A wavelet artificial neural network method for medium‐term rainfall prediction in Queensland (Australia) and the comparisons with conventional methods
This study aims to develop a medium‐term rainfall forecast model to predict monthly rainfall 1, 3, 6, and 12 months in advance using hybrid wavelet‐artificial neural networks (WANN) for Queensland, Australia. To assess the performance of the models, seven input sets comprised of either past rainfall...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of climatology 2021-01, Vol.41 (S1), p.E1396-E1416 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E1416 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | E1396 |
container_title | International journal of climatology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Ghamariadyan, Meysam Imteaz, Monzur Alam |
description | This study aims to develop a medium‐term rainfall forecast model to predict monthly rainfall 1, 3, 6, and 12 months in advance using hybrid wavelet‐artificial neural networks (WANN) for Queensland, Australia. To assess the performance of the models, seven input sets comprised of either past rainfall magnitudes, selected climate anomalies, or combinations of rainfall with different climate anomalies as independent variables were defined. The data of the years 1908–1999 and 2000–2016 from 10 weather stations in Queensland were used for training and verification of the models, respectively. The results showed that the WANN enhances the average prediction accuracy in terms of root‐mean‐square‐error (RMSE) with 90, 52, 32, and 15% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months lead time, respectively compared to of the artificial neural networks (ANN). Also, the current prediction system of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM), Australian Community Climate Earth‐System Simulator–Seasonal (ACCESS‐S) provided the predictions with the average RMSE values of 91.0, 102.7, and 100.3 mm for 1, 3, and 6 months lead times, respectively. In contrast, the corresponding RMSE values of 8.2, 37.6, and 52.4 mm are obtained through the WANN. Moreover, performance of the WANN method was compared with the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models. ARIMA and MLR produced similar performances at same lead times; corresponding average RMSE values of 78.8, 82.72, 80.9, and 79.5 mm were obtained through ARIMA compared to the 75.9, 79.5, 79.0, and 78.9 mm through the MLR. The results of the current study indicate than the performance of the WANN is more accurate than the ANN, ARIMA, MLR, and ACCESS‐S forecasts.
Future rainfall prediction is complex due to the presence of different effective climatological factors. It is even more intricate in Australia because of its high grade of temporal and spatial inconsistency. Therefore, it is highly beneficial to predict rainfall a few months in advance to manage unusual climatological events. Hence, the wavelet‐ANN technique is used to obtain better results of forecasting monthly rainfall. The results show that WNN outperforms conventional prediction methods as well as the BOM's current prediction system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/joc.6775 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2478596327</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2478596327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-3fb53dd48e442d7baa48354e0781de2167fdc4974583d3e842786983cd9506e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1q3DAUhUVpoNOk0EcQdJMSnEqWbEnLwaR_BEKhXRuNdM1oaktTSc6QXR8hyz5fniRyJnRX6Or-8J17Dweht5RcUkLqD7tgLlshmhdoRYkSFSFSvkQrIpWqJKfyFXqd0o4QohRtV-jPGh_0LYyQsY7ZDc44PWIPc3wq-RDiTzxB3gaLhxBLa908Pfy-zxAnHLXzgx5HvI9lb7ILHjuPv80APo3aW3y-nlMut5x-j5c5bwGbMO11dCn4hA8ub8vC34Jf1OXp8Vk6QyflcoI3z_UU_fh49b37XF3ffPrSra8rUyvWVGzYNMxaLoHz2oqN1lyyhgMRklqoaSsGa7gSvJHMMpC8FrJVkhmrGtKCYKfo3fHuPoZfM6Tc78Ici5HU11zIRrWsXqjzI2ViSCnC0O-jm3S86ynpl9yLyvRL7gW9OKIH2IQhGQfewF-8BN-0nBWudIQWWv4_3bmsl5S6MPtcpNWz1I1w909D_deb7snYI_uNqE0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478596327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A wavelet artificial neural network method for medium‐term rainfall prediction in Queensland (Australia) and the comparisons with conventional methods</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Ghamariadyan, Meysam ; Imteaz, Monzur Alam</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghamariadyan, Meysam ; Imteaz, Monzur Alam</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to develop a medium‐term rainfall forecast model to predict monthly rainfall 1, 3, 6, and 12 months in advance using hybrid wavelet‐artificial neural networks (WANN) for Queensland, Australia. To assess the performance of the models, seven input sets comprised of either past rainfall magnitudes, selected climate anomalies, or combinations of rainfall with different climate anomalies as independent variables were defined. The data of the years 1908–1999 and 2000–2016 from 10 weather stations in Queensland were used for training and verification of the models, respectively. The results showed that the WANN enhances the average prediction accuracy in terms of root‐mean‐square‐error (RMSE) with 90, 52, 32, and 15% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months lead time, respectively compared to of the artificial neural networks (ANN). Also, the current prediction system of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM), Australian Community Climate Earth‐System Simulator–Seasonal (ACCESS‐S) provided the predictions with the average RMSE values of 91.0, 102.7, and 100.3 mm for 1, 3, and 6 months lead times, respectively. In contrast, the corresponding RMSE values of 8.2, 37.6, and 52.4 mm are obtained through the WANN. Moreover, performance of the WANN method was compared with the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models. ARIMA and MLR produced similar performances at same lead times; corresponding average RMSE values of 78.8, 82.72, 80.9, and 79.5 mm were obtained through ARIMA compared to the 75.9, 79.5, 79.0, and 78.9 mm through the MLR. The results of the current study indicate than the performance of the WANN is more accurate than the ANN, ARIMA, MLR, and ACCESS‐S forecasts.
Future rainfall prediction is complex due to the presence of different effective climatological factors. It is even more intricate in Australia because of its high grade of temporal and spatial inconsistency. Therefore, it is highly beneficial to predict rainfall a few months in advance to manage unusual climatological events. Hence, the wavelet‐ANN technique is used to obtain better results of forecasting monthly rainfall. The results show that WNN outperforms conventional prediction methods as well as the BOM's current prediction system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/joc.6775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Access ; ANN ; Anomalies ; ARIMA ; Artificial neural networks ; Autoregressive models ; Climate ; Climate models ; Current prediction ; Independent variables ; Lead time ; Meteorology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences ; MLR ; Monthly rainfall ; monthly rainfall prediction ; Neural networks ; Physical Sciences ; Predictions ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Rainfall forecasting ; Regression analysis ; Root-mean-square errors ; Science & Technology ; Simulators ; Statistical analysis ; Training ; WANN ; Weather stations</subject><ispartof>International journal of climatology, 2021-01, Vol.41 (S1), p.E1396-E1416</ispartof><rights>2020 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><rights>2021 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>16</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000564375300001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-3fb53dd48e442d7baa48354e0781de2167fdc4974583d3e842786983cd9506e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-3fb53dd48e442d7baa48354e0781de2167fdc4974583d3e842786983cd9506e73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1800-3157 ; 0000-0002-1466-388X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjoc.6775$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjoc.6775$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,39267,45583,45584</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghamariadyan, Meysam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imteaz, Monzur Alam</creatorcontrib><title>A wavelet artificial neural network method for medium‐term rainfall prediction in Queensland (Australia) and the comparisons with conventional methods</title><title>International journal of climatology</title><addtitle>INT J CLIMATOL</addtitle><description>This study aims to develop a medium‐term rainfall forecast model to predict monthly rainfall 1, 3, 6, and 12 months in advance using hybrid wavelet‐artificial neural networks (WANN) for Queensland, Australia. To assess the performance of the models, seven input sets comprised of either past rainfall magnitudes, selected climate anomalies, or combinations of rainfall with different climate anomalies as independent variables were defined. The data of the years 1908–1999 and 2000–2016 from 10 weather stations in Queensland were used for training and verification of the models, respectively. The results showed that the WANN enhances the average prediction accuracy in terms of root‐mean‐square‐error (RMSE) with 90, 52, 32, and 15% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months lead time, respectively compared to of the artificial neural networks (ANN). Also, the current prediction system of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM), Australian Community Climate Earth‐System Simulator–Seasonal (ACCESS‐S) provided the predictions with the average RMSE values of 91.0, 102.7, and 100.3 mm for 1, 3, and 6 months lead times, respectively. In contrast, the corresponding RMSE values of 8.2, 37.6, and 52.4 mm are obtained through the WANN. Moreover, performance of the WANN method was compared with the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models. ARIMA and MLR produced similar performances at same lead times; corresponding average RMSE values of 78.8, 82.72, 80.9, and 79.5 mm were obtained through ARIMA compared to the 75.9, 79.5, 79.0, and 78.9 mm through the MLR. The results of the current study indicate than the performance of the WANN is more accurate than the ANN, ARIMA, MLR, and ACCESS‐S forecasts.
Future rainfall prediction is complex due to the presence of different effective climatological factors. It is even more intricate in Australia because of its high grade of temporal and spatial inconsistency. Therefore, it is highly beneficial to predict rainfall a few months in advance to manage unusual climatological events. Hence, the wavelet‐ANN technique is used to obtain better results of forecasting monthly rainfall. The results show that WNN outperforms conventional prediction methods as well as the BOM's current prediction system.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>ANN</subject><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>ARIMA</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Autoregressive models</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Current prediction</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Lead time</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>MLR</subject><subject>Monthly rainfall</subject><subject>monthly rainfall prediction</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall forecasting</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Simulators</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>WANN</subject><subject>Weather stations</subject><issn>0899-8418</issn><issn>1097-0088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1q3DAUhUVpoNOk0EcQdJMSnEqWbEnLwaR_BEKhXRuNdM1oaktTSc6QXR8hyz5fniRyJnRX6Or-8J17Dweht5RcUkLqD7tgLlshmhdoRYkSFSFSvkQrIpWqJKfyFXqd0o4QohRtV-jPGh_0LYyQsY7ZDc44PWIPc3wq-RDiTzxB3gaLhxBLa908Pfy-zxAnHLXzgx5HvI9lb7ILHjuPv80APo3aW3y-nlMut5x-j5c5bwGbMO11dCn4hA8ub8vC34Jf1OXp8Vk6QyflcoI3z_UU_fh49b37XF3ffPrSra8rUyvWVGzYNMxaLoHz2oqN1lyyhgMRklqoaSsGa7gSvJHMMpC8FrJVkhmrGtKCYKfo3fHuPoZfM6Tc78Ici5HU11zIRrWsXqjzI2ViSCnC0O-jm3S86ynpl9yLyvRL7gW9OKIH2IQhGQfewF-8BN-0nBWudIQWWv4_3bmsl5S6MPtcpNWz1I1w909D_deb7snYI_uNqE0</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Ghamariadyan, Meysam</creator><creator>Imteaz, Monzur Alam</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1800-3157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1466-388X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>A wavelet artificial neural network method for medium‐term rainfall prediction in Queensland (Australia) and the comparisons with conventional methods</title><author>Ghamariadyan, Meysam ; Imteaz, Monzur Alam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-3fb53dd48e442d7baa48354e0781de2167fdc4974583d3e842786983cd9506e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>ANN</topic><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>ARIMA</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Autoregressive models</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Current prediction</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Lead time</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>MLR</topic><topic>Monthly rainfall</topic><topic>monthly rainfall prediction</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall forecasting</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Simulators</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>WANN</topic><topic>Weather stations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghamariadyan, Meysam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imteaz, Monzur Alam</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghamariadyan, Meysam</au><au>Imteaz, Monzur Alam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A wavelet artificial neural network method for medium‐term rainfall prediction in Queensland (Australia) and the comparisons with conventional methods</atitle><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle><stitle>INT J CLIMATOL</stitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>E1396</spage><epage>E1416</epage><pages>E1396-E1416</pages><issn>0899-8418</issn><eissn>1097-0088</eissn><abstract>This study aims to develop a medium‐term rainfall forecast model to predict monthly rainfall 1, 3, 6, and 12 months in advance using hybrid wavelet‐artificial neural networks (WANN) for Queensland, Australia. To assess the performance of the models, seven input sets comprised of either past rainfall magnitudes, selected climate anomalies, or combinations of rainfall with different climate anomalies as independent variables were defined. The data of the years 1908–1999 and 2000–2016 from 10 weather stations in Queensland were used for training and verification of the models, respectively. The results showed that the WANN enhances the average prediction accuracy in terms of root‐mean‐square‐error (RMSE) with 90, 52, 32, and 15% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months lead time, respectively compared to of the artificial neural networks (ANN). Also, the current prediction system of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM), Australian Community Climate Earth‐System Simulator–Seasonal (ACCESS‐S) provided the predictions with the average RMSE values of 91.0, 102.7, and 100.3 mm for 1, 3, and 6 months lead times, respectively. In contrast, the corresponding RMSE values of 8.2, 37.6, and 52.4 mm are obtained through the WANN. Moreover, performance of the WANN method was compared with the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models. ARIMA and MLR produced similar performances at same lead times; corresponding average RMSE values of 78.8, 82.72, 80.9, and 79.5 mm were obtained through ARIMA compared to the 75.9, 79.5, 79.0, and 78.9 mm through the MLR. The results of the current study indicate than the performance of the WANN is more accurate than the ANN, ARIMA, MLR, and ACCESS‐S forecasts.
Future rainfall prediction is complex due to the presence of different effective climatological factors. It is even more intricate in Australia because of its high grade of temporal and spatial inconsistency. Therefore, it is highly beneficial to predict rainfall a few months in advance to manage unusual climatological events. Hence, the wavelet‐ANN technique is used to obtain better results of forecasting monthly rainfall. The results show that WNN outperforms conventional prediction methods as well as the BOM's current prediction system.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/joc.6775</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1800-3157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1466-388X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-8418 |
ispartof | International journal of climatology, 2021-01, Vol.41 (S1), p.E1396-E1416 |
issn | 0899-8418 1097-0088 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2478596327 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Access ANN Anomalies ARIMA Artificial neural networks Autoregressive models Climate Climate models Current prediction Independent variables Lead time Meteorology Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences MLR Monthly rainfall monthly rainfall prediction Neural networks Physical Sciences Predictions Rain Rainfall Rainfall forecasting Regression analysis Root-mean-square errors Science & Technology Simulators Statistical analysis Training WANN Weather stations |
title | A wavelet artificial neural network method for medium‐term rainfall prediction in Queensland (Australia) and the comparisons with conventional methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T03%3A03%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20wavelet%20artificial%20neural%20network%20method%20for%20medium%E2%80%90term%20rainfall%20prediction%20in%20Queensland%20(Australia)%20and%20the%20comparisons%20with%20conventional%20methods&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20climatology&rft.au=Ghamariadyan,%20Meysam&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=E1396&rft.epage=E1416&rft.pages=E1396-E1416&rft.issn=0899-8418&rft.eissn=1097-0088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/joc.6775&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2478596327%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478596327&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |