Feature Fusion of Raman Chemical Imaging and Digital Histopathology using Machine Learning for Prostate Cancer Detection

The diagnosis of prostate cancer is challenging due to the heterogeneity of its presentations, leading to the over diagnosis and treatment of non-clinically important disease. Accurate diagnosis can directly benefit a patient's quality of life and prognosis. Towards addressing this issue, we pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2021-01
Hauptverfasser: Doherty, Trevor, McKeever, Susan, Al-Attar, Nebras, Murphy, Tiarnan, Aura, Claudia, Rahman, Arman, O'Neill, Amanda, Finn, Stephen P, Kay, Elaine, Gallagher, William M, Watson, R William G, Gowen, Aoife, Jackman, Patrick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Doherty, Trevor
McKeever, Susan
Al-Attar, Nebras
Murphy, Tiarnan
Aura, Claudia
Rahman, Arman
O'Neill, Amanda
Finn, Stephen P
Kay, Elaine
Gallagher, William M
Watson, R William G
Gowen, Aoife
Jackman, Patrick
description The diagnosis of prostate cancer is challenging due to the heterogeneity of its presentations, leading to the over diagnosis and treatment of non-clinically important disease. Accurate diagnosis can directly benefit a patient's quality of life and prognosis. Towards addressing this issue, we present a learning model for the automatic identification of prostate cancer. While many prostate cancer studies have adopted Raman spectroscopy approaches, none have utilised the combination of Raman Chemical Imaging (RCI) and other imaging modalities. This study uses multimodal images formed from stained Digital Histopathology (DP) and unstained RCI. The approach was developed and tested on a set of 178 clinical samples from 32 patients, containing a range of non-cancerous, Gleason grade 3 (G3) and grade 4 (G4) tissue microarray samples. For each histological sample, there is a pathologist labelled DP - RCI image pair. The hypothesis tested was whether multimodal image models can outperform single modality baseline models in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Binary non-cancer/cancer models and the more challenging G3/G4 differentiation were investigated. Regarding G3/G4 classification, the multimodal approach achieved a sensitivity of 73.8% and specificity of 88.1% while the baseline DP model showed a sensitivity and specificity of 54.1% and 84.7% respectively. The multimodal approach demonstrated a statistically significant 12.7% AUC advantage over the baseline with a value of 85.8% compared to 73.1%, also outperforming models based solely on RCI and median Raman spectra. Feature fusion of DP and RCI does not improve the more trivial task of tumour identification but does deliver an observed advantage in G3/G4 discrimination. Building on these promising findings, future work could include the acquisition of larger datasets for enhanced model generalization.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2479187060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2479187060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24791870603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjcGKwkAQRAdBUFb_ocGzME7UxHM0KLgg4l2a2EkmJNM604Hdv3cW_IA9Fbx6RY3U1CTJapmtjZmoeQit1tpsU7PZJFP1UxDK4AmKIVh2wBVcsUcHeUO9LbGDU4-1dTWge8De1lYiO9og_ERpuOP6F-I0Ct9YNtYRnAm9-wMVe7h4DoJCkKMrycOehEqJTzM1rrALNP_kl1oUh1t-XD49vwYKcm958C5Wd7NOd6ss1Vud_M96Ax-kTWk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479187060</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feature Fusion of Raman Chemical Imaging and Digital Histopathology using Machine Learning for Prostate Cancer Detection</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Doherty, Trevor ; McKeever, Susan ; Al-Attar, Nebras ; Murphy, Tiarnan ; Aura, Claudia ; Rahman, Arman ; O'Neill, Amanda ; Finn, Stephen P ; Kay, Elaine ; Gallagher, William M ; Watson, R William G ; Gowen, Aoife ; Jackman, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Trevor ; McKeever, Susan ; Al-Attar, Nebras ; Murphy, Tiarnan ; Aura, Claudia ; Rahman, Arman ; O'Neill, Amanda ; Finn, Stephen P ; Kay, Elaine ; Gallagher, William M ; Watson, R William G ; Gowen, Aoife ; Jackman, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>The diagnosis of prostate cancer is challenging due to the heterogeneity of its presentations, leading to the over diagnosis and treatment of non-clinically important disease. Accurate diagnosis can directly benefit a patient's quality of life and prognosis. Towards addressing this issue, we present a learning model for the automatic identification of prostate cancer. While many prostate cancer studies have adopted Raman spectroscopy approaches, none have utilised the combination of Raman Chemical Imaging (RCI) and other imaging modalities. This study uses multimodal images formed from stained Digital Histopathology (DP) and unstained RCI. The approach was developed and tested on a set of 178 clinical samples from 32 patients, containing a range of non-cancerous, Gleason grade 3 (G3) and grade 4 (G4) tissue microarray samples. For each histological sample, there is a pathologist labelled DP - RCI image pair. The hypothesis tested was whether multimodal image models can outperform single modality baseline models in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Binary non-cancer/cancer models and the more challenging G3/G4 differentiation were investigated. Regarding G3/G4 classification, the multimodal approach achieved a sensitivity of 73.8% and specificity of 88.1% while the baseline DP model showed a sensitivity and specificity of 54.1% and 84.7% respectively. The multimodal approach demonstrated a statistically significant 12.7% AUC advantage over the baseline with a value of 85.8% compared to 73.1%, also outperforming models based solely on RCI and median Raman spectra. Feature fusion of DP and RCI does not improve the more trivial task of tumour identification but does deliver an observed advantage in G3/G4 discrimination. Building on these promising findings, future work could include the acquisition of larger datasets for enhanced model generalization.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Digital imaging ; Heterogeneity ; Histopathology ; Machine learning ; Medical imaging ; Model accuracy ; Prostate cancer ; Raman spectra ; Raman spectroscopy ; Sensitivity ; Spectrum analysis ; Statistical methods</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-01</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>778,782</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeever, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Attar, Nebras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Tiarnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aura, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Arman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finn, Stephen P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kay, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, William M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, R William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gowen, Aoife</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackman, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Feature Fusion of Raman Chemical Imaging and Digital Histopathology using Machine Learning for Prostate Cancer Detection</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>The diagnosis of prostate cancer is challenging due to the heterogeneity of its presentations, leading to the over diagnosis and treatment of non-clinically important disease. Accurate diagnosis can directly benefit a patient's quality of life and prognosis. Towards addressing this issue, we present a learning model for the automatic identification of prostate cancer. While many prostate cancer studies have adopted Raman spectroscopy approaches, none have utilised the combination of Raman Chemical Imaging (RCI) and other imaging modalities. This study uses multimodal images formed from stained Digital Histopathology (DP) and unstained RCI. The approach was developed and tested on a set of 178 clinical samples from 32 patients, containing a range of non-cancerous, Gleason grade 3 (G3) and grade 4 (G4) tissue microarray samples. For each histological sample, there is a pathologist labelled DP - RCI image pair. The hypothesis tested was whether multimodal image models can outperform single modality baseline models in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Binary non-cancer/cancer models and the more challenging G3/G4 differentiation were investigated. Regarding G3/G4 classification, the multimodal approach achieved a sensitivity of 73.8% and specificity of 88.1% while the baseline DP model showed a sensitivity and specificity of 54.1% and 84.7% respectively. The multimodal approach demonstrated a statistically significant 12.7% AUC advantage over the baseline with a value of 85.8% compared to 73.1%, also outperforming models based solely on RCI and median Raman spectra. Feature fusion of DP and RCI does not improve the more trivial task of tumour identification but does deliver an observed advantage in G3/G4 discrimination. Building on these promising findings, future work could include the acquisition of larger datasets for enhanced model generalization.</description><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Raman spectra</subject><subject>Raman spectroscopy</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjcGKwkAQRAdBUFb_ocGzME7UxHM0KLgg4l2a2EkmJNM604Hdv3cW_IA9Fbx6RY3U1CTJapmtjZmoeQit1tpsU7PZJFP1UxDK4AmKIVh2wBVcsUcHeUO9LbGDU4-1dTWge8De1lYiO9og_ERpuOP6F-I0Ct9YNtYRnAm9-wMVe7h4DoJCkKMrycOehEqJTzM1rrALNP_kl1oUh1t-XD49vwYKcm958C5Wd7NOd6ss1Vud_M96Ax-kTWk</recordid><startdate>20210118</startdate><enddate>20210118</enddate><creator>Doherty, Trevor</creator><creator>McKeever, Susan</creator><creator>Al-Attar, Nebras</creator><creator>Murphy, Tiarnan</creator><creator>Aura, Claudia</creator><creator>Rahman, Arman</creator><creator>O'Neill, Amanda</creator><creator>Finn, Stephen P</creator><creator>Kay, Elaine</creator><creator>Gallagher, William M</creator><creator>Watson, R William G</creator><creator>Gowen, Aoife</creator><creator>Jackman, Patrick</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210118</creationdate><title>Feature Fusion of Raman Chemical Imaging and Digital Histopathology using Machine Learning for Prostate Cancer Detection</title><author>Doherty, Trevor ; McKeever, Susan ; Al-Attar, Nebras ; Murphy, Tiarnan ; Aura, Claudia ; Rahman, Arman ; O'Neill, Amanda ; Finn, Stephen P ; Kay, Elaine ; Gallagher, William M ; Watson, R William G ; Gowen, Aoife ; Jackman, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24791870603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Raman spectra</topic><topic>Raman spectroscopy</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeever, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Attar, Nebras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Tiarnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aura, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Arman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finn, Stephen P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kay, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, William M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, R William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gowen, Aoife</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackman, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doherty, Trevor</au><au>McKeever, Susan</au><au>Al-Attar, Nebras</au><au>Murphy, Tiarnan</au><au>Aura, Claudia</au><au>Rahman, Arman</au><au>O'Neill, Amanda</au><au>Finn, Stephen P</au><au>Kay, Elaine</au><au>Gallagher, William M</au><au>Watson, R William G</au><au>Gowen, Aoife</au><au>Jackman, Patrick</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Feature Fusion of Raman Chemical Imaging and Digital Histopathology using Machine Learning for Prostate Cancer Detection</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-01-18</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>The diagnosis of prostate cancer is challenging due to the heterogeneity of its presentations, leading to the over diagnosis and treatment of non-clinically important disease. Accurate diagnosis can directly benefit a patient's quality of life and prognosis. Towards addressing this issue, we present a learning model for the automatic identification of prostate cancer. While many prostate cancer studies have adopted Raman spectroscopy approaches, none have utilised the combination of Raman Chemical Imaging (RCI) and other imaging modalities. This study uses multimodal images formed from stained Digital Histopathology (DP) and unstained RCI. The approach was developed and tested on a set of 178 clinical samples from 32 patients, containing a range of non-cancerous, Gleason grade 3 (G3) and grade 4 (G4) tissue microarray samples. For each histological sample, there is a pathologist labelled DP - RCI image pair. The hypothesis tested was whether multimodal image models can outperform single modality baseline models in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Binary non-cancer/cancer models and the more challenging G3/G4 differentiation were investigated. Regarding G3/G4 classification, the multimodal approach achieved a sensitivity of 73.8% and specificity of 88.1% while the baseline DP model showed a sensitivity and specificity of 54.1% and 84.7% respectively. The multimodal approach demonstrated a statistically significant 12.7% AUC advantage over the baseline with a value of 85.8% compared to 73.1%, also outperforming models based solely on RCI and median Raman spectra. Feature fusion of DP and RCI does not improve the more trivial task of tumour identification but does deliver an observed advantage in G3/G4 discrimination. Building on these promising findings, future work could include the acquisition of larger datasets for enhanced model generalization.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2021-01
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2479187060
source Free E- Journals
subjects Diagnosis
Diagnostic systems
Digital imaging
Heterogeneity
Histopathology
Machine learning
Medical imaging
Model accuracy
Prostate cancer
Raman spectra
Raman spectroscopy
Sensitivity
Spectrum analysis
Statistical methods
title Feature Fusion of Raman Chemical Imaging and Digital Histopathology using Machine Learning for Prostate Cancer Detection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T19%3A15%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Feature%20Fusion%20of%20Raman%20Chemical%20Imaging%20and%20Digital%20Histopathology%20using%20Machine%20Learning%20for%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Detection&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Doherty,%20Trevor&rft.date=2021-01-18&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2479187060%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479187060&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true