Functional and ecosystem service differences between tree species: implications for tree species replacement

Key message Tree species differ in their functioning at the scale of an individual tree which will result in differences in ecosystem service provision. Replacement trees for diseased trees should take account of functional differences. Globally tree species composition is changing due to species lo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trees (Berlin, West) West), 2021-02, Vol.35 (1), p.307-317
Hauptverfasser: Mitchell, R. J., Hewison, R. L., Haghi, R. K., Robertson, A. H. J., Main, A. M., Owen, I. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 317
container_issue 1
container_start_page 307
container_title Trees (Berlin, West)
container_volume 35
creator Mitchell, R. J.
Hewison, R. L.
Haghi, R. K.
Robertson, A. H. J.
Main, A. M.
Owen, I. J.
description Key message Tree species differ in their functioning at the scale of an individual tree which will result in differences in ecosystem service provision. Replacement trees for diseased trees should take account of functional differences. Globally tree species composition is changing due to species loss from pests and pathogens. The impact of this change on ecological functioning is rarely tested. Using six sites across the UK, with multiple tree species at each site, we test for functional differences between three species threatened by disease in the UK: Quercus petraea , Q. robur and Fraxinus excelsior and six other species: Acer pseudoplatanus , Castanea sativa , Fagus sylvatica , Quercus cerris , Quercus rubra, and Tilia x europaea , which have previously been suggested as ecological replacements. Differences between species were detected for all the variables measured: nitrogen mineralization, decomposition rate, total soil carbon and nitrogen, soil pH, soil temperature, and bark water holding capacity. Non-native Quercus species were only suitable replacements for native Quercu s for some of the functions measured but replicating native Quercu s functioning using a mixture of other species may be possible. The functioning of F. excelsior was different from most other tree species, suggesting that replicating its functioning with replacement tree species is difficult. The work highlighted that which species replaces diseased trees, even at the scale of single trees, will impact on the functions and ecosystem services provided.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00468-020-02035-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2480025486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2480025486</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b32ae38916e55fefb813af3888b609d73ea18213cd420446bd96d8a90d1702273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Bz9VJ0o_UmyyuCgte9BzSdCJd-mUmq-y_t2sF8eJhmMM87wvzMHYp4FoAFDcEkOY6AQmHUVkijthCpEomUursmC2gVCIRuoRTdka0BQCVC7lg7XrXu9gMvW257WuObqA9Rew4YfhoHPK68R4D9g6JVxg_EXseAyKnEV2DdMubbmwbZw8txP0Q_px5wLG1Djvs4zk78bYlvPjZS_a6vn9ZPSab54en1d0mcUqUMamUtKh0KXLMMo--0kJZr7TWVQ5lXSi0QkuhXJ1KSNO8qsu81raEWhQgZaGW7GruHcPwvkOKZjvswvQiGZlqAJmlOp8oOVMuDEQBvRlD09mwNwLMwaqZrZrJqPm2asQUUnOIJrh_w_Bb_U_qCx_Le5Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2480025486</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional and ecosystem service differences between tree species: implications for tree species replacement</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Mitchell, R. J. ; Hewison, R. L. ; Haghi, R. K. ; Robertson, A. H. J. ; Main, A. M. ; Owen, I. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, R. J. ; Hewison, R. L. ; Haghi, R. K. ; Robertson, A. H. J. ; Main, A. M. ; Owen, I. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Key message Tree species differ in their functioning at the scale of an individual tree which will result in differences in ecosystem service provision. Replacement trees for diseased trees should take account of functional differences. Globally tree species composition is changing due to species loss from pests and pathogens. The impact of this change on ecological functioning is rarely tested. Using six sites across the UK, with multiple tree species at each site, we test for functional differences between three species threatened by disease in the UK: Quercus petraea , Q. robur and Fraxinus excelsior and six other species: Acer pseudoplatanus , Castanea sativa , Fagus sylvatica , Quercus cerris , Quercus rubra, and Tilia x europaea , which have previously been suggested as ecological replacements. Differences between species were detected for all the variables measured: nitrogen mineralization, decomposition rate, total soil carbon and nitrogen, soil pH, soil temperature, and bark water holding capacity. Non-native Quercus species were only suitable replacements for native Quercu s for some of the functions measured but replicating native Quercu s functioning using a mixture of other species may be possible. The functioning of F. excelsior was different from most other tree species, suggesting that replicating its functioning with replacement tree species is difficult. The work highlighted that which species replaces diseased trees, even at the scale of single trees, will impact on the functions and ecosystem services provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-1890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00468-020-02035-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Bark ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecological function ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Forestry ; Herbivores ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Life Sciences ; Mineralization ; Nitrogen ; Original Article ; Pests ; Plant Anatomy/Development ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant species ; Quercus ; Replication ; Soil chemistry ; Soil pH ; Soil temperature ; Soil water ; Species composition ; Threatened species ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Trees (Berlin, West), 2021-02, Vol.35 (1), p.307-317</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b32ae38916e55fefb813af3888b609d73ea18213cd420446bd96d8a90d1702273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b32ae38916e55fefb813af3888b609d73ea18213cd420446bd96d8a90d1702273</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6973-6241 ; 0000-0001-8151-2769</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00468-020-02035-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00468-020-02035-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewison, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghi, R. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, A. H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Main, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, I. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Functional and ecosystem service differences between tree species: implications for tree species replacement</title><title>Trees (Berlin, West)</title><addtitle>Trees</addtitle><description>Key message Tree species differ in their functioning at the scale of an individual tree which will result in differences in ecosystem service provision. Replacement trees for diseased trees should take account of functional differences. Globally tree species composition is changing due to species loss from pests and pathogens. The impact of this change on ecological functioning is rarely tested. Using six sites across the UK, with multiple tree species at each site, we test for functional differences between three species threatened by disease in the UK: Quercus petraea , Q. robur and Fraxinus excelsior and six other species: Acer pseudoplatanus , Castanea sativa , Fagus sylvatica , Quercus cerris , Quercus rubra, and Tilia x europaea , which have previously been suggested as ecological replacements. Differences between species were detected for all the variables measured: nitrogen mineralization, decomposition rate, total soil carbon and nitrogen, soil pH, soil temperature, and bark water holding capacity. Non-native Quercus species were only suitable replacements for native Quercu s for some of the functions measured but replicating native Quercu s functioning using a mixture of other species may be possible. The functioning of F. excelsior was different from most other tree species, suggesting that replicating its functioning with replacement tree species is difficult. The work highlighted that which species replaces diseased trees, even at the scale of single trees, will impact on the functions and ecosystem services provided.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bark</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plant Anatomy/Development</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Quercus</subject><subject>Replication</subject><subject>Soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soil pH</subject><subject>Soil temperature</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0931-1890</issn><issn>1432-2285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Bz9VJ0o_UmyyuCgte9BzSdCJd-mUmq-y_t2sF8eJhmMM87wvzMHYp4FoAFDcEkOY6AQmHUVkijthCpEomUursmC2gVCIRuoRTdka0BQCVC7lg7XrXu9gMvW257WuObqA9Rew4YfhoHPK68R4D9g6JVxg_EXseAyKnEV2DdMubbmwbZw8txP0Q_px5wLG1Djvs4zk78bYlvPjZS_a6vn9ZPSab54en1d0mcUqUMamUtKh0KXLMMo--0kJZr7TWVQ5lXSi0QkuhXJ1KSNO8qsu81raEWhQgZaGW7GruHcPwvkOKZjvswvQiGZlqAJmlOp8oOVMuDEQBvRlD09mwNwLMwaqZrZrJqPm2asQUUnOIJrh_w_Bb_U_qCx_Le5Y</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Mitchell, R. J.</creator><creator>Hewison, R. L.</creator><creator>Haghi, R. K.</creator><creator>Robertson, A. H. J.</creator><creator>Main, A. M.</creator><creator>Owen, I. J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6973-6241</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8151-2769</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Functional and ecosystem service differences between tree species: implications for tree species replacement</title><author>Mitchell, R. J. ; Hewison, R. L. ; Haghi, R. K. ; Robertson, A. H. J. ; Main, A. M. ; Owen, I. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b32ae38916e55fefb813af3888b609d73ea18213cd420446bd96d8a90d1702273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bark</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plant Anatomy/Development</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Quercus</topic><topic>Replication</topic><topic>Soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soil pH</topic><topic>Soil temperature</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewison, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghi, R. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, A. H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Main, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, I. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Trees (Berlin, West)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mitchell, R. J.</au><au>Hewison, R. L.</au><au>Haghi, R. K.</au><au>Robertson, A. H. J.</au><au>Main, A. M.</au><au>Owen, I. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional and ecosystem service differences between tree species: implications for tree species replacement</atitle><jtitle>Trees (Berlin, West)</jtitle><stitle>Trees</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>317</epage><pages>307-317</pages><issn>0931-1890</issn><eissn>1432-2285</eissn><abstract>Key message Tree species differ in their functioning at the scale of an individual tree which will result in differences in ecosystem service provision. Replacement trees for diseased trees should take account of functional differences. Globally tree species composition is changing due to species loss from pests and pathogens. The impact of this change on ecological functioning is rarely tested. Using six sites across the UK, with multiple tree species at each site, we test for functional differences between three species threatened by disease in the UK: Quercus petraea , Q. robur and Fraxinus excelsior and six other species: Acer pseudoplatanus , Castanea sativa , Fagus sylvatica , Quercus cerris , Quercus rubra, and Tilia x europaea , which have previously been suggested as ecological replacements. Differences between species were detected for all the variables measured: nitrogen mineralization, decomposition rate, total soil carbon and nitrogen, soil pH, soil temperature, and bark water holding capacity. Non-native Quercus species were only suitable replacements for native Quercu s for some of the functions measured but replicating native Quercu s functioning using a mixture of other species may be possible. The functioning of F. excelsior was different from most other tree species, suggesting that replicating its functioning with replacement tree species is difficult. The work highlighted that which species replaces diseased trees, even at the scale of single trees, will impact on the functions and ecosystem services provided.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00468-020-02035-1</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6973-6241</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8151-2769</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-1890
ispartof Trees (Berlin, West), 2021-02, Vol.35 (1), p.307-317
issn 0931-1890
1432-2285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2480025486
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Agriculture
Bark
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Ecological function
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Forestry
Herbivores
Indigenous species
Introduced species
Life Sciences
Mineralization
Nitrogen
Original Article
Pests
Plant Anatomy/Development
Plant Pathology
Plant Physiology
Plant Sciences
Plant species
Quercus
Replication
Soil chemistry
Soil pH
Soil temperature
Soil water
Species composition
Threatened species
Trees
title Functional and ecosystem service differences between tree species: implications for tree species replacement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20and%20ecosystem%20service%20differences%20between%20tree%20species:%20implications%20for%20tree%20species%20replacement&rft.jtitle=Trees%20(Berlin,%20West)&rft.au=Mitchell,%20R.%20J.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=317&rft.pages=307-317&rft.issn=0931-1890&rft.eissn=1432-2285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00468-020-02035-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2480025486%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2480025486&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true