Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination

We identify a form of gender-based governmental discrimination that directly affects billions of women on a daily basis: the setting of import tariffs for gendered goods. These tax rates, which can differ across otherwise identical gender-specific products, often impose direct penalties on women as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American political science review 2021-02, Vol.115 (1), p.307-315
Hauptverfasser: BETZ, TIMM, FORTUNATO, DAVID, O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 315
container_issue 1
container_start_page 307
container_title The American political science review
container_volume 115
creator BETZ, TIMM
FORTUNATO, DAVID
O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.
description We identify a form of gender-based governmental discrimination that directly affects billions of women on a daily basis: the setting of import tariffs for gendered goods. These tax rates, which can differ across otherwise identical gender-specific products, often impose direct penalties on women as consumers. Comparing nearly 200,000 paired tariff rates on men’s and women’s apparel products in 167 countries between 1995 and 2015, we find that women suffer a tax penalty that varies systematically across countries. We demonstrate that in democracies, women’s presence in the legislature is associated with decreased import tax penalties on women’s goods. This finding is buttressed by a comparison of democracies and non-democracies and analyses of the implementation of legislative gender quotas. Our work highlights a previously unacknowledged government policy that penalizes women and also provides powerful evidence that descriptive representation can have a substantial, direct impact on discriminatory policies.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0003055420000799
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2478936545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0003055420000799</cupid><sourcerecordid>2478936545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-7100f77579d73331c6db61ec36cac367c66071d07181d01cf393904a2fcba4723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UM1KAzEQDqJgrT6At4Dn1clms2mO0motFgSteFzSZFa2uNk12Yq9-Rq-nk9i1hY8iIf5ZuD7mWEIOWVwzoDJiwcA4CBElsYBpFJ7ZMAEl4lQGd8ng55Oev6QHIWw6kUMRgNy-9TU6L4-PgOdYDC-arvqDek9th4Duk53VeOodpZO0Vn0aOmsbhvf0YV-p5Oqt9SV-5Edk4NSvwQ82fUheby-WoxvkvnddDa-nCeGC-gSyQBKKYVUVnLOmcntMmdoeG50BGnyHCSzsUYRmSm54goynZZmqTOZ8iE52-a2vnldY-iKVbP2Lq4s0kyOFM9FJqKKbVXGNyF4LIs2nqr9pmBQ9D8r_vwsevjOo-ulr-wz_kb_7_oGK-ptng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478936545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>BETZ, TIMM ; FORTUNATO, DAVID ; O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>BETZ, TIMM ; FORTUNATO, DAVID ; O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</creatorcontrib><description>We identify a form of gender-based governmental discrimination that directly affects billions of women on a daily basis: the setting of import tariffs for gendered goods. These tax rates, which can differ across otherwise identical gender-specific products, often impose direct penalties on women as consumers. Comparing nearly 200,000 paired tariff rates on men’s and women’s apparel products in 167 countries between 1995 and 2015, we find that women suffer a tax penalty that varies systematically across countries. We demonstrate that in democracies, women’s presence in the legislature is associated with decreased import tax penalties on women’s goods. This finding is buttressed by a comparison of democracies and non-democracies and analyses of the implementation of legislative gender quotas. Our work highlights a previously unacknowledged government policy that penalizes women and also provides powerful evidence that descriptive representation can have a substantial, direct impact on discriminatory policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0003055420000799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Clothing industry ; Coding ; Consumer goods ; Consumers ; Cotton ; Democracy ; Economic justification ; Females ; Financial Policy ; Fines &amp; penalties ; Fines and penalties ; Gender ; Gender Differences ; Gender Discrimination ; Imports ; Legislatures ; Males ; Penalties ; Political power ; Political science ; Politics ; Public policy ; Quotas ; Schedules ; Sex discrimination ; Tariffs ; Tax rates ; Taxation ; Taxes ; Textile industry ; Wholesalers ; Women</subject><ispartof>The American political science review, 2021-02, Vol.115 (1), p.307-315</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-7100f77579d73331c6db61ec36cac367c66071d07181d01cf393904a2fcba4723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-7100f77579d73331c6db61ec36cac367c66071d07181d01cf393904a2fcba4723</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2200-4080 ; 0000-0001-5632-2832 ; 0000-0003-3578-1321</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055420000799/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,12843,27922,27923,55626</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BETZ, TIMM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORTUNATO, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</creatorcontrib><title>Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination</title><title>The American political science review</title><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><description>We identify a form of gender-based governmental discrimination that directly affects billions of women on a daily basis: the setting of import tariffs for gendered goods. These tax rates, which can differ across otherwise identical gender-specific products, often impose direct penalties on women as consumers. Comparing nearly 200,000 paired tariff rates on men’s and women’s apparel products in 167 countries between 1995 and 2015, we find that women suffer a tax penalty that varies systematically across countries. We demonstrate that in democracies, women’s presence in the legislature is associated with decreased import tax penalties on women’s goods. This finding is buttressed by a comparison of democracies and non-democracies and analyses of the implementation of legislative gender quotas. Our work highlights a previously unacknowledged government policy that penalizes women and also provides powerful evidence that descriptive representation can have a substantial, direct impact on discriminatory policies.</description><subject>Clothing industry</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Consumer goods</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Economic justification</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Financial Policy</subject><subject>Fines &amp; penalties</subject><subject>Fines and penalties</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Gender Discrimination</subject><subject>Imports</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Penalties</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Quotas</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Sex discrimination</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>Textile industry</subject><subject>Wholesalers</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UM1KAzEQDqJgrT6At4Dn1clms2mO0motFgSteFzSZFa2uNk12Yq9-Rq-nk9i1hY8iIf5ZuD7mWEIOWVwzoDJiwcA4CBElsYBpFJ7ZMAEl4lQGd8ng55Oev6QHIWw6kUMRgNy-9TU6L4-PgOdYDC-arvqDek9th4Duk53VeOodpZO0Vn0aOmsbhvf0YV-p5Oqt9SV-5Edk4NSvwQ82fUheby-WoxvkvnddDa-nCeGC-gSyQBKKYVUVnLOmcntMmdoeG50BGnyHCSzsUYRmSm54goynZZmqTOZ8iE52-a2vnldY-iKVbP2Lq4s0kyOFM9FJqKKbVXGNyF4LIs2nqr9pmBQ9D8r_vwsevjOo-ulr-wz_kb_7_oGK-ptng</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>BETZ, TIMM</creator><creator>FORTUNATO, DAVID</creator><creator>O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2200-4080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5632-2832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-1321</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination</title><author>BETZ, TIMM ; FORTUNATO, DAVID ; O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-7100f77579d73331c6db61ec36cac367c66071d07181d01cf393904a2fcba4723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clothing industry</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Consumer goods</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Economic justification</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Financial Policy</topic><topic>Fines &amp; penalties</topic><topic>Fines and penalties</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Gender Discrimination</topic><topic>Imports</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Penalties</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Quotas</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Sex discrimination</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>Textile industry</topic><topic>Wholesalers</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BETZ, TIMM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORTUNATO, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BETZ, TIMM</au><au>FORTUNATO, DAVID</au><au>O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination</atitle><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>307-315</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><abstract>We identify a form of gender-based governmental discrimination that directly affects billions of women on a daily basis: the setting of import tariffs for gendered goods. These tax rates, which can differ across otherwise identical gender-specific products, often impose direct penalties on women as consumers. Comparing nearly 200,000 paired tariff rates on men’s and women’s apparel products in 167 countries between 1995 and 2015, we find that women suffer a tax penalty that varies systematically across countries. We demonstrate that in democracies, women’s presence in the legislature is associated with decreased import tax penalties on women’s goods. This finding is buttressed by a comparison of democracies and non-democracies and analyses of the implementation of legislative gender quotas. Our work highlights a previously unacknowledged government policy that penalizes women and also provides powerful evidence that descriptive representation can have a substantial, direct impact on discriminatory policies.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0003055420000799</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2200-4080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5632-2832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-1321</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0554
ispartof The American political science review, 2021-02, Vol.115 (1), p.307-315
issn 0003-0554
1537-5943
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2478936545
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Clothing industry
Coding
Consumer goods
Consumers
Cotton
Democracy
Economic justification
Females
Financial Policy
Fines & penalties
Fines and penalties
Gender
Gender Differences
Gender Discrimination
Imports
Legislatures
Males
Penalties
Political power
Political science
Politics
Public policy
Quotas
Schedules
Sex discrimination
Tariffs
Tax rates
Taxation
Taxes
Textile industry
Wholesalers
Women
title Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A11%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women%E2%80%99s%20Descriptive%20Representation%20and%20Gendered%20Import%20Tax%20Discrimination&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=BETZ,%20TIMM&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=307-315&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0003055420000799&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2478936545%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478936545&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0003055420000799&rfr_iscdi=true