Distributed Rural Proofing – An Essential Tool for the Future of Rural Development?
Current rural proofing models are criticised for the inability to perceive detailed and varying local circumstances and the inability to pay attention to dynamics, to changing circumstances and the potential for change. The concept of rural proofing is discussed in this article, along with examples...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociologia ruralis 2021-01, Vol.61 (1), p.141-162 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 162 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | Sociologia ruralis |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Nordberg, Kenneth |
description | Current rural proofing models are criticised for the inability to perceive detailed and varying local circumstances and the inability to pay attention to dynamics, to changing circumstances and the potential for change. The concept of rural proofing is discussed in this article, along with examples of proofing models in different countries. The deficiencies of the models are addressed using the concepts spatial justice and social innovation, which in combination allow for perceiving essential factors connected to geography and the varying capability of places. Two case studies are used for demonstrating the importance of these factors when judging centralising reforms. Together, the theoretical discussion and the case studies inform the construction of a new model for rural proofing, more relevant to rural development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/soru.12316 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2478908193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2478908193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-5f72bc7cee63830db73fd10a4c4810b7bd64c16ff345059d83df269e54a143ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQRi0EEqWw4QSW2CGl2LFjxytU9QeQKhWVZm0lsQ2p0rjYMag77sANOQkp6ZrZfIt534z0ALjGaIS7ufPWhRGOCWYnYIAp45FIYnIKBgiRNEJYiHNw4f0GIURxTAcgm1a-dVURWq3gKri8hs_OWlM1r_Dn6xuOGzjzXjdt1W3W1tbQWAfbNw3noQ1OQ2uOtan-0LXdbTv2_hKcmbz2-uqYQ5DNZ-vJY7RYPjxNxouoJISzKDE8Lkpeas1ISpAqODEKo5yWNMWo4IVitMTMGEITlAiVEmViJnRCc0yJVmQIbvq7O2ffg_at3Njgmu6ljClPBUqxIB1121Ols947beTOVdvc7SVG8qBNHrTJP20djHv4s6r1_h9SvixXWd_5BSy1cFs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478908193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distributed Rural Proofing – An Essential Tool for the Future of Rural Development?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Nordberg, Kenneth</creator><creatorcontrib>Nordberg, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><description>Current rural proofing models are criticised for the inability to perceive detailed and varying local circumstances and the inability to pay attention to dynamics, to changing circumstances and the potential for change. The concept of rural proofing is discussed in this article, along with examples of proofing models in different countries. The deficiencies of the models are addressed using the concepts spatial justice and social innovation, which in combination allow for perceiving essential factors connected to geography and the varying capability of places. Two case studies are used for demonstrating the importance of these factors when judging centralising reforms. Together, the theoretical discussion and the case studies inform the construction of a new model for rural proofing, more relevant to rural development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0199</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9523</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/soru.12316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Geography ; Innovations ; neo‐endogenous rural development ; Proofing ; Rural areas ; Rural development ; rural proofing ; social innovation ; Social justice ; spatial justice</subject><ispartof>Sociologia ruralis, 2021-01, Vol.61 (1), p.141-162</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Rural Sociology</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-5f72bc7cee63830db73fd10a4c4810b7bd64c16ff345059d83df269e54a143ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-5f72bc7cee63830db73fd10a4c4810b7bd64c16ff345059d83df269e54a143ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0073-1503</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsoru.12316$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsoru.12316$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nordberg, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><title>Distributed Rural Proofing – An Essential Tool for the Future of Rural Development?</title><title>Sociologia ruralis</title><description>Current rural proofing models are criticised for the inability to perceive detailed and varying local circumstances and the inability to pay attention to dynamics, to changing circumstances and the potential for change. The concept of rural proofing is discussed in this article, along with examples of proofing models in different countries. The deficiencies of the models are addressed using the concepts spatial justice and social innovation, which in combination allow for perceiving essential factors connected to geography and the varying capability of places. Two case studies are used for demonstrating the importance of these factors when judging centralising reforms. Together, the theoretical discussion and the case studies inform the construction of a new model for rural proofing, more relevant to rural development.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>neo‐endogenous rural development</subject><subject>Proofing</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><subject>rural proofing</subject><subject>social innovation</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>spatial justice</subject><issn>0038-0199</issn><issn>1467-9523</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQRi0EEqWw4QSW2CGl2LFjxytU9QeQKhWVZm0lsQ2p0rjYMag77sANOQkp6ZrZfIt534z0ALjGaIS7ufPWhRGOCWYnYIAp45FIYnIKBgiRNEJYiHNw4f0GIURxTAcgm1a-dVURWq3gKri8hs_OWlM1r_Dn6xuOGzjzXjdt1W3W1tbQWAfbNw3noQ1OQ2uOtan-0LXdbTv2_hKcmbz2-uqYQ5DNZ-vJY7RYPjxNxouoJISzKDE8Lkpeas1ISpAqODEKo5yWNMWo4IVitMTMGEITlAiVEmViJnRCc0yJVmQIbvq7O2ffg_at3Njgmu6ljClPBUqxIB1121Ols947beTOVdvc7SVG8qBNHrTJP20djHv4s6r1_h9SvixXWd_5BSy1cFs</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Nordberg, Kenneth</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0073-1503</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Distributed Rural Proofing – An Essential Tool for the Future of Rural Development?</title><author>Nordberg, Kenneth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-5f72bc7cee63830db73fd10a4c4810b7bd64c16ff345059d83df269e54a143ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>neo‐endogenous rural development</topic><topic>Proofing</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><topic>rural proofing</topic><topic>social innovation</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>spatial justice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nordberg, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociologia ruralis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nordberg, Kenneth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distributed Rural Proofing – An Essential Tool for the Future of Rural Development?</atitle><jtitle>Sociologia ruralis</jtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>141-162</pages><issn>0038-0199</issn><eissn>1467-9523</eissn><abstract>Current rural proofing models are criticised for the inability to perceive detailed and varying local circumstances and the inability to pay attention to dynamics, to changing circumstances and the potential for change. The concept of rural proofing is discussed in this article, along with examples of proofing models in different countries. The deficiencies of the models are addressed using the concepts spatial justice and social innovation, which in combination allow for perceiving essential factors connected to geography and the varying capability of places. Two case studies are used for demonstrating the importance of these factors when judging centralising reforms. Together, the theoretical discussion and the case studies inform the construction of a new model for rural proofing, more relevant to rural development.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/soru.12316</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0073-1503</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-0199 |
ispartof | Sociologia ruralis, 2021-01, Vol.61 (1), p.141-162 |
issn | 0038-0199 1467-9523 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2478908193 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Case studies Geography Innovations neo‐endogenous rural development Proofing Rural areas Rural development rural proofing social innovation Social justice spatial justice |
title | Distributed Rural Proofing – An Essential Tool for the Future of Rural Development? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A10%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distributed%20Rural%20Proofing%20%E2%80%93%20An%20Essential%20Tool%20for%20the%20Future%20of%20Rural%20Development?&rft.jtitle=Sociologia%20ruralis&rft.au=Nordberg,%20Kenneth&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=141-162&rft.issn=0038-0199&rft.eissn=1467-9523&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/soru.12316&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2478908193%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478908193&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |