Analysis of hydraulic conductivity of fractured groundwater flow media using artificial neural network back propagation

Groundwater flow in the Grasberg open-pit mine is governed by fractured flow media. Groundwater modeling in fractured media requires detailed hydraulic conductivity ( K ) value distribution to illustrate hydrogeological conditions of the Grasberg open-pit mine properly. The value of K is estimated b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neural computing & applications 2021, Vol.33 (1), p.159-179
Hauptverfasser: Cahyadi, Tedy Agung, Syihab, Zuher, Widodo, Lilik Eko, Notosiswoyo, Sudarto, Widijanto, Eman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 1
container_start_page 159
container_title Neural computing & applications
container_volume 33
creator Cahyadi, Tedy Agung
Syihab, Zuher
Widodo, Lilik Eko
Notosiswoyo, Sudarto
Widijanto, Eman
description Groundwater flow in the Grasberg open-pit mine is governed by fractured flow media. Groundwater modeling in fractured media requires detailed hydraulic conductivity ( K ) value distribution to illustrate hydrogeological conditions of the Grasberg open-pit mine properly. The value of K is estimated by using the hydraulic conductivity (HC) system method based on rock quality designation (RQD), lithology permeability index (LPI), depth index (DI), and gouge content designation (GCD) data. Accordingly, all parameters must be available, but in this case, this information are only partially available. This paper proposes a method to solve this problem with artificial neural network (ANN) through a five approach scenario to find the K value with a model of incomplete empirical parameters. The artificial neural network back propagation (ANNBP) method is used to estimate the distributed K value based on the distributed observed RQD and LPI, as shown in the block model. This paper uses five optimum architectural schemes consisting of learning rate selection, momentum coefficient, number of nodes, number of hidden layers, activation method (sigmoid, tangent hyperbolic and Gaussian). Verification of the results of the K value is approached by the statistical approaches determination coefficient ( R 2 ), correlation coefficient ( R ), standard error of estimate (SEE), root-mean-squared (RMS), and normal root mean square (NRMS). ANNBP modeling used data for training and testing based on packer test and slug test as many as 49 points. Through five scenarios, it was found that scenario with learning rates of 10 –5 , momentum coefficient 0.1, number of nodes 10, number of hidden layer 5, with hyperbolic tangent activation methods is the most optimum result with R 2  = 0.822, the accuracy of predicting/validating results is expressed by using R 2  = 0.863, with R  = 0.929, and the error percentage = 3.67%. The K value prediction results are used as an input for groundwater modeling. The modeling results show a significant correlation with high validity between the data extracted from the model and field observation. In a 3D model, the K value distribution is similar to the field RQD data distribution. Furthermore, the K value distribution results are clustered in order to understand the relationship between geological as well as geotechnical data. The highest K values are found in volcanic breccia rocks (DLMVB), volcanic sediments (DLMVS), volcanic andesite (DLMVA) and quat
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00521-020-04970-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2480986760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2480986760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b5b7df279c836876b01813415e002a88fd9d1d04035a1fbd57d58e9758877f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EEqXwAkyWmAPHcRw7Y1VxkyqxsFuOL8WQxsV2qNKnJ7RIbEz_8F-OzofQNYFbAsDvEgArSQElFFA1HIr9CZqRitKCAhOnaAZNNdl1Rc_RRUrvAFDVgs3QbtGrbkw-4eDw22iiGjqvsQ69GXT2Xz6PP46LSuchWoPXMQy92alsI3Zd2OGNNV7hIfl-jVXM3nntVYd7O8SD5F2IH7hV-gNvY9iqtco-9JfozKku2atfnaPXh_vX5VOxenl8Xi5WhaakyUXLWm5cyRstaC143QIRhFaEWYBSCeFMY4iBCihTxLWGccOEbTgTgnNH6RzdHGen05-DTVm-hyFOLydZVgIaUfMaplR5TOkYUorWyW30GxVHSUD-8JVHvnLiKw985X4q0WMpTeF-bePf9D-tb9lwgIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2480986760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of hydraulic conductivity of fractured groundwater flow media using artificial neural network back propagation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Cahyadi, Tedy Agung ; Syihab, Zuher ; Widodo, Lilik Eko ; Notosiswoyo, Sudarto ; Widijanto, Eman</creator><creatorcontrib>Cahyadi, Tedy Agung ; Syihab, Zuher ; Widodo, Lilik Eko ; Notosiswoyo, Sudarto ; Widijanto, Eman</creatorcontrib><description>Groundwater flow in the Grasberg open-pit mine is governed by fractured flow media. Groundwater modeling in fractured media requires detailed hydraulic conductivity ( K ) value distribution to illustrate hydrogeological conditions of the Grasberg open-pit mine properly. The value of K is estimated by using the hydraulic conductivity (HC) system method based on rock quality designation (RQD), lithology permeability index (LPI), depth index (DI), and gouge content designation (GCD) data. Accordingly, all parameters must be available, but in this case, this information are only partially available. This paper proposes a method to solve this problem with artificial neural network (ANN) through a five approach scenario to find the K value with a model of incomplete empirical parameters. The artificial neural network back propagation (ANNBP) method is used to estimate the distributed K value based on the distributed observed RQD and LPI, as shown in the block model. This paper uses five optimum architectural schemes consisting of learning rate selection, momentum coefficient, number of nodes, number of hidden layers, activation method (sigmoid, tangent hyperbolic and Gaussian). Verification of the results of the K value is approached by the statistical approaches determination coefficient ( R 2 ), correlation coefficient ( R ), standard error of estimate (SEE), root-mean-squared (RMS), and normal root mean square (NRMS). ANNBP modeling used data for training and testing based on packer test and slug test as many as 49 points. Through five scenarios, it was found that scenario with learning rates of 10 –5 , momentum coefficient 0.1, number of nodes 10, number of hidden layer 5, with hyperbolic tangent activation methods is the most optimum result with R 2  = 0.822, the accuracy of predicting/validating results is expressed by using R 2  = 0.863, with R  = 0.929, and the error percentage = 3.67%. The K value prediction results are used as an input for groundwater modeling. The modeling results show a significant correlation with high validity between the data extracted from the model and field observation. In a 3D model, the K value distribution is similar to the field RQD data distribution. Furthermore, the K value distribution results are clustered in order to understand the relationship between geological as well as geotechnical data. The highest K values are found in volcanic breccia rocks (DLMVB), volcanic sediments (DLMVS), volcanic andesite (DLMVA) and quaternary glacial till. The geological condition is confirmed by the average rock RQD value between 12.4 and 39.6%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-0643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-04970-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Andesite ; Artificial Intelligence ; Artificial neural networks ; Back propagation ; Back propagation networks ; Breccia ; Computational Biology/Bioinformatics ; Computational Science and Engineering ; Computer Science ; Correlation coefficients ; Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery ; Empirical analysis ; Glacial till ; Groundwater ; Groundwater flow ; Hydraulic conductivity ; Hydraulics ; Hydrogeology ; Image Processing and Computer Vision ; Learning ; Learning theory ; Lithology ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Momentum ; Neural networks ; Nodes ; Open pit mining ; Original Article ; Parameters ; Probability and Statistics in Computer Science ; Sediments ; Standard error ; Three dimensional models</subject><ispartof>Neural computing &amp; applications, 2021, Vol.33 (1), p.159-179</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b5b7df279c836876b01813415e002a88fd9d1d04035a1fbd57d58e9758877f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b5b7df279c836876b01813415e002a88fd9d1d04035a1fbd57d58e9758877f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00521-020-04970-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00521-020-04970-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cahyadi, Tedy Agung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syihab, Zuher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widodo, Lilik Eko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Notosiswoyo, Sudarto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widijanto, Eman</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of hydraulic conductivity of fractured groundwater flow media using artificial neural network back propagation</title><title>Neural computing &amp; applications</title><addtitle>Neural Comput &amp; Applic</addtitle><description>Groundwater flow in the Grasberg open-pit mine is governed by fractured flow media. Groundwater modeling in fractured media requires detailed hydraulic conductivity ( K ) value distribution to illustrate hydrogeological conditions of the Grasberg open-pit mine properly. The value of K is estimated by using the hydraulic conductivity (HC) system method based on rock quality designation (RQD), lithology permeability index (LPI), depth index (DI), and gouge content designation (GCD) data. Accordingly, all parameters must be available, but in this case, this information are only partially available. This paper proposes a method to solve this problem with artificial neural network (ANN) through a five approach scenario to find the K value with a model of incomplete empirical parameters. The artificial neural network back propagation (ANNBP) method is used to estimate the distributed K value based on the distributed observed RQD and LPI, as shown in the block model. This paper uses five optimum architectural schemes consisting of learning rate selection, momentum coefficient, number of nodes, number of hidden layers, activation method (sigmoid, tangent hyperbolic and Gaussian). Verification of the results of the K value is approached by the statistical approaches determination coefficient ( R 2 ), correlation coefficient ( R ), standard error of estimate (SEE), root-mean-squared (RMS), and normal root mean square (NRMS). ANNBP modeling used data for training and testing based on packer test and slug test as many as 49 points. Through five scenarios, it was found that scenario with learning rates of 10 –5 , momentum coefficient 0.1, number of nodes 10, number of hidden layer 5, with hyperbolic tangent activation methods is the most optimum result with R 2  = 0.822, the accuracy of predicting/validating results is expressed by using R 2  = 0.863, with R  = 0.929, and the error percentage = 3.67%. The K value prediction results are used as an input for groundwater modeling. The modeling results show a significant correlation with high validity between the data extracted from the model and field observation. In a 3D model, the K value distribution is similar to the field RQD data distribution. Furthermore, the K value distribution results are clustered in order to understand the relationship between geological as well as geotechnical data. The highest K values are found in volcanic breccia rocks (DLMVB), volcanic sediments (DLMVS), volcanic andesite (DLMVA) and quaternary glacial till. The geological condition is confirmed by the average rock RQD value between 12.4 and 39.6%.</description><subject>Andesite</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Back propagation</subject><subject>Back propagation networks</subject><subject>Breccia</subject><subject>Computational Biology/Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Computational Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Glacial till</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater flow</subject><subject>Hydraulic conductivity</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Image Processing and Computer Vision</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Momentum</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>Open pit mining</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Probability and Statistics in Computer Science</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Standard error</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><issn>0941-0643</issn><issn>1433-3058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EEqXwAkyWmAPHcRw7Y1VxkyqxsFuOL8WQxsV2qNKnJ7RIbEz_8F-OzofQNYFbAsDvEgArSQElFFA1HIr9CZqRitKCAhOnaAZNNdl1Rc_RRUrvAFDVgs3QbtGrbkw-4eDw22iiGjqvsQ69GXT2Xz6PP46LSuchWoPXMQy92alsI3Zd2OGNNV7hIfl-jVXM3nntVYd7O8SD5F2IH7hV-gNvY9iqtco-9JfozKku2atfnaPXh_vX5VOxenl8Xi5WhaakyUXLWm5cyRstaC143QIRhFaEWYBSCeFMY4iBCihTxLWGccOEbTgTgnNH6RzdHGen05-DTVm-hyFOLydZVgIaUfMaplR5TOkYUorWyW30GxVHSUD-8JVHvnLiKw985X4q0WMpTeF-bePf9D-tb9lwgIQ</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Cahyadi, Tedy Agung</creator><creator>Syihab, Zuher</creator><creator>Widodo, Lilik Eko</creator><creator>Notosiswoyo, Sudarto</creator><creator>Widijanto, Eman</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Analysis of hydraulic conductivity of fractured groundwater flow media using artificial neural network back propagation</title><author>Cahyadi, Tedy Agung ; Syihab, Zuher ; Widodo, Lilik Eko ; Notosiswoyo, Sudarto ; Widijanto, Eman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b5b7df279c836876b01813415e002a88fd9d1d04035a1fbd57d58e9758877f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Andesite</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Back propagation</topic><topic>Back propagation networks</topic><topic>Breccia</topic><topic>Computational Biology/Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Computational Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Glacial till</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater flow</topic><topic>Hydraulic conductivity</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Image Processing and Computer Vision</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Momentum</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>Open pit mining</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Probability and Statistics in Computer Science</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Standard error</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cahyadi, Tedy Agung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syihab, Zuher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widodo, Lilik Eko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Notosiswoyo, Sudarto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widijanto, Eman</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Neural computing &amp; applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cahyadi, Tedy Agung</au><au>Syihab, Zuher</au><au>Widodo, Lilik Eko</au><au>Notosiswoyo, Sudarto</au><au>Widijanto, Eman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of hydraulic conductivity of fractured groundwater flow media using artificial neural network back propagation</atitle><jtitle>Neural computing &amp; applications</jtitle><stitle>Neural Comput &amp; Applic</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>159-179</pages><issn>0941-0643</issn><eissn>1433-3058</eissn><abstract>Groundwater flow in the Grasberg open-pit mine is governed by fractured flow media. Groundwater modeling in fractured media requires detailed hydraulic conductivity ( K ) value distribution to illustrate hydrogeological conditions of the Grasberg open-pit mine properly. The value of K is estimated by using the hydraulic conductivity (HC) system method based on rock quality designation (RQD), lithology permeability index (LPI), depth index (DI), and gouge content designation (GCD) data. Accordingly, all parameters must be available, but in this case, this information are only partially available. This paper proposes a method to solve this problem with artificial neural network (ANN) through a five approach scenario to find the K value with a model of incomplete empirical parameters. The artificial neural network back propagation (ANNBP) method is used to estimate the distributed K value based on the distributed observed RQD and LPI, as shown in the block model. This paper uses five optimum architectural schemes consisting of learning rate selection, momentum coefficient, number of nodes, number of hidden layers, activation method (sigmoid, tangent hyperbolic and Gaussian). Verification of the results of the K value is approached by the statistical approaches determination coefficient ( R 2 ), correlation coefficient ( R ), standard error of estimate (SEE), root-mean-squared (RMS), and normal root mean square (NRMS). ANNBP modeling used data for training and testing based on packer test and slug test as many as 49 points. Through five scenarios, it was found that scenario with learning rates of 10 –5 , momentum coefficient 0.1, number of nodes 10, number of hidden layer 5, with hyperbolic tangent activation methods is the most optimum result with R 2  = 0.822, the accuracy of predicting/validating results is expressed by using R 2  = 0.863, with R  = 0.929, and the error percentage = 3.67%. The K value prediction results are used as an input for groundwater modeling. The modeling results show a significant correlation with high validity between the data extracted from the model and field observation. In a 3D model, the K value distribution is similar to the field RQD data distribution. Furthermore, the K value distribution results are clustered in order to understand the relationship between geological as well as geotechnical data. The highest K values are found in volcanic breccia rocks (DLMVB), volcanic sediments (DLMVS), volcanic andesite (DLMVA) and quaternary glacial till. The geological condition is confirmed by the average rock RQD value between 12.4 and 39.6%.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00521-020-04970-z</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-0643
ispartof Neural computing & applications, 2021, Vol.33 (1), p.159-179
issn 0941-0643
1433-3058
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2480986760
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Andesite
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial neural networks
Back propagation
Back propagation networks
Breccia
Computational Biology/Bioinformatics
Computational Science and Engineering
Computer Science
Correlation coefficients
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Empirical analysis
Glacial till
Groundwater
Groundwater flow
Hydraulic conductivity
Hydraulics
Hydrogeology
Image Processing and Computer Vision
Learning
Learning theory
Lithology
Mathematical models
Modelling
Momentum
Neural networks
Nodes
Open pit mining
Original Article
Parameters
Probability and Statistics in Computer Science
Sediments
Standard error
Three dimensional models
title Analysis of hydraulic conductivity of fractured groundwater flow media using artificial neural network back propagation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A38%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20hydraulic%20conductivity%20of%20fractured%20groundwater%20flow%20media%20using%20artificial%20neural%20network%20back%20propagation&rft.jtitle=Neural%20computing%20&%20applications&rft.au=Cahyadi,%20Tedy%20Agung&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=159-179&rft.issn=0941-0643&rft.eissn=1433-3058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00521-020-04970-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2480986760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2480986760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true