Distributed Rural Proofing – An Essential Tool for the Future of Rural Development?

Current rural proofing models are criticised for the inability to perceive detailed and varying local circumstances and the inability to pay attention to dynamics, to changing circumstances and the potential for change. The concept of rural proofing is discussed in this article, along with examples...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sociologia ruralis 2021-01, Vol.61 (1), p.141-162
1. Verfasser: Nordberg, Kenneth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue 1
container_start_page 141
container_title Sociologia ruralis
container_volume 61
creator Nordberg, Kenneth
description Current rural proofing models are criticised for the inability to perceive detailed and varying local circumstances and the inability to pay attention to dynamics, to changing circumstances and the potential for change. The concept of rural proofing is discussed in this article, along with examples of proofing models in different countries. The deficiencies of the models are addressed using the concepts spatial justice and social innovation, which in combination allow for perceiving essential factors connected to geography and the varying capability of places. Two case studies are used for demonstrating the importance of these factors when judging centralising reforms. Together, the theoretical discussion and the case studies inform the construction of a new model for rural proofing, more relevant to rural development.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/soru.12316
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2478908193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2478908193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-5f72bc7cee63830db73fd10a4c4810b7bd64c16ff345059d83df269e54a143ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQRi0EEqWw4QSW2CGl2LFjxytU9QeQKhWVZm0lsQ2p0rjYMag77sANOQkp6ZrZfIt534z0ALjGaIS7ufPWhRGOCWYnYIAp45FIYnIKBgiRNEJYiHNw4f0GIURxTAcgm1a-dVURWq3gKri8hs_OWlM1r_Dn6xuOGzjzXjdt1W3W1tbQWAfbNw3noQ1OQ2uOtan-0LXdbTv2_hKcmbz2-uqYQ5DNZ-vJY7RYPjxNxouoJISzKDE8Lkpeas1ISpAqODEKo5yWNMWo4IVitMTMGEITlAiVEmViJnRCc0yJVmQIbvq7O2ffg_at3Njgmu6ljClPBUqxIB1121Ols947beTOVdvc7SVG8qBNHrTJP20djHv4s6r1_h9SvixXWd_5BSy1cFs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478908193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distributed Rural Proofing – An Essential Tool for the Future of Rural Development?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Nordberg, Kenneth</creator><creatorcontrib>Nordberg, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><description>Current rural proofing models are criticised for the inability to perceive detailed and varying local circumstances and the inability to pay attention to dynamics, to changing circumstances and the potential for change. The concept of rural proofing is discussed in this article, along with examples of proofing models in different countries. The deficiencies of the models are addressed using the concepts spatial justice and social innovation, which in combination allow for perceiving essential factors connected to geography and the varying capability of places. Two case studies are used for demonstrating the importance of these factors when judging centralising reforms. Together, the theoretical discussion and the case studies inform the construction of a new model for rural proofing, more relevant to rural development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0199</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9523</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/soru.12316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Geography ; Innovations ; neo‐endogenous rural development ; Proofing ; Rural areas ; Rural development ; rural proofing ; social innovation ; Social justice ; spatial justice</subject><ispartof>Sociologia ruralis, 2021-01, Vol.61 (1), p.141-162</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Rural Sociology</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-5f72bc7cee63830db73fd10a4c4810b7bd64c16ff345059d83df269e54a143ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-5f72bc7cee63830db73fd10a4c4810b7bd64c16ff345059d83df269e54a143ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0073-1503</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsoru.12316$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsoru.12316$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nordberg, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><title>Distributed Rural Proofing – An Essential Tool for the Future of Rural Development?</title><title>Sociologia ruralis</title><description>Current rural proofing models are criticised for the inability to perceive detailed and varying local circumstances and the inability to pay attention to dynamics, to changing circumstances and the potential for change. The concept of rural proofing is discussed in this article, along with examples of proofing models in different countries. The deficiencies of the models are addressed using the concepts spatial justice and social innovation, which in combination allow for perceiving essential factors connected to geography and the varying capability of places. Two case studies are used for demonstrating the importance of these factors when judging centralising reforms. Together, the theoretical discussion and the case studies inform the construction of a new model for rural proofing, more relevant to rural development.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>neo‐endogenous rural development</subject><subject>Proofing</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><subject>rural proofing</subject><subject>social innovation</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>spatial justice</subject><issn>0038-0199</issn><issn>1467-9523</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQRi0EEqWw4QSW2CGl2LFjxytU9QeQKhWVZm0lsQ2p0rjYMag77sANOQkp6ZrZfIt534z0ALjGaIS7ufPWhRGOCWYnYIAp45FIYnIKBgiRNEJYiHNw4f0GIURxTAcgm1a-dVURWq3gKri8hs_OWlM1r_Dn6xuOGzjzXjdt1W3W1tbQWAfbNw3noQ1OQ2uOtan-0LXdbTv2_hKcmbz2-uqYQ5DNZ-vJY7RYPjxNxouoJISzKDE8Lkpeas1ISpAqODEKo5yWNMWo4IVitMTMGEITlAiVEmViJnRCc0yJVmQIbvq7O2ffg_at3Njgmu6ljClPBUqxIB1121Ols947beTOVdvc7SVG8qBNHrTJP20djHv4s6r1_h9SvixXWd_5BSy1cFs</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Nordberg, Kenneth</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0073-1503</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Distributed Rural Proofing – An Essential Tool for the Future of Rural Development?</title><author>Nordberg, Kenneth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-5f72bc7cee63830db73fd10a4c4810b7bd64c16ff345059d83df269e54a143ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>neo‐endogenous rural development</topic><topic>Proofing</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><topic>rural proofing</topic><topic>social innovation</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>spatial justice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nordberg, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociologia ruralis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nordberg, Kenneth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distributed Rural Proofing – An Essential Tool for the Future of Rural Development?</atitle><jtitle>Sociologia ruralis</jtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>141-162</pages><issn>0038-0199</issn><eissn>1467-9523</eissn><abstract>Current rural proofing models are criticised for the inability to perceive detailed and varying local circumstances and the inability to pay attention to dynamics, to changing circumstances and the potential for change. The concept of rural proofing is discussed in this article, along with examples of proofing models in different countries. The deficiencies of the models are addressed using the concepts spatial justice and social innovation, which in combination allow for perceiving essential factors connected to geography and the varying capability of places. Two case studies are used for demonstrating the importance of these factors when judging centralising reforms. Together, the theoretical discussion and the case studies inform the construction of a new model for rural proofing, more relevant to rural development.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/soru.12316</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0073-1503</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0199
ispartof Sociologia ruralis, 2021-01, Vol.61 (1), p.141-162
issn 0038-0199
1467-9523
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2478908193
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Case studies
Geography
Innovations
neo‐endogenous rural development
Proofing
Rural areas
Rural development
rural proofing
social innovation
Social justice
spatial justice
title Distributed Rural Proofing – An Essential Tool for the Future of Rural Development?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A10%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distributed%20Rural%20Proofing%20%E2%80%93%20An%20Essential%20Tool%20for%20the%20Future%20of%20Rural%20Development?&rft.jtitle=Sociologia%20ruralis&rft.au=Nordberg,%20Kenneth&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=141-162&rft.issn=0038-0199&rft.eissn=1467-9523&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/soru.12316&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2478908193%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478908193&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true