Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility
The integrity of professional service in psychology depends upon its scientific foundation. Continual strengthening of that foundation is therefore essential. The complexities of many conditions that engage practitioners, however, limit the extent to which practice can be based exclusively on scient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2004-06, Vol.11 (2), p.196-210 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 210 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 196 |
container_title | Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Peterson, Donald R. |
description | The integrity of professional service in psychology depends upon its scientific foundation. Continual strengthening of that foundation is therefore essential. The complexities of many conditions that engage practitioners, however, limit the extent to which practice can be based exclusively on scientific knowledge and still provide maximum benefit to the public. Resolution of this dilemma can be advanced by adopting a strong definition of science but acknowledging that some problems confronting practitioners are inaccessible to rigorous scientific inquiry and require alternative, primarily humanistic approaches. Three levels of pragmatically acceptable scientistic confidence are defined, the advantages of constructive dialogue across these levels are discussed, and the view of psychology as a pluralistic rather than monistic discipline is advocated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/clipsy.bph072 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2477601847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2477601847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3226-be02fa809cee23ca651796fb4a15721d231d21d0d043660d6d6f2f0a3ca50a9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c1PwyAYBnBiNHF-HL0venTVF2hpOeqiUzN1Oo2JlzeU0sisa4Uuuv9etEZPeiBw-PHw5oGQHQoHFCQ_1JVt_PIgb54gZSukR2ORRSxLYJX0QAoZJZnk62TD-xkACCmgR_hUWzPXZtD_OrTWvwz6al70J64ujfe2nquqf2t8U8-9zW1l2-UWWStV5c32975J7k9P7oZn0fh6dD48GkeKMyai3AArVQZSG8O4ViKhqRRlHiuapIwWjIdFCygg5kJAIQpRshJUoAkomfNNstflNq5-XRjf4qxeuDCPRxanqQCaxWlQu38qLmIKlENAUYe0q713psTG2RfllkgBP8vDrjzsyguedf7NVmb5P8bhZDqhUvw-Yn1r3n8uKfeMIuVpgg9XI7y5vLs4nopHpMHvd141CkOeVq61ujJeL5wLf4G68UgpMvxM_wAKjJJl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2477601847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Peterson, Donald R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><description>The integrity of professional service in psychology depends upon its scientific foundation. Continual strengthening of that foundation is therefore essential. The complexities of many conditions that engage practitioners, however, limit the extent to which practice can be based exclusively on scientific knowledge and still provide maximum benefit to the public. Resolution of this dilemma can be advanced by adopting a strong definition of science but acknowledging that some problems confronting practitioners are inaccessible to rigorous scientific inquiry and require alternative, primarily humanistic approaches. Three levels of pragmatically acceptable scientistic confidence are defined, the advantages of constructive dialogue across these levels are discussed, and the view of psychology as a pluralistic rather than monistic discipline is advocated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-5893</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/clipsy.bph072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Clinical Psychology ; Humanism ; monism ; pluralism ; Pragmatism ; profession ; Professionalism ; Responsibility ; science ; Sciences ; scientism</subject><ispartof>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.), 2004-06, Vol.11 (2), p.196-210</ispartof><rights>2004 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Summer 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3226-be02fa809cee23ca651796fb4a15721d231d21d0d043660d6d6f2f0a3ca50a9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3226-be02fa809cee23ca651796fb4a15721d231d21d0d043660d6d6f2f0a3ca50a9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1093%2Fclipsy.bph072$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1093%2Fclipsy.bph072$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><title>Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility</title><title>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>The integrity of professional service in psychology depends upon its scientific foundation. Continual strengthening of that foundation is therefore essential. The complexities of many conditions that engage practitioners, however, limit the extent to which practice can be based exclusively on scientific knowledge and still provide maximum benefit to the public. Resolution of this dilemma can be advanced by adopting a strong definition of science but acknowledging that some problems confronting practitioners are inaccessible to rigorous scientific inquiry and require alternative, primarily humanistic approaches. Three levels of pragmatically acceptable scientistic confidence are defined, the advantages of constructive dialogue across these levels are discussed, and the view of psychology as a pluralistic rather than monistic discipline is advocated.</description><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Humanism</subject><subject>monism</subject><subject>pluralism</subject><subject>Pragmatism</subject><subject>profession</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>Responsibility</subject><subject>science</subject><subject>Sciences</subject><subject>scientism</subject><issn>0969-5893</issn><issn>1468-2850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90c1PwyAYBnBiNHF-HL0venTVF2hpOeqiUzN1Oo2JlzeU0sisa4Uuuv9etEZPeiBw-PHw5oGQHQoHFCQ_1JVt_PIgb54gZSukR2ORRSxLYJX0QAoZJZnk62TD-xkACCmgR_hUWzPXZtD_OrTWvwz6al70J64ujfe2nquqf2t8U8-9zW1l2-UWWStV5c32975J7k9P7oZn0fh6dD48GkeKMyai3AArVQZSG8O4ViKhqRRlHiuapIwWjIdFCygg5kJAIQpRshJUoAkomfNNstflNq5-XRjf4qxeuDCPRxanqQCaxWlQu38qLmIKlENAUYe0q713psTG2RfllkgBP8vDrjzsyguedf7NVmb5P8bhZDqhUvw-Yn1r3n8uKfeMIuVpgg9XI7y5vLs4nopHpMHvd141CkOeVq61ujJeL5wLf4G68UgpMvxM_wAKjJJl</recordid><startdate>200406</startdate><enddate>200406</enddate><creator>Peterson, Donald R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200406</creationdate><title>Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility</title><author>Peterson, Donald R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3226-be02fa809cee23ca651796fb4a15721d231d21d0d043660d6d6f2f0a3ca50a9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Humanism</topic><topic>monism</topic><topic>pluralism</topic><topic>Pragmatism</topic><topic>profession</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>Responsibility</topic><topic>science</topic><topic>Sciences</topic><topic>scientism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peterson, Donald R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility</atitle><jtitle>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2004-06</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>196</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>196-210</pages><issn>0969-5893</issn><eissn>1468-2850</eissn><abstract>The integrity of professional service in psychology depends upon its scientific foundation. Continual strengthening of that foundation is therefore essential. The complexities of many conditions that engage practitioners, however, limit the extent to which practice can be based exclusively on scientific knowledge and still provide maximum benefit to the public. Resolution of this dilemma can be advanced by adopting a strong definition of science but acknowledging that some problems confronting practitioners are inaccessible to rigorous scientific inquiry and require alternative, primarily humanistic approaches. Three levels of pragmatically acceptable scientistic confidence are defined, the advantages of constructive dialogue across these levels are discussed, and the view of psychology as a pluralistic rather than monistic discipline is advocated.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1093/clipsy.bph072</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-5893 |
ispartof | Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.), 2004-06, Vol.11 (2), p.196-210 |
issn | 0969-5893 1468-2850 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2477601847 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Clinical Psychology Humanism monism pluralism Pragmatism profession Professionalism Responsibility science Sciences scientism |
title | Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A04%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Science,%20Scientism,%20and%20Professional%20Responsibility&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20psychology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Peterson,%20Donald%20R.&rft.date=2004-06&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=196&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=196-210&rft.issn=0969-5893&rft.eissn=1468-2850&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/clipsy.bph072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2477601847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2477601847&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |