-yn9IAiIY45pS4ljjolmIz3Y1gz_OvG6nP_4bwpXdfE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2481364288</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Statistically downscaled precipitation sensitivity to gridded observation data and downscaling technique</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wootten, Adrienne M. ; Dixon, Keith W. ; Adams‐Smith, Dennis J. ; McPherson, Renee A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wootten, Adrienne M. ; Dixon, Keith W. ; Adams‐Smith, Dennis J. ; McPherson, Renee A.</creatorcontrib><description>Future climate projections illuminate our understanding of the climate system and generate data products often used in climate impact assessments. Statistical downscaling (SD) is commonly used to address biases in global climate models (GCM) and to translate large‐scale projected changes to the higher spatial resolutions desired for regional and local scale studies. However, downscaled climate projections are sensitive to method configuration and input data source choices made during the downscaling process that can affect a projection's ultimate suitability for particular impact assessments. Quantifying how changes in inputs or parameters affect SD‐generated projections of precipitation is critical for improving these datasets and their use by impacts researchers. Through analysis of a systematically designed set of 18 statistically downscaled future daily precipitation projections for the south‐central United States, this study aims to improve the guidance available to impacts researchers. Two statistical processing techniques are examined: a ratio delta downscaling technique and an equi‐ratio quantile mapping method. The projections are generated using as input results from three GCMs forced with representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5 and three gridded observation‐based data products. Sensitivity analyses identify differences in the values of precipitation variables among the projections and the underlying reasons for the differences.Results indicate that differences in how observational station data are converted to gridded daily observational products can markedly affect statistically downscaled future projections of wet‐day frequency, intensity of precipitation extremes, and the length of multi‐day wet and dry periods. The choice of downscaling technique also can affect the climate change signal for variables of interest, in some cases causing change signals to reverse sign. Hence, this study provides illustrations and explanations for some downscaled precipitation projection differences that users may encounter, as well as evidence of symptoms that can affect user decisions. Statistical downscaling techniques are frequently used to translate changes from global climate models to local scales. However, there is no standard practice with respect to downscaling technique or creating the gridded observations used for training. This study demonstrates that multiple precipitation variables are sensitive to the training observations and the downscaling technique. Depending upon the variable of interest and the application, end users of downscaled projections should consider these factors in their own efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/joc.6716</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Climate change ; climate model evaluation ; Climate models ; climate projections ; Climate system ; Daily precipitation ; Data ; downscaling ; Dry periods ; Environmental assessment ; Extreme weather ; Future climates ; Global climate ; Global climate models ; Hydrologic data ; Illustrations ; impact assessments ; Precipitation ; Sensitivity analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Symptoms</subject><ispartof>International journal of climatology, 2021-02, Vol.41 (2), p.980-1001</ispartof><rights>2020 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><rights>2021 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3276-2d997e47e51cd2e7036ba30a3579290ab58d419f1b00d09150e9cd79b45aca053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3276-2d997e47e51cd2e7036ba30a3579290ab58d419f1b00d09150e9cd79b45aca053</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6363-5973 ; 0000-0001-6004-5823 ; 0000-0002-1497-9681 ; 0000-0003-3044-326X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjoc.6716$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjoc.6716$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wootten, Adrienne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Keith W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams‐Smith, Dennis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPherson, Renee A.</creatorcontrib><title>Statistically downscaled precipitation sensitivity to gridded observation data and downscaling technique</title><title>International journal of climatology</title><description>Future climate projections illuminate our understanding of the climate system and generate data products often used in climate impact assessments. Statistical downscaling (SD) is commonly used to address biases in global climate models (GCM) and to translate large‐scale projected changes to the higher spatial resolutions desired for regional and local scale studies. However, downscaled climate projections are sensitive to method configuration and input data source choices made during the downscaling process that can affect a projection's ultimate suitability for particular impact assessments. Quantifying how changes in inputs or parameters affect SD‐generated projections of precipitation is critical for improving these datasets and their use by impacts researchers. Through analysis of a systematically designed set of 18 statistically downscaled future daily precipitation projections for the south‐central United States, this study aims to improve the guidance available to impacts researchers. Two statistical processing techniques are examined: a ratio delta downscaling technique and an equi‐ratio quantile mapping method. The projections are generated using as input results from three GCMs forced with representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5 and three gridded observation‐based data products. Sensitivity analyses identify differences in the values of precipitation variables among the projections and the underlying reasons for the differences.Results indicate that differences in how observational station data are converted to gridded daily observational products can markedly affect statistically downscaled future projections of wet‐day frequency, intensity of precipitation extremes, and the length of multi‐day wet and dry periods. The choice of downscaling technique also can affect the climate change signal for variables of interest, in some cases causing change signals to reverse sign. Hence, this study provides illustrations and explanations for some downscaled precipitation projection differences that users may encounter, as well as evidence of symptoms that can affect user decisions. Statistical downscaling techniques are frequently used to translate changes from global climate models to local scales. However, there is no standard practice with respect to downscaling technique or creating the gridded observations used for training. This study demonstrates that multiple precipitation variables are sensitive to the training observations and the downscaling technique. Depending upon the variable of interest and the application, end users of downscaled projections should consider these factors in their own efforts.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>climate model evaluation</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>climate projections</subject><subject>Climate system</subject><subject>Daily precipitation</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>downscaling</subject><subject>Dry periods</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>Future climates</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Global climate models</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Illustrations</subject><subject>impact assessments</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><issn>0899-8418</issn><issn>1097-0088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq-BMCXrxsnexXkqMUPyn0oJ5DNknblHWzJmnL_ntTV7x5moF5ZgZehK4JzAhAfrd1alZTUp-gCQFOMwDGTtEEGOcZKwk7RxchbAGAc1JP0OYtymhDtEq27YC1O3QhtUbj3htle3scuw4H0wUb7d7GAUeH195qnZBrgvH7kWgZJZad_jtiuzWORm06-7Uzl-hsJdtgrn7rFH08PrzPn7PF8ullfr_IVJHTOss159SU1FRE6dxQKOpGFiCLivKcg2wqpkvCV6QB0MBJBYYrTXlTVlJJqIopuhnv9t6ltyGKrdv5Lr0UeclIUZc5Y0ndjkp5F4I3K9F7-yn9IAiIY45pS4ljjolmIz3Y1gz_OvG6nP_4bwpXdfE</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Wootten, Adrienne M.</creator><creator>Dixon, Keith W.</creator><creator>Adams‐Smith, Dennis J.</creator><creator>McPherson, Renee A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6363-5973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-5823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1497-9681</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3044-326X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Statistically downscaled precipitation sensitivity to gridded observation data and downscaling technique</title><author>Wootten, Adrienne M. ; Dixon, Keith W. ; Adams‐Smith, Dennis J. ; McPherson, Renee A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3276-2d997e47e51cd2e7036ba30a3579290ab58d419f1b00d09150e9cd79b45aca053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>climate model evaluation</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>climate projections</topic><topic>Climate system</topic><topic>Daily precipitation</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>downscaling</topic><topic>Dry periods</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>Future climates</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Global climate models</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Illustrations</topic><topic>impact assessments</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wootten, Adrienne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Keith W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams‐Smith, Dennis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPherson, Renee A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wootten, Adrienne M.</au><au>Dixon, Keith W.</au><au>Adams‐Smith, Dennis J.</au><au>McPherson, Renee A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Statistically downscaled precipitation sensitivity to gridded observation data and downscaling technique</atitle><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>980</spage><epage>1001</epage><pages>980-1001</pages><issn>0899-8418</issn><eissn>1097-0088</eissn><abstract>Future climate projections illuminate our understanding of the climate system and generate data products often used in climate impact assessments. Statistical downscaling (SD) is commonly used to address biases in global climate models (GCM) and to translate large‐scale projected changes to the higher spatial resolutions desired for regional and local scale studies. However, downscaled climate projections are sensitive to method configuration and input data source choices made during the downscaling process that can affect a projection's ultimate suitability for particular impact assessments. Quantifying how changes in inputs or parameters affect SD‐generated projections of precipitation is critical for improving these datasets and their use by impacts researchers. Through analysis of a systematically designed set of 18 statistically downscaled future daily precipitation projections for the south‐central United States, this study aims to improve the guidance available to impacts researchers. Two statistical processing techniques are examined: a ratio delta downscaling technique and an equi‐ratio quantile mapping method. The projections are generated using as input results from three GCMs forced with representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5 and three gridded observation‐based data products. Sensitivity analyses identify differences in the values of precipitation variables among the projections and the underlying reasons for the differences.Results indicate that differences in how observational station data are converted to gridded daily observational products can markedly affect statistically downscaled future projections of wet‐day frequency, intensity of precipitation extremes, and the length of multi‐day wet and dry periods. The choice of downscaling technique also can affect the climate change signal for variables of interest, in some cases causing change signals to reverse sign. Hence, this study provides illustrations and explanations for some downscaled precipitation projection differences that users may encounter, as well as evidence of symptoms that can affect user decisions. Statistical downscaling techniques are frequently used to translate changes from global climate models to local scales. However, there is no standard practice with respect to downscaling technique or creating the gridded observations used for training. This study demonstrates that multiple precipitation variables are sensitive to the training observations and the downscaling technique. Depending upon the variable of interest and the application, end users of downscaled projections should consider these factors in their own efforts.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/joc.6716</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6363-5973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-5823</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1497-9681</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3044-326X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-8418
ispartof International journal of climatology, 2021-02, Vol.41 (2), p.980-1001
issn 0899-8418
1097-0088
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2481364288
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Assessments
Climate change
climate model evaluation
Climate models
climate projections
Climate system
Daily precipitation
Data
downscaling
Dry periods
Environmental assessment
Extreme weather
Future climates
Global climate
Global climate models
Hydrologic data
Illustrations
impact assessments
Precipitation
Sensitivity analysis
Statistical analysis
Symptoms
title Statistically downscaled precipitation sensitivity to gridded observation data and downscaling technique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A18%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Statistically%20downscaled%20precipitation%20sensitivity%20to%20gridded%20observation%20data%20and%20downscaling%20technique&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20climatology&rft.au=Wootten,%20Adrienne%20M.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=980&rft.epage=1001&rft.pages=980-1001&rft.issn=0899-8418&rft.eissn=1097-0088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/joc.6716&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2481364288%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2481364288&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true