Examining the Spatial Variability of Geosite Assessment and Its Relevance in Geosite Management

Assessment is the initial step for experts on geoheritage and geotourism when designating geosites in a certain area. During this process, geologically interesting outcrops, formations and places are examined with the use of different criteria to see if they are suitable for geoconservation and geot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geoheritage 2021-03, Vol.13 (1), Article 8
Hauptverfasser: Pál, Márton, Albert, Gáspár
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Geoheritage
container_volume 13
creator Pál, Márton
Albert, Gáspár
description Assessment is the initial step for experts on geoheritage and geotourism when designating geosites in a certain area. During this process, geologically interesting outcrops, formations and places are examined with the use of different criteria to see if they are suitable for geoconservation and geotourism purposes. A quantitative assessment method—Modified Geosite Assessment Model (M-GAM)—was applied in the study area, which is part of the Bakony–Balaton UNESCO Global Geopark in Hungary. M-GAM uses a weight factor (importance) that expresses the opinion of geotourists about 27 infrastructural, tourism and scientific indicators. This factor was examined by questionnaires at nine geosites in the area. At each site, we determined a unique importance value, which shows significant difference from site-to-site and reflects the opinions of visitors about the geosite. The M-GAM method is originally aimed at applying a common weight on each of the 27 criteria during the assessment of selected sites. While this approach is valid, we demonstrated that the method can be extended because the weights spatially vary and can be used to draw conclusions on geosite management. Practically, the evaluation of the factors obtained in this way offers an individual development plan for every site. The current state of improvement direction, the level of communication and the interpretability of the geo-objects can also be determined. In this way, we can get a more realistic development strategy for the geosites.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12371-020-00528-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2480084668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2480084668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c5ed07c3d50fae6424fa11c73469cb9fff22a7868de3f04bb2a0809dbc631e933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWLR_wFPA82o-dpPssZRaCxXBr2vIZic1ZZutyVbsv3frSr05l5nD874DD0JXlNxQQuRtooxLmhFGMkIKpjJxgkZUCZmxXBWnx1vKczROaU364bRQvBwhPfsyGx98WOHuHfDz1nTeNPjNRG8q3_huj1uH59Am3wGepAQpbSB02IQaL7qEn6CBTxMsYB-O3IMJZgUH7hKdOdMkGP_uC_R6N3uZ3mfLx_liOllmlgveZbaAmkjL64I4AyJnuTOUWslzUdqqdM4xZqQSqgbuSF5VzBBFyrqyglMoOb9A10PvNrYfO0idXre7GPqXupdAiMqFUD3FBsrGNqUITm-j35i415Tog0s9uNS9S_3jUos-xIdQ6uGwgvhX_U_qGxu5dzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2480084668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining the Spatial Variability of Geosite Assessment and Its Relevance in Geosite Management</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Pál, Márton ; Albert, Gáspár</creator><creatorcontrib>Pál, Márton ; Albert, Gáspár</creatorcontrib><description>Assessment is the initial step for experts on geoheritage and geotourism when designating geosites in a certain area. During this process, geologically interesting outcrops, formations and places are examined with the use of different criteria to see if they are suitable for geoconservation and geotourism purposes. A quantitative assessment method—Modified Geosite Assessment Model (M-GAM)—was applied in the study area, which is part of the Bakony–Balaton UNESCO Global Geopark in Hungary. M-GAM uses a weight factor (importance) that expresses the opinion of geotourists about 27 infrastructural, tourism and scientific indicators. This factor was examined by questionnaires at nine geosites in the area. At each site, we determined a unique importance value, which shows significant difference from site-to-site and reflects the opinions of visitors about the geosite. The M-GAM method is originally aimed at applying a common weight on each of the 27 criteria during the assessment of selected sites. While this approach is valid, we demonstrated that the method can be extended because the weights spatially vary and can be used to draw conclusions on geosite management. Practically, the evaluation of the factors obtained in this way offers an individual development plan for every site. The current state of improvement direction, the level of communication and the interpretability of the geo-objects can also be determined. In this way, we can get a more realistic development strategy for the geosites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-2477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-2485</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12371-020-00528-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biogeosciences ; Development strategies ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geoheritage ; Historical Geology ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Mineralogy ; Original Article ; Paleontology ; Physical Geography</subject><ispartof>Geoheritage, 2021-03, Vol.13 (1), Article 8</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c5ed07c3d50fae6424fa11c73469cb9fff22a7868de3f04bb2a0809dbc631e933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c5ed07c3d50fae6424fa11c73469cb9fff22a7868de3f04bb2a0809dbc631e933</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6321-7803 ; 0000-0002-1723-8328</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12371-020-00528-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12371-020-00528-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pál, Márton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albert, Gáspár</creatorcontrib><title>Examining the Spatial Variability of Geosite Assessment and Its Relevance in Geosite Management</title><title>Geoheritage</title><addtitle>Geoheritage</addtitle><description>Assessment is the initial step for experts on geoheritage and geotourism when designating geosites in a certain area. During this process, geologically interesting outcrops, formations and places are examined with the use of different criteria to see if they are suitable for geoconservation and geotourism purposes. A quantitative assessment method—Modified Geosite Assessment Model (M-GAM)—was applied in the study area, which is part of the Bakony–Balaton UNESCO Global Geopark in Hungary. M-GAM uses a weight factor (importance) that expresses the opinion of geotourists about 27 infrastructural, tourism and scientific indicators. This factor was examined by questionnaires at nine geosites in the area. At each site, we determined a unique importance value, which shows significant difference from site-to-site and reflects the opinions of visitors about the geosite. The M-GAM method is originally aimed at applying a common weight on each of the 27 criteria during the assessment of selected sites. While this approach is valid, we demonstrated that the method can be extended because the weights spatially vary and can be used to draw conclusions on geosite management. Practically, the evaluation of the factors obtained in this way offers an individual development plan for every site. The current state of improvement direction, the level of communication and the interpretability of the geo-objects can also be determined. In this way, we can get a more realistic development strategy for the geosites.</description><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Development strategies</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geoheritage</subject><subject>Historical Geology</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Paleontology</subject><subject>Physical Geography</subject><issn>1867-2477</issn><issn>1867-2485</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWLR_wFPA82o-dpPssZRaCxXBr2vIZic1ZZutyVbsv3frSr05l5nD874DD0JXlNxQQuRtooxLmhFGMkIKpjJxgkZUCZmxXBWnx1vKczROaU364bRQvBwhPfsyGx98WOHuHfDz1nTeNPjNRG8q3_huj1uH59Am3wGepAQpbSB02IQaL7qEn6CBTxMsYB-O3IMJZgUH7hKdOdMkGP_uC_R6N3uZ3mfLx_liOllmlgveZbaAmkjL64I4AyJnuTOUWslzUdqqdM4xZqQSqgbuSF5VzBBFyrqyglMoOb9A10PvNrYfO0idXre7GPqXupdAiMqFUD3FBsrGNqUITm-j35i415Tog0s9uNS9S_3jUos-xIdQ6uGwgvhX_U_qGxu5dzs</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Pál, Márton</creator><creator>Albert, Gáspár</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6321-7803</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1723-8328</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Examining the Spatial Variability of Geosite Assessment and Its Relevance in Geosite Management</title><author>Pál, Márton ; Albert, Gáspár</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c5ed07c3d50fae6424fa11c73469cb9fff22a7868de3f04bb2a0809dbc631e933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Development strategies</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geoheritage</topic><topic>Historical Geology</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Paleontology</topic><topic>Physical Geography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pál, Márton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albert, Gáspár</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Geoheritage</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pál, Márton</au><au>Albert, Gáspár</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining the Spatial Variability of Geosite Assessment and Its Relevance in Geosite Management</atitle><jtitle>Geoheritage</jtitle><stitle>Geoheritage</stitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><artnum>8</artnum><issn>1867-2477</issn><eissn>1867-2485</eissn><abstract>Assessment is the initial step for experts on geoheritage and geotourism when designating geosites in a certain area. During this process, geologically interesting outcrops, formations and places are examined with the use of different criteria to see if they are suitable for geoconservation and geotourism purposes. A quantitative assessment method—Modified Geosite Assessment Model (M-GAM)—was applied in the study area, which is part of the Bakony–Balaton UNESCO Global Geopark in Hungary. M-GAM uses a weight factor (importance) that expresses the opinion of geotourists about 27 infrastructural, tourism and scientific indicators. This factor was examined by questionnaires at nine geosites in the area. At each site, we determined a unique importance value, which shows significant difference from site-to-site and reflects the opinions of visitors about the geosite. The M-GAM method is originally aimed at applying a common weight on each of the 27 criteria during the assessment of selected sites. While this approach is valid, we demonstrated that the method can be extended because the weights spatially vary and can be used to draw conclusions on geosite management. Practically, the evaluation of the factors obtained in this way offers an individual development plan for every site. The current state of improvement direction, the level of communication and the interpretability of the geo-objects can also be determined. In this way, we can get a more realistic development strategy for the geosites.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12371-020-00528-6</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6321-7803</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1723-8328</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1867-2477
ispartof Geoheritage, 2021-03, Vol.13 (1), Article 8
issn 1867-2477
1867-2485
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2480084668
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biogeosciences
Development strategies
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Geoheritage
Historical Geology
Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning
Mineralogy
Original Article
Paleontology
Physical Geography
title Examining the Spatial Variability of Geosite Assessment and Its Relevance in Geosite Management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T08%3A41%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20the%20Spatial%20Variability%20of%20Geosite%20Assessment%20and%20Its%20Relevance%20in%20Geosite%20Management&rft.jtitle=Geoheritage&rft.au=P%C3%A1l,%20M%C3%A1rton&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.artnum=8&rft.issn=1867-2477&rft.eissn=1867-2485&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12371-020-00528-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2480084668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2480084668&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true