Studying Animal Innovation at the Individual Level: A Ratings-Based Assessment in Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.)
Large-scale studies of individual differences in innovative behavior among nonhuman animals are rare because of logistical difficulties associated with obtaining observational data on a large number of innovative individuals across multiple locations. Here, we take a different approach, using observ...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of comparative psychology (1983) 2021-05, Vol.135 (2), p.258-265 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 265 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 258 |
| container_title | Journal of comparative psychology (1983) |
| container_volume | 135 |
| creator | Morton, F. Blake Buchanan-Smith, Hannah M. Brosnan, Sarah F. Thierry, Bernard Paukner, Annika Essler, Jennifer L. Marcum, Christopher S. Lee, Phyllis C. |
| description | Large-scale studies of individual differences in innovative behavior among nonhuman animals are rare because of logistical difficulties associated with obtaining observational data on a large number of innovative individuals across multiple locations. Here, we take a different approach, using observer ratings to study individual differences in innovative behavior in 127 brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.) from 15 social groups and 7 facilities. Capuchins were reliably rated by 1 to 7 raters (mean 3.2 ± 1.6 raters/monkey) on a 7-point Likert scale for levels of innovative behavior, task motivation, sociality, and dominance. In a subsample, we demonstrate these ratings are valid: Rated innovation predicted performance on a learning task, rated motivation predicted participation in the task, rated dominance predicted social rank based on win/loss aggressive outcomes, and rated sociality predicted the time that monkeys spent in proximity to others. Across all 127 capuchins, individuals that were rated as being more innovative were significantly younger, more social, and more motivated to engage in tasks. Age, sociality, and task motivation all had independent effects on innovativeness, whereas sex, dominance, and group size were nonsignificant. Our findings are consistent with long-term behavioral observations of innovation in wild white-faced capuchins. Observer ratings may, therefore, be a valid tool for studies of animal innovation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/com0000264 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2478839917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2559714182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a450t-e09431292efe57877699ec067e387b0fea026fa2a94ffdbf5a6a3414f586ed3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiMEokvhwgMgS1xaIMWOndjmFiKglRYhUTghZDnJuJsla4c4Xti3xyFluSF88Wj8zfif-ZPkMcEXBFP-snE7HE9WsDvJikgq0wwLfjdZYU7zlGNanCQPvN9GpiCM309OKGUFI5ivkp_XU2gPnb1Bpe12ukdX1rq9njpnkZ7QtIGYabt914b4uIY99K9QiT5Gwt749LX20KLSe_B-B3ZCnUWVHkKzicF7Z7_BwaOzaz3obfDoSwV18F-RHy7OHyb3jO49PLq9T5PPb998qi7T9Yd3V1W5TjXL8ZQCloySTGZgIOeC80JKaHDBgQpeYwM6zm10piUzpq1NrgtNGWEmFwW0tKWnyfnSd6N7NYxxxvGgnO7UZblWcw5TzOIu2J5E9unCDqP7HsBPauvCaKM8leW55IQRkf2TYlwIKiXhkXq2UM3ovB_BHD8nWM22qb-2RfjJbctQ76A9on98isDzBfgBtTO-6cA2cMRmYwuRZUTGiMwKxf_TVTf9trtywU6x9MVSGi1Tgz80epy6pgffhHGMBs-qFaG5yuJKBP0F5QTAzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478839917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Studying Animal Innovation at the Individual Level: A Ratings-Based Assessment in Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.)</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Morton, F. Blake ; Buchanan-Smith, Hannah M. ; Brosnan, Sarah F. ; Thierry, Bernard ; Paukner, Annika ; Essler, Jennifer L. ; Marcum, Christopher S. ; Lee, Phyllis C.</creator><contributor>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Morton, F. Blake ; Buchanan-Smith, Hannah M. ; Brosnan, Sarah F. ; Thierry, Bernard ; Paukner, Annika ; Essler, Jennifer L. ; Marcum, Christopher S. ; Lee, Phyllis C. ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M</creatorcontrib><description>Large-scale studies of individual differences in innovative behavior among nonhuman animals are rare because of logistical difficulties associated with obtaining observational data on a large number of innovative individuals across multiple locations. Here, we take a different approach, using observer ratings to study individual differences in innovative behavior in 127 brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.) from 15 social groups and 7 facilities. Capuchins were reliably rated by 1 to 7 raters (mean 3.2 ± 1.6 raters/monkey) on a 7-point Likert scale for levels of innovative behavior, task motivation, sociality, and dominance. In a subsample, we demonstrate these ratings are valid: Rated innovation predicted performance on a learning task, rated motivation predicted participation in the task, rated dominance predicted social rank based on win/loss aggressive outcomes, and rated sociality predicted the time that monkeys spent in proximity to others. Across all 127 capuchins, individuals that were rated as being more innovative were significantly younger, more social, and more motivated to engage in tasks. Age, sociality, and task motivation all had independent effects on innovativeness, whereas sex, dominance, and group size were nonsignificant. Our findings are consistent with long-term behavioral observations of innovation in wild white-faced capuchins. Observer ratings may, therefore, be a valid tool for studies of animal innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/com0000264</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33464107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>WASHINGTON: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Animal ; Animal behavior ; Animal Cognition ; Animal Learning ; Animal Motivation ; Animal Social Behavior ; Associative Processes ; Behavioral Sciences ; Dominance ; Evolutionary Psychology ; Female ; Individual Differences ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Life Sciences ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Male ; Monkeys ; Monkeys & apes ; Motivation ; Observers ; Psychology ; Psychology, Multidisciplinary ; Rating ; Science & Technology ; Social networks ; Social Sciences ; Studies ; Test Validity ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2021-05, Vol.135 (2), p.258-265</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May 2021</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>2</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000668221900012</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a450t-e09431292efe57877699ec067e387b0fea026fa2a94ffdbf5a6a3414f586ed3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a450t-e09431292efe57877699ec067e387b0fea026fa2a94ffdbf5a6a3414f586ed3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0899-6143 ; 0000-0002-8644-1557 ; 0000-0002-2516-7734 ; 0000-0002-5117-6706 ; 0000-0002-4296-3513 ; 0000-0002-8065-093X ; 0000-0002-3421-1864 ; 0000-0001-5091-6496</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930,39262,39263</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03044104$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Morton, F. Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan-Smith, Hannah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brosnan, Sarah F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thierry, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paukner, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essler, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcum, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Phyllis C.</creatorcontrib><title>Studying Animal Innovation at the Individual Level: A Ratings-Based Assessment in Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.)</title><title>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</title><addtitle>J COMP PSYCHOL</addtitle><addtitle>J Comp Psychol</addtitle><description>Large-scale studies of individual differences in innovative behavior among nonhuman animals are rare because of logistical difficulties associated with obtaining observational data on a large number of innovative individuals across multiple locations. Here, we take a different approach, using observer ratings to study individual differences in innovative behavior in 127 brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.) from 15 social groups and 7 facilities. Capuchins were reliably rated by 1 to 7 raters (mean 3.2 ± 1.6 raters/monkey) on a 7-point Likert scale for levels of innovative behavior, task motivation, sociality, and dominance. In a subsample, we demonstrate these ratings are valid: Rated innovation predicted performance on a learning task, rated motivation predicted participation in the task, rated dominance predicted social rank based on win/loss aggressive outcomes, and rated sociality predicted the time that monkeys spent in proximity to others. Across all 127 capuchins, individuals that were rated as being more innovative were significantly younger, more social, and more motivated to engage in tasks. Age, sociality, and task motivation all had independent effects on innovativeness, whereas sex, dominance, and group size were nonsignificant. Our findings are consistent with long-term behavioral observations of innovation in wild white-faced capuchins. Observer ratings may, therefore, be a valid tool for studies of animal innovation.</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal Cognition</subject><subject>Animal Learning</subject><subject>Animal Motivation</subject><subject>Animal Social Behavior</subject><subject>Associative Processes</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Evolutionary Psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monkeys</subject><subject>Monkeys & apes</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Observers</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology, Multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Rating</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0735-7036</issn><issn>1939-2087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiMEokvhwgMgS1xaIMWOndjmFiKglRYhUTghZDnJuJsla4c4Xti3xyFluSF88Wj8zfif-ZPkMcEXBFP-snE7HE9WsDvJikgq0wwLfjdZYU7zlGNanCQPvN9GpiCM309OKGUFI5ivkp_XU2gPnb1Bpe12ukdX1rq9njpnkZ7QtIGYabt914b4uIY99K9QiT5Gwt749LX20KLSe_B-B3ZCnUWVHkKzicF7Z7_BwaOzaz3obfDoSwV18F-RHy7OHyb3jO49PLq9T5PPb998qi7T9Yd3V1W5TjXL8ZQCloySTGZgIOeC80JKaHDBgQpeYwM6zm10piUzpq1NrgtNGWEmFwW0tKWnyfnSd6N7NYxxxvGgnO7UZblWcw5TzOIu2J5E9unCDqP7HsBPauvCaKM8leW55IQRkf2TYlwIKiXhkXq2UM3ovB_BHD8nWM22qb-2RfjJbctQ76A9on98isDzBfgBtTO-6cA2cMRmYwuRZUTGiMwKxf_TVTf9trtywU6x9MVSGi1Tgz80epy6pgffhHGMBs-qFaG5yuJKBP0F5QTAzg</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Morton, F. Blake</creator><creator>Buchanan-Smith, Hannah M.</creator><creator>Brosnan, Sarah F.</creator><creator>Thierry, Bernard</creator><creator>Paukner, Annika</creator><creator>Essler, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Marcum, Christopher S.</creator><creator>Lee, Phyllis C.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>Amer Psychological Assoc</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0899-6143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8644-1557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2516-7734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5117-6706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4296-3513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8065-093X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3421-1864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5091-6496</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Studying Animal Innovation at the Individual Level: A Ratings-Based Assessment in Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.)</title><author>Morton, F. Blake ; Buchanan-Smith, Hannah M. ; Brosnan, Sarah F. ; Thierry, Bernard ; Paukner, Annika ; Essler, Jennifer L. ; Marcum, Christopher S. ; Lee, Phyllis C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a450t-e09431292efe57877699ec067e387b0fea026fa2a94ffdbf5a6a3414f586ed3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal Cognition</topic><topic>Animal Learning</topic><topic>Animal Motivation</topic><topic>Animal Social Behavior</topic><topic>Associative Processes</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Evolutionary Psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monkeys</topic><topic>Monkeys & apes</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Observers</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology, Multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Rating</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morton, F. Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan-Smith, Hannah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brosnan, Sarah F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thierry, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paukner, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essler, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcum, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Phyllis C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morton, F. Blake</au><au>Buchanan-Smith, Hannah M.</au><au>Brosnan, Sarah F.</au><au>Thierry, Bernard</au><au>Paukner, Annika</au><au>Essler, Jennifer L.</au><au>Marcum, Christopher S.</au><au>Lee, Phyllis C.</au><au>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Studying Animal Innovation at the Individual Level: A Ratings-Based Assessment in Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle><stitle>J COMP PSYCHOL</stitle><addtitle>J Comp Psychol</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>265</epage><pages>258-265</pages><issn>0735-7036</issn><eissn>1939-2087</eissn><abstract>Large-scale studies of individual differences in innovative behavior among nonhuman animals are rare because of logistical difficulties associated with obtaining observational data on a large number of innovative individuals across multiple locations. Here, we take a different approach, using observer ratings to study individual differences in innovative behavior in 127 brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.) from 15 social groups and 7 facilities. Capuchins were reliably rated by 1 to 7 raters (mean 3.2 ± 1.6 raters/monkey) on a 7-point Likert scale for levels of innovative behavior, task motivation, sociality, and dominance. In a subsample, we demonstrate these ratings are valid: Rated innovation predicted performance on a learning task, rated motivation predicted participation in the task, rated dominance predicted social rank based on win/loss aggressive outcomes, and rated sociality predicted the time that monkeys spent in proximity to others. Across all 127 capuchins, individuals that were rated as being more innovative were significantly younger, more social, and more motivated to engage in tasks. Age, sociality, and task motivation all had independent effects on innovativeness, whereas sex, dominance, and group size were nonsignificant. Our findings are consistent with long-term behavioral observations of innovation in wild white-faced capuchins. Observer ratings may, therefore, be a valid tool for studies of animal innovation.</abstract><cop>WASHINGTON</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>33464107</pmid><doi>10.1037/com0000264</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0899-6143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8644-1557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2516-7734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5117-6706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4296-3513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8065-093X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3421-1864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5091-6496</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0735-7036 |
| ispartof | Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2021-05, Vol.135 (2), p.258-265 |
| issn | 0735-7036 1939-2087 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2478839917 |
| source | APA PsycARTICLES; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
| subjects | Animal Animal behavior Animal Cognition Animal Learning Animal Motivation Animal Social Behavior Associative Processes Behavioral Sciences Dominance Evolutionary Psychology Female Individual Differences Innovation Innovations Life Sciences Life Sciences & Biomedicine Male Monkeys Monkeys & apes Motivation Observers Psychology Psychology, Multidisciplinary Rating Science & Technology Social networks Social Sciences Studies Test Validity Zoology |
| title | Studying Animal Innovation at the Individual Level: A Ratings-Based Assessment in Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] sp.) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T21%3A00%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Studying%20Animal%20Innovation%20at%20the%20Individual%20Level:%20A%20Ratings-Based%20Assessment%20in%20Capuchin%20Monkeys%20(Sapajus%20%5BCebus%5D%20sp.)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20comparative%20psychology%20(1983)&rft.au=Morton,%20F.%20Blake&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=265&rft.pages=258-265&rft.issn=0735-7036&rft.eissn=1939-2087&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/com0000264&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2559714182%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478839917&rft_id=info:pmid/33464107&rfr_iscdi=true |