Modeling of biogas production from food, fruits and vegetables wastes using artificial neural network (ANN)
•Cumulative biogas production was studied for food, fruits and vegetables wastes.•Database was built on mixed values of eight variables seen in literature.•Different artificial neural network (ANN) topologies were implemented and assessed.•The predictions showed more than 85% correctness using the c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fuel (Guildford) 2021-02, Vol.285, p.119081, Article 119081 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 119081 |
container_title | Fuel (Guildford) |
container_volume | 285 |
creator | Gonçalves Neto, João Vidal Ozorio, Leticia Campos de Abreu, Thais Cristina Ferreira dos Santos, Brunno Pradelle, Florian |
description | •Cumulative biogas production was studied for food, fruits and vegetables wastes.•Database was built on mixed values of eight variables seen in literature.•Different artificial neural network (ANN) topologies were implemented and assessed.•The predictions showed more than 85% correctness using the complete database.
Biogas can be generated from many types of biomass residues. These biomasses have different characteristics which makes standardization of process conditions difficult. Thus, the influence of different conditions has been explored for several biogas production scenarios using numerical models. In the present work, an experimental study of biogas production from food waste was carried out in triplicate in a batch reactor at 37 °C with an organic loading rate (OLR) equal to 5, 10 and 20 g VS/(l.d) after 21 days. A database was also built using values presented in the literature in order to develop a numerical model using artificial neural networks (ANN), for food waste (FW), fruit and vegetables waste (FVW) or blends of both in codigestion (CD), reactor/feed type, volatile solid (VS), pH, OLR, hydraulic retention time, temperature and reactor volume, as input variables, and the cumulative biogas production as output. The response surfaces of the ANN model were found to be useful for defining the optimum region in biogas production; when applied to the training, testing and validation datasets, the model showed acceptable values of coefficient of determination (0.9929, 0.8486 and 0.6167 for the input parameters respectively). It was found that the production of biogas was the highest when temperatures was within the range of thermophilic conditions, with a local maximum for mesophilic conditions. Optimized biodigestion of CD or FW allows higher VS content (around 15–20%) than for FVW (lower than 10%). It was also observed that biodigestion of FVW leads to the highest cumulative biogas production (around twice the value found for FW and CD). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119081 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2479480795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016236120320779</els_id><sourcerecordid>2479480795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2fe69329723ef7b69313b87b15b1cb519ccce750973300091a97f7a13a95c3433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4BTwEvCm7NR7fZgBcpfkGtFz2HbPalpN1uapJt8d-bWs-eZnjMvPdmELqkZEQJndwtR7aHdsQIywMqSUWP0IBWgheClvwYDUhWFYxP6Ck6i3FJCBFVOR6g1ZtvoHXdAnuLa-cXOuJN8E1vkvMdtsGvsfW-uc20dyli3TV4CwtIum4h4p2OKUMf9yt0SM4643SLO-jDL6SdDyt8_TCf35yjE6vbCBd_OESfT48f05di9v78On2YFYYLlgpmYSI5k4JxsKLOnPK6EjUta2rqkkpjDIiSSMF5ziGplsIKTbmWpeFjzofo6rA3B_nqISa19H3o8knFxkKOKyJkmVXsoDLBxxjAqk1wax2-FSVqX6paqn2pal-qOpSaTfcHE-T_tw6CisZBZ6BxAUxSjXf_2X8AB2J_oQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479480795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling of biogas production from food, fruits and vegetables wastes using artificial neural network (ANN)</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gonçalves Neto, João ; Vidal Ozorio, Leticia ; Campos de Abreu, Thais Cristina ; Ferreira dos Santos, Brunno ; Pradelle, Florian</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves Neto, João ; Vidal Ozorio, Leticia ; Campos de Abreu, Thais Cristina ; Ferreira dos Santos, Brunno ; Pradelle, Florian</creatorcontrib><description>•Cumulative biogas production was studied for food, fruits and vegetables wastes.•Database was built on mixed values of eight variables seen in literature.•Different artificial neural network (ANN) topologies were implemented and assessed.•The predictions showed more than 85% correctness using the complete database.
Biogas can be generated from many types of biomass residues. These biomasses have different characteristics which makes standardization of process conditions difficult. Thus, the influence of different conditions has been explored for several biogas production scenarios using numerical models. In the present work, an experimental study of biogas production from food waste was carried out in triplicate in a batch reactor at 37 °C with an organic loading rate (OLR) equal to 5, 10 and 20 g VS/(l.d) after 21 days. A database was also built using values presented in the literature in order to develop a numerical model using artificial neural networks (ANN), for food waste (FW), fruit and vegetables waste (FVW) or blends of both in codigestion (CD), reactor/feed type, volatile solid (VS), pH, OLR, hydraulic retention time, temperature and reactor volume, as input variables, and the cumulative biogas production as output. The response surfaces of the ANN model were found to be useful for defining the optimum region in biogas production; when applied to the training, testing and validation datasets, the model showed acceptable values of coefficient of determination (0.9929, 0.8486 and 0.6167 for the input parameters respectively). It was found that the production of biogas was the highest when temperatures was within the range of thermophilic conditions, with a local maximum for mesophilic conditions. Optimized biodigestion of CD or FW allows higher VS content (around 15–20%) than for FVW (lower than 10%). It was also observed that biodigestion of FVW leads to the highest cumulative biogas production (around twice the value found for FW and CD).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Artificial neural networks (ANN) ; Batch reactors ; Biogas ; Co-digestion (CD) ; Food ; Food production ; Food waste ; Food waste (FW) ; Fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) ; Fruits ; Hydraulic retention time ; Load distribution ; Loading rate ; Mathematical models ; Neural networks ; Numerical models ; Organic loading ; Reactors ; Refuse as fuel ; Response surface methodology ; Retention time ; Standardization ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>Fuel (Guildford), 2021-02, Vol.285, p.119081, Article 119081</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2fe69329723ef7b69313b87b15b1cb519ccce750973300091a97f7a13a95c3433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2fe69329723ef7b69313b87b15b1cb519ccce750973300091a97f7a13a95c3433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236120320779$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves Neto, João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal Ozorio, Leticia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos de Abreu, Thais Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira dos Santos, Brunno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradelle, Florian</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling of biogas production from food, fruits and vegetables wastes using artificial neural network (ANN)</title><title>Fuel (Guildford)</title><description>•Cumulative biogas production was studied for food, fruits and vegetables wastes.•Database was built on mixed values of eight variables seen in literature.•Different artificial neural network (ANN) topologies were implemented and assessed.•The predictions showed more than 85% correctness using the complete database.
Biogas can be generated from many types of biomass residues. These biomasses have different characteristics which makes standardization of process conditions difficult. Thus, the influence of different conditions has been explored for several biogas production scenarios using numerical models. In the present work, an experimental study of biogas production from food waste was carried out in triplicate in a batch reactor at 37 °C with an organic loading rate (OLR) equal to 5, 10 and 20 g VS/(l.d) after 21 days. A database was also built using values presented in the literature in order to develop a numerical model using artificial neural networks (ANN), for food waste (FW), fruit and vegetables waste (FVW) or blends of both in codigestion (CD), reactor/feed type, volatile solid (VS), pH, OLR, hydraulic retention time, temperature and reactor volume, as input variables, and the cumulative biogas production as output. The response surfaces of the ANN model were found to be useful for defining the optimum region in biogas production; when applied to the training, testing and validation datasets, the model showed acceptable values of coefficient of determination (0.9929, 0.8486 and 0.6167 for the input parameters respectively). It was found that the production of biogas was the highest when temperatures was within the range of thermophilic conditions, with a local maximum for mesophilic conditions. Optimized biodigestion of CD or FW allows higher VS content (around 15–20%) than for FVW (lower than 10%). It was also observed that biodigestion of FVW leads to the highest cumulative biogas production (around twice the value found for FW and CD).</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks (ANN)</subject><subject>Batch reactors</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Co-digestion (CD)</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>Food waste</subject><subject>Food waste (FW)</subject><subject>Fruit and vegetable waste (FVW)</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Hydraulic retention time</subject><subject>Load distribution</subject><subject>Loading rate</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Organic loading</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Refuse as fuel</subject><subject>Response surface methodology</subject><subject>Retention time</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0016-2361</issn><issn>1873-7153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4BTwEvCm7NR7fZgBcpfkGtFz2HbPalpN1uapJt8d-bWs-eZnjMvPdmELqkZEQJndwtR7aHdsQIywMqSUWP0IBWgheClvwYDUhWFYxP6Ck6i3FJCBFVOR6g1ZtvoHXdAnuLa-cXOuJN8E1vkvMdtsGvsfW-uc20dyli3TV4CwtIum4h4p2OKUMf9yt0SM4643SLO-jDL6SdDyt8_TCf35yjE6vbCBd_OESfT48f05di9v78On2YFYYLlgpmYSI5k4JxsKLOnPK6EjUta2rqkkpjDIiSSMF5ziGplsIKTbmWpeFjzofo6rA3B_nqISa19H3o8knFxkKOKyJkmVXsoDLBxxjAqk1wax2-FSVqX6paqn2pal-qOpSaTfcHE-T_tw6CisZBZ6BxAUxSjXf_2X8AB2J_oQ</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Gonçalves Neto, João</creator><creator>Vidal Ozorio, Leticia</creator><creator>Campos de Abreu, Thais Cristina</creator><creator>Ferreira dos Santos, Brunno</creator><creator>Pradelle, Florian</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Modeling of biogas production from food, fruits and vegetables wastes using artificial neural network (ANN)</title><author>Gonçalves Neto, João ; Vidal Ozorio, Leticia ; Campos de Abreu, Thais Cristina ; Ferreira dos Santos, Brunno ; Pradelle, Florian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2fe69329723ef7b69313b87b15b1cb519ccce750973300091a97f7a13a95c3433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks (ANN)</topic><topic>Batch reactors</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Co-digestion (CD)</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>Food waste</topic><topic>Food waste (FW)</topic><topic>Fruit and vegetable waste (FVW)</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Hydraulic retention time</topic><topic>Load distribution</topic><topic>Loading rate</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Organic loading</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Refuse as fuel</topic><topic>Response surface methodology</topic><topic>Retention time</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves Neto, João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal Ozorio, Leticia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos de Abreu, Thais Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira dos Santos, Brunno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradelle, Florian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonçalves Neto, João</au><au>Vidal Ozorio, Leticia</au><au>Campos de Abreu, Thais Cristina</au><au>Ferreira dos Santos, Brunno</au><au>Pradelle, Florian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling of biogas production from food, fruits and vegetables wastes using artificial neural network (ANN)</atitle><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>285</volume><spage>119081</spage><pages>119081-</pages><artnum>119081</artnum><issn>0016-2361</issn><eissn>1873-7153</eissn><abstract>•Cumulative biogas production was studied for food, fruits and vegetables wastes.•Database was built on mixed values of eight variables seen in literature.•Different artificial neural network (ANN) topologies were implemented and assessed.•The predictions showed more than 85% correctness using the complete database.
Biogas can be generated from many types of biomass residues. These biomasses have different characteristics which makes standardization of process conditions difficult. Thus, the influence of different conditions has been explored for several biogas production scenarios using numerical models. In the present work, an experimental study of biogas production from food waste was carried out in triplicate in a batch reactor at 37 °C with an organic loading rate (OLR) equal to 5, 10 and 20 g VS/(l.d) after 21 days. A database was also built using values presented in the literature in order to develop a numerical model using artificial neural networks (ANN), for food waste (FW), fruit and vegetables waste (FVW) or blends of both in codigestion (CD), reactor/feed type, volatile solid (VS), pH, OLR, hydraulic retention time, temperature and reactor volume, as input variables, and the cumulative biogas production as output. The response surfaces of the ANN model were found to be useful for defining the optimum region in biogas production; when applied to the training, testing and validation datasets, the model showed acceptable values of coefficient of determination (0.9929, 0.8486 and 0.6167 for the input parameters respectively). It was found that the production of biogas was the highest when temperatures was within the range of thermophilic conditions, with a local maximum for mesophilic conditions. Optimized biodigestion of CD or FW allows higher VS content (around 15–20%) than for FVW (lower than 10%). It was also observed that biodigestion of FVW leads to the highest cumulative biogas production (around twice the value found for FW and CD).</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119081</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-2361 |
ispartof | Fuel (Guildford), 2021-02, Vol.285, p.119081, Article 119081 |
issn | 0016-2361 1873-7153 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2479480795 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Artificial neural networks Artificial neural networks (ANN) Batch reactors Biogas Co-digestion (CD) Food Food production Food waste Food waste (FW) Fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) Fruits Hydraulic retention time Load distribution Loading rate Mathematical models Neural networks Numerical models Organic loading Reactors Refuse as fuel Response surface methodology Retention time Standardization Vegetables |
title | Modeling of biogas production from food, fruits and vegetables wastes using artificial neural network (ANN) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A36%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20of%20biogas%20production%20from%20food,%20fruits%20and%20vegetables%20wastes%20using%20artificial%20neural%20network%20(ANN)&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20(Guildford)&rft.au=Gon%C3%A7alves%20Neto,%20Jo%C3%A3o&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=285&rft.spage=119081&rft.pages=119081-&rft.artnum=119081&rft.issn=0016-2361&rft.eissn=1873-7153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2479480795%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479480795&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016236120320779&rfr_iscdi=true |