Landscape factors and how they influence whitefly pests in cassava fields across East Africa
Context African production landscapes are diverse, with multiple cassava cultivars grown in small patches amongst a diversity of other crops. Studies on how diverse smallholder landscapes impact herbivore pest outbreak risk have not been carried out in sub-Saharan Africa. Objectives Bemisia tabaci i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Landscape ecology 2021, Vol.36 (1), p.45-67 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 67 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | Landscape ecology |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Macfadyen, Sarina Tay, Wee Tek Hulthen, Andrew D. Paull, Cate Kalyebi, Andrew Jacomb, Frances Parry, Hazel Sseruwagi, Peter Seguni, Zuberi Omongo, Christopher Abu Kachigamba, Donald Otim, Michael Schellhorn, Nancy Polaszek, Andrew Colvin, John De Barro, Paul |
description | Context
African production landscapes are diverse, with multiple cassava cultivars grown in small patches amongst a diversity of other crops. Studies on how diverse smallholder landscapes impact herbivore pest outbreak risk have not been carried out in sub-Saharan Africa.
Objectives
Bemisia tabaci
is a cryptic pest species complex that cause damage to cassava through feeding and vectoring plant-virus diseases and are known to reach very high densities in certain contexts. However, the factors driving this phenomenon are unclear.
Methods
Bemisia
density data in cassava across a large number of sites representing a geographic gradient across Uganda, Tanzania and Malawi were collected. We tested whether in-field or landscape factors associated with land-use patterns underpinned
Bemisia
density variability and parasitism.
Results
We found the
B. tabaci
SSA1 species dominated our study sites, although other species were also common in some cassava fields. Factors associated with the surrounding landscape were unimportant for explaining variability in adult density, but the in-field variables of cassava age and cultivar were very important. The density of nymphs and the parasitism of nymphs was heavily influenced by a diversity of landscape factors surrounding the field, including the size of focal cassava field, and area of cassava in the landscape. However, unlike the trend from many other studies on drivers of natural enemy populations, this pattern was not solely related to the amount of non-crop vegetation, or the diversity of crops grown in the landscape.
Conclusions
Our findings provide management options to reduce whitefly abundance, including describing the characteristics of landscapes with high parasitism. The choice of cassava cultivar by the farmer is critical to reduce whitefly outbreak risk at the landscape-scale. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10980-020-01099-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2478168371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2478168371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-2139fd4c984e38b606952178b480b1a87b22447ffe3465d5273d7234e8ea35b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BTwHP0cnHbpJjKfUDCl70JoRsNrFb1t012Sr996ZdwZuHYYaZ9948HkLXFG4pgLxLFLQCAixXHjWhJ2hGC8mIliU9RTPQjBKmJT9HFyltAYBzgBl6W9uuTs4OHgfrxj4mnBd403_jceP3uOlCu_Od8_h704w-tHs8-DSmfMDOpmS_LA6Nb-vMc7FPCa9sGvEixMbZS3QWbJv81W-fo9f71cvykayfH56WizVxvOQjYZTrUAunlfBcVSWUumBUqkooqKhVsmJMCBmC56Is6oJJXkvGhVfe8qICPkc3k-4Q-89dtme2_S52-aVhQipaKi5pRrEJdfQZfTBDbD5s3BsK5pCimVI0OUVzTNEcSHwipQzu3n38k_6H9QOC-HQS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478168371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Landscape factors and how they influence whitefly pests in cassava fields across East Africa</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Macfadyen, Sarina ; Tay, Wee Tek ; Hulthen, Andrew D. ; Paull, Cate ; Kalyebi, Andrew ; Jacomb, Frances ; Parry, Hazel ; Sseruwagi, Peter ; Seguni, Zuberi ; Omongo, Christopher Abu ; Kachigamba, Donald ; Otim, Michael ; Schellhorn, Nancy ; Polaszek, Andrew ; Colvin, John ; De Barro, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Macfadyen, Sarina ; Tay, Wee Tek ; Hulthen, Andrew D. ; Paull, Cate ; Kalyebi, Andrew ; Jacomb, Frances ; Parry, Hazel ; Sseruwagi, Peter ; Seguni, Zuberi ; Omongo, Christopher Abu ; Kachigamba, Donald ; Otim, Michael ; Schellhorn, Nancy ; Polaszek, Andrew ; Colvin, John ; De Barro, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Context
African production landscapes are diverse, with multiple cassava cultivars grown in small patches amongst a diversity of other crops. Studies on how diverse smallholder landscapes impact herbivore pest outbreak risk have not been carried out in sub-Saharan Africa.
Objectives
Bemisia tabaci
is a cryptic pest species complex that cause damage to cassava through feeding and vectoring plant-virus diseases and are known to reach very high densities in certain contexts. However, the factors driving this phenomenon are unclear.
Methods
Bemisia
density data in cassava across a large number of sites representing a geographic gradient across Uganda, Tanzania and Malawi were collected. We tested whether in-field or landscape factors associated with land-use patterns underpinned
Bemisia
density variability and parasitism.
Results
We found the
B. tabaci
SSA1 species dominated our study sites, although other species were also common in some cassava fields. Factors associated with the surrounding landscape were unimportant for explaining variability in adult density, but the in-field variables of cassava age and cultivar were very important. The density of nymphs and the parasitism of nymphs was heavily influenced by a diversity of landscape factors surrounding the field, including the size of focal cassava field, and area of cassava in the landscape. However, unlike the trend from many other studies on drivers of natural enemy populations, this pattern was not solely related to the amount of non-crop vegetation, or the diversity of crops grown in the landscape.
Conclusions
Our findings provide management options to reduce whitefly abundance, including describing the characteristics of landscapes with high parasitism. The choice of cassava cultivar by the farmer is critical to reduce whitefly outbreak risk at the landscape-scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10980-020-01099-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bemisia ; Bemisia tabaci ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cassava ; Crop diversification ; Crops ; Cultivars ; Density ; Ecology ; Environmental Management ; Land use ; Landscape ; Landscape Ecology ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Life Sciences ; Nature Conservation ; Outbreaks ; Parasitism ; Pest outbreaks ; Pests ; Plant diseases ; Research Article ; Species ; Sustainable Development ; Variability</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2021, Vol.36 (1), p.45-67</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-2139fd4c984e38b606952178b480b1a87b22447ffe3465d5273d7234e8ea35b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-2139fd4c984e38b606952178b480b1a87b22447ffe3465d5273d7234e8ea35b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3553-4910</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10980-020-01099-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10980-020-01099-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macfadyen, Sarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tay, Wee Tek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulthen, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paull, Cate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalyebi, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacomb, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sseruwagi, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seguni, Zuberi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omongo, Christopher Abu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachigamba, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otim, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellhorn, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polaszek, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colvin, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Barro, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Landscape factors and how they influence whitefly pests in cassava fields across East Africa</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><addtitle>Landscape Ecol</addtitle><description>Context
African production landscapes are diverse, with multiple cassava cultivars grown in small patches amongst a diversity of other crops. Studies on how diverse smallholder landscapes impact herbivore pest outbreak risk have not been carried out in sub-Saharan Africa.
Objectives
Bemisia tabaci
is a cryptic pest species complex that cause damage to cassava through feeding and vectoring plant-virus diseases and are known to reach very high densities in certain contexts. However, the factors driving this phenomenon are unclear.
Methods
Bemisia
density data in cassava across a large number of sites representing a geographic gradient across Uganda, Tanzania and Malawi were collected. We tested whether in-field or landscape factors associated with land-use patterns underpinned
Bemisia
density variability and parasitism.
Results
We found the
B. tabaci
SSA1 species dominated our study sites, although other species were also common in some cassava fields. Factors associated with the surrounding landscape were unimportant for explaining variability in adult density, but the in-field variables of cassava age and cultivar were very important. The density of nymphs and the parasitism of nymphs was heavily influenced by a diversity of landscape factors surrounding the field, including the size of focal cassava field, and area of cassava in the landscape. However, unlike the trend from many other studies on drivers of natural enemy populations, this pattern was not solely related to the amount of non-crop vegetation, or the diversity of crops grown in the landscape.
Conclusions
Our findings provide management options to reduce whitefly abundance, including describing the characteristics of landscapes with high parasitism. The choice of cassava cultivar by the farmer is critical to reduce whitefly outbreak risk at the landscape-scale.</description><subject>Bemisia</subject><subject>Bemisia tabaci</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cassava</subject><subject>Crop diversification</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Outbreaks</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Pest outbreaks</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Variability</subject><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BTwHP0cnHbpJjKfUDCl70JoRsNrFb1t012Sr996ZdwZuHYYaZ9948HkLXFG4pgLxLFLQCAixXHjWhJ2hGC8mIliU9RTPQjBKmJT9HFyltAYBzgBl6W9uuTs4OHgfrxj4mnBd403_jceP3uOlCu_Od8_h704w-tHs8-DSmfMDOpmS_LA6Nb-vMc7FPCa9sGvEixMbZS3QWbJv81W-fo9f71cvykayfH56WizVxvOQjYZTrUAunlfBcVSWUumBUqkooqKhVsmJMCBmC56Is6oJJXkvGhVfe8qICPkc3k-4Q-89dtme2_S52-aVhQipaKi5pRrEJdfQZfTBDbD5s3BsK5pCimVI0OUVzTNEcSHwipQzu3n38k_6H9QOC-HQS</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Macfadyen, Sarina</creator><creator>Tay, Wee Tek</creator><creator>Hulthen, Andrew D.</creator><creator>Paull, Cate</creator><creator>Kalyebi, Andrew</creator><creator>Jacomb, Frances</creator><creator>Parry, Hazel</creator><creator>Sseruwagi, Peter</creator><creator>Seguni, Zuberi</creator><creator>Omongo, Christopher Abu</creator><creator>Kachigamba, Donald</creator><creator>Otim, Michael</creator><creator>Schellhorn, Nancy</creator><creator>Polaszek, Andrew</creator><creator>Colvin, John</creator><creator>De Barro, Paul</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-4910</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Landscape factors and how they influence whitefly pests in cassava fields across East Africa</title><author>Macfadyen, Sarina ; Tay, Wee Tek ; Hulthen, Andrew D. ; Paull, Cate ; Kalyebi, Andrew ; Jacomb, Frances ; Parry, Hazel ; Sseruwagi, Peter ; Seguni, Zuberi ; Omongo, Christopher Abu ; Kachigamba, Donald ; Otim, Michael ; Schellhorn, Nancy ; Polaszek, Andrew ; Colvin, John ; De Barro, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-2139fd4c984e38b606952178b480b1a87b22447ffe3465d5273d7234e8ea35b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bemisia</topic><topic>Bemisia tabaci</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cassava</topic><topic>Crop diversification</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Outbreaks</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Pest outbreaks</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macfadyen, Sarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tay, Wee Tek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulthen, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paull, Cate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalyebi, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacomb, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sseruwagi, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seguni, Zuberi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omongo, Christopher Abu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachigamba, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otim, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellhorn, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polaszek, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colvin, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Barro, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macfadyen, Sarina</au><au>Tay, Wee Tek</au><au>Hulthen, Andrew D.</au><au>Paull, Cate</au><au>Kalyebi, Andrew</au><au>Jacomb, Frances</au><au>Parry, Hazel</au><au>Sseruwagi, Peter</au><au>Seguni, Zuberi</au><au>Omongo, Christopher Abu</au><au>Kachigamba, Donald</au><au>Otim, Michael</au><au>Schellhorn, Nancy</au><au>Polaszek, Andrew</au><au>Colvin, John</au><au>De Barro, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Landscape factors and how they influence whitefly pests in cassava fields across East Africa</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><stitle>Landscape Ecol</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>45-67</pages><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Context
African production landscapes are diverse, with multiple cassava cultivars grown in small patches amongst a diversity of other crops. Studies on how diverse smallholder landscapes impact herbivore pest outbreak risk have not been carried out in sub-Saharan Africa.
Objectives
Bemisia tabaci
is a cryptic pest species complex that cause damage to cassava through feeding and vectoring plant-virus diseases and are known to reach very high densities in certain contexts. However, the factors driving this phenomenon are unclear.
Methods
Bemisia
density data in cassava across a large number of sites representing a geographic gradient across Uganda, Tanzania and Malawi were collected. We tested whether in-field or landscape factors associated with land-use patterns underpinned
Bemisia
density variability and parasitism.
Results
We found the
B. tabaci
SSA1 species dominated our study sites, although other species were also common in some cassava fields. Factors associated with the surrounding landscape were unimportant for explaining variability in adult density, but the in-field variables of cassava age and cultivar were very important. The density of nymphs and the parasitism of nymphs was heavily influenced by a diversity of landscape factors surrounding the field, including the size of focal cassava field, and area of cassava in the landscape. However, unlike the trend from many other studies on drivers of natural enemy populations, this pattern was not solely related to the amount of non-crop vegetation, or the diversity of crops grown in the landscape.
Conclusions
Our findings provide management options to reduce whitefly abundance, including describing the characteristics of landscapes with high parasitism. The choice of cassava cultivar by the farmer is critical to reduce whitefly outbreak risk at the landscape-scale.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10980-020-01099-1</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-4910</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-2973 |
ispartof | Landscape ecology, 2021, Vol.36 (1), p.45-67 |
issn | 0921-2973 1572-9761 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2478168371 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Bemisia Bemisia tabaci Biomedical and Life Sciences Cassava Crop diversification Crops Cultivars Density Ecology Environmental Management Land use Landscape Landscape Ecology Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning Life Sciences Nature Conservation Outbreaks Parasitism Pest outbreaks Pests Plant diseases Research Article Species Sustainable Development Variability |
title | Landscape factors and how they influence whitefly pests in cassava fields across East Africa |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A59%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Landscape%20factors%20and%20how%20they%20influence%20whitefly%20pests%20in%20cassava%20fields%20across%20East%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=Macfadyen,%20Sarina&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=45-67&rft.issn=0921-2973&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10980-020-01099-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2478168371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478168371&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |