Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl vs Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine Following Abdominal Surgery for Cancer in Children, a Randomized Trial

Abstract Background Intrathecal fentanyl in spinal anesthesia improves intra- and postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine is a fascinating adjuvant with regards to neuraxial anesthesia in children experiencing surgery for abdominal malignancy. Patients and Methods After endorsement by the instituti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) Mass.), 2020-11, Vol.21 (11), p.2634-2641
Hauptverfasser: Fares, Khaled Mohamed, Mohamed, Sahar Abdel-Baky, Abd El-Rahman, Ahmad Mohammad, AbdeLemam, Rania Mohammed, Osman, Amira Mahmoud Mohamed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2641
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2634
container_title Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
container_volume 21
creator Fares, Khaled Mohamed
Mohamed, Sahar Abdel-Baky
Abd El-Rahman, Ahmad Mohammad
AbdeLemam, Rania Mohammed
Osman, Amira Mahmoud Mohamed
description Abstract Background Intrathecal fentanyl in spinal anesthesia improves intra- and postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine is a fascinating adjuvant with regards to neuraxial anesthesia in children experiencing surgery for abdominal malignancy. Patients and Methods After endorsement by the institutional reviewing board (IRB) and guardians’ written informed consent, this research was carried out on 60 pediatric malignancy patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery. Children were randomly distributed into three groups (20 patients each): Group C: given 2 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% (0.4 mg/kg) intrathecally, injected gradually over 20 seconds. Group F: the same as group C, plus fentanyl 0.2 μg/kg. Group D: the same as group C, plus dexmedetomidine 0.2 μg/kg. Pain at zero, two, four, six, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively was evaluated by Face, Legs, Activity, Crying, and Consolability (FLACC) score. First analgesic request and postoperative unfavorable effects were recorded for 24 hours postoperatively. Results A significant decrease was recognized in the mean FLACC score in groups D and F at six, eight, and 12 hours postoperatively, in contrast to group C (P ≤ 0.05). First analgesic request was significantly prolonged in group D (7.67 ± 0.57 hours), in contrast to groups F and C (5.40 ± 1.09 hours and 4.23 ± 3.27 hours, respectively, P < 0.04). Paracetamol utilization was significantly decreased in group D (316.67 ± 28.86 mg), in contrast to group C (391.00 ± 52.00 mg, P < 0.03), without a significant difference between group F (354.44 ± 46.67 mg) and groups D and C (P > 0.05). Conclusions Adding dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine improved postoperative analgesia following abdominal surgery for cancer in children, with better overall analgesia of dexmedetomidine compared with fentanyl.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/pm/pnaa259
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2478601366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A655376763</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/pm/pnaa259</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A655376763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-45be2825bac2ded4eca0c60e87163f003ca684df0bc2d4e6a902083ac567fcca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd2O0zAQhSMEYn_ghgdAIyFuVnTXjhMnvcyWLay0EhIs19HUHnddJXawk0J5GJ4VVy0gJIR8MZbnO-OjOVn2grNLzubiauivBoeYl_NH2SkvczkrpKgeH--5qMqT7CzGDWNcFrV4mp2IfM4LLvlp9qNx2K0pWgU3xpAawRu4dWPA8YEUdrAkN6LbdbCN8Ja-9aRp9L3V1hFghEZvpi26McLo4Xoa7BYV7ntL33X-q3VraFY6CdI38GkKawo7MD7AAp2iANbB4sF2OpB7Awgf0e3h76ThPljsnmVPDHaRnh_refZ5eXO_eD-7-_DudtHczVTBy3FWlCvK67xcoco16SI5Z0oyqisuhWFMKJR1oQ1bpX5BEucsZ7VAVcrKKIXiPHt1mDsE_2WiOLYbP4XkObZ5UdWScSHlH2qNHbXWGZ_2pHobVdvIshSVrKRI1OU_qHQ09VZ5R8am978EFweBCj7GQKYdgu0x7FrO2n3C7dC3x4QT_PLodFqlMH6jvyJNwOsD4Kfhf4N-An-AsAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478601366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl vs Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine Following Abdominal Surgery for Cancer in Children, a Randomized Trial</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fares, Khaled Mohamed ; Mohamed, Sahar Abdel-Baky ; Abd El-Rahman, Ahmad Mohammad ; AbdeLemam, Rania Mohammed ; Osman, Amira Mahmoud Mohamed</creator><creatorcontrib>Fares, Khaled Mohamed ; Mohamed, Sahar Abdel-Baky ; Abd El-Rahman, Ahmad Mohammad ; AbdeLemam, Rania Mohammed ; Osman, Amira Mahmoud Mohamed</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Intrathecal fentanyl in spinal anesthesia improves intra- and postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine is a fascinating adjuvant with regards to neuraxial anesthesia in children experiencing surgery for abdominal malignancy. Patients and Methods After endorsement by the institutional reviewing board (IRB) and guardians’ written informed consent, this research was carried out on 60 pediatric malignancy patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery. Children were randomly distributed into three groups (20 patients each): Group C: given 2 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% (0.4 mg/kg) intrathecally, injected gradually over 20 seconds. Group F: the same as group C, plus fentanyl 0.2 μg/kg. Group D: the same as group C, plus dexmedetomidine 0.2 μg/kg. Pain at zero, two, four, six, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively was evaluated by Face, Legs, Activity, Crying, and Consolability (FLACC) score. First analgesic request and postoperative unfavorable effects were recorded for 24 hours postoperatively. Results A significant decrease was recognized in the mean FLACC score in groups D and F at six, eight, and 12 hours postoperatively, in contrast to group C (P ≤ 0.05). First analgesic request was significantly prolonged in group D (7.67 ± 0.57 hours), in contrast to groups F and C (5.40 ± 1.09 hours and 4.23 ± 3.27 hours, respectively, P &lt; 0.04). Paracetamol utilization was significantly decreased in group D (316.67 ± 28.86 mg), in contrast to group C (391.00 ± 52.00 mg, P &lt; 0.03), without a significant difference between group F (354.44 ± 46.67 mg) and groups D and C (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusions Adding dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine improved postoperative analgesia following abdominal surgery for cancer in children, with better overall analgesia of dexmedetomidine compared with fentanyl.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-2375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4637</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa259</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32914161</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Abdominal surgery ; Adjuvants ; Analgesia ; Analgesics ; Anesthesia ; Anesthetics, Local ; Bupivacaine ; Cancer ; Cancer in children ; Care and treatment ; Child ; Children ; Dexmedetomidine ; Dosage and administration ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug therapy ; Fentanyl ; Gastric cancer ; Humans ; Malignancy ; Methods ; Neoplasms ; Pain perception ; Pain, Postoperative ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Paracetamol ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Pediatric anesthesia ; Pediatric research ; Pediatrics ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2020-11, Vol.21 (11), p.2634-2641</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-45be2825bac2ded4eca0c60e87163f003ca684df0bc2d4e6a902083ac567fcca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-45be2825bac2ded4eca0c60e87163f003ca684df0bc2d4e6a902083ac567fcca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914161$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fares, Khaled Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Sahar Abdel-Baky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abd El-Rahman, Ahmad Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AbdeLemam, Rania Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Amira Mahmoud Mohamed</creatorcontrib><title>Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl vs Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine Following Abdominal Surgery for Cancer in Children, a Randomized Trial</title><title>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Pain Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Intrathecal fentanyl in spinal anesthesia improves intra- and postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine is a fascinating adjuvant with regards to neuraxial anesthesia in children experiencing surgery for abdominal malignancy. Patients and Methods After endorsement by the institutional reviewing board (IRB) and guardians’ written informed consent, this research was carried out on 60 pediatric malignancy patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery. Children were randomly distributed into three groups (20 patients each): Group C: given 2 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% (0.4 mg/kg) intrathecally, injected gradually over 20 seconds. Group F: the same as group C, plus fentanyl 0.2 μg/kg. Group D: the same as group C, plus dexmedetomidine 0.2 μg/kg. Pain at zero, two, four, six, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively was evaluated by Face, Legs, Activity, Crying, and Consolability (FLACC) score. First analgesic request and postoperative unfavorable effects were recorded for 24 hours postoperatively. Results A significant decrease was recognized in the mean FLACC score in groups D and F at six, eight, and 12 hours postoperatively, in contrast to group C (P ≤ 0.05). First analgesic request was significantly prolonged in group D (7.67 ± 0.57 hours), in contrast to groups F and C (5.40 ± 1.09 hours and 4.23 ± 3.27 hours, respectively, P &lt; 0.04). Paracetamol utilization was significantly decreased in group D (316.67 ± 28.86 mg), in contrast to group C (391.00 ± 52.00 mg, P &lt; 0.03), without a significant difference between group F (354.44 ± 46.67 mg) and groups D and C (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusions Adding dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine improved postoperative analgesia following abdominal surgery for cancer in children, with better overall analgesia of dexmedetomidine compared with fentanyl.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abdominal surgery</subject><subject>Adjuvants</subject><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer in children</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Dexmedetomidine</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neoplasms</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Paracetamol</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatric anesthesia</subject><subject>Pediatric research</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1526-2375</issn><issn>1526-4637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd2O0zAQhSMEYn_ghgdAIyFuVnTXjhMnvcyWLay0EhIs19HUHnddJXawk0J5GJ4VVy0gJIR8MZbnO-OjOVn2grNLzubiauivBoeYl_NH2SkvczkrpKgeH--5qMqT7CzGDWNcFrV4mp2IfM4LLvlp9qNx2K0pWgU3xpAawRu4dWPA8YEUdrAkN6LbdbCN8Ja-9aRp9L3V1hFghEZvpi26McLo4Xoa7BYV7ntL33X-q3VraFY6CdI38GkKawo7MD7AAp2iANbB4sF2OpB7Awgf0e3h76ThPljsnmVPDHaRnh_refZ5eXO_eD-7-_DudtHczVTBy3FWlCvK67xcoco16SI5Z0oyqisuhWFMKJR1oQ1bpX5BEucsZ7VAVcrKKIXiPHt1mDsE_2WiOLYbP4XkObZ5UdWScSHlH2qNHbXWGZ_2pHobVdvIshSVrKRI1OU_qHQ09VZ5R8am978EFweBCj7GQKYdgu0x7FrO2n3C7dC3x4QT_PLodFqlMH6jvyJNwOsD4Kfhf4N-An-AsAA</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Fares, Khaled Mohamed</creator><creator>Mohamed, Sahar Abdel-Baky</creator><creator>Abd El-Rahman, Ahmad Mohammad</creator><creator>AbdeLemam, Rania Mohammed</creator><creator>Osman, Amira Mahmoud Mohamed</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl vs Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine Following Abdominal Surgery for Cancer in Children, a Randomized Trial</title><author>Fares, Khaled Mohamed ; Mohamed, Sahar Abdel-Baky ; Abd El-Rahman, Ahmad Mohammad ; AbdeLemam, Rania Mohammed ; Osman, Amira Mahmoud Mohamed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-45be2825bac2ded4eca0c60e87163f003ca684df0bc2d4e6a902083ac567fcca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abdominal surgery</topic><topic>Adjuvants</topic><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer in children</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Dexmedetomidine</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neoplasms</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Paracetamol</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatric anesthesia</topic><topic>Pediatric research</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fares, Khaled Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Sahar Abdel-Baky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abd El-Rahman, Ahmad Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AbdeLemam, Rania Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Amira Mahmoud Mohamed</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fares, Khaled Mohamed</au><au>Mohamed, Sahar Abdel-Baky</au><au>Abd El-Rahman, Ahmad Mohammad</au><au>AbdeLemam, Rania Mohammed</au><au>Osman, Amira Mahmoud Mohamed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl vs Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine Following Abdominal Surgery for Cancer in Children, a Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Med</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2634</spage><epage>2641</epage><pages>2634-2641</pages><issn>1526-2375</issn><eissn>1526-4637</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Intrathecal fentanyl in spinal anesthesia improves intra- and postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine is a fascinating adjuvant with regards to neuraxial anesthesia in children experiencing surgery for abdominal malignancy. Patients and Methods After endorsement by the institutional reviewing board (IRB) and guardians’ written informed consent, this research was carried out on 60 pediatric malignancy patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery. Children were randomly distributed into three groups (20 patients each): Group C: given 2 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% (0.4 mg/kg) intrathecally, injected gradually over 20 seconds. Group F: the same as group C, plus fentanyl 0.2 μg/kg. Group D: the same as group C, plus dexmedetomidine 0.2 μg/kg. Pain at zero, two, four, six, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively was evaluated by Face, Legs, Activity, Crying, and Consolability (FLACC) score. First analgesic request and postoperative unfavorable effects were recorded for 24 hours postoperatively. Results A significant decrease was recognized in the mean FLACC score in groups D and F at six, eight, and 12 hours postoperatively, in contrast to group C (P ≤ 0.05). First analgesic request was significantly prolonged in group D (7.67 ± 0.57 hours), in contrast to groups F and C (5.40 ± 1.09 hours and 4.23 ± 3.27 hours, respectively, P &lt; 0.04). Paracetamol utilization was significantly decreased in group D (316.67 ± 28.86 mg), in contrast to group C (391.00 ± 52.00 mg, P &lt; 0.03), without a significant difference between group F (354.44 ± 46.67 mg) and groups D and C (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusions Adding dexmedetomidine and fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine improved postoperative analgesia following abdominal surgery for cancer in children, with better overall analgesia of dexmedetomidine compared with fentanyl.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32914161</pmid><doi>10.1093/pm/pnaa259</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-2375
ispartof Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2020-11, Vol.21 (11), p.2634-2641
issn 1526-2375
1526-4637
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2478601366
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Abdomen
Abdominal surgery
Adjuvants
Analgesia
Analgesics
Anesthesia
Anesthetics, Local
Bupivacaine
Cancer
Cancer in children
Care and treatment
Child
Children
Dexmedetomidine
Dosage and administration
Double-Blind Method
Drug therapy
Fentanyl
Gastric cancer
Humans
Malignancy
Methods
Neoplasms
Pain perception
Pain, Postoperative
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Paracetamol
Patient outcomes
Patients
Pediatric anesthesia
Pediatric research
Pediatrics
Surgery
title Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl vs Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine Following Abdominal Surgery for Cancer in Children, a Randomized Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T22%3A02%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analgesic%20Effect%20of%20Intrathecal%20Fentanyl%20vs%20Dexmedetomidine%20as%20Adjuvants%20to%20Bupivacaine%20Following%20Abdominal%20Surgery%20for%20Cancer%20in%20Children,%20a%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Pain%20medicine%20(Malden,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Fares,%20Khaled%20Mohamed&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2634&rft.epage=2641&rft.pages=2634-2641&rft.issn=1526-2375&rft.eissn=1526-4637&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/pm/pnaa259&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA655376763%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478601366&rft_id=info:pmid/32914161&rft_galeid=A655376763&rft_oup_id=10.1093/pm/pnaa259&rfr_iscdi=true