Global economic and environmental outcomes of the Paris Agreement

In this paper, we use a ten-region model of the world economy to analyze the economic and environmental outcomes that are likely to result from the Paris Climate Agreement. To construct our modeling scenario, we first convert the Agreement's disparate Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) pl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy economics 2020-08, Vol.90, p.104838, Article 104838
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Weifeng, McKibbin, Warwick J., Morris, Adele C., Wilcoxen, Peter J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 104838
container_title Energy economics
container_volume 90
creator Liu, Weifeng
McKibbin, Warwick J.
Morris, Adele C.
Wilcoxen, Peter J.
description In this paper, we use a ten-region model of the world economy to analyze the economic and environmental outcomes that are likely to result from the Paris Climate Agreement. To construct our modeling scenario, we first convert the Agreement's disparate Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) pledges into equivalent reductions in CO2 emissions relative to a baseline scenario without the Agreement. We then model the Agreement by solving for a CO2 price path in each region that would gradually fulfill the region's NDC pledge by its target date. The resulting paths are quite different across regions, indicating significant differences in marginal abatement costs. We also find that if all regions achieve their NDCs, the Agreement significantly reduces CO2 emissions relative to baseline. However, global emissions would not decline in absolute terms relative to 2015 levels, let alone follow a path consistent with a 2 °C stabilization scenario. We then construct additional scenarios to explore how the outcomes of the Agreement would change if particular countries (the United States, China, and Australia) were to unilaterally withdraw from it without undertaking alternative climate policies. We find that leaving the Agreement raises GDP for the country that leaves, but it also sharply reduces the domestic co-benefits the country receives as a side effect of controlling CO2. For each country we consider, the net effect of withdrawing is negative: the loss of co-benefits exceeds the gain in GDP. That is, we show that when co-benefits are considered, it is in each country's self-interest to remain in the Agreement. •Compares Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) pledges by countries.•Calculates a CO2 price path in each region that fulfills the regions NDC pledges and considers co-benefits as well as economic costs of meeting NDCs.•The Paris Agreement does not reduce global emissions in absolute terms relative to 2015 levels.•Explores the global impacts if particular countries (the United States, China, and Australia) unilaterally withdraw.•No country benefits from withdrawal from the Paris Agreement when co-benefits are accounted for.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104838
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2478821944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014098832030178X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2478821944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-815760a04eff6eb08f7696add9bbcc34142b5f2c0b5afb702610ce147d4a34ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH78Ai8Bz10nbZqmBw_LoquwoAc9hzSdaMo2WZPugv_e1nr2NDDzPjPMQ8gNgyUDJu66JXo0YZlDPnW4LOQJWTBZFZlgkp2SBTAOWS1lcU4uUuoAoBSlXJDVZhcavaMj7UPvDNW-peiPLgbfox_GUTgMJvSYaLB0-ET6qqNLdPUREafEFTmzepfw-q9ekvfHh7f1U7Z92TyvV9vMcM6GTLKyEqCBo7UCG5C2ErXQbVs3jTEFZzxvSpsbaEptmwpywcAg41XLdcGxLS7J7bx3H8PXAdOgunCIfjypcl5JmbOa8zFVzCkTQ0oRrdpH1-v4rRioyZXq1K8rNblSs6uRup8pHB84OowqGYfeYOsimkG1wf3L_wCtrHLu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478821944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global economic and environmental outcomes of the Paris Agreement</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Liu, Weifeng ; McKibbin, Warwick J. ; Morris, Adele C. ; Wilcoxen, Peter J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Weifeng ; McKibbin, Warwick J. ; Morris, Adele C. ; Wilcoxen, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we use a ten-region model of the world economy to analyze the economic and environmental outcomes that are likely to result from the Paris Climate Agreement. To construct our modeling scenario, we first convert the Agreement's disparate Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) pledges into equivalent reductions in CO2 emissions relative to a baseline scenario without the Agreement. We then model the Agreement by solving for a CO2 price path in each region that would gradually fulfill the region's NDC pledge by its target date. The resulting paths are quite different across regions, indicating significant differences in marginal abatement costs. We also find that if all regions achieve their NDCs, the Agreement significantly reduces CO2 emissions relative to baseline. However, global emissions would not decline in absolute terms relative to 2015 levels, let alone follow a path consistent with a 2 °C stabilization scenario. We then construct additional scenarios to explore how the outcomes of the Agreement would change if particular countries (the United States, China, and Australia) were to unilaterally withdraw from it without undertaking alternative climate policies. We find that leaving the Agreement raises GDP for the country that leaves, but it also sharply reduces the domestic co-benefits the country receives as a side effect of controlling CO2. For each country we consider, the net effect of withdrawing is negative: the loss of co-benefits exceeds the gain in GDP. That is, we show that when co-benefits are considered, it is in each country's self-interest to remain in the Agreement. •Compares Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) pledges by countries.•Calculates a CO2 price path in each region that fulfills the regions NDC pledges and considers co-benefits as well as economic costs of meeting NDCs.•The Paris Agreement does not reduce global emissions in absolute terms relative to 2015 levels.•Explores the global impacts if particular countries (the United States, China, and Australia) unilaterally withdraw.•No country benefits from withdrawal from the Paris Agreement when co-benefits are accounted for.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-9883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Carbon pricing ; Carbon taxes ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Climate policy ; Economic analysis ; Economic models ; Emissions ; Energy economics ; Environmental policy ; G-cubed ; GDP ; Global economy ; Global macroeconomic modeling ; Gross Domestic Product ; Paris Agreement ; Self interest ; Stabilization ; Unilateralism</subject><ispartof>Energy economics, 2020-08, Vol.90, p.104838, Article 104838</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-815760a04eff6eb08f7696add9bbcc34142b5f2c0b5afb702610ce147d4a34ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-815760a04eff6eb08f7696add9bbcc34142b5f2c0b5afb702610ce147d4a34ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104838$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27864,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Weifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKibbin, Warwick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Adele C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcoxen, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><title>Global economic and environmental outcomes of the Paris Agreement</title><title>Energy economics</title><description>In this paper, we use a ten-region model of the world economy to analyze the economic and environmental outcomes that are likely to result from the Paris Climate Agreement. To construct our modeling scenario, we first convert the Agreement's disparate Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) pledges into equivalent reductions in CO2 emissions relative to a baseline scenario without the Agreement. We then model the Agreement by solving for a CO2 price path in each region that would gradually fulfill the region's NDC pledge by its target date. The resulting paths are quite different across regions, indicating significant differences in marginal abatement costs. We also find that if all regions achieve their NDCs, the Agreement significantly reduces CO2 emissions relative to baseline. However, global emissions would not decline in absolute terms relative to 2015 levels, let alone follow a path consistent with a 2 °C stabilization scenario. We then construct additional scenarios to explore how the outcomes of the Agreement would change if particular countries (the United States, China, and Australia) were to unilaterally withdraw from it without undertaking alternative climate policies. We find that leaving the Agreement raises GDP for the country that leaves, but it also sharply reduces the domestic co-benefits the country receives as a side effect of controlling CO2. For each country we consider, the net effect of withdrawing is negative: the loss of co-benefits exceeds the gain in GDP. That is, we show that when co-benefits are considered, it is in each country's self-interest to remain in the Agreement. •Compares Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) pledges by countries.•Calculates a CO2 price path in each region that fulfills the regions NDC pledges and considers co-benefits as well as economic costs of meeting NDCs.•The Paris Agreement does not reduce global emissions in absolute terms relative to 2015 levels.•Explores the global impacts if particular countries (the United States, China, and Australia) unilaterally withdraw.•No country benefits from withdrawal from the Paris Agreement when co-benefits are accounted for.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Carbon pricing</subject><subject>Carbon taxes</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>G-cubed</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Global macroeconomic modeling</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Paris Agreement</subject><subject>Self interest</subject><subject>Stabilization</subject><subject>Unilateralism</subject><issn>0140-9883</issn><issn>1873-6181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH78Ai8Bz10nbZqmBw_LoquwoAc9hzSdaMo2WZPugv_e1nr2NDDzPjPMQ8gNgyUDJu66JXo0YZlDPnW4LOQJWTBZFZlgkp2SBTAOWS1lcU4uUuoAoBSlXJDVZhcavaMj7UPvDNW-peiPLgbfox_GUTgMJvSYaLB0-ET6qqNLdPUREafEFTmzepfw-q9ekvfHh7f1U7Z92TyvV9vMcM6GTLKyEqCBo7UCG5C2ErXQbVs3jTEFZzxvSpsbaEptmwpywcAg41XLdcGxLS7J7bx3H8PXAdOgunCIfjypcl5JmbOa8zFVzCkTQ0oRrdpH1-v4rRioyZXq1K8rNblSs6uRup8pHB84OowqGYfeYOsimkG1wf3L_wCtrHLu</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Liu, Weifeng</creator><creator>McKibbin, Warwick J.</creator><creator>Morris, Adele C.</creator><creator>Wilcoxen, Peter J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Global economic and environmental outcomes of the Paris Agreement</title><author>Liu, Weifeng ; McKibbin, Warwick J. ; Morris, Adele C. ; Wilcoxen, Peter J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-815760a04eff6eb08f7696add9bbcc34142b5f2c0b5afb702610ce147d4a34ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Carbon pricing</topic><topic>Carbon taxes</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>G-cubed</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Global macroeconomic modeling</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Paris Agreement</topic><topic>Self interest</topic><topic>Stabilization</topic><topic>Unilateralism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Weifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKibbin, Warwick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Adele C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcoxen, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Weifeng</au><au>McKibbin, Warwick J.</au><au>Morris, Adele C.</au><au>Wilcoxen, Peter J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global economic and environmental outcomes of the Paris Agreement</atitle><jtitle>Energy economics</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>90</volume><spage>104838</spage><pages>104838-</pages><artnum>104838</artnum><issn>0140-9883</issn><eissn>1873-6181</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we use a ten-region model of the world economy to analyze the economic and environmental outcomes that are likely to result from the Paris Climate Agreement. To construct our modeling scenario, we first convert the Agreement's disparate Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) pledges into equivalent reductions in CO2 emissions relative to a baseline scenario without the Agreement. We then model the Agreement by solving for a CO2 price path in each region that would gradually fulfill the region's NDC pledge by its target date. The resulting paths are quite different across regions, indicating significant differences in marginal abatement costs. We also find that if all regions achieve their NDCs, the Agreement significantly reduces CO2 emissions relative to baseline. However, global emissions would not decline in absolute terms relative to 2015 levels, let alone follow a path consistent with a 2 °C stabilization scenario. We then construct additional scenarios to explore how the outcomes of the Agreement would change if particular countries (the United States, China, and Australia) were to unilaterally withdraw from it without undertaking alternative climate policies. We find that leaving the Agreement raises GDP for the country that leaves, but it also sharply reduces the domestic co-benefits the country receives as a side effect of controlling CO2. For each country we consider, the net effect of withdrawing is negative: the loss of co-benefits exceeds the gain in GDP. That is, we show that when co-benefits are considered, it is in each country's self-interest to remain in the Agreement. •Compares Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) pledges by countries.•Calculates a CO2 price path in each region that fulfills the regions NDC pledges and considers co-benefits as well as economic costs of meeting NDCs.•The Paris Agreement does not reduce global emissions in absolute terms relative to 2015 levels.•Explores the global impacts if particular countries (the United States, China, and Australia) unilaterally withdraw.•No country benefits from withdrawal from the Paris Agreement when co-benefits are accounted for.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104838</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-9883
ispartof Energy economics, 2020-08, Vol.90, p.104838, Article 104838
issn 0140-9883
1873-6181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2478821944
source PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Agreements
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emissions
Carbon pricing
Carbon taxes
Climate change
Climate models
Climate policy
Economic analysis
Economic models
Emissions
Energy economics
Environmental policy
G-cubed
GDP
Global economy
Global macroeconomic modeling
Gross Domestic Product
Paris Agreement
Self interest
Stabilization
Unilateralism
title Global economic and environmental outcomes of the Paris Agreement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A19%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20economic%20and%20environmental%20outcomes%20of%20the%20Paris%20Agreement&rft.jtitle=Energy%20economics&rft.au=Liu,%20Weifeng&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=90&rft.spage=104838&rft.pages=104838-&rft.artnum=104838&rft.issn=0140-9883&rft.eissn=1873-6181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104838&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2478821944%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478821944&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S014098832030178X&rfr_iscdi=true