Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination
We identify a form of gender-based governmental discrimination that directly affects billions of women on a daily basis: the setting of import tariffs for gendered goods. These tax rates, which can differ across otherwise identical gender-specific products, often impose direct penalties on women as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American political science review 2021-02, Vol.115 (1), p.307-315 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 315 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 307 |
container_title | The American political science review |
container_volume | 115 |
creator | BETZ, TIMM FORTUNATO, DAVID O’BRIEN, DIANA Z. |
description | We identify a form of gender-based governmental discrimination that directly affects billions of women on a daily basis: the setting of import tariffs for gendered goods. These tax rates, which can differ across otherwise identical gender-specific products, often impose direct penalties on women as consumers. Comparing nearly 200,000 paired tariff rates on men’s and women’s apparel products in 167 countries between 1995 and 2015, we find that women suffer a tax penalty that varies systematically across countries. We demonstrate that in democracies, women’s presence in the legislature is associated with decreased import tax penalties on women’s goods. This finding is buttressed by a comparison of democracies and non-democracies and analyses of the implementation of legislative gender quotas. Our work highlights a previously unacknowledged government policy that penalizes women and also provides powerful evidence that descriptive representation can have a substantial, direct impact on discriminatory policies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0003055420000799 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2478936545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0003055420000799</cupid><sourcerecordid>2478936545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-7100f77579d73331c6db61ec36cac367c66071d07181d01cf393904a2fcba4723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UM1KAzEQDqJgrT6At4Dn1clms2mO0motFgSteFzSZFa2uNk12Yq9-Rq-nk9i1hY8iIf5ZuD7mWEIOWVwzoDJiwcA4CBElsYBpFJ7ZMAEl4lQGd8ng55Oev6QHIWw6kUMRgNy-9TU6L4-PgOdYDC-arvqDek9th4Duk53VeOodpZO0Vn0aOmsbhvf0YV-p5Oqt9SV-5Edk4NSvwQ82fUheby-WoxvkvnddDa-nCeGC-gSyQBKKYVUVnLOmcntMmdoeG50BGnyHCSzsUYRmSm54goynZZmqTOZ8iE52-a2vnldY-iKVbP2Lq4s0kyOFM9FJqKKbVXGNyF4LIs2nqr9pmBQ9D8r_vwsevjOo-ulr-wz_kb_7_oGK-ptng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478936545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>BETZ, TIMM ; FORTUNATO, DAVID ; O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>BETZ, TIMM ; FORTUNATO, DAVID ; O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</creatorcontrib><description>We identify a form of gender-based governmental discrimination that directly affects billions of women on a daily basis: the setting of import tariffs for gendered goods. These tax rates, which can differ across otherwise identical gender-specific products, often impose direct penalties on women as consumers. Comparing nearly 200,000 paired tariff rates on men’s and women’s apparel products in 167 countries between 1995 and 2015, we find that women suffer a tax penalty that varies systematically across countries. We demonstrate that in democracies, women’s presence in the legislature is associated with decreased import tax penalties on women’s goods. This finding is buttressed by a comparison of democracies and non-democracies and analyses of the implementation of legislative gender quotas. Our work highlights a previously unacknowledged government policy that penalizes women and also provides powerful evidence that descriptive representation can have a substantial, direct impact on discriminatory policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0003055420000799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Clothing industry ; Coding ; Consumer goods ; Consumers ; Cotton ; Democracy ; Economic justification ; Females ; Financial Policy ; Fines & penalties ; Fines and penalties ; Gender ; Gender Differences ; Gender Discrimination ; Imports ; Legislatures ; Males ; Penalties ; Political power ; Political science ; Politics ; Public policy ; Quotas ; Schedules ; Sex discrimination ; Tariffs ; Tax rates ; Taxation ; Taxes ; Textile industry ; Wholesalers ; Women</subject><ispartof>The American political science review, 2021-02, Vol.115 (1), p.307-315</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-7100f77579d73331c6db61ec36cac367c66071d07181d01cf393904a2fcba4723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-7100f77579d73331c6db61ec36cac367c66071d07181d01cf393904a2fcba4723</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2200-4080 ; 0000-0001-5632-2832 ; 0000-0003-3578-1321</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055420000799/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,12843,27922,27923,55626</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BETZ, TIMM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORTUNATO, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</creatorcontrib><title>Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination</title><title>The American political science review</title><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><description>We identify a form of gender-based governmental discrimination that directly affects billions of women on a daily basis: the setting of import tariffs for gendered goods. These tax rates, which can differ across otherwise identical gender-specific products, often impose direct penalties on women as consumers. Comparing nearly 200,000 paired tariff rates on men’s and women’s apparel products in 167 countries between 1995 and 2015, we find that women suffer a tax penalty that varies systematically across countries. We demonstrate that in democracies, women’s presence in the legislature is associated with decreased import tax penalties on women’s goods. This finding is buttressed by a comparison of democracies and non-democracies and analyses of the implementation of legislative gender quotas. Our work highlights a previously unacknowledged government policy that penalizes women and also provides powerful evidence that descriptive representation can have a substantial, direct impact on discriminatory policies.</description><subject>Clothing industry</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Consumer goods</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Economic justification</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Financial Policy</subject><subject>Fines & penalties</subject><subject>Fines and penalties</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Gender Discrimination</subject><subject>Imports</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Penalties</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Quotas</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Sex discrimination</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>Textile industry</subject><subject>Wholesalers</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UM1KAzEQDqJgrT6At4Dn1clms2mO0motFgSteFzSZFa2uNk12Yq9-Rq-nk9i1hY8iIf5ZuD7mWEIOWVwzoDJiwcA4CBElsYBpFJ7ZMAEl4lQGd8ng55Oev6QHIWw6kUMRgNy-9TU6L4-PgOdYDC-arvqDek9th4Duk53VeOodpZO0Vn0aOmsbhvf0YV-p5Oqt9SV-5Edk4NSvwQ82fUheby-WoxvkvnddDa-nCeGC-gSyQBKKYVUVnLOmcntMmdoeG50BGnyHCSzsUYRmSm54goynZZmqTOZ8iE52-a2vnldY-iKVbP2Lq4s0kyOFM9FJqKKbVXGNyF4LIs2nqr9pmBQ9D8r_vwsevjOo-ulr-wz_kb_7_oGK-ptng</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>BETZ, TIMM</creator><creator>FORTUNATO, DAVID</creator><creator>O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2200-4080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5632-2832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-1321</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination</title><author>BETZ, TIMM ; FORTUNATO, DAVID ; O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-7100f77579d73331c6db61ec36cac367c66071d07181d01cf393904a2fcba4723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clothing industry</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Consumer goods</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Economic justification</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Financial Policy</topic><topic>Fines & penalties</topic><topic>Fines and penalties</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Gender Discrimination</topic><topic>Imports</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Penalties</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Quotas</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Sex discrimination</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>Textile industry</topic><topic>Wholesalers</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BETZ, TIMM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORTUNATO, DAVID</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BETZ, TIMM</au><au>FORTUNATO, DAVID</au><au>O’BRIEN, DIANA Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination</atitle><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>307-315</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><abstract>We identify a form of gender-based governmental discrimination that directly affects billions of women on a daily basis: the setting of import tariffs for gendered goods. These tax rates, which can differ across otherwise identical gender-specific products, often impose direct penalties on women as consumers. Comparing nearly 200,000 paired tariff rates on men’s and women’s apparel products in 167 countries between 1995 and 2015, we find that women suffer a tax penalty that varies systematically across countries. We demonstrate that in democracies, women’s presence in the legislature is associated with decreased import tax penalties on women’s goods. This finding is buttressed by a comparison of democracies and non-democracies and analyses of the implementation of legislative gender quotas. Our work highlights a previously unacknowledged government policy that penalizes women and also provides powerful evidence that descriptive representation can have a substantial, direct impact on discriminatory policies.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0003055420000799</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2200-4080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5632-2832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-1321</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0554 |
ispartof | The American political science review, 2021-02, Vol.115 (1), p.307-315 |
issn | 0003-0554 1537-5943 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2478936545 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Clothing industry Coding Consumer goods Consumers Cotton Democracy Economic justification Females Financial Policy Fines & penalties Fines and penalties Gender Gender Differences Gender Discrimination Imports Legislatures Males Penalties Political power Political science Politics Public policy Quotas Schedules Sex discrimination Tariffs Tax rates Taxation Taxes Textile industry Wholesalers Women |
title | Women’s Descriptive Representation and Gendered Import Tax Discrimination |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A11%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women%E2%80%99s%20Descriptive%20Representation%20and%20Gendered%20Import%20Tax%20Discrimination&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=BETZ,%20TIMM&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=307-315&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0003055420000799&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2478936545%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478936545&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0003055420000799&rfr_iscdi=true |