Empirical analysis of the synergy of the three sectors’ development and labor employment
•This paper exhibits the proximity of industry structure and employment structure by making the assumption that employment is an important production factor for industry development. The result indicates that the primary industry structure is least capable of coordinating with employment structure w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Technological forecasting & social change 2020-11, Vol.160, p.120223, Article 120223 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 120223 |
container_title | Technological forecasting & social change |
container_volume | 160 |
creator | Ding, YingYing Li, Zheng Ge, Xiaojun Hu, Yu |
description | •This paper exhibits the proximity of industry structure and employment structure by making the assumption that employment is an important production factor for industry development. The result indicates that the primary industry structure is least capable of coordinating with employment structure where as the secondary industry structure is better at coordinating with employment structure. In the context of service sector the structure showed the best coordination with employment structure and it can effectively absorb the surplus labor in the primary and secondary industry. The authors of the paper, analyses employment elasticity, structural deviation degree, and ratio labor productivity of three industries. The results show that, the primary industry experiences a negative employment elasticity which means the economic growth of the primary industry caused a decrease in employment. Similarly the secondary sector experiences the Crowding-out effect showing a sharp decline. In the context of the service sector developed quickly, and economic growth played a decisive pulling function in employment growth.•The present study finds out that the coordination is the crucial guarantee for upgradation of Industry. The data shows that there is a certain coordination difference between three industry structure and the employment structure. The coordination in the primary industry is the worst with a large number of surplus labor force not being transferred. And the secondary industry as a whole is good; the surplus labor force can be effectively transferred to some extent. The service sector has the best coordination.
Employment is an important production factor within economic development. There is a close connection between economic sector structure and employment structure, and the synergy between these two is an important index to measure the sustainable development of a social economy. This paper studies the degree of synergy within the three sectors from the three dimensions of employment elasticity, degree of structural deviation, and labor productivity ratio. The results show that the employment elasticity of the three sectors presents different characteristics and that the tertiary sector has the most significant driving effect on employment. The imbalance between the primary and secondary sector structures and the employment structure is relatively prominent. The labor productivity ratio of the three sectors is slightly superior to the national level in t |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120223 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2478820881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0040162520310490</els_id><sourcerecordid>2478820881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d060af0b96c11979c114ced2eaf0c8059d9ff8fc9c83c24bc792fefa54ea485f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwBRSJdcrY-XN2oKr8SJXYwIaN5Tpj6iiJg51Wyo5rcD1OgqvQNZsZzdO80byPkGsKCwo0v60XA6qttg4XDFgQQ2XJCZlRXiRxlkF5SmYAKcQ0Z9k5ufC-BoAi4fmMvK_a3jijZBPJTjajNz6yOhq2GPmxQ_cxHsdh6zCIqAbr_M_Xd1ThHhvbt9gNwVtFjdxYF2HbN3Y8iJfkTMvG49Vfn5O3h9Xr8ilevzw-L-_XsUoKNsQV5CA1bMpcUVoWZaipwophEBWHrKxKrblWpeKJYulGFSXTqGWWokx5ppM5uZnu9s5-7tAPorY7F8J4wdKCcwac07CVT1vKWe8datE700o3CgriwFHU4shRHDiKiWMw3k1GDBn2Bp3wymAXXjQuwBCVNf-d-AVDl4HA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478820881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirical analysis of the synergy of the three sectors’ development and labor employment</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ding, YingYing ; Li, Zheng ; Ge, Xiaojun ; Hu, Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, YingYing ; Li, Zheng ; Ge, Xiaojun ; Hu, Yu</creatorcontrib><description>•This paper exhibits the proximity of industry structure and employment structure by making the assumption that employment is an important production factor for industry development. The result indicates that the primary industry structure is least capable of coordinating with employment structure where as the secondary industry structure is better at coordinating with employment structure. In the context of service sector the structure showed the best coordination with employment structure and it can effectively absorb the surplus labor in the primary and secondary industry. The authors of the paper, analyses employment elasticity, structural deviation degree, and ratio labor productivity of three industries. The results show that, the primary industry experiences a negative employment elasticity which means the economic growth of the primary industry caused a decrease in employment. Similarly the secondary sector experiences the Crowding-out effect showing a sharp decline. In the context of the service sector developed quickly, and economic growth played a decisive pulling function in employment growth.•The present study finds out that the coordination is the crucial guarantee for upgradation of Industry. The data shows that there is a certain coordination difference between three industry structure and the employment structure. The coordination in the primary industry is the worst with a large number of surplus labor force not being transferred. And the secondary industry as a whole is good; the surplus labor force can be effectively transferred to some extent. The service sector has the best coordination.
Employment is an important production factor within economic development. There is a close connection between economic sector structure and employment structure, and the synergy between these two is an important index to measure the sustainable development of a social economy. This paper studies the degree of synergy within the three sectors from the three dimensions of employment elasticity, degree of structural deviation, and labor productivity ratio. The results show that the employment elasticity of the three sectors presents different characteristics and that the tertiary sector has the most significant driving effect on employment. The imbalance between the primary and secondary sector structures and the employment structure is relatively prominent. The labor productivity ratio of the three sectors is slightly superior to the national level in the same period. The tertiary sector has the strongest ability to absorb labor and the highest degree of synergy. The purpose of this study is to analyze the employment absorption capacity of the three industries and provide guidance for the government and relevant departments to formulate industrial development policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-1625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120223</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Departments ; Development policy ; Economic conditions ; Economic development ; Economic factors ; Economic sectors ; Economic structure ; Elasticity ; Empirical analysis ; Employment ; Industrial development ; Labor ; Labor economics ; Labor employment ; Labor productivity ; Productivity ; Sustainable development ; Synergy ; Three sectors development</subject><ispartof>Technological forecasting & social change, 2020-11, Vol.160, p.120223, Article 120223</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d060af0b96c11979c114ced2eaf0c8059d9ff8fc9c83c24bc792fefa54ea485f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d060af0b96c11979c114ced2eaf0c8059d9ff8fc9c83c24bc792fefa54ea485f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120223$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27868,27926,27927,33776,45997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, YingYing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Empirical analysis of the synergy of the three sectors’ development and labor employment</title><title>Technological forecasting & social change</title><description>•This paper exhibits the proximity of industry structure and employment structure by making the assumption that employment is an important production factor for industry development. The result indicates that the primary industry structure is least capable of coordinating with employment structure where as the secondary industry structure is better at coordinating with employment structure. In the context of service sector the structure showed the best coordination with employment structure and it can effectively absorb the surplus labor in the primary and secondary industry. The authors of the paper, analyses employment elasticity, structural deviation degree, and ratio labor productivity of three industries. The results show that, the primary industry experiences a negative employment elasticity which means the economic growth of the primary industry caused a decrease in employment. Similarly the secondary sector experiences the Crowding-out effect showing a sharp decline. In the context of the service sector developed quickly, and economic growth played a decisive pulling function in employment growth.•The present study finds out that the coordination is the crucial guarantee for upgradation of Industry. The data shows that there is a certain coordination difference between three industry structure and the employment structure. The coordination in the primary industry is the worst with a large number of surplus labor force not being transferred. And the secondary industry as a whole is good; the surplus labor force can be effectively transferred to some extent. The service sector has the best coordination.
Employment is an important production factor within economic development. There is a close connection between economic sector structure and employment structure, and the synergy between these two is an important index to measure the sustainable development of a social economy. This paper studies the degree of synergy within the three sectors from the three dimensions of employment elasticity, degree of structural deviation, and labor productivity ratio. The results show that the employment elasticity of the three sectors presents different characteristics and that the tertiary sector has the most significant driving effect on employment. The imbalance between the primary and secondary sector structures and the employment structure is relatively prominent. The labor productivity ratio of the three sectors is slightly superior to the national level in the same period. The tertiary sector has the strongest ability to absorb labor and the highest degree of synergy. The purpose of this study is to analyze the employment absorption capacity of the three industries and provide guidance for the government and relevant departments to formulate industrial development policies.</description><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Development policy</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic factors</subject><subject>Economic sectors</subject><subject>Economic structure</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Labor employment</subject><subject>Labor productivity</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Synergy</subject><subject>Three sectors development</subject><issn>0040-1625</issn><issn>1873-5509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwBRSJdcrY-XN2oKr8SJXYwIaN5Tpj6iiJg51Wyo5rcD1OgqvQNZsZzdO80byPkGsKCwo0v60XA6qttg4XDFgQQ2XJCZlRXiRxlkF5SmYAKcQ0Z9k5ufC-BoAi4fmMvK_a3jijZBPJTjajNz6yOhq2GPmxQ_cxHsdh6zCIqAbr_M_Xd1ThHhvbt9gNwVtFjdxYF2HbN3Y8iJfkTMvG49Vfn5O3h9Xr8ilevzw-L-_XsUoKNsQV5CA1bMpcUVoWZaipwophEBWHrKxKrblWpeKJYulGFSXTqGWWokx5ppM5uZnu9s5-7tAPorY7F8J4wdKCcwac07CVT1vKWe8datE700o3CgriwFHU4shRHDiKiWMw3k1GDBn2Bp3wymAXXjQuwBCVNf-d-AVDl4HA</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Ding, YingYing</creator><creator>Li, Zheng</creator><creator>Ge, Xiaojun</creator><creator>Hu, Yu</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Empirical analysis of the synergy of the three sectors’ development and labor employment</title><author>Ding, YingYing ; Li, Zheng ; Ge, Xiaojun ; Hu, Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d060af0b96c11979c114ced2eaf0c8059d9ff8fc9c83c24bc792fefa54ea485f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Development policy</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic factors</topic><topic>Economic sectors</topic><topic>Economic structure</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Labor employment</topic><topic>Labor productivity</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Synergy</topic><topic>Three sectors development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, YingYing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Technological forecasting & social change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, YingYing</au><au>Li, Zheng</au><au>Ge, Xiaojun</au><au>Hu, Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Empirical analysis of the synergy of the three sectors’ development and labor employment</atitle><jtitle>Technological forecasting & social change</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>160</volume><spage>120223</spage><pages>120223-</pages><artnum>120223</artnum><issn>0040-1625</issn><eissn>1873-5509</eissn><abstract>•This paper exhibits the proximity of industry structure and employment structure by making the assumption that employment is an important production factor for industry development. The result indicates that the primary industry structure is least capable of coordinating with employment structure where as the secondary industry structure is better at coordinating with employment structure. In the context of service sector the structure showed the best coordination with employment structure and it can effectively absorb the surplus labor in the primary and secondary industry. The authors of the paper, analyses employment elasticity, structural deviation degree, and ratio labor productivity of three industries. The results show that, the primary industry experiences a negative employment elasticity which means the economic growth of the primary industry caused a decrease in employment. Similarly the secondary sector experiences the Crowding-out effect showing a sharp decline. In the context of the service sector developed quickly, and economic growth played a decisive pulling function in employment growth.•The present study finds out that the coordination is the crucial guarantee for upgradation of Industry. The data shows that there is a certain coordination difference between three industry structure and the employment structure. The coordination in the primary industry is the worst with a large number of surplus labor force not being transferred. And the secondary industry as a whole is good; the surplus labor force can be effectively transferred to some extent. The service sector has the best coordination.
Employment is an important production factor within economic development. There is a close connection between economic sector structure and employment structure, and the synergy between these two is an important index to measure the sustainable development of a social economy. This paper studies the degree of synergy within the three sectors from the three dimensions of employment elasticity, degree of structural deviation, and labor productivity ratio. The results show that the employment elasticity of the three sectors presents different characteristics and that the tertiary sector has the most significant driving effect on employment. The imbalance between the primary and secondary sector structures and the employment structure is relatively prominent. The labor productivity ratio of the three sectors is slightly superior to the national level in the same period. The tertiary sector has the strongest ability to absorb labor and the highest degree of synergy. The purpose of this study is to analyze the employment absorption capacity of the three industries and provide guidance for the government and relevant departments to formulate industrial development policies.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120223</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-1625 |
ispartof | Technological forecasting & social change, 2020-11, Vol.160, p.120223, Article 120223 |
issn | 0040-1625 1873-5509 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2478820881 |
source | PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Departments Development policy Economic conditions Economic development Economic factors Economic sectors Economic structure Elasticity Empirical analysis Employment Industrial development Labor Labor economics Labor employment Labor productivity Productivity Sustainable development Synergy Three sectors development |
title | Empirical analysis of the synergy of the three sectors’ development and labor employment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A13%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirical%20analysis%20of%20the%20synergy%20of%20the%20three%20sectors%E2%80%99%20development%20and%20labor%20employment&rft.jtitle=Technological%20forecasting%20&%20social%20change&rft.au=Ding,%20YingYing&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=160&rft.spage=120223&rft.pages=120223-&rft.artnum=120223&rft.issn=0040-1625&rft.eissn=1873-5509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2478820881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478820881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0040162520310490&rfr_iscdi=true |