P55 Timing of ERCP and outcomes in patients with acute gallstone cholangitis graded by severity
IntroductionThe optimal timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the management of acute gallstone cholangitis is not known. Severity of cholangitis can be classified with the Tokyo 2018 criteria. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy published guidance on the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gut 2021-01, Vol.70 (Suppl 1), p.A69-A69 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A69 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A69 |
container_title | Gut |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | On, Wei Watters, Christopher Dwyer, Laura Hood, Stephen Saleem, Rizwan Sturgess, Richard Stern, Nick |
description | IntroductionThe optimal timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the management of acute gallstone cholangitis is not known. Severity of cholangitis can be classified with the Tokyo 2018 criteria. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy published guidance on the recommended timing of ERCP guided by the severity of cholangitis; stipulating that biliary drainage should occur within the following timeframes: mild – elective, moderate – within two to three days and severe – as soon as possible. We aim to analyse the clinical outcomes of patients with acute cholangitis who have been admitted to a tertiary hepatobiliary centre when categorised by severity.MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients admitted to our hospital with acute cholangitis over a 3 year period from June 2016 to June 2019 was carried out. Patients were identified via coding department and endoscopy reporting tool. All patients met 2018 Tokyo criteria for definite cholangitis. Only patients with choledocholithiasis without concurrent biliary pathology were included for analysis. Case notes and electronic database interrogation yielded information for calculation of severity of cholangitis. Statistical analyses were carried out with Kruskall-Wallis test or chi-squared tests where appropriate.ResultsA total of 218 patients were identified and 199 patients who underwent ERCP during the index admission were included for analysis. There was a female preponderance (55.8%) and the median age was 73 years (range 19–96). The proportion of severity of cholangitis at presentation was as follows: 51.3% (n=102) mild, 32.6% (n=65) moderate and 16.1% (n=32) severe. The median time taken from admission to ERCP for the 199 patients was 4.8 days (mild 4.4 days, moderate 5.4 days, severe 4.8 days; p=0.31). The median length of stay 7.8 days (mild 7.2 days, moderate 7.8 days, severe 9.5 days; p=0.009). 31.3% of patients with severe cholangitis (n=10) were admitted to intensive care (ITU); 6 of whom required urgent ERCP. For patients with severe cholangitis, the median time in those who required urgent ERCP was 1.5 days vs 5.6 days in those who did not. The overall 30-day all-cause mortality amongst the 199 patients was 1% (n=2; both with severe cholangitis who underwent successful ERCP at 23 hours and 42 hours). 30-day all-cause mortality was 6.3% in the severe group and 0% in both mild and moderate groups (p=0.005).ConclusionsOur results demonstrate no difference in timing |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-bsgcampus.130 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2479632822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2479632822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1240-5a18cc0bbaf6a0e2eafc52a3c61f5fad65bca111f51ab0fb358da7284477afab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90N9KwzAUBvAgCs7pO0S8riZp02aXMuYfGDhkXoeTNOlS2rQ2qbI7b3xRn8SOiVcfH3ycAz-Erim5pTTN76ox1r5JGGEkUaHS0PZjuKUpOUEzmuUiSZkQp2hGCC0SXmSLc3QRQk0IEWJBZwg2nP98fW9d63yFO4tXr8sNBl_iboy6a03AzuMeojM-Bvzp4g6DHqPBFTRNiJ03WO-6Bnzlogu4GqA0JVZ7HMyHGVzcX6IzC00wV385R28Pq-3yKVm_PD4v79eJoiwjCQcqtCZKgc2BGGbAas4g1Tm13EKZc6WB0qlQUMSqlIsSCiayrCjAgkrn6OZ4tx-699GEKOtuHPz0UrKsWOQTBGPTKjuuVFvLfnAtDHtJiTxgyiOmPGDKf0w5Yaa_fEFvoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479632822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P55 Timing of ERCP and outcomes in patients with acute gallstone cholangitis graded by severity</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>On, Wei ; Watters, Christopher ; Dwyer, Laura ; Hood, Stephen ; Saleem, Rizwan ; Sturgess, Richard ; Stern, Nick</creator><creatorcontrib>On, Wei ; Watters, Christopher ; Dwyer, Laura ; Hood, Stephen ; Saleem, Rizwan ; Sturgess, Richard ; Stern, Nick</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionThe optimal timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the management of acute gallstone cholangitis is not known. Severity of cholangitis can be classified with the Tokyo 2018 criteria. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy published guidance on the recommended timing of ERCP guided by the severity of cholangitis; stipulating that biliary drainage should occur within the following timeframes: mild – elective, moderate – within two to three days and severe – as soon as possible. We aim to analyse the clinical outcomes of patients with acute cholangitis who have been admitted to a tertiary hepatobiliary centre when categorised by severity.MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients admitted to our hospital with acute cholangitis over a 3 year period from June 2016 to June 2019 was carried out. Patients were identified via coding department and endoscopy reporting tool. All patients met 2018 Tokyo criteria for definite cholangitis. Only patients with choledocholithiasis without concurrent biliary pathology were included for analysis. Case notes and electronic database interrogation yielded information for calculation of severity of cholangitis. Statistical analyses were carried out with Kruskall-Wallis test or chi-squared tests where appropriate.ResultsA total of 218 patients were identified and 199 patients who underwent ERCP during the index admission were included for analysis. There was a female preponderance (55.8%) and the median age was 73 years (range 19–96). The proportion of severity of cholangitis at presentation was as follows: 51.3% (n=102) mild, 32.6% (n=65) moderate and 16.1% (n=32) severe. The median time taken from admission to ERCP for the 199 patients was 4.8 days (mild 4.4 days, moderate 5.4 days, severe 4.8 days; p=0.31). The median length of stay 7.8 days (mild 7.2 days, moderate 7.8 days, severe 9.5 days; p=0.009). 31.3% of patients with severe cholangitis (n=10) were admitted to intensive care (ITU); 6 of whom required urgent ERCP. For patients with severe cholangitis, the median time in those who required urgent ERCP was 1.5 days vs 5.6 days in those who did not. The overall 30-day all-cause mortality amongst the 199 patients was 1% (n=2; both with severe cholangitis who underwent successful ERCP at 23 hours and 42 hours). 30-day all-cause mortality was 6.3% in the severe group and 0% in both mild and moderate groups (p=0.005).ConclusionsOur results demonstrate no difference in timing to ERCP in patients with acute gallstone cholangitis when categorised by severity. Deaths were observed only in patients with severe cholangitis although the majority of patients with severe disease did not require urgent ERCP. Provision for urgent ERCP has to be available especially for those admitted to intensive care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-bsgcampus.130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Calculi ; Cholangitis ; Endoscopy ; Gallstones ; Intensive care ; Mortality ; Patients ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2021-01, Vol.70 (Suppl 1), p.A69-A69</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>On, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watters, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hood, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleem, Rizwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturgess, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Nick</creatorcontrib><title>P55 Timing of ERCP and outcomes in patients with acute gallstone cholangitis graded by severity</title><title>Gut</title><description>IntroductionThe optimal timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the management of acute gallstone cholangitis is not known. Severity of cholangitis can be classified with the Tokyo 2018 criteria. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy published guidance on the recommended timing of ERCP guided by the severity of cholangitis; stipulating that biliary drainage should occur within the following timeframes: mild – elective, moderate – within two to three days and severe – as soon as possible. We aim to analyse the clinical outcomes of patients with acute cholangitis who have been admitted to a tertiary hepatobiliary centre when categorised by severity.MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients admitted to our hospital with acute cholangitis over a 3 year period from June 2016 to June 2019 was carried out. Patients were identified via coding department and endoscopy reporting tool. All patients met 2018 Tokyo criteria for definite cholangitis. Only patients with choledocholithiasis without concurrent biliary pathology were included for analysis. Case notes and electronic database interrogation yielded information for calculation of severity of cholangitis. Statistical analyses were carried out with Kruskall-Wallis test or chi-squared tests where appropriate.ResultsA total of 218 patients were identified and 199 patients who underwent ERCP during the index admission were included for analysis. There was a female preponderance (55.8%) and the median age was 73 years (range 19–96). The proportion of severity of cholangitis at presentation was as follows: 51.3% (n=102) mild, 32.6% (n=65) moderate and 16.1% (n=32) severe. The median time taken from admission to ERCP for the 199 patients was 4.8 days (mild 4.4 days, moderate 5.4 days, severe 4.8 days; p=0.31). The median length of stay 7.8 days (mild 7.2 days, moderate 7.8 days, severe 9.5 days; p=0.009). 31.3% of patients with severe cholangitis (n=10) were admitted to intensive care (ITU); 6 of whom required urgent ERCP. For patients with severe cholangitis, the median time in those who required urgent ERCP was 1.5 days vs 5.6 days in those who did not. The overall 30-day all-cause mortality amongst the 199 patients was 1% (n=2; both with severe cholangitis who underwent successful ERCP at 23 hours and 42 hours). 30-day all-cause mortality was 6.3% in the severe group and 0% in both mild and moderate groups (p=0.005).ConclusionsOur results demonstrate no difference in timing to ERCP in patients with acute gallstone cholangitis when categorised by severity. Deaths were observed only in patients with severe cholangitis although the majority of patients with severe disease did not require urgent ERCP. Provision for urgent ERCP has to be available especially for those admitted to intensive care.</description><subject>Calculi</subject><subject>Cholangitis</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Gallstones</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo90N9KwzAUBvAgCs7pO0S8riZp02aXMuYfGDhkXoeTNOlS2rQ2qbI7b3xRn8SOiVcfH3ycAz-Erim5pTTN76ox1r5JGGEkUaHS0PZjuKUpOUEzmuUiSZkQp2hGCC0SXmSLc3QRQk0IEWJBZwg2nP98fW9d63yFO4tXr8sNBl_iboy6a03AzuMeojM-Bvzp4g6DHqPBFTRNiJ03WO-6Bnzlogu4GqA0JVZ7HMyHGVzcX6IzC00wV385R28Pq-3yKVm_PD4v79eJoiwjCQcqtCZKgc2BGGbAas4g1Tm13EKZc6WB0qlQUMSqlIsSCiayrCjAgkrn6OZ4tx-699GEKOtuHPz0UrKsWOQTBGPTKjuuVFvLfnAtDHtJiTxgyiOmPGDKf0w5Yaa_fEFvoQ</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>On, Wei</creator><creator>Watters, Christopher</creator><creator>Dwyer, Laura</creator><creator>Hood, Stephen</creator><creator>Saleem, Rizwan</creator><creator>Sturgess, Richard</creator><creator>Stern, Nick</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>P55 Timing of ERCP and outcomes in patients with acute gallstone cholangitis graded by severity</title><author>On, Wei ; Watters, Christopher ; Dwyer, Laura ; Hood, Stephen ; Saleem, Rizwan ; Sturgess, Richard ; Stern, Nick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1240-5a18cc0bbaf6a0e2eafc52a3c61f5fad65bca111f51ab0fb358da7284477afab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Calculi</topic><topic>Cholangitis</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Gallstones</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>On, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watters, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hood, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleem, Rizwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturgess, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, Nick</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>On, Wei</au><au>Watters, Christopher</au><au>Dwyer, Laura</au><au>Hood, Stephen</au><au>Saleem, Rizwan</au><au>Sturgess, Richard</au><au>Stern, Nick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P55 Timing of ERCP and outcomes in patients with acute gallstone cholangitis graded by severity</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A69</spage><epage>A69</epage><pages>A69-A69</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>IntroductionThe optimal timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the management of acute gallstone cholangitis is not known. Severity of cholangitis can be classified with the Tokyo 2018 criteria. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy published guidance on the recommended timing of ERCP guided by the severity of cholangitis; stipulating that biliary drainage should occur within the following timeframes: mild – elective, moderate – within two to three days and severe – as soon as possible. We aim to analyse the clinical outcomes of patients with acute cholangitis who have been admitted to a tertiary hepatobiliary centre when categorised by severity.MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients admitted to our hospital with acute cholangitis over a 3 year period from June 2016 to June 2019 was carried out. Patients were identified via coding department and endoscopy reporting tool. All patients met 2018 Tokyo criteria for definite cholangitis. Only patients with choledocholithiasis without concurrent biliary pathology were included for analysis. Case notes and electronic database interrogation yielded information for calculation of severity of cholangitis. Statistical analyses were carried out with Kruskall-Wallis test or chi-squared tests where appropriate.ResultsA total of 218 patients were identified and 199 patients who underwent ERCP during the index admission were included for analysis. There was a female preponderance (55.8%) and the median age was 73 years (range 19–96). The proportion of severity of cholangitis at presentation was as follows: 51.3% (n=102) mild, 32.6% (n=65) moderate and 16.1% (n=32) severe. The median time taken from admission to ERCP for the 199 patients was 4.8 days (mild 4.4 days, moderate 5.4 days, severe 4.8 days; p=0.31). The median length of stay 7.8 days (mild 7.2 days, moderate 7.8 days, severe 9.5 days; p=0.009). 31.3% of patients with severe cholangitis (n=10) were admitted to intensive care (ITU); 6 of whom required urgent ERCP. For patients with severe cholangitis, the median time in those who required urgent ERCP was 1.5 days vs 5.6 days in those who did not. The overall 30-day all-cause mortality amongst the 199 patients was 1% (n=2; both with severe cholangitis who underwent successful ERCP at 23 hours and 42 hours). 30-day all-cause mortality was 6.3% in the severe group and 0% in both mild and moderate groups (p=0.005).ConclusionsOur results demonstrate no difference in timing to ERCP in patients with acute gallstone cholangitis when categorised by severity. Deaths were observed only in patients with severe cholangitis although the majority of patients with severe disease did not require urgent ERCP. Provision for urgent ERCP has to be available especially for those admitted to intensive care.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2020-bsgcampus.130</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-5749 |
ispartof | Gut, 2021-01, Vol.70 (Suppl 1), p.A69-A69 |
issn | 0017-5749 1468-3288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2479632822 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Calculi Cholangitis Endoscopy Gallstones Intensive care Mortality Patients Statistical analysis |
title | P55 Timing of ERCP and outcomes in patients with acute gallstone cholangitis graded by severity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A28%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P55%E2%80%85Timing%20of%20ERCP%20and%20outcomes%20in%20patients%20with%20acute%20gallstone%20cholangitis%20graded%20by%20severity&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=On,%20Wei&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A69&rft.epage=A69&rft.pages=A69-A69&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-bsgcampus.130&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E2479632822%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479632822&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |