Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility

The integrity of professional service in psychology depends upon its scientific foundation. Continual strengthening of that foundation is therefore essential. The complexities of many conditions that engage practitioners, however, limit the extent to which practice can be based exclusively on scient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2004-06, Vol.11 (2), p.196-210
1. Verfasser: Peterson, Donald R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 210
container_issue 2
container_start_page 196
container_title Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 11
creator Peterson, Donald R.
description The integrity of professional service in psychology depends upon its scientific foundation. Continual strengthening of that foundation is therefore essential. The complexities of many conditions that engage practitioners, however, limit the extent to which practice can be based exclusively on scientific knowledge and still provide maximum benefit to the public. Resolution of this dilemma can be advanced by adopting a strong definition of science but acknowledging that some problems confronting practitioners are inaccessible to rigorous scientific inquiry and require alternative, primarily humanistic approaches. Three levels of pragmatically acceptable scientistic confidence are defined, the advantages of constructive dialogue across these levels are discussed, and the view of psychology as a pluralistic rather than monistic discipline is advocated.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/clipsy.bph072
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2477601847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2477601847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3226-be02fa809cee23ca651796fb4a15721d231d21d0d043660d6d6f2f0a3ca50a9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c1PwyAYBnBiNHF-HL0venTVF2hpOeqiUzN1Oo2JlzeU0sisa4Uuuv9etEZPeiBw-PHw5oGQHQoHFCQ_1JVt_PIgb54gZSukR2ORRSxLYJX0QAoZJZnk62TD-xkACCmgR_hUWzPXZtD_OrTWvwz6al70J64ujfe2nquqf2t8U8-9zW1l2-UWWStV5c32975J7k9P7oZn0fh6dD48GkeKMyai3AArVQZSG8O4ViKhqRRlHiuapIwWjIdFCygg5kJAIQpRshJUoAkomfNNstflNq5-XRjf4qxeuDCPRxanqQCaxWlQu38qLmIKlENAUYe0q713psTG2RfllkgBP8vDrjzsyguedf7NVmb5P8bhZDqhUvw-Yn1r3n8uKfeMIuVpgg9XI7y5vLs4nopHpMHvd141CkOeVq61ujJeL5wLf4G68UgpMvxM_wAKjJJl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2477601847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Peterson, Donald R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><description>The integrity of professional service in psychology depends upon its scientific foundation. Continual strengthening of that foundation is therefore essential. The complexities of many conditions that engage practitioners, however, limit the extent to which practice can be based exclusively on scientific knowledge and still provide maximum benefit to the public. Resolution of this dilemma can be advanced by adopting a strong definition of science but acknowledging that some problems confronting practitioners are inaccessible to rigorous scientific inquiry and require alternative, primarily humanistic approaches. Three levels of pragmatically acceptable scientistic confidence are defined, the advantages of constructive dialogue across these levels are discussed, and the view of psychology as a pluralistic rather than monistic discipline is advocated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-5893</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/clipsy.bph072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Clinical Psychology ; Humanism ; monism ; pluralism ; Pragmatism ; profession ; Professionalism ; Responsibility ; science ; Sciences ; scientism</subject><ispartof>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.), 2004-06, Vol.11 (2), p.196-210</ispartof><rights>2004 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Summer 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3226-be02fa809cee23ca651796fb4a15721d231d21d0d043660d6d6f2f0a3ca50a9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3226-be02fa809cee23ca651796fb4a15721d231d21d0d043660d6d6f2f0a3ca50a9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1093%2Fclipsy.bph072$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1093%2Fclipsy.bph072$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><title>Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility</title><title>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>The integrity of professional service in psychology depends upon its scientific foundation. Continual strengthening of that foundation is therefore essential. The complexities of many conditions that engage practitioners, however, limit the extent to which practice can be based exclusively on scientific knowledge and still provide maximum benefit to the public. Resolution of this dilemma can be advanced by adopting a strong definition of science but acknowledging that some problems confronting practitioners are inaccessible to rigorous scientific inquiry and require alternative, primarily humanistic approaches. Three levels of pragmatically acceptable scientistic confidence are defined, the advantages of constructive dialogue across these levels are discussed, and the view of psychology as a pluralistic rather than monistic discipline is advocated.</description><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Humanism</subject><subject>monism</subject><subject>pluralism</subject><subject>Pragmatism</subject><subject>profession</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>Responsibility</subject><subject>science</subject><subject>Sciences</subject><subject>scientism</subject><issn>0969-5893</issn><issn>1468-2850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90c1PwyAYBnBiNHF-HL0venTVF2hpOeqiUzN1Oo2JlzeU0sisa4Uuuv9etEZPeiBw-PHw5oGQHQoHFCQ_1JVt_PIgb54gZSukR2ORRSxLYJX0QAoZJZnk62TD-xkACCmgR_hUWzPXZtD_OrTWvwz6al70J64ujfe2nquqf2t8U8-9zW1l2-UWWStV5c32975J7k9P7oZn0fh6dD48GkeKMyai3AArVQZSG8O4ViKhqRRlHiuapIwWjIdFCygg5kJAIQpRshJUoAkomfNNstflNq5-XRjf4qxeuDCPRxanqQCaxWlQu38qLmIKlENAUYe0q713psTG2RfllkgBP8vDrjzsyguedf7NVmb5P8bhZDqhUvw-Yn1r3n8uKfeMIuVpgg9XI7y5vLs4nopHpMHvd141CkOeVq61ujJeL5wLf4G68UgpMvxM_wAKjJJl</recordid><startdate>200406</startdate><enddate>200406</enddate><creator>Peterson, Donald R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200406</creationdate><title>Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility</title><author>Peterson, Donald R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3226-be02fa809cee23ca651796fb4a15721d231d21d0d043660d6d6f2f0a3ca50a9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Humanism</topic><topic>monism</topic><topic>pluralism</topic><topic>Pragmatism</topic><topic>profession</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>Responsibility</topic><topic>science</topic><topic>Sciences</topic><topic>scientism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peterson, Donald R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility</atitle><jtitle>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2004-06</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>196</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>196-210</pages><issn>0969-5893</issn><eissn>1468-2850</eissn><abstract>The integrity of professional service in psychology depends upon its scientific foundation. Continual strengthening of that foundation is therefore essential. The complexities of many conditions that engage practitioners, however, limit the extent to which practice can be based exclusively on scientific knowledge and still provide maximum benefit to the public. Resolution of this dilemma can be advanced by adopting a strong definition of science but acknowledging that some problems confronting practitioners are inaccessible to rigorous scientific inquiry and require alternative, primarily humanistic approaches. Three levels of pragmatically acceptable scientistic confidence are defined, the advantages of constructive dialogue across these levels are discussed, and the view of psychology as a pluralistic rather than monistic discipline is advocated.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1093/clipsy.bph072</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-5893
ispartof Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.), 2004-06, Vol.11 (2), p.196-210
issn 0969-5893
1468-2850
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2477601847
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Clinical Psychology
Humanism
monism
pluralism
Pragmatism
profession
Professionalism
Responsibility
science
Sciences
scientism
title Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A04%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Science,%20Scientism,%20and%20Professional%20Responsibility&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20psychology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Peterson,%20Donald%20R.&rft.date=2004-06&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=196&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=196-210&rft.issn=0969-5893&rft.eissn=1468-2850&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/clipsy.bph072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2477601847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2477601847&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true