Farming tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) in static clear water versus a biofloc system with or without Bacillus subtilis supplementation
The use of probiotics can beneficially improve the water quality in the biofloc technology (BFT) system consequently enhancing the fish performance. This study focused on the effect of Bacillus subtilis on a clear water static system compared to the BFT system on the productive performance, proximat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Aquaculture international 2021-02, Vol.29 (1), p.207-218 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 218 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 207 |
| container_title | Aquaculture international |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | dos Santos, Driely Kathriny Monteiro Kojima, Juliana Tomomi Santana, Thiago Macedo de Castro, Diogo Pereira Serra, Paula Taquita Dantas, Naiara Silva Menezes da Fonseca, Flávio Augusto Leão Mariúba, Luís André Morais Gonçalves, Ligia Uribe |
| description | The use of probiotics can beneficially improve the water quality in the biofloc technology (BFT) system consequently enhancing the fish performance. This study focused on the effect of
Bacillus subtilis
on a clear water static system compared to the BFT system on the productive performance, proximate body composition, and diversity of intestinal bacterial communities of tambaqui (
Colossoma macropomum
) juveniles submitted to four treatments: clear water static system with (CW + BS) or without (CW)
B. subtilis
and BFT with (BFT + BS) or without (BFT)
B. subtilis
. For the study, 20 juveniles (five replicates) per treatment were used for 60 days. For the
B. subtilis
treatments, water was inoculated at weekly intervals with a 4 × 10
8
-cell mL
−1
culture suspension. Results revealed that regardless of
B. subtilis
supplementation, fish reared in BFT displayed better zootechnical performance than those in CW—weight gain (BFT 33.57 ± 4.08 g; CW 19.97 ± 5.42 g), protein efficiency (BFT 0.16 ± 0.02; CW 0.11 ± 0.02), feed conversion ratio (BFT 0.71 ± 0.08; CW 0.84 ± 0.40), and relative growth rate (BFT 1.52 ± 0.12; CW 1.06 ± 0.15)—which suggests that biofloc consumption was 31.9% crude protein. Moreover, fish reared in BFT + BS had a higher condition factor (2.30 ± 0.09). In conclusion, BFT is regarded as a promising system to save water, decrease aquaculture effluents, and promote tambaqui farming. Although
B. subtilis
is a common bacterium found in tambaqui gut, its supplementation in the BFT system improved the fish condition factor. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10499-020-00618-w |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2480549280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2480549280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4c533609959dba193283a2b4ff9350c9d585618f2a6bd80fa7f514349be86173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAkyWWGAIXMf58wgVBaRKLB3YLMd1iqs4Tm2HqE_Aa-O2SGxM5w7nnKvzIXRN4J4AlA-eQMZYAikkAAWpkvEETUhe0oRk9OMUTYAVZVKQFM7RhfcbAKBlRiboey6c0d0aB2FqsR00vp3Z1npvjcBGSGd7awZzh3WHfRBBSyxbJRweRVAOfynnB48FrrVtWiux3_mgDB51-MTWHdQOAT8Jqds2Ov1QB93q_dH3rTKq25fa7hKdNaL16upXp2g5f17OXpPF-8vb7HGRSEpYSDKZU1oAYzlb1YIwmlZUpHXWNIzmINkqr_I4v0lFUa8qaETZ5JFAxmpVFaSkU3RzrO2d3Q7KB76xg-viR55mFeQZSyuIrvToivO9d6rhvdNGuB0nwPe8-ZE3j7z5gTcfY4geQz6au7Vyf9X_pH4A9i6GPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2480549280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Farming tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) in static clear water versus a biofloc system with or without Bacillus subtilis supplementation</title><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>dos Santos, Driely Kathriny Monteiro ; Kojima, Juliana Tomomi ; Santana, Thiago Macedo ; de Castro, Diogo Pereira ; Serra, Paula Taquita ; Dantas, Naiara Silva Menezes ; da Fonseca, Flávio Augusto Leão ; Mariúba, Luís André Morais ; Gonçalves, Ligia Uribe</creator><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Driely Kathriny Monteiro ; Kojima, Juliana Tomomi ; Santana, Thiago Macedo ; de Castro, Diogo Pereira ; Serra, Paula Taquita ; Dantas, Naiara Silva Menezes ; da Fonseca, Flávio Augusto Leão ; Mariúba, Luís André Morais ; Gonçalves, Ligia Uribe</creatorcontrib><description>The use of probiotics can beneficially improve the water quality in the biofloc technology (BFT) system consequently enhancing the fish performance. This study focused on the effect of
Bacillus subtilis
on a clear water static system compared to the BFT system on the productive performance, proximate body composition, and diversity of intestinal bacterial communities of tambaqui (
Colossoma macropomum
) juveniles submitted to four treatments: clear water static system with (CW + BS) or without (CW)
B. subtilis
and BFT with (BFT + BS) or without (BFT)
B. subtilis
. For the study, 20 juveniles (five replicates) per treatment were used for 60 days. For the
B. subtilis
treatments, water was inoculated at weekly intervals with a 4 × 10
8
-cell mL
−1
culture suspension. Results revealed that regardless of
B. subtilis
supplementation, fish reared in BFT displayed better zootechnical performance than those in CW—weight gain (BFT 33.57 ± 4.08 g; CW 19.97 ± 5.42 g), protein efficiency (BFT 0.16 ± 0.02; CW 0.11 ± 0.02), feed conversion ratio (BFT 0.71 ± 0.08; CW 0.84 ± 0.40), and relative growth rate (BFT 1.52 ± 0.12; CW 1.06 ± 0.15)—which suggests that biofloc consumption was 31.9% crude protein. Moreover, fish reared in BFT + BS had a higher condition factor (2.30 ± 0.09). In conclusion, BFT is regarded as a promising system to save water, decrease aquaculture effluents, and promote tambaqui farming. Although
B. subtilis
is a common bacterium found in tambaqui gut, its supplementation in the BFT system improved the fish condition factor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-6120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-143X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10499-020-00618-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Aquaculture effluents ; Bacillus subtilis ; Bacteria ; Biofloc technology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biometrics ; Body composition ; Colossoma macropomum ; Condition factor ; Effluents ; Farming ; Feed conversion ; Fish ; Food conversion ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Growth rate ; Inoculation ; Juveniles ; Life Sciences ; Probiotics ; Proteins ; Water quality ; Weekly ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture international, 2021-02, Vol.29 (1), p.207-218</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4c533609959dba193283a2b4ff9350c9d585618f2a6bd80fa7f514349be86173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4c533609959dba193283a2b4ff9350c9d585618f2a6bd80fa7f514349be86173</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5014-6986</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10499-020-00618-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10499-020-00618-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Driely Kathriny Monteiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kojima, Juliana Tomomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Thiago Macedo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Castro, Diogo Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra, Paula Taquita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantas, Naiara Silva Menezes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Fonseca, Flávio Augusto Leão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariúba, Luís André Morais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Ligia Uribe</creatorcontrib><title>Farming tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) in static clear water versus a biofloc system with or without Bacillus subtilis supplementation</title><title>Aquaculture international</title><addtitle>Aquacult Int</addtitle><description>The use of probiotics can beneficially improve the water quality in the biofloc technology (BFT) system consequently enhancing the fish performance. This study focused on the effect of
Bacillus subtilis
on a clear water static system compared to the BFT system on the productive performance, proximate body composition, and diversity of intestinal bacterial communities of tambaqui (
Colossoma macropomum
) juveniles submitted to four treatments: clear water static system with (CW + BS) or without (CW)
B. subtilis
and BFT with (BFT + BS) or without (BFT)
B. subtilis
. For the study, 20 juveniles (five replicates) per treatment were used for 60 days. For the
B. subtilis
treatments, water was inoculated at weekly intervals with a 4 × 10
8
-cell mL
−1
culture suspension. Results revealed that regardless of
B. subtilis
supplementation, fish reared in BFT displayed better zootechnical performance than those in CW—weight gain (BFT 33.57 ± 4.08 g; CW 19.97 ± 5.42 g), protein efficiency (BFT 0.16 ± 0.02; CW 0.11 ± 0.02), feed conversion ratio (BFT 0.71 ± 0.08; CW 0.84 ± 0.40), and relative growth rate (BFT 1.52 ± 0.12; CW 1.06 ± 0.15)—which suggests that biofloc consumption was 31.9% crude protein. Moreover, fish reared in BFT + BS had a higher condition factor (2.30 ± 0.09). In conclusion, BFT is regarded as a promising system to save water, decrease aquaculture effluents, and promote tambaqui farming. Although
B. subtilis
is a common bacterium found in tambaqui gut, its supplementation in the BFT system improved the fish condition factor.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquaculture effluents</subject><subject>Bacillus subtilis</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biofloc technology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Body composition</subject><subject>Colossoma macropomum</subject><subject>Condition factor</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Feed conversion</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food conversion</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Weekly</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0967-6120</issn><issn>1573-143X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAkyWWGAIXMf58wgVBaRKLB3YLMd1iqs4Tm2HqE_Aa-O2SGxM5w7nnKvzIXRN4J4AlA-eQMZYAikkAAWpkvEETUhe0oRk9OMUTYAVZVKQFM7RhfcbAKBlRiboey6c0d0aB2FqsR00vp3Z1npvjcBGSGd7awZzh3WHfRBBSyxbJRweRVAOfynnB48FrrVtWiux3_mgDB51-MTWHdQOAT8Jqds2Ov1QB93q_dH3rTKq25fa7hKdNaL16upXp2g5f17OXpPF-8vb7HGRSEpYSDKZU1oAYzlb1YIwmlZUpHXWNIzmINkqr_I4v0lFUa8qaETZ5JFAxmpVFaSkU3RzrO2d3Q7KB76xg-viR55mFeQZSyuIrvToivO9d6rhvdNGuB0nwPe8-ZE3j7z5gTcfY4geQz6au7Vyf9X_pH4A9i6GPw</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>dos Santos, Driely Kathriny Monteiro</creator><creator>Kojima, Juliana Tomomi</creator><creator>Santana, Thiago Macedo</creator><creator>de Castro, Diogo Pereira</creator><creator>Serra, Paula Taquita</creator><creator>Dantas, Naiara Silva Menezes</creator><creator>da Fonseca, Flávio Augusto Leão</creator><creator>Mariúba, Luís André Morais</creator><creator>Gonçalves, Ligia Uribe</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5014-6986</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Farming tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) in static clear water versus a biofloc system with or without Bacillus subtilis supplementation</title><author>dos Santos, Driely Kathriny Monteiro ; Kojima, Juliana Tomomi ; Santana, Thiago Macedo ; de Castro, Diogo Pereira ; Serra, Paula Taquita ; Dantas, Naiara Silva Menezes ; da Fonseca, Flávio Augusto Leão ; Mariúba, Luís André Morais ; Gonçalves, Ligia Uribe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-4c533609959dba193283a2b4ff9350c9d585618f2a6bd80fa7f514349be86173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquaculture effluents</topic><topic>Bacillus subtilis</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biofloc technology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Body composition</topic><topic>Colossoma macropomum</topic><topic>Condition factor</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Feed conversion</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food conversion</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Weekly</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Driely Kathriny Monteiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kojima, Juliana Tomomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Thiago Macedo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Castro, Diogo Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra, Paula Taquita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantas, Naiara Silva Menezes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Fonseca, Flávio Augusto Leão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariúba, Luís André Morais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Ligia Uribe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>dos Santos, Driely Kathriny Monteiro</au><au>Kojima, Juliana Tomomi</au><au>Santana, Thiago Macedo</au><au>de Castro, Diogo Pereira</au><au>Serra, Paula Taquita</au><au>Dantas, Naiara Silva Menezes</au><au>da Fonseca, Flávio Augusto Leão</au><au>Mariúba, Luís André Morais</au><au>Gonçalves, Ligia Uribe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Farming tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) in static clear water versus a biofloc system with or without Bacillus subtilis supplementation</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture international</jtitle><stitle>Aquacult Int</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>207-218</pages><issn>0967-6120</issn><eissn>1573-143X</eissn><abstract>The use of probiotics can beneficially improve the water quality in the biofloc technology (BFT) system consequently enhancing the fish performance. This study focused on the effect of
Bacillus subtilis
on a clear water static system compared to the BFT system on the productive performance, proximate body composition, and diversity of intestinal bacterial communities of tambaqui (
Colossoma macropomum
) juveniles submitted to four treatments: clear water static system with (CW + BS) or without (CW)
B. subtilis
and BFT with (BFT + BS) or without (BFT)
B. subtilis
. For the study, 20 juveniles (five replicates) per treatment were used for 60 days. For the
B. subtilis
treatments, water was inoculated at weekly intervals with a 4 × 10
8
-cell mL
−1
culture suspension. Results revealed that regardless of
B. subtilis
supplementation, fish reared in BFT displayed better zootechnical performance than those in CW—weight gain (BFT 33.57 ± 4.08 g; CW 19.97 ± 5.42 g), protein efficiency (BFT 0.16 ± 0.02; CW 0.11 ± 0.02), feed conversion ratio (BFT 0.71 ± 0.08; CW 0.84 ± 0.40), and relative growth rate (BFT 1.52 ± 0.12; CW 1.06 ± 0.15)—which suggests that biofloc consumption was 31.9% crude protein. Moreover, fish reared in BFT + BS had a higher condition factor (2.30 ± 0.09). In conclusion, BFT is regarded as a promising system to save water, decrease aquaculture effluents, and promote tambaqui farming. Although
B. subtilis
is a common bacterium found in tambaqui gut, its supplementation in the BFT system improved the fish condition factor.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10499-020-00618-w</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5014-6986</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0967-6120 |
| ispartof | Aquaculture international, 2021-02, Vol.29 (1), p.207-218 |
| issn | 0967-6120 1573-143X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2480549280 |
| source | SpringerLink |
| subjects | Aquaculture Aquaculture effluents Bacillus subtilis Bacteria Biofloc technology Biomedical and Life Sciences Biometrics Body composition Colossoma macropomum Condition factor Effluents Farming Feed conversion Fish Food conversion Freshwater & Marine Ecology Growth rate Inoculation Juveniles Life Sciences Probiotics Proteins Water quality Weekly Zoology |
| title | Farming tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) in static clear water versus a biofloc system with or without Bacillus subtilis supplementation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A23%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Farming%20tambaqui%20(Colossoma%20macropomum)%20in%20static%20clear%20water%20versus%20a%20biofloc%20system%20with%20or%20without%20Bacillus%20subtilis%20supplementation&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20international&rft.au=dos%20Santos,%20Driely%20Kathriny%20Monteiro&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=207-218&rft.issn=0967-6120&rft.eissn=1573-143X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10499-020-00618-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2480549280%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2480549280&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |